AMD 0002 SF30 IFB_70Z08824B0000159_MAINT DREDGING 060202024.pdf

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1 2

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

0002 20JUN2024 51290PR240000159 10229181

6. ISSUED BY CODE 70Z088 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

CODE 70Z088

Commanding Officer

CG CEU OAKLAND (CN)

1301 Clay Street 7th Floor, Suite 700N Oakland, CA 94612-5203

Commanding Officer

CG CEU OAKLAND (CN)

1301 Clay Street 7th Floor, Suite 700N Oakland, CA 94612-5203

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No. Street, county, State and ZIP: Code) (4) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

X 70Z08824B0000159

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04JUN2024

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning one (1) copy of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATA SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and data specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(4) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER: Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return 1 copy to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

MAINTENANCE DREDGING AT USCG STATION UMPQUA RIVER, WINCHESTER BAY, OR.

The purpose of this IFB Amendment No. 0002 is to:

1. Address RFI Questions 1 and 5 (refer to page below, this includes a revision to Section B: Schedule of Prices within amended IFB document)

2. Extend the IFB closing date from 1:00PM PT, 24JUN2024 to 1:00PM PT, 26JUN2024 (refer to amended IFB and SF1442 documents).

3. Extend the Bid Opening date from 1:00PM PT, 25JUN2024 to 1:00PMT, 27JUN2024 (refer to amended IFB and SF1442 documents).

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Travis Cohen Contracting Officer

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

BY ___________________________________________

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11-2016)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE COMPUTER GENERATED Prescribed by FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

INVITATION FOR BID (IFB) NO. 70Z08824R0000159

MAINTENANCE DREDGING AT USCG STATION UMPQUA RIVER, WINCHESTER BAY, OR.

RFIs 1-5

Question 1:

Will the government please clarify if there is an incumbent providing service on this contract or is this level of effort a new need? If there is an incumbent, can the government please provide the most recent contract award number & contract value?

Response 1:

No incumbent exists.

Question 2:

The project description in APPENDIX A SF1442 STA UMPQUA DREDGE_B0000159_1 stated: "ALL DREDGE

SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED USING A MECHANICAL CLAMSHELL OR HYDRAULIC SUCTION AND

TRANSPORTED BY BARGE FOR DISPOSAL AT THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)

APPROVED OCEAN DREDGE MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES (ODMDS) IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN."

As I went through all the documents, I saw that the permit application mentioned the potential in-water disposal (Umpqua River Mile 0.8 in-water disposal site). In my understanding, this means in-water flow lane disposal. I want to double-check and see if this could be a potential flow lane disposal site, and if it would be a possibility for us to bid to use flow lane disposal.

Response 2:

No approval is granted for a potential flow lane disposal, the project is only approved for two ODMDS locations. Disregard 401 – two ODMSDS locations plus flowlanes.

Question 3:

The new bid form added CLIN 0006 Biological Monitoring & Reporting 1 Job. And says to reference the specs.

There were no new specs provided in the amendment and in the original set there is no information about biological monitoring. Can you explain what this is and what is required? If there is a section explaining it, can you reference the section?

Response 3:

Refer to CLIN 0006 revision in IFB attachment.

Question 4:

In water work window: Section 01 10 00 paragraph 1.01 states dredging shall occur between 1 July and 31 January. However, Section 01 35 43 paragraph 1.08 states all work will occur between 1 July and 15 September.

Response 4:

Refer to Section 01 10 00, para 101, dredging must be completed by 31 January 2025.

Question 5:

Throughout the bid documents it is stated the material will be disposed of at the ocean disposal site. However, in section 01 10 00 paragraph 1.01 it states “Should sediment analysis indicate material is not suitable for in-water disposal, material will be placed in approved upland disposal site. Please clarify which it is. The cost difference is substantially less to dispose in-water.

Response 5:

The suitability determination allows for in water disposal and USCG CEUO does not expect a need for disposal upland, bids should assume in water disposal.

- END -