Ketchikan Galley - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).doc
DOC document 163 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Base Ketchikan Galley Full Food Service
- Solicitation number
- 70Z08424QKETC0003
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for a federal contract opportunity for Full Food Services at USCG Base Ketchikan under Solicitation 70Z08424QKETC0003. The questionnaire is intended for completion by respondents who have previously worked with the offeror to evaluate their past performance on factors such as quality, schedule, cost control, management, and regulatory compliance. The contract has a detailed description of the work required, including aspects like quality control procedures, meeting project schedules, managing government-furnished materials, providing qualified personnel, and complying with environmental and labor regulations. The respondent is asked to rate the offeror's performance on a scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory and provide narrative explanations for any ratings below Satisfactory. The overall information gathered through this PPQ will be used in the source selection process for the upcoming full food services contract at USCG Base Ketchikan.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002 WD 2024-0195 CBA.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002 Questions and Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002 Invoice Instructions.docx | DOCX document | |
| WD 2015-5685 Rev 23.pdf | ||
| 70Z08424QKETC0003.pdf | ||
| SOW Base Ketchikan Food Service.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
70Z08424QKETC0003
Full Food Services
USCG Base Ketchikan
The United States Coast Guard, Operational Logistics Command is currently procuring Full Food Services as required by the U.S. Coast Guard at Base Ketchikan, Ketchikan, AK under solicitation 70Z08424QKETC0003. As a result, we are performing a past performance survey and reference investigation on potential contractors for the upcoming contract.
The information contained herein is considered “Source Selection Information” in accordance with FAR 3.104. Therefore, it is asked that you treat it accordingly. While the results of the overall past performance survey may be discussed with the contractor, FAR Part 15.610 and 15.1004 prohibits the release of the name of the individual responding to the survey.
Responses to this questionnaire should be EMAILED TO Susan Lawson, LOG 92 at susan.b.lawson@uscg.mil.
Should you have any questions concerning this survey, please contact the above named person at (510) 519-0550.
This portion is to be completed by the Offeror.
Contract Number:
Offeror’s Company Name:__________________________________________________________
Address:
Telephone/Fax Number: ___________________________________________________________
Point of Contact:
Email:
Was work performed as a subcontractor under a prime contract? No If yes, include, Yes Prime Contract Number: ___________________________________________________________
Prime Contractor’s Name: __________________________________________________________
Address:
Telephone/Fax Number: ___________________________________________________________
Point of Contact:
Offeror Name: _________________________________________ Solicitation 70Z08424QKETC0003 Project Title and Detailed Description of Work for which the Contractor was responsible to perform:
This portion is to be completed by the Respondent
Name and Title of Evaluator: _________________________________________________________________
Company Name: __________________________________________________________________
Address:
Telephone/Fax Number: _____________________________________________________________________
Point of Contact:
1. Contractor performed as Key Personnel Subcontractor Prime Contractor
2. The description of work as stated above does not accurately describe the work that was performed by Contractor being rated.
accurately or
3. The contract was IAW (check all that apply): Subcontracting Sole Source Davis Bacon SCA IDIQ T&M CR FFP
4. The total dollar value awarded: _________________________________________________
5. The total dollar value performed to date: _________________________________________
6. The Period of Performance awarded: ____________________________________________
7. The Period of Performance performed to date: _____________________________________
Offeror Name: _________________________________________ Solicitation 70Z08424QKETC0003 Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF E, G, M or U.
| E |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| G |
| Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| S |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| M |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| U |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective |
| N |
| Neutral |
| Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against. |
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
QUALITY
| 1 |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 2 |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 3 |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 4 |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
SCHEDULE
| 1 |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 2 |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 3 |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| 4 |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
Offeror Name: _________________________________________ Solicitation 70Z08424QDL930005
COST CONTROL
| 1 |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 2 |
| Managed Government furnished materials and supplies effectively and not in a wasteful manner |
MANAGEMENT
| 1 |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2 |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 3 |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 4 |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 5 |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 6 |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 7 |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 8. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 9 |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 10 |
| Managed Program w/Integration & Coordination of the customer. |
| 11 |
| Managed Key Personnel |
| 12 |
| Managed Subcontracts |
| 13 |
| Integrity/Ethics Program |
| 14 |
| Reasonable and Cooperative in Behavior with Government personnel |
REGULATORY
| 1 |
| Complied with Environmental laws and regulations |
| 2 |
| Complied with Labor laws and regulations |
| 3 |
| Complied with other regulations and codes and safety requirements |
| 4 |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| Contract discrepancy reports (or equivalent) frequent |
| YES/NO |
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON ANY RATING ELEMENT CAN BE MADE BELOW:
Offeror Name: _________________________________________ Solicitation 70Z08424QKETC0003
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .