70Z0G324QOIPL00060002_QA2.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

70Z0G324QOIPL00060002

Summary of Changes

Questions and Answers

1. Is the requirement of this solicitation for the vendor to provide a database? or is the vendor to choose their desired system of data storage?

A. There is no requirement for the vendor to provide a database. The database already exists. This requirement is for collection of the data only, in the format described in Section 2.0

2. Will the system be housed in the vendor facility or that of USCG?

A. The existing database is housed by the USCG and will continue until further notice.

3. Per section 2.0 of the SOW Item 5 states " If states go offline periodically, every effort will be made to get the states back online without compromising the data already in VIS." Can you clarify this requirement? It seems the VIS is already developed. Is this a solicitation to build a component of the VIS?

A. The intent of Item 5 is to convey the expectation that the vendor address lack of receipt of dataset from participating states, territories and District of Columbia.

There is no expectation to build a component of the VIS.

4. Who is responsible for developing the MOA between the vendor and the participating states? Is there an MOA template that USCG can provide?

A. Vendor is responsible for establishing an agreement between participating states and the vendor.

Per section 2.0 Participating States, "the data feed between the States and the vendor must be agreed to without any intervention with the Coast Guard."

5. Can the 39 states with an MOA be transferred to the vendor to meet the 35 MOAs for contract award?

A. No.

6. Can USCG provide the contact details for each state to obtain a signed MOA?

A. Yes. The information is publicly available. State Boating Contacts - NASBLA https://www.nasbla.org/about-nasbla/boating-contacts

7. Are we expected to provide a secure sFTP client/system, or just a place for them to connect and upload?

A. USCG will provide SFTP server access.

8. How many different data formats can we expect from the states and if applicable can we get a list of those data formats?

A. Unknown. The vendor can assume each participating state to have a different format (some use codes, some use abbreviations, and some have terminology spelled out), however, IAW 33 CFR 174.17, all states are required to collect the same information.

https://www.nasbla.org/about-nasbla/boating-contacts

70Z0G324QOIPL00060002

9. Is it expected that the system will be delivered and operational prior to January 02 2025 or is there any development/integration time that can/will be allocated in the first part of the base period?

A. Needs to be operational upon start of Period of Performance.

10.Place of Performance: Can the services under this SOW be carried out from the vendor's own location - instead of the USCG facility in Kearneysville, WV

A. Yes.

11.Outside of publicly available information, Is there any information on the location of future conferences and in-person VIRT sub-committee meetings, beyond year 2026?

A. The annual NASBLA Conference is held in a different state each year and the location is announced at the conclusion of the conference. For example, this year the meeting was held in New Orleans and at its conclusion, we learned the meeting in 2025 will be held in Des Moines, IA. There is also a second annual meeting (RBS Workshop) that is held in Lexington, KY each year.

12.Are there any number of personnel required to complete the tasks of the SOW?

A. No.

USCG C5ISC-MARTINSBURG, 408 Coast Guard Drive Kearneysville, WV, 25430, US

AMD_ISSUING_OFFICE_LOCCODE: 70Z0G3