PWS_for_IF_V1312_MDE_Replacement_Governor_System_(Rev-0_4-23-18).pdf
PDF 90 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Isotta Fraschini Model V1312T1-MLH-KC Main Diesel Engines (MDE) Replacement Governor System
- Solicitation number
- 70Z08518Q40008B00
About this file
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| A00001.pdf | ||
| FINAL_SOLICITATION_PACKAGE.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Rev-0 (4/23/2018)
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) – U.S. COAST GUARD (USCG)
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)
FOR
REPLACEMENT GOVERNOR SYSTEM ON THE ISOTTA FRASCHINI MOTORI
MODEL V1312T1-MLH-KC MAIN PROPULSION DIESEL ENGINES
1.0 GENERAL
1.1 Background/Scope
The governor actuators installed on the Isotta Fraschini Motori (IFM) Model V1312T1- MLH-KC Main Propulsion Diesel Engines for the USCG inland construction tenders and river tenders have experienced premature failures due to excessive shipboard and engine vibrations. The U.S. Coast Guard Surface Forces Logistics Center – Icebreaker, Buoy, and Construction Tender Product Line (SFLC-IBCTPL) requires support in identifying replacement options and prototyping a replacement governor system on three cutters (one cutter of each subclass). This will result in six (6) prototype installations, two engines for each cutter. Contingent on successful prototype efforts, support may include installation of the approved replacement governor system for the remaining MPDEs in the fleet.
The current configuration consists of the following components, with the governor actuator directly connected to the engine’s fuel injection pump.
• Heinzman Helenos II - Digital Control Unit Model DC 20402-01
• Heinzman Actuator Model StG 2040-01
• Bosch Inline Fuel Injection Pump - Model “PES 12P120 A920 RS”
• Isotta Fraschini Model V1312T1-MLH-KC Main Propulsion Diesel Engine (MPDE)
1.2 Objectives
The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and non-personal services necessary to analyze, identify, install, test, and support the replacement governor system on the USCG IFM Model V1312T1-MLH-KC MPDEs. The proposed system shall be capable of withstanding the current levels of vibration present through the operating range of the MPDE. Tasking shall include the following support as defined within this PWS:
• Participate in a Post Award Conference (PWS 4.3)
• Conduct familiarization site-visits (3 total) to review “as-built” system and component configuration, including data collection & analysis of current vibration levels experienced by the actuator (PWS 2.1, 2.2, & 2.3)
• Conduct research to identify commercial options and propose suitable replacement governor system(s) for USCG review/approval (PWS 2.4)
• Install prototype governor system onboard three (3) USCG cutters (PWS 2.5)
• Provide on-site and remote technical support for the prototype installations for the duration of the prototype period (PWS 2.5)
• Conduct data collection & vibration analysis of the prototyped systems, including analysis/comparisons between existing and prototyped governor systems (PWS 2.6)
• Contingent on successful prototype efforts and USCG acceptance, install the approved replacement system on the remaining cutters in the fleet; 21 cutters, 42 MPDEs total (PWS 2.7)
1.3 Applicable Documents
1.3.1 Compliance Documents
Surface Forces Logistics Center Standard Specification 0000 (SFLC Std Spec 0000), 2014, General Requirements ANSI S2.25 Guide for the Measurement, Reporting, and Evaluation of Hull and
Superstructure Vibration in Ships ANSI S2.27 Guidelines for the Measurement and Evaluation of Ship Propulsion
Machinery Vibration ISO 20283-2 Mechanical Vibration - Measurement of Vibration Onboard Ships, Part 2:
Measurement of Structural Vibration ISO 4867 Code for the Measurement and Reporting of Shipboard Vibration Data ISO 4868 Code for the Measurement and Reporting of Local Vibration Data of Ship
Structures and Equipment
1.3.2 Reference Documents
1.3.2.1 Coast Guard Drawings
65 WLR Class:
Coast Guard Drawing 65 WD 103-003, Rev A, General Arrangement Coast Guard Drawing 65 WD 2402-001, Rev B, Propulsion Control System to Suit IF
1312 MDE
Coast Guard Drawing 65 WD 4000-002, Rev A, Machinery Arrangement Mods to Suit IF
1312 MDE
Coast Guard Drawing 65B WD 103-002, Rev -, General Arrangement Coast Guard Drawing 65B WD 2402-001, Rev D, Propulsion Control System to Suit IF
1312 MDE
Coast Guard Drawing 65B WD 4000-004, Rev B, Machinery Arrangement Mods to Suit
IF 1312 MDE
75 WLR Class:
Coast Guard Drawing 75C WAGL 103-023, Rev 4, General Design Plans and Outboard
Profile (75401-05) Coast Guard Drawing 75C WAGL 252-002, Rev K, Propulsion Control System to Suit IF
1312 MDE
Coast Guard Drawing 75C WAGL 4000-002, Rev E, Machinery Arrangement Mods to
Suit IF 1312 MDE Coast Guard Drawing 75D WAGL 4000-007, Rev B, Machinery Arrangement Mods to
Suit IF 1312 MDE Coast Guard Drawing 75E WLR 103-003, Rev -, Booklet of General Plans Coast Guard Drawing 75E WLR 252-001, Rev E, Propulsion Control System to Suit IF
1312 MDE
Coast Guard Drawing 75E WLR 252-002, Rev -, Propulsion Control System to Suit IF
1312 MDE
Coast Guard Drawing 75E WLR 4000-004, Rev C, Machinery Arrangement Mods to Suit
IF 1312 MDE
75 WLIC Class:
Coast Guard Drawing 75 WAGL 103-008, Rev A, Booklet of General Plans Coast Guard Drawing 75 WAGL 2402-002, Rev E, Propulsion Control System to Suit IF
1312 MDE (ANVIL)
Coast Guard Drawing 75 WAGL 2402-003, Rev C, Propulsion Control System to Suit IF
1312 MDE (HAMMER)
Coast Guard Drawing 75B WAGL 252-002, Rev F, Propulsion Control System to Suit IF
1312 MDE
Coast Guard Drawing 75B WAGL 252-003, Rev A, Propulsion Control System to Suit IF
1312 MDE
Coast Guard Drawing 75B WAGL 4000-005, Rev C, Machinery Arrangement Mods to
Suit IF 1312 MDE Coast Guard Drawing 75D WAGL 252-002, Rev D, Propulsion Control System to Suit IF
1312 MDE
Coast Guard Drawing 75D WAGL 4000-007, Rev B, Machinery Arrangement Mods to
Suit IF 1312 MDE
1.3.2.2 Coast Guard Technical Publications
Coast Guard Technical Publication (TP) 4998, Propulsion Control and Engine Alarm
System Coast Guard Technical Publication (TP) 6307A, Ancillary Equipment – MDE – Model
V1312T1MLH-KC
Coast Guard Technical Publication (TP) 6308B, MDE - Model V1312T1MLH-KC –
Operating and Maintenance Manual Coast Guard Technical Publication (TP) 6309B, MDE - Model V1312T1MLH-KC – Spare
Parts Catalog Coast Guard Technical Publication (TP) 6318, Speed Control System Coast Guard Technical Publication (TP) 6330, MDE - Model V1312T1MLH-KC –
Overhaul Manual
2.0 REQUIREMENTS / TASKS
2.1 Vibrations Sampling and Analysis Plan
2.1.1 A Vibrations Sampling and Analysis (VSA) Plan shall be prepared by the Contractor for government approval. The intent of the VSA Plan is to establish the methodology to be used to analyze the current vibrations experienced and effects on the original governor configuration; in support of selecting a suitable replacement governor system. The plan shall adhere to the testing requirements of the references listed in
PWS 1.3.1.
2.1.2 The VSA Plan shall include the Contractor’s procedures, tests, measurements (including location of test points on the MPDE), calibrated instrumentation, required cutter operating conditions, required crew support, and total time required (i.e. time to install instrumentation, conduct test and remove instrumentation) in support of analysis.
At a minimum, data shall be collected at steady-state conditions corresponding to engine speeds of 800 RPM, 1000 RPM, 1300 RPM, 1550 RPM, 1800 RPM, 1950 RPM, and 2100 RPM; as well as reverse/”backing down” operations. All testing shall be accomplished with the tender coupled to its companion barge.
2.1.3 The VSA Plan shall also identify any optional tests that may need to be conducted in order to recommend corrective actions for the excessive noise and vibration.
