70CMSW22R00000011 Attachment 4 FINAL.doc

DOC document 69 KB Posted

Attached to
9MM Duty Ammunition RFP to support ICE/OFTP Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
70CMSW22R00000011
Issued by
Immigration and Customs Enforcement

About this file

This solicitation requests proposals for 9mm duty ammunition to support Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations. Multiple vendors will be awarded indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts to provide between 124 and 150 grain 9mm Luger or 9mm Luger +P ammunition meeting specifications in the Statement of Work. Vendors must submit pricing on the attached schedule by the deadline of July 7, 2022. Proposals will be evaluated based on pricing as well as past performance as assessed through a questionnaire to be completed by references and submitted directly to the contracting officer. Contract awards will result in the issuance of firm-fixed price delivery orders under the contracts.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to 9MM Duty Ammunition RFP to support ICE/OFTP, newest first.
File Type Posted
9MM DUTY RFP Questions and Answers 5 31 22.pdf PDF
70CMSW22R00000011 Attachment 6 FINAL.pdf PDF
70CMSW22R00000011 Attachment 5 FINAL.pdf PDF
70CMSW22R00000011 Attachment 7 FINAL.pdf PDF
70CMSW22R00000011 Attachment 3 FINAL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
70CMSW22R00000011 Attachment 2 FINAL.pdf PDF
70CMSW22R00000011 Attachment 1 FINAL.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 4

70CMSW22R00000011

9MM Duty Ammunition RFP

CONTRACTOR-PROVIDED LETTER

REQUESTING PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

70CMSW22R00000011

DATE:

Company Name/Address

FAX:

PHONE:

SUBJECT:

Past Performance of

Contract No.

Mr./Ms.:

Our company recently completed or is currently engaged under the above contract, which we provided ammunition for your Agency. The requirements of this contract were similar to the requirements of a solicitation for which we have submitted a proposal to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

As part of the proposal evaluation, I ask that you evaluate our performance under the subject contract by completing the attached questionnaire form and emailing directly to the Contract Officer, Tony Ross at Tony.Ross@ice.dhs.gov no later than Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 4:00PM Eastern Standard Time (EST). Please provide rationale for the assigned ratings, particularly the ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory. The completed form will be marked and treated as “Source Selection Information” in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation 3.104, Procurement Integrity, and it will not be released except to Government personnel needing the information for source selection purposes or to your Agency for comments during the source selection process.

Your cooperation and expeditious attention in this matter is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely

Title:

Company:

Name of Proposed Contractor: ____________________

Contract No.:

Name of Rater: _______________________

Phone No.: ________________

Contract Type: _______________________

Place of Performance: ________________

Performance Period: __________________

Contract Dollar Amount:

1. Adjectival Definitions:

Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional = E
Based on the offeror’s past performance record, performance met contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. It is highly likely that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Very Good = VG
Based on the offeror’s past performance record, performance met contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. It is most likely that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory = SAT
Based on the offeror’s past performance record, performance met contractual requirements. It is likely that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Marginal = M
Based on the offeror’s past performance record, performance did not meet some contractual requirements. It is likely that the offeror will not successfully perform all of the required effort.
Unsatisfactory = U
Based on the offeror’s past performance record, performance did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery was not accomplished in a timely manner. It is highly likely that the offeror will not successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral = N
No relevant performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance rating. A search was unable to identify any relevant past performance information for the offeror, key personnel, or subcontractors. This is neither a negative or positive assessment.

Please circle each of the areas below of the contractor’s past performance based on the comments provided by the customer.

2. Customer Satisfaction Commitment: To what degree was the Contractor considered responsive to and cooperative with customer personnel?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Narrative Summary:

3. Quality of Service: This area of the questionnaire deals with compliance of contract requirements, to include appropriateness of personnel and technical excellence.

3.a Overall compliance with contract terms and conditions:

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

3.b Effectiveness and reliability of Contractor’s Key Personnel.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

3.c Adequacy of maintaining and controlling Government equipment.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

4. Timeliness of Performance: This is the area that deals with the contractor’s ability to meet milestones and delivery schedule, to include responsiveness to technical direction, completion of efforts on time including wrap-up and contract administration.

4.a Overall performance in planning, schedule, and monitoring.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

4.b Completion of major milestones on schedule:

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

4.c Responsiveness to contract changes from a contract administration perspective.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

4.d Responsiveness to changes in technical direction.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

4.e Timely completion of efforts within period of performance.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

4.f Responsiveness/capability to respond to urgent/short term requirements.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

4.g Efficiency in meeting cost targets without experiencing overruns.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

4.h Ability to control costs through the use of evolving technology mixed with Commercial Off-The-Shelf technologies.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

4.i Effectively assess impacts of changes on other associated projects, task and efforts.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

4.j Appropriately choose effective subcontractors and teaming partners and maintain good business relationships.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

4.k Ability to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from Government personnel.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

4.l Effectiveness in interfacing with Government personnel.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

4.m Has the Contractor ever been given a cure notice, a show cause notice, suspension of progress payments, or other letters directing the correction of a performance problem?

Yes_________

No____________

If yes, please explain:

4.n Changes in contract dollars value throughout the life of the contract are/were attributable, for the most part, to:

( ) Government-issued change orders

( ) claims submitted by the Contractor

( ) other Government actions

( ) other contractor actions.

Please explain:

4.o Based on this Contractor’s overall performance, would you award this Contractor another Government contract?

Yes________

No___________

If no, please explain:

5. Overall rating for this offeror:

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

6. Any other relevant information or comments:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .