SF30-A00001_with_attachments.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Solicitation Pages 27-32 have been changed. Change is to Prior Experience factor and has been replaced with Past Performance. Refer to updated pages attached to this amendment for proper submission and evaluation criteria.

The Contract Specialist has been changed to Micha Wisniewski at Micha.A.Wisniewski@uscg.mil Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

00001

The amendment is issued for the following;

Micha Wisniewski, Contract Specialist United States Coast Guard, Surface Forces Logistics Center 2401 Hawkins Point Road Baltimore, MD 21226

70Z08518RP45C3500

1 1

05/11/2018

05/08/2018

ATTACHMENT 3- Continuation of Combined Synopsis Solicitation

SOLICITATION NO. 70Z08518RP45C3500

Dockside Repairs of USCGC BERTHOLF (WMSL 750) FY18 FQ4

Amendment A00001

Cost/hour/trade

Supplies/materials (description & cost of each)

Sub-total

Pension Plans

Overhead at a rate of ______%

Profit at a rate of ________%

Total for item _____________

(10) DHS NOTICE TO OFFERORS

It is DHS policy that pricing for competitive negotiations should be based on adequate price competition.

However, in the event only one responsible offer is obtained as a result of this solicitation, that offeror may be required to submit Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data (FAR 15-403-3) to support price negotiations.

(11) REQUIREMENTS/INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

These instructions prescribe the format and approach to be used in the development and presentation of proposal data. They are designed to assure the submission of information essential to the proposal. The instructions permit the inclusion of data or information an offeror deems pertinent.

1. Proposals must be prepared in accordance with these instructions, providing all required information in the format specified. Failure of a proposal to show compliance with these instructions may be grounds for exclusion of the proposal from further consideration.

2. Offerors are cautioned that the government could elect to award a contract without discussion therefore, initial proposals should represent the best possible effort. Attention is invited to FAR 52.215-1(f).

3. Any resultant contract shall include the general contract provisions and contract clauses applicable to the selected offeror's organization and type of contract awarded. Any additional clauses required by public law, executive order, or acquisition regulations in effect at the time of execution of the proposed contract will be included. The Coast Guard reserves the right to incorporate into the resulting contract all or any portion of the offeror's proposal.

4. The proposal shall concisely describe the offeror’s response to the requirements of the solicitation.

Elaborate artwork, expensive paper or bindings, and expensive visual or other aids are not necessary or encouraged.

5. All pages containing text shall be typewritten or printed on 8 ½ x 11 inch paper, with at least single spacing. Type size for text shall be no smaller than 10 point, with not more than an average of twelve (12) characters per linear inch (12 pitch), with proportional spacing permitted. Type size for figures and tables shall be no smaller than 5 point, 20 pitches, with proportional spacing permitted. Margins on all four edges of each page will be at least one inch. A page printed on both sides shall be counted as two pages. Pages exceeding the limitations will be removed from the proposal by the Contracting Officer and returned to the offeror to ensure that they are not evaluated. Other deviations from the instructions will be reviewed by the

Contracting Officer to ensure that no offeror receives a competitive advantage. Deviations resulting in a competitive advantage for an offeror will result in the proposal being returned to the offeror as noncompliant with the RFP requirements.

6. A table of contents should be provided with figures and tables listed separately where necessary. (These pages are excluded from the page count.)

All pages in the proposal shall be numbered and identified with the proposal’s name - USCGC BERTHOLF

(WMSL 750), Dockside Repairs FY18 FQ4, RFP number, and date of proposal. Subsequent revisions should be similarly identified to show revision number and date.

Dockside Repairs of USCGC BERTHOLF (WMSL 750) FY18 FQ4

(12) REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSAL CONTENT

Offerors shall submit price and past performance proposals in separate volumes as follows:

Volume Title Copies Page Limit

Volume I Price Proposal Original and 1 copy None

(1 copy if emailed)

Volume II Past Performance Proposal Original and 2 copies 5 pages

(1 copy if emailed)

1. Volume I – Price Proposal:

Price proposal instructions: Provide the original and one completed copy of ATTACHMENT 2, Schedule of

Supplies/Services and any necessary information to support the price proposal. Also provide the original and one (1) fully executed and signed copies of the solicitation. Ensure all sections are complete.

Provide a listing by subcontractor with the following information:

a) Identification of each proposed subcontractor (name, address, phone number) and his small business status.

b) A brief description of the service or supply, by work item, to be furnished and the proposed price for each.

c) An explanation of why and how the proposed subcontractor was selected including the extent of competition obtained.

2. Volume II - Past Performance

In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(1), the offeror is required to identify past or current contracts (including

Federal, State, and local government and/or commercial) for efforts similar to the requirement of this solicitation. The Government shall consider this information, as well as information obtained from any other sources, when evaluating the offeror’s past performance. The offeror is further reminded that the source selection authority (SSA) shall determine the relevance of similar past performance information (PPI).

Preference will be given to completed contracts for which a Contract Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) is found in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS). The offeror shall submit PPI of contracts performed within the last three years, each listed separately. If the offeror submits more than four

PPI, all of which are recent and relevant, then the SSA will consider the four PPI that are most recent, using reverse chronological order and reserves the right to consider other recent and relevant past performance information from other sources. The offeror is requested to provide this information in the following format for each contract:

a) Contract number, and agency point of contact and telephone number;

b) Ship name, hull number, type, and displacement;

c) Type of availability (dry dock, dockside, etc.) and where performed;

d) Original contract commencement and completion dates, actual commencement and completion dates, and explanation of (i.e. reasons for) schedule slippage/extensions, if any;

e) Award and final (award plus growth) contract prices, including the total number of

f) growth work changes and scope of these changes;

g) Total number of actual man-hours expended, and how many of those hours were or additional /changed work;

h) The number of reasons for any deficiency reports issued by the customer for each specification item.

Provide copies of these reports if requested;

i) Discuss problems encountered and the Offeror’s corrective action

Dockside Repairs of USCGC BERTHOLF (WMSL 750) FY18 FQ4

If subcontracting arrangement is proposed, the above data must also be provided for each first tier subcontractor. If a joint effort or teaming arrangement is proposed, highlight previous experience with the proposed team or subcontractor.

The quality of past performance and relevance of experience to the Coast Guard will be evaluated. The ability to manage and maintain a qualified workforce will be considered. Customer satisfaction will be an integral consideration. In evaluating past performance the Government will consider contracts performed during the last three years. Emphasis will be placed upon the contractor’s administration of the contractual responsibilities.

Preference will be given to the past performance information that is found in the PPIRS. The Contractor’s past performance will be evaluated according to the following factors: Quality, Schedule, Management and

Regulatory Compliance.

Consistent with FAR 15.305(a)(2), an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror will be rated “neither favorable or unfavorable.”

Consistent with FAR 15.306(a) & (b), offerors may provide information on adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to comment.

Solicitation Amendments If applicable, Offerors shall acknowledge all Solicitation Amendments. Offerors shall complete Blocks 8 and 15(a-

c) on all Solicitation Amendments (SF-30) issued by the Government and submit with their offer. All Solicitation

Amendments will be posted on the FedBizOpps website for all potential offerors to view.

Method to Submit Proposals

Submit your proposal to the below mailing address or e-mail address; your proposal shall be received at or before the exact date and time specified in this solicitation. Offerors are encouraged to submit their offers via e-mail;

however, large offers should be submitted to the mailing address. Do not submit offers via document sharing websites. Please confirm receipt of your offer by calling or e-mailing Jing Liu at (510) 637-5970 or

Jing.Liu@uscg.mil. Facsimile proposals will not be accepted.

Mailing Address:

United States Coast Guard

Surface Forces Logistics Center

Contract & Procurement Division (C&P2-LRE)

Attn: Jing Liu

1301 Clay Street Suite 800N

Oakland, CA 94612

E-Mail: Jing.Liu@uscg.mil

Offerors that elect to use commercial delivery services for delivery of task order proposals are advised that such delivery must be made to Suite 800N on the 8th Floor of the Oakland Federal Building by the delivery time provided in this RFP to be considered timely.

Proposal Due Date

Proposals are due No Later Than June 8, 2018 at 3:00 PM Pacific Standard Time.

Period for Acceptance of Offers

The offeror agrees to hold prices in its proposal firm for 90 calendar days from the Proposal Due Date, unless another time period is specified in an amendment to the RFP.

Request for Clarification mailto:Jing.Liu@uscg.mil

Dockside Repairs of USCGC BERTHOLF (WMSL 750) FY18 FQ4

It shall be the obligation of the offeror to exercise due diligence to discover and to bring to the attention of the

Government any ambiguities, inconsistencies, or concerns regarding the information in the Request for Proposal. All questions/concerns regarding this Request for Proposal (RFP) shall be submitted in writing by filling in the attachment 4, Request for Clarification to the Contracting Officer at Jing.Liu@uscg.mil no later than May 25, 2018 at 3:00 pm Pacific Standard Time. Follow-up/additional questions will not be accepted after this date. Offerors shall reference the RFP number and provide enough information in their e-mail so the Government can easily respond to their questions/concerns. Questions/concerns will be compiled and addressed on an “Amendment of Solicitation”

(SF-30) and will be released to the posted potential offerors. Responses to questions/concerns will be available after the due date for questions/concerns has past.

*DO NOT ask or submit questions/concerns regarding this RFP to any other USCG personnel (e.g., COR, program manager, etc.).*

(13) FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1. Price

2. Past Performance

Past performance is significantly more important than price.

In selecting the best overall offer, the Government will consider the value of each offer in terms of the evaluated technical quality offered for the price. The relative quality of offerors will be based upon their ability to meet or exceed the minimum performance requirements of this solicitation resulting in less risk of nonperformance, defective performance, and late performance under the resulting contract.

Price will not be a numerically weighted factor in the evaluation of proposals.

The Government reserves the right to award a contract on the basis of evaluation of the original submission without discussions or call for Final Proposal Revisions.

Factor 1, Price: The total evaluated price of the offeror will be determined by totaling the proposed prices of all the

Definite Items plus the composite labor hour extended total.

(1) DEFINITE ITEMS: These are the items, which, if there is an award at all, will be awarded. The proposal shall be evaluated to include the price for each definite item.

(2) OPTIONAL ITEMS: These are the items which may be awarded if inspection reports reveal the necessity for activation, or if funds become available. The proposal shall be evaluated to include the price for each optional item. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of the options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the options.

(3) COMPOSITE LABOR HOUR RATE: The offer shall be evaluated to include the offer price for the

Composite Labor Hour Rate multiplied by the estimated quantity of hours. This is being added for evaluation purposes only.

Factor 2, Past Performance: This factor evaluates recent past performance on relevant work similar to the scope of work in this solicitation. Recent past performance is considered to be within the last three (3) years of proposal submission. In evaluating past performance, the Government will first consider the information in the Offeror’s

Dockside Repairs of USCGC BERTHOLF (WMSL 750) FY18 FQ4 proposal that are found in PPIRS as well as information gathered from other sources including former customers, Government agencies, federal databases and other references. If Offerors submit more than four PPI, all of which are recent and relevant, then the Government will evaluate four of the submitted past performance references that are most recent, using reverse chronological order.

The Government will determine relevance of past performance information (PPI) for each offeror. In determining relevancy, the Government will consider the following information:

a) Scope of contract, including dollar value and length of performance period

b) Offeror’s performance as prime contractor on ship repair contracts.

The past performance evaluation will take into account the guidelines outlined at FAR 15.305(a)(2) Past

Performance Evaluation. The Contractor’s past performance will be evaluated according to the following subfactors: Quality, Schedule, Management, and Regulatory Compliance.

General trends in a Contractor’s performance will also be considered. An offeror without sufficient record of relevant past performance will not be evaluated favorably nor unfavorably and will be assigned a “neither favorable nor unfavorable” rating.

***Past Performance is significantly more important than Price. If past performance evaluations of offers result in equal ratings, price will become a determinative factor in the Best Value Decision****

Award may be made without any type of discussions or negotiations. This is based on the Contracting Officer’s determination after an evaluation has been completed on all offers.

A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.

Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(14) FAR 52.209-2 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING WITH INVERTED DOMESTIC

CORPORATIONS –REPRESENTATION (NOV 2015)

(a) Definitions. “Inverted domestic corporation” and “subsidiary” have the meaning given in the clause of this contract entitled Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations (52.209-10).

(b) Government agencies are not permitted to use appropriated (or otherwise made available) funds for contracts with either an inverted domestic corporation, or a subsidiary of an inverted domestic corporation, unless the exception at 9.108-2(b) applies or the requirement is waived in accordance with the procedures at 9.108-4.

(c) Representation. The offeror represents that—

(1) It [ ] is, [ ] is not an inverted domestic corporation; and

(2) It [ ] is, [ ] is not a subsidiary of an inverted domestic corporation.

(End of provision)

(15) FAR 52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS. (OCT 2015)

(a) (1) The Offeror certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that --

Dockside Repairs of USCGC BERTHOLF (WMSL 750) FY18 FQ4

(i) The Offeror and/or any of its Principals --

(A) Are [_] are not [_] presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any Federal agency;

(B) Have [_] have not [_], within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property (if offeror checks “have”, the offeror shall also see 52.209-7, if included in this solicitation); and

(C) Are [_] are not [_] presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with, commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this provision; and

(D) Have [_], have not [_], within a three-year period preceding this offer, been notified of any delinquent Federal taxes in an amount that exceeds $3,500 for which the liability remains unsatisfied.

(1) Federal taxes are considered delinquent if both of the following criteria apply:

(i) The tax liability is finally determined. The liability is finally determined if it has been assessed. A liability is not finally determined if there is a pending administrative or judicial challenge. In the case of a judicial challenge to the liability, the liability is not finally determined until all judicial appeal rights have been exhausted.

(ii) The taxpayer is delinquent in making payment. A taxpayer is delinquent if the taxpayer has failed to pay the tax liability when full payment was due and required. A taxpayer is not delinquent in cases where enforced collection action is precluded.

(2) Examples.