Pre-Proposal Conference Slides.ppt

Federal Protective Service Pre-Proposal Conference PSO Services Region 3

RFP 70RFP322RE3000001 Protective Security Officer (PSO) Services Philadelphia, Metropolitan Area

PSO Services Region 3

Federal Protective Service - Protective Security Officer (PSO) Services Disclaimer:

PSO Services Region 3

Federal Protective Service Mission Statement Protecting the critical infrastructure and key resources of the United States is essential to our Nation’s security, public health and safety, economic vitality, and way of life. The Federal Protective Service (FPS) protects one component of the Nation’s infrastructure by mitigating risk to Federal facilities and their occupants. FPS ensures that Federal properties are safe and secure for Federal employees, officials, and visitors in a professional and cost-effective manner by deploying a highly trained and multi-disciplined police force.

PSO Services Region 3

Request for Proposals Full and Open Competition

PSO Services Region 3

Contract Type Government anticipates awarding a single award IDIQ Contract with firm fixed price provisions. Resultant task orders under this contract will be firm fixed price.

The guaranteed minimum amount to be ordered under the IDIQ contract will be $100,000.

Contract Award/Transition

PSO Services Region 3

Period of Performance

Individual task orders will include specific performance periods

All posts to begin on October 1, 2022

Full Term of IDIQ Contract if all Options are Exercised: October 1, 2022 to September 30, 2027

PSO Services Region 3

General Scope

PSO Services Region 3

General Scope (continued) FPS Statement of Work for PSO services (July 2019)

PSO Services Region 3

PSO Services

Emergency Security Services (ESS)

Source Selection Criteria Proposals will be evaluated based on the following three (3) evaluation factors:

Source Selection Criteria (continued)

The technical evaluation factors, when combined, are more important than price.

Relevant Past Performance

The Government reserves the right to obtain information from sources other than those identified by the Contractor. The Government will also consider the quality of the Contractor’s relevant past performance.

The Government reserves the right to evaluate submitted projects individually or in the aggregate in order to determine relevance and will do so consistently across all evaluated offers.

Teaming Arrangements Reference FAR 9.6 Where teaming arrangement is proposed, an additional maximum of up to three projects total for partner(s)/subcontractor(s) shall be submitted.

Provide a narrative and/or the actual teaming agreement if one exists.

Include the roles & responsibilities and the distribution of effort for each partner (by type and percentage) anticipated in performance.

Evaluation Criteria -Management Approach Quality Assurance

Quality Control

Transition Outline significant transition steps Associated timeframes Staffing Outline plan to recruit, retain and manage PSOs. Requirement changed from CBA to DOL WD.

DHS Mentor/ Protégé Program Provide evidence of participation in the program or are in process of entering the program

Note #1 - Offerors provide management strategies and proposed solutions demonstrating how they will result in better value to the government.

Evaluation Criteria - Price

Evaluation Criteria - Price (continued) Total evaluated price (Base + Options)

Prices may be evaluated for realism

Minimum wage rates and fringe benefits

Proposal Evaluation Information Non-price factors, when combined, are more important than price. However, the Government contemplates the possibility that it may identify an offer(s) of such a high technical quality that it would not be in the Government’s interest to pay an additional price premium for any additional technical (non-price) advantage.

As a result, offerors are advised that the Government may not evaluate the technical proposals of all offerors under this RFP. The government will first review the total evaluated price of all proposals received. The technical proposals of those offerors whose pricing is determined by the Contracting Officer to be most competitive may be reviewed prior to, or instead of, other technical proposals received.

Proposal Evaluation Information

Based on the initial review of these technical proposals, the government may not evaluate the technical proposals of other offerors, whose total evaluated pricing was higher than that of one already evaluated and already assigned the highest possible technical adjectival rating.

This would occur when the Contracting Officer determines that one or more of the technical proposals already reviewed is of such a level of quality that it would not be in the interest of the government to incur cost beyond the price of the technical proposals already reviewed.

Basis for Selection The Government will select the responsible Contractor whose proposal, in conforming to this RFP, provides the overall best value to meet the Government’s requirements, price and non-price factors considered. Only apparent successful contractors determined to be responsible pursuant to FAR 9.104-1 will be issued a contract.

Proposal Submission Requirements - Price

Closing/Due Date Proposals are due by: Friday, March 04, 2022, 12:00 EST

Submit offers electronically to Thomas Schrank and Danielle Brown

Federal Protective Service - Points of Contact Contracting Officer: Thomas Schrank

E-mail: thomas.schrank@fps.dhs.gov Phone: (215) 521-2257 Contract Specialist: Danielle Brown

E-mail: danielle.brown@fps.dhs.gov Phone: (215) 521-2271 PSO Services Region 3