2.2 Pre-Installation Site-Visits, Operational Test, and Vibrations Sampling
2.2.1 Upon acceptance of the VSA Plan, the Contractor shall perform three (3) site visits in support of operational testing and vibration sampling per the VSA Plan.
2.2.2 Site visits shall be accomplished on three (3) of the cutters listed in Appendix A “United States Coast Guard 65’ WLR, 75’ WLR, and 75’ WLIC Homeports” for locations.
Specific vessels will be identified by the USCG at a later date.
2.3 Pre-Installation Vibrations Analysis Report
2.3.1 Upon completion of the site-visits, the Contractor shall provide a trip report summarizing the results.
2.3.2 The report shall include all inspection findings, assessments, and vibration data collected.
2.4 Recommendations Report
2.4.1 The Contractor shall provide a preliminary report, presentation, and final report to include the research and recommendations performed for this task.
2.4.2 The presentation and report shall include the following:
• Summary of current governor control system configuration, with supporting vendor/manufacturer data.
• Summary of proposed replacement system(s), with supporting vendor/manufacturer data. Summary shall include comparison of the technical attributes between the current system and proposed replacement(s)
• Contractor’s recommended replacement system; including removal/installation drawings, installation procedures, technical manuals, required supporting systems/components (e.g. injection pump conversion kits, resilient mounts, etc), and any modifications required for the existing MPDE and ship control configuration to support proposed replacement system
• Cost estimate (number of persons, labor, travel, and material) to install the proposed system on three (3) USCG cutters per PWS 2.2.2 in support of prototyping efforts
2.4.3 The proposed replacement governor system(s) shall adhere to the following requirements:
• Compatible with the existing ship control system and engine configuration
• Installed in a configuration that isolates the governor system components from the shipboard vibration and reduces governor system actuator vibrations below the manufacturer’s specified tolerances
• Meets or exceeds the performance attributes of the existing governor control system
• Suitable for installation in a commercial (marine) prime mover application per OEM, satisfying the following requirements:
o Duty:
Variable speed application, capable of governing engine speeds from 750 to 2110 RPM (with adjustable overspeed trip setpoint) o Operating Environment:
-25 oC to +90 oC (-13 oF to 194 oF) ambient operating temperature Up to 95% relative humidity @ 60 oC (140 oF) No vibratory stresses experienced in excess of ANSI S2.27 standards and the equipment/component manufacturer’s specifications for all operational modes (e.g. steady-state, transients, reverse) o Additional Requirements:
Power Input: 18-32 VDC (24 VDC nominal) with surge protection Inputs (minimum): 2 speed, 4 discrete, 4 analog Outputs (minimum): 2
2.5 Prototype Installation (3 cutters)
2.5.1 Upon USCG approval, the Contractor shall install the replacement governor system onboard three USCG cutters (two MPDEs per cutter) in support of prototype evaluation efforts.
2.5.2 The Contractor shall provide on-site technical support for installation, initial training, and testing during installation.
2.5.3 The Contractor shall provide technical support (on-site and remote as necessary) in support of any issues encountered during the prototype period.
2.5.4 The Contractor shall turnover all removed equipment and components to the Government.
2.6 Post-Installation Operational Testing, Vibrations Sampling, and Analysis Report
2.6.1 The Contractor shall conduct vibration sampling in accordance with the approved VSA Plan per PWS 2.1. The intent of this task is to provide comparisons between the original configuration (data collected in PWS 2.2) and the prototyped governor system (installed in PWS 2.5).
2.6.2 In addition to vibration sampling, the Contractor shall conduct operational testing to demonstrate system response capabilities throughout the engine operating ranges.
The intent of this task is to provide performance comparisons between the original configuration and the prototyped governor system. At a minimum, the engine shall be operated at the following conditions to demonstrate system capabilities:
• 25% continuous load rating (1100 RPM) - 30 minutes
• 50% continuous load rating (1500 RPM) - 30 minutes
• 75% continuous load rating (1800 RPM) - 30 minutes
• Full continuous load rating (2100 RPM) - 30 minutes
• Full continuous load in reverse - 5 minutes or as conditions allow
• Crash back (Full power forward to full power astern) - Twice
• Load transitions o 0% to 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% o 25% to 50%, 75%, and 100% o 50% to 75% and 100% o 75% to 100% o 100% to 0%, 75% to 0%, 50% to 0%, and 25% to 0%
2.6.3 Testing (vibration sampling and operational) shall be conducted on each of the three (3) USCG cutters which had the prototyped governor system installed. Testing shall be accomplished in conjunction with prototype installation to ensure satisfactory operations prior to Contractor departure. Vibration and operational testing may be accomplished concurrently. In the event of an unsuccessful test, the Contractor shall be responsible for reinstalling and testing all original equipment to return the MPDE to original configuration and operational status.
2.6.4 The Contractor shall provide a trip report summarizing the results of the testing.
The report shall include all inspection findings, assessments, and vibration data collected. The report shall also include comparisons between the existing governor system (data presented in PWS 2.3) and the prototyped replacement system (data collected in PWS 2.6.1).
2.7 Fleet Installation
2.7.1 Upon completion of the prototype evaluation and contingent on USCG acceptance, the Contractor shall install the approved replacement system on the remaining cutters of the fleet (21 cutters, 42 MDEs).
2.7.2 The Contractor shall provide a plan and estimate (labor, travel, and materials) in support of installations. The plan shall include required materials, equipment, expected durations, and notional timeline in support of efforts.
3.0 CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL
3.1 Security Clearance / USCG Installation Access.
Security clearances are not required to perform any work under this specification;
however, the Contractor shall ensure personnel comply with all installation security requirements. The Contractor shall supply a list of all employees who may be required to perform work under this specification and periodically update that list. Prior to each ship visit (no later than 10 business days before scheduled arrival); the Contractor shall submit information on visiting employees to the COR. For cutters berthed at a Department of Defense or foreign government military facility, the KO will provide instructions on the method by which the cutter crew will assist the Contractor’s representatives in meeting facility access requirements at the time the Contractor is tasked.
3.2 Employee Identification
Contractor employees visiting Government facilities shall wear an identification badge that, at a minimum, displays the Contractor name, the employee’s photo, name, and badge expiration date. Visiting Contractor employees shall comply with all Government escort rules and requirements. All Contractor employees shall identify themselves as Contractors when their status is not readily apparent and display all identification and visitor badges in plain view above the waist at all times.
3.3 Employee Conduct
Contractor’s employees shall comply with all applicable Government regulations, policies and procedures (e.g., fire, safety, sanitation, environmental protection, security, “off limits” areas, wearing of parts of DHS uniforms, and possession of weapons) when visiting or working at Government facilities. The Contractor shall ensure Contractor employees present a professional appearance at all times and that their conduct shall not reflect discredit on the United States or the Department of Homeland Security. The Project Manager shall ensure Contractor employees understand and abide by Department of Homeland Security established rules, regulations and policies concerning safety and security.
3.4 Removing Employees for Misconduct or Security Reasons
The Government may, at its sole discretion (via the Contracting Officer), direct the Contractor to remove any Contractor employee from DHS facilities for misconduct or security reasons. Removal does not relieve the Contractor of the responsibility to continue providing the services required under the contract. The Contracting Officer will provide the Contractor with a written explanation to support any request to remove an employee.
4.0 OTHER APPLICABLE CONDITIONS
4.1 Place of Performance
The majority of services will be performed on-board the cutter, at the respective cutter’s homeport. All WLR and WLIC homeports are located in the CONUS; no travel is anticipated OCONUS in support of tasking. Refer to Appendix A, “United States Coast Guard 65’ WLR, 75’ WLR, and 75’ WLIC Homeports”, http://www.uscg.mil/datasheet/wlr.asp and http://www.uscg.mil/datasheet/wlic.asp for additional information. Work will be conducted “pier-side” and “underway”, with operational testing to be conducted underway within the cutter’s local area of responsibility (AOR). Underway tasking will not require overnight stay onboard the cutter.
4.2 Travel
Contractor travel is required to support this requirement. Proposed travel and per diem for each task order shall represent total compensation for employees’ transportation, lodging, meals, and incidentals in accordance with FAR part 31.205-46. The Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining approval (electronic mail is acceptable) for all reimbursable travel in advance of each travel event.
4.3 Post Award Conference
The Contractor shall attend a Post Award Conference in accordance with FAR Regulation Subpart 42.5 to discuss the PWS objectives no later than 7 calendar days after the date of award. This conference will include the Contracting Officer (KO), Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), and additional USCG representative. The purpose of the Post Award Conference, which will be chaired by the Contracting Officer, is to discuss technical and contracting objectives of this contract and review the Contractor's draft Project Plan. The Post Award Conference will be held at the USCG facility, located at SFLC Baltimore (707 E. Ordinance Rd, Baltimore, MD) or via teleconference.
http://www.uscg.mil/datasheet/wlr.asp http://www.uscg.mil/datasheet/wlic.asp
4.4 Project Plan
The Contractor shall provide a draft Project Plan at the Post Award Conference for Government review and comment. The Contractor shall provide a final Project Plan to the COR no later than 5 business days after the Post Award Conference.
4.5 Progress Reports
The Contractor shall provide a monthly progress report to the Contracting Officer and COR via electronic mail. This report shall include a summary of all Contractor work performed, an assessment of technical progress, schedule status, any travel conducted, and any Contractor concerns or recommendations for the previous reporting period.
4.6 Progress Meetings
The Contractor shall be available to meet with the COR upon request to present deliverables, discuss progress, exchange information and resolve emergent technical problems and issues. These meetings may be accomplished at Government’s facility, Contractor’s facility, or via teleconference.
4.7 Quality Control
The Contractor shall develop and maintain an effective quality control program (QCP) to ensure services are performed in accordance with this PWS. The Contractor shall develop and implement procedures to identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective. The QCP is the means by which the work complies with the requirement of the contract.
4.8 Physical Security
The Contractor shall be responsible for safeguarding all government equipment, information, and/or property provided for Contractor’s use.
5.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED RESOURCES
5.1 USCG References
The Government will provide copies of the USCG references cited in PWS 1.3 upon request during solicitation.
5.2 Usage and Release Restrictions
The Contractor shall use Government furnished information, data, and documents only for the performance of work under this contract. The Contractor shall not release Government furnished information, data, or documents to outside parties without the prior and explicit consent of the KO.
6.0 CONTRACTOR FURNISHED RESOURCES
The Contractor shall furnish all facilities, materials, parts, equipment, tools, and services necessary to fulfill the requirements of this contract, except for the Government Furnished Resources specified in PWS 5.0.
7.0 GOVERNMENT ACCEPTANCE
7.1 Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
The COR will be identified by separate letter. The COR monitors all technical aspects of the contract and assists in contract administration. The COR is authorized to perform the following functions: assure that the Contractor performs the technical requirements of the contract, perform inspections necessary in connection with contract performance, maintain written and oral communications with the Contractor concerning technical aspects of the contract, issue written interpretations of technical requirements (including Government drawings, designs, specifications), monitor Contractor's performance and notifies both the Contracting Officer and Contractor of any deficiencies, coordinate availability of government furnished property, and provide site entry of Contractor personnel. A letter of designation issued to the COR, a copy of which is sent to the Contractor, states the responsibilities and limitations of the COR, especially with regard to changes in cost or price, estimates or changes in delivery dates. The COR is not authorized to change any of the terms and conditions of the resulting order.
7.2 Deliverable Acceptance
The COR will review deliverables prior to acceptance and will send an e-mail notification to the Contractor attesting that the deliverable has been accepted.
7.3 Deficiencies
The COR will review all deliverables for accuracy and compliance in accordance with the PWS. Any deficiencies found in the deliverables that are contrary to the information contained in the Contractor’s accepted proposal will be addressed by the KO. The Contractor shall have an opportunity to comment on the deficiency and resubmit the rejected deliverable per delivery instructions.
8.0 DELIVERABLES
8.1 Deliverable Dates
The following deliverable due dates are provided for guidance. Actual dates shall be defined by the Contractor and provided in the Contractor’s proposal for the PWS. Items in bold are deliverables or events that must be reviewed and/or approved by the COR prior to proceeding to the next deliverable or event in this PWS. All days are considered calendar days unless otherwise noted.
Item
PWS
Reference Deliverable / Event Due By Distribution
1 4.3 Post Award Conference 7 days after award To be arranged by the KO
1a 4.3 Post Award Conference “Draft Plan”
At Post Award Conference
All conference attendees
1b 4.3 Post Award Conference Meeting Minutes
5 days after conference
Provided by COR to all attendees
2 2.1 Vibrations Sampling and Analysis (VSA) Plan
(PRELIMINARY)
14 days after Post Award Conference KO
2a 2.1 USCG Comments on VSA Plan
7 days after receipt Contractor
3 2.1 VSA Plan (FINAL) 14 days after receipt of USCG comments
KO
4 2.1 USCG Acceptance of VSA Plan
7 days after receipt
KO, COR,
Contractor
5 2.2
Pre-Installation Site-Visit, Operational Tests, and Vibration Sampling completed
45 days after VSA Plan acceptance
5a 2.3 Pre-Installation Vibrations Analysis Report
7 days after Pre- Installation
Shipcheck & Operational Test
KO, COR
6 2.4 Recommendations Report
(PRELIMINARY)
30 days after last VSA site-visit KO, COR
6a 2.4 USCG Comments to Recommendations Report
7 days after receipt Contractor
7 2.4 Recommendations Report Meeting / Presentation
14 days after receipt of USCG comments
KO, COR
8 2.4 Recommendations Report
(FINAL)
14 days after Recommendations
Presentation
KO, COR
9 2.4 USCG Approval of Recommendation
7 days after receipt Contractor
10 2.5 Installation of Prototypes 30 days after Approval of
Recommendation Contractor
11 2.6 Post-Installation Operational Test and Vibration Sampling
Concurrently with prototype installations Contractor
11a 2.6 Post-Installation Report 14 days after
Post-Installation Operational Test
KO, COR
12 2.6 Prototype Evaluation Complete
90 days after installation
KO, COR,
Contractor
13 2.7 Fleet Installation Begins TBD KO, Contractor
8.2 Format
The Contractor shall provide all deliverables in electronic format with read/write capability, using applications that are compatible with Coast Guard Standard Workstation III (Windows 7, Microsoft Office, and Adobe Acrobat applications).
9.0 GOVERNMENT TERMS, DEFINITIONS, AND ACRONYMS
ANSI American National Standards Institute COR Contracting Officer’s Representative FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation IBCTPL Icebreaker, Buoy, and Construction Tender Product Line KO Contracting Officer MDE Main Diesel Engine OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer
PWS Performance Work Statement QA Quality Assurance QCP Quality Control Program SFLC Surface Forces Logistics Center USCG United States Coast Guard VSA Vibration Sampling & Analysis WLIC Inland Construction Tender WLR River Buoy Tender
Appendix A: United States Coast Guard 65’ WLR, 75’ WLR, and 75’ WLIC Homeports
65 WLR
Cutter Hull Number Homeport
USCGC OUACHITA WLR 65501 Chattanooga, TN USCGC CIMARRON WLR 65502 Buchanan, TN
USCGC OBION WLR 65503 Owensboro, KY USCGC SCIOTO WLR 65504 Keokuk, IA USCGC OSAGE WLR 65505 Sewickley, PA
USCGC SANGAMON WLR 65506 Peoria, IL
75 WLR
USCGC WEDGE WLR 75307 Demopolis, AL
USCGC GASCONADE WLR 75401 Omaha, NE USCGC MUSKINGUM WLR 75402 Sallisaw, OK USCGC WYACONDA WLR 75403 Dubuque, IA USCGC CHIPPEWA WLR 75404 Buchanan, TN USCGC CHEYENNE WLR 75405 St Louis, MO USCGC KICKAPOO WLR 75406 Vicksburg, MS USCGC KANAWHA WLR 75407 Pine Bluff, AR USCGC PATOKA WLR 75408 Greenville, MS USCGC CHENA WLR 75409 Hickman, KY
**USCGC KANKAKEE WLR 75500 Memphis, TN **USCGC GREENBRIER WLR 75501 Natchez, MS
** NOTE: 75 WLR “F” class cutters do not utilize the Isotta Fraschini Model V1312T1-MLH-KC with Heinzman governor system configuration and are not included in this PWS. Homeport locations are provided for information only.
75 WLIC
USCGC ANVIL WLIC 75301 Charleston, SC
USCGC HAMMER WLIC 75302 Mayport, FL USCGC SLEDGE WLIC 75303 Baltimore, MD USCGC MALLET WLIC 75304 Corpus Christi, TX
USCGC VISE WLIC 75305 St Petersburg, FL USCGC CLAMP WLIC 75306 Galveston, TX
USCGC HATCHET WLIC 75309 Galveston, TX USCGC AXE WLIC 75310 Morgan City, LA
File details come from the government source that posted it.