E_-_PPQ.docx

DOCX document 56 KB Posted

Attached to
CCV System Installation in Tucson, AZ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
70RFPW19QW9000011
Issued by
Department of Homeland Security Office of Procurement Operations

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire for 70RFPW19QW9000011

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to CCV System Installation in Tucson, AZ, newest first.
File Type Posted
AM0003_-_70RFPW19QW9000011.pdf PDF
AM0002_-_70RFPW19QW9000011.pdf PDF
70RFPW19QW9000011_-_AM0001.pdf PDF
70RFPW19QW9000011_-_AM0001.pdf PDF
D_-_PPPF.pdf PDF
F_-_Contractor_Quotation_Checklist.docx DOCX document
70RFPW19QW9000011_-_Solicitation.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Federal Protective Service Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Western Consolidated Contracting Group 400 15th St. SW Auburn, WA 98001

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation: 70RFPW19QW9000011

NAME OF CONTRACTOR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE:

The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information regarding the quality of the above named Contractor’s past performance relative to a contract, completed or in progress, at your company/agency. The Federal Protective Service is considering this Contractor for the installation of a Closed Circuit Video (CCV) System in Tucson, AZ. We would greatly appreciate your input regarding the quality of the Contractor’s past performance.

Handwritten or typed responses are sufficient. It is requested that the individual(s) responsible for the administrative oversight of the project (e.g. security specialist, COR, COTR, etc.) respond to this questionnaire. More than one copy of the questionnaire may be submitted if responses from more than one individual are appropriate.

Upon completion of the survey, PLEASE EMAIL to Rachel Kalac at Rachel.d.kalac@fps.dhs.gov. If you have any questions, please submit in writing to both addresses listed. We appreciate your efforts on our behalf.

CONTRACT NO. OR PROJECT TITLE: PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

TOTAL PROJECT VALUE (TO DATE): NAME:

TITLE: COMPANY: TELEPHONE: EMAIL:

ATTACHMENT

E

March

Version

PERFORMANCE

QUESTIONS:

)Please provide a brief description of the scope of this project so that we may determine any similarities to this contract:

Please provide your comments on the Contractor’s performance in the following areas:

1. Discuss the Contractor’s overall level of professionalism and attentiveness. Comments:

2. ( 3.

Discuss the

Contractor’s quality control over the entirety of the installation.

How effective was the )Discuss the Contractor’s overall level of customer service and responsiveness. Comments:

3. Contractor in identifying and resolving problems—was the Contractor proactive or reactionary? Comments:

4. Discuss the Contractor’s ability to provide sufficient supervision/staffing to ensure effective and successful performance.

Comments:

5. How effectively does the Contractor respond to problems presented to them by owner and tenant representatives?

6. Discuss the Contractor’s overall management of the project. Comments:

7. Please describe any special, unique and/or complex requirements of the project, and how well the Contractor was able to handle those complex requirements.

8. If you had a choice, would you hire this Contractor again? Why or why not? Comments:

9. In summary, would you describe the quality of the Contractor's services and overall performance as:

a.Highly Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is substantially less than the level expected from a competent vendor.
b.Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is no more than the level expected from a competent vendor.
c.Unacceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is greater than the level normally expected from a competent vendor.

image1.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it.