Amendment No. A0002 - 70Z08522RLREP0014.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

A0002 70Z085

SUBJECT: Solicitation #70Z08525RLREP0014, Dockside Repairs of CGC WAESCHE (WMSL 751)

PLEASE PAGE 2 FOR DESCRIPTION

USCG - Surface Forces Logistics Centers CPD2-LREPL - ATTn: Valerie Rivera-Chase 42 Eagle Street, Bldg. 55, CG Alameda Base Alameda, CA 94501

Same as Block #6

70Z08525RLREP0014

07/02/2025

06/11/2025

Solicitation No. 70Z08525RLREP0014 Request for Proposal Dockside Repairs of CGC WAESCHE (751) Amendment A0002

The purpose of this amendment is as follows:

a. The due date to submit proposal is extended until 10 July 2025 at 10:00 A.M., PST. As stated in the original solicitation, submission of proposal must be sent via e-mail to Valerie S. Rivera-Chase at Valerie.S.Riverachase@uscg.mil or to Robin Kloeppel at Robin.B.Kloeppel@uscg.mil. Proposals received after this date and time, will not be considered.

b. The answers to the following Request for Clarifications are as follows:

QUESTION NO. 4: Title: CIR; CIR- Critical items mention Helo Hangar Door and Oily water separator as CIR but these are not included as WI on the taks list. Are these to removed? Also on CIR list has sometimes have the wrong W.I #. Can the CIRs be updated to match the W.I on the specifications?

ANSWER: The consolidated list of critical inspection items on page x is from an older version of the specification. Work items Helo Hangar Door, Inspect and Test as well as Oily Water Separator (OWS) System, Inspect and Groom, were removed from the final version of the specification. The correct consolidated list of critical inspection items is as follows: WI 2 Sewage Holding Tank(s), Clean and Inspect;

WI 5 Gas Turbine Flexible Hoses, Renew; WI 10 Decks (Pump Rooms), Preserve (Full); WI 11 Decks, Preserve (Partial); and WI 12 Deck Covering (Slip-Resistant), Renew. A copy of the new specification is incorporated and attached with this amendment.

QUESTION NO. 5: WI-10, Decks, Pump Rooms, Preserve; paragraph 3.6. Can we have the existing QA Assurance documents to determine existing DFTs and anchor profiles?

ANSWERS: There are no existing QA documents for the associated spaces.

The intent of WI 10 is to fully preserve these spaces, so all resulting anchor profiles and DFTs will be the result of this work. The required anchor profile and resulting DFT is listed in SFLC Std Spec 6310, as listed in the specification. The existing condition of one area of 3-36-01-E is shown in Figure 2 of WI 10.

mailto:Valerie.S.Riverachase@uscg.mil mailto:Robin.B.Kloeppel@uscg.mil

Dockside Repairs of CGC WAESCHE (751) Amendment A0002

QUESTION NO. 6: Page x Consolidated List of Critical Inspection Report.

Looking at page X it identifies CIR activity in Item 9 & 12 upon further inspection we found no CIR activity in item 9. There was unidentified CIR activity in Item 10 and Item 12 on same Page is not the same item as found in the spec. Can the Government remove CIR verbiage for Item 9, include Item 10 CIR and confirm item 12 is in accordance with Table of contents and current item?

ANSWER: The consolidated list of critical inspection items on page x is from an older version of the specification. Work items Helo Hangar Door, Inspect and Test as well as Oily Water Separator (OWS) System, Inspect and Groom, were removed from the final version of the specification. The correct consolidated list of critical inspection items is as follows: WI 2 Sewage Holding Tank(s), Clean and Inspect;

WI 5 Gas Turbine Flexible Hoses, Renew; WI 10 Decks (Pump Rooms), Preserve (Full); WI 11 Decks, preserve (Partial); and WI 12 Deck Covering (Slip-Resistant), Renew.

QUESTION NO. 7 – Order of Importance, pages 48 through 85.

The Government states the following “Order of Importance: FACTOR 2 – Technical Capability and FACTOR 3 – Past Performance are equal in importance. When combined, FACTORS 2 and 3 are SIGNIFICANTLY MORE important than FACTOR 1 - Price. The Government will use best value trade-off source selection procedures to determine the awardee. If technical capability and past performance quality assessments converge in terms of equality, price will become the determinative factor in the best value tradeoff decision. Question can the Government categorically list examples of what it considers “trade offs “ that are not articulated in the solicitation, SOW, Standard Spec or applicable drawing or any other known contract requirements that justify considering them acceptable in a rating system that doesn’t acknowledge them as a pre or post requisite?

ANSWER: The USCG uses Best Value Trade Off (BVTO), and here is an explanation on how it is used and how it differs from Lowest Priced Technically acceptable (LPTA). I will explain the difference. The difference between using LPTA and BVTO is that LPTA, is driven by the lowest price that is “technically” acceptable.

For LPTA, if there are 2 companies with the lowest total price, you must select the one with the lowest price, even if the one slightly higher has a better technical

Dockside Repairs of CGC WAESCHE (751) Amendment A0002 rating. In that same situation, if we used BVTO, we could select the one that has a higher technical rating (the tradeoff), even though the price is higher. In the same respect, if one vendor has a higher rated past performance record but the price is slightly higher than one with a lower performance rating, the one with the higher performance rating (tradeoff) would be selected.

c. No other changes are made to the terms & conditions of the solicitation.