Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 33 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70Z02320QADW01100
About this file
This document includes a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract solicitation. The United States Coast Guard is seeking contractor support services to develop performance management data sets and measures to support its Acquisition Directorate's strategic plan and action plan goals. Specifically, the Coast Guard requires a business intelligence capability to provide a holistic view of performance data in a single dashboard, enable searching and displaying of relevant information, and integrate data from multiple sources into one portal displaying measures, metrics, and reports. Interested offerors must submit responses by February 27, 2020 to the points of contact listed. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by references for offerors and aims to assess quality, schedule, management, small business utilization, regulatory compliance, and provide an overall recommendation.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE RATING SHEET
SOLICITATION NUMBER: 70Z02320QADW01100
Evaluator Point of Contact
Agency/Company Completing Questionnaire
Contractor Being Evaluated
Contract Number
Delivery Order/Task Order Number
Length of Involvement with Offeror
Description of Service
EVALUATION INSTRUCTIONS
The United States Coast Guard (USCG) Office of Contracts Support (CG-9123) is issuing this Request for Quote (RFQ) on behalf of the USCG Acquisition Directorate (CG-9) to solicit for Contractor services to further develop a Business Intelligence material solution CG-9’s existing Business Intelligence System.
This questionnaire is utilized by the Contract Specialist to obtain past performance information from the reference listed in the Contractor’s quote. Please provide your assessment of the Contractor’s past performance on the contract for which you are a reference. Mark the appropriate block, indicating the rating using the following rating guidelines. Space is provided for comments.
Submit completed questionnaire by Thursday, 27 February 2020 via e-mail to the following:
ATTN: Leslie Kenser and Ryan Shaughnessy Email: Leslie.A.Kenser@uscg.mil and Ryan.W.Shaughnessy@uscg.mil
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE RATINGS
RATING SCALE
A common five level assessment rating system is used to evaluate a contractor's performance. Ratings range from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional. Here's a breakdown of each category:
Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
RATING SCALE
(Select one)
EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFAC-TORY
NOT APPLICABLE
QUALITY RATING
Comments:
SCHEDULE RATING
Comments:
MANAGEMENT RATING
UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS RATING
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE RATING
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDATION:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .