7-1. Notice to Bidders.pdf

PDF 382 KB Posted

Attached to
Structural Assessment and Aquatic Market Viability Study
Solicitation number
RFQ 306-26 KD
Issued by
Orange County, Texas

About this file

This is a Notice to Bidders and Request for Qualifications (RFQ) document issued by the City of Amarillo, Texas for a Structural Assessment and Aquatic Market Viability Study. The RFQ 306-26 KD solicits qualifications from a consultant team to evaluate the physical condition, market demand, and operational feasibility of the City's outdoor aquatic facilities, including Southeast Pool, Southwest Pool, Warford Activity Center Pool, and 15 splashpad locations across various parks. The RFQ was issued on March 3, 2026, with advertisement dates of March 3 and March 10, 2026. The deadline for submitting questions is March 16, 2026, and proposals must be submitted electronically through the Euna Procurement platform by April 2, 2026, at 3:00 P.M. A pre-bid meeting is available for registered vendors, though attendance is not mandatory. The contract will be awarded to the highest evaluated respondent based on evaluation criteria, and final approval is subject to Amarillo City Council action. The project completion date is August 2026.

The project budget is $100,000, and pricing information must not be included in proposals; any submission containing pricing will not be considered. Proposals must not exceed 35 pages and must include a cover sheet, table of contents, response to scope of work, relevant experience, references, project timeline, and selection criteria responses. The evaluation committee will score responses based on response to scope of work (35 points), relevant experience and qualifications (35 points), references (10 points), and project timeline (20 points), for a maximum possible score of 100 points. The selected consultant team must include a licensed structural engineer with demonstrated experience in swimming pool and aquatic facility assessments. The City reserves the right to conduct presentations and interviews with responsive candidates and may award the contract without presentations based solely on RFQ submissions. The successful respondent must provide Professional Liability Insurance of $1,000,000 per claim and execute a contract within 10 calendar days of receiving the Notice of Award. Additionally, the vendor must comply with Texas ethics requirements, including filing Form 1295 and certifying non-discrimination against firearm entities and non-participation in energy company boycotts.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CITY OF AMARILLO

PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS

Contract and Bidding Documents for

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Structural Assessment and Aquatic Market Viability Study

FOR

THE CITY OF AMARILLO, TEXAS

Bid No.

RFQ 306-26 KD

Bid Closing:

April 02, 2026 at 3:00 P.M.

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Structural Assessment and Aquatic Market Viability Study

RFQ 306-26 KD

The intent of this RFQ is to enable the City of Amarillo to evaluate the knowledge, capabilities and experience of a consultant based on the attached scope for the Structural Assessment and Aquatic Market Viability Study for the City of Amarillo’s Outdoor Pools.

It is the intent of the City to award this RFQ to the highest evaluated respondent.

APPROXIMATE TIMELINE

Issuance of RFQ March 03, 2026 Advertisement Dates March 03, 2026, and March 10, 2026 Deadline for RFQ Questions March 16, 2026 Deadline for Proposal Submissions April 02, 2026, by 3:00 PM

DUE DATE AND DELIVERY LOCATION

Proposers may submit proposals electronically by uploading required documents at the City of Amarillo’s partner’s website, Euna Procurement. This Request for Proposals is for your convenience in submitting an offer for the specified services.

https://amarillo.bonfirehub.com/portal/?tab=openOpportunities

GENERAL CONDITIONS

LEGAL ADDRESSES:

All notices, letters, and other communications to you will be emailed or delivered to the respondent's business address or email address listed in your response. You may change the address or contact information at any time by email to the City of Amarillo.

INDEMNIFICATION:

Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, liabilities and expenses, Including penalties, fines, Judgments (including court costs, interest and reasonable attorney’s fees), of any kind arising out of the negligent acts, errors, or omissions of consultant, its employees, subcontractors or agents in performing services under this agreement. Consultant is to perform in a sound and professional manner by exercising the degree of care, skill, and diligence in https://amarillo.bonfirehub.com/portal/?tab=openOpportunities the performance of the services as is exercised by a professional under similar circumstances at the time such services are performed. This indemnity provided herein shall survive the expiration or termination of this agreement.

FUNDING OUT CLAUSE:

Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this agreement, each payment obligation of the City created by this agreement is conditioned upon the availability of funds that are appropriated or allocated by the Amarillo City Council for the payment of the product of functionally similar products. If sufficient funds are not allocated and are available for any subsequent fiscal year (October 1 to September 30) during the term of this agreement, the City may terminate this agreement or reduce its obligation to match the appropriate funding. The City shall notify the vendor that funds have not been appropriated by the City Council at the earliest possible time and this agreement will terminate or be reduced at the beginning of the fiscal year for which no funds or reduced funds have been appropriated by the City Council. No penalty shall be accrued to the City in the event this provision is exercised, and the City shall not be obligated or liable for any future payments due or for any damages because of termination or reduction under this section. This provision shall not be construed to permit the City to terminate or reduce this agreement in order to purchase, lease or rent similar equipment from another entity.

COOPERATIVE PURCHASING

The contract resulting from this solicitation will be available for use by all governmental entities, providing there is no conflict with any applicable statutes, rules, policies, or procedures. The governmental entities will have the option to use the pricing as agreed to within the resulting contract.

Governmental entities will issue their internal purchase orders directly to the contractor(s), however, shall reference and cite the City of Amarillo contract number (Solicitation number) within the purchase order document.

INSURANCE:

CONSULTANT will provide insurance coverage in accordance with CLIENT’S insurance requirements as set forth in the “Certificate of Insurance Requirements,” attached to this Agreement and by reference made a part hereof. If the required insurance is terminated, altered, or changed in a manner not acceptable to CLIENT, this Agreement may be terminated by CLIENT, without penalty, on written notice to CONSULTANT. In addition, CONSULTANT will provide Professional Liability Insurance in the amount of One Million and No/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per claim for this Agreement’s term.

PROPOSALS BECOME PUBLIC RECORDS; MARKING CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY

INFORMATION

During the evaluation process, the City of Amarillo treats all responses with the highest level of confidentiality. However, once the evaluation process has been completed and a contract is awarded, the entire procurement becomes public information. If you consider any portion of your response to be confidential and/or proprietary and that disclosure of its contents to competitors would cause you substantial competitive harm, then you must clearly identify those portions of your response by placing the term CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY in bold letters on the applicable page(s). The City of Amarillo will attempt to protect the identified portions from disclosure to the extent possible under the law. You will be given notice of any request for disclosure of the identified information and given the opportunity to support your claim of confidentiality before the Texas Attorney General.

QUESTIONS, CLARIFICATIONS and CORRESPONDENCE:

All questions and requests for clarification must be submitted to the Purchasing Agent in writing and will be answered by the Purchasing Agent in writing. No questions will be accepted or answered verbally. Except as provided in this section, upon issuance of this RFP, RFQ, or Bid vendors are specifically directed not to contact other City personnel, to include any Engineers or Architects and anyone other than purchasing personnel for answers to questions, clarifications, meeting, conferences, or technical discussions or anything else related to this RFP, RFQ, or Bid. Failure to strictly abide by this policy may result in the immediate disqualification of the vendor from this and other bidding opportunities.

Exempted from the no contact rule is the Pre-bid meeting, to which all of the registered vendors are invited. Pre-bid meetings can be either mandatory or non-mandatory. All questions presented at a Pre-bid meeting will be addressed in an aggregated Question and Answer document that will then be provided to all vendors at the same time.

If the answers do not change the information published in the original documents, they will be sent clarification only. If the answers do change the information published in the original documents, they will be sent an addendum. Addendums require signed acknowledgement of receipt of the addendum and submitted with the response to the RFP, RFQ, or Bid as instructed.

It is the responsibility of the respondent to verify if any addendum(s) or clarification(s) have been issued and to make sure the respondent has received all copies. Contact the Purchasing Department at 806-378-3028 to verify this information. Respondents may also go to our bidding platform, Euna (Bonfire) and register as a vendor with the City of Amarillo and to download a copy of the addendum or any other bidding documents. Addendums and clarifications will be posted to the bidding platform website.

All questions must be submitted at least 10 days prior to the bid due date. All questions will be answered at least 7 days prior to the bid due date. If the questions cannot be fully answered by that time, then, the closing date of the bid will be extended by addenda to allow sufficient time for all questions to be answered and those answers to be provided to all registered vendors. All questions must be submitted via bidding platform, Euna (formerly Bonfire). No questions will be answered by phone, orally or written outside of Bonfire.

ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF PROPOSALS:

The City of Amarillo reserves the right to accept or reject any or all responses or parts of responses, to waive any formalities and technicalities, and to accept the best evaluated response.

CANCELLATION:

The RFQ may be cancelled (in part or in its entirety) at any time with written notice by the City of Amarillo.

REIMBURSEMENTS:

There is no express or implied obligation for the City of Amarillo to reimburse respondents for any expenses incurred in preparing responses to this Request for Qualifications. The City of Amarillo will not reimburse respondents for these expenses, nor will the City of Amarillo pay any subsequent costs associated with the provision of any additional information or presentation, or to procure a contract for these services.

DISPUTES:

In case of any doubt or difference of opinion as to the services and deliverables herein, the decisions of the City of Amarillo shall be final and binding on both parties. The laws of the State of Texas will govern interpretation and performance of the obligations imposed on the parties pursuant to this order.

Further, the successful respondent agrees that the courts of the State of Texas shall have jurisdiction over the successful respondent with respect to any action brought by the City of Amarillo relating to the performance of the respondent’s obligation hereunder. Venue and jurisdiction of any suit, right or cause of action arising under or in connection with these specifications, shall lie exclusively in Potter County, Texas.

DEFAULT:

In case of default by the successful responder, the City of Amarillo may procure the services from other sources.

CONDITIONS FOR PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

All responses to this RFQ become the property of the City of Amarillo. The City of Amarillo will not return responses or other information supplied to the City of Amarillo.

All respondents shall comply with all conditions, requirements, and specifications contained herein.

Any departure will constitute sufficient cause for rejection of the response.

Responses are to contain a statement indicating the period during which the response will remain valid.

A period of not less than one hundred twenty (120) days is required.

FAMILIARITY WITH SCOPE OF WORK:

This RFQ is based on the Scope of Work and information included in this document. Prior to submission of any response, each respondent should be thoroughly familiar with the scope, information, and the general terms and conditions in this package. The failure or omission of any respondent to examine any form, instrument or document shall in no way relieve any respondent from any obligation in respect to his/her response. No allowance will be made because of lack of knowledge of this document. It is the responsibility of each respondent to ascertain the completeness of the information contained herein and thoroughly address those concerns in their response to this RFQ.

SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE:

This RFQ will require specific performance on all criteria as stated in your response. All specifications are as written unless specifically taken exception to by you. Any exception accepted by the City of Amarillo will be strictly adhered to. Responders must submit written requests for exceptions to any specifications/conditions with their response. Exceptions made without submission of a written request may result in disqualification.

PROHIBITION:

Do not submit pricing information. If pricing information is submitted, the response to the RFQ will not be considered.

SCOPE OF WORK

Scope of Work for Structural Assessment and Aquatic Market Viability Study:

Repair or Replacement of Aging Facilities

Project Budget - $100,000 Required Project Completion Date – August 2026

1. Introduction

This study will evaluate the market viability of repairing or replacing aquatic facilities. The primary and immediate focus of this study will be a comprehensive structural assessment of the Southeast and Southwest pools, as their condition will critically inform all subsequent market, financial, and feasibility analyses. The study will assess demand, financial sustainability, and operational feasibility to guide decisions on repairs, renovations, or new construction.

Facilities to be evaluated:

- Southeast Pool

- Southwest Pool

- Warford Activity Center Pool

- Splashpads o Benton Park o Bones Hooks Park o City View Park o Eastridge Park o El Alamo Park o Forest Hill Park o Gene Howe Park o Glenwood Park o Hamlet Park o John Ward Park o Memorial Park o San Jacinto Park o Southlawn Park o Southwest Pool o Westover Village Park

2. Objectives

• Conduct a full structural assessment of the Southeast and Southwest pools as a high-priority task to determine safety, remaining service life, and feasibility of repair.

• Assess market demand for aquatic services in the city and surrounding region.

• Compare the financial and operational feasibility of repairing versus replacing aging facilities.

• Identify revenue potential and funding sources for both repair and replacement options.

• Provide actionable recommendations based on market demand, financial sustainability, and long-term ROI.

3. Tasks and Deliverables

Task 1: Priority Structural Assessment – Southeast and Southwest Pools

• Comprehensive Structural Evaluation: Perform a full structural assessment of the Southeast and Southwest pools, including pool shells, decks, mechanical systems, building structures, building infrastructure (including plumbing, electrical, HVAC, and associated utility systems), foundations, and all supporting site infrastructure.

• Subsurface and Void Investigation: Perform additional investigations and testing, as necessary, to determine the presence, extent, and impact of subsurface voids and soil loss around and beneath the pools. Testing may include non-destructive evaluation methods and geotechnical exploration to fully characterize existing conditions.

• Risk and Longevity Analysis: Identify structural deficiencies, safety concerns, remaining useful life, and code compliance issues.

• Repair Feasibility Determination: Establish whether structural conditions support repair or necessitate full replacement.

Deliverables: A comprehensive structural assessment report for the Southeast and Southwest pools summarizing findings; results of subsurface and void investigations; mapped documentation of identified voids, including their location, estimated extent, and relative severity; repair feasibility conclusions; and order-of-magnitude cost considerations.

Task 2: Market Demand Analysis

• Demographic and Trend Analysis: Review population trends and aquatic service demand, including leisure, fitness, and competitive swimming.

• Competitive Landscape: Analyze local competitors (Amarillo and Canyon), including public and private pools, fitness centers, and recreation facilities.

• Usage Projections: Estimate current and future demand based on demographic trends and market needs.

Deliverables: Market demand and competitive landscape reports.

Task 3: Facility and Operational Assessment

• Facility Condition Review: Assess the physical condition of existing aquatic facilities, identifying necessary repairs and upgrades.

• Operational Review: Analyze the financial performance of existing facilities, including costs, revenues, and operational inefficiencies.

Deliverables: Facility condition and operational assessment reports.

Task 4: Repair vs. Replacement Market Viability

• Repair Viability: Evaluate the costs and benefits of repairing existing facilities, including upgrades and necessary repairs.

• Replacement Viability: Analyze the potential for new or replacement facilities, including design concepts, cost estimates, and market demand.

• Comparative Analysis: Compare the financial and operational benefits of repairing versus replacing facilities if repairs/replacement are determined to be viable.

Deliverables: Repair vs. replacement market viability report.

Task 5: Financial Feasibility and Funding

• Revenue Potential: Estimate potential revenue from new programs, memberships, and facility usage.

• Life-Cycle Cost Analysis: Conduct a cost analysis for both repairs and replacement, factoring in long-term operational costs and potential returns.

• Staffing and Operations Plan: Develop a preliminary staffing and operations plan for replacement pools and/or modified existing facilities, including recommended staffing levels, operational schedules, maintenance requirements, and associated costs.

• Programming and Service Model Review: Evaluate and recommend potential changes to programming, service delivery, and facility use to optimize community benefit and financial performance.

• Funding Options: Identify funding sources such as grants, bonds, and public-private partnerships.

Deliverables: A comprehensive financial feasibility, funding, and operational report outlining revenue projections, life-cycle cost comparisons, staffing and operations plans, programming recommendations, and identified funding strategies.

Task 6: Evaluation of Repair and Replacement of Splashpads

• Splashpad Demand and Usage Analysis

Assess current and future demand for splashpads, considering population trends and community interest. Review usage patterns, including peak times and areas with underserved demand.

• Facility Condition and Operational Review

Evaluate the physical condition of existing splashpads, identifying repair needs and operational inefficiencies.

Assess maintenance costs, water usage, and user satisfaction.

• Repair vs. Replacement Viability

Analyze the feasibility and cost of repairing versus replacing splashpads. Compare long-term costs, water efficiency, and community impact for both options.

• Quantity and Location Recommendations

Recommend the ideal number and locations for splashpads based on demand analysis and accessibility. Prioritize areas with high foot traffic, young families, and underserved regions to ensure equitable access.

• Alignment with Parks Master Plan

Ensure all splashpad recommendations—including repair, replacement, expansion, consolidation, or relocation—are evaluated for consistency with the City’s adopted Parks Master Plan goals, service standards, capital improvement priorities, and long-term vision for park system development.

• Deliverables:

o Splashpad demand and usage report.

o Facility condition and operational assessment.

o Repair vs. replacement analysis.

o Quantity and location recommendations aligned with the Parks Master Plan.

Task 7: Final Report and Recommendations

• Draft Report: Compile all findings into a draft report for review.

• Final Report: Provide a final report with actionable recommendations and an implementation roadmap.

Deliverables: Final market viability study report with recommendations.

4. Deliverables Summary

• Priority structural assessment of the Southeast and Southwest pools.

• A comprehensive structural assessment of the Southeast and Southwest pools, including subsurface investigations and void mapping.

• Market demand and competitive analysis for aquatic services within the city and surrounding region.

• Facility condition and operational assessments for existing aquatic facilities and splashpads.

• Comparative repair versus replacement viability analysis with cost considerations.

• Financial feasibility analysis, including staffing, operations, programming recommendations, and funding strategies.

• A final integrated Market Viability and Structural Assessment Report with actionable recommendations and an implementation plan.

5. Team Qualifications Requirement

• The selected consultant team must include a licensed structural engineer with demonstrated experience in the evaluation and assessment of swimming pools and other aquatic facilities.

• Minimum qualifications include:

o Professional licensure as a structural engineer in the applicable jurisdiction.

o Documented experience conducting structural evaluations of aquatic facilities, including pool shells, decks, foundations, buildings and associated infrastructure.

o Experience assessing aging or deteriorating aquatic facilities to determine remaining service life, safety risks, and feasibility of repair versus replacement.

o Ability to provide defensible, engineering-based conclusions that directly inform capital planning and market viability decisions.

• The structural engineer shall play a direct and active role in Task 1 and support subsequent feasibility analyses as required.

RFQ RESPONSE ELEMENTS AND FORMAT

The City requires comprehensive responses to every section within this RFQ. To facilitate the review of the responses, Respondents shall follow the described response format. The intent of the response format requirements is to expedite review and evaluation. It is not the intent to constrain Respondents with regard to content, but to assure that the specific requirements set forth in this RFQ are addressed in a uniform manner amenable to review and evaluation. A response that does not provide all the information requested below may be deemed non-responsive. Your response must concisely contain sufficient information to assure the City of its accuracy and any additional information necessary to summarize the overall benefit of the response to the City. Proposals must include the following information in the order listed:

• Cover Sheet

• Table of Contents

• Response to Scope of Work

• Relevant Experience

• References

• Project Timeline

• Response to the Selection Submittals & Description of the Selection Criteria

NOTE: The response should not exceed the maximum of 35 pages.

Include any information deemed pertinent that has not been included elsewhere in the response.

EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS

After the responses are opened on the stated date and time, they will be reviewed for responsiveness by the Purchasing Department. In order for a response to be considered responsive to this RFQ, it must conform to all the substantial material terms and conditions required herein. A response that does not so conform will be declared non-responsive and will not be further evaluated.

The responsive replies will undergo a second evaluation conducted by members of the Evaluation Committee. The committee will evaluate the responses based upon the following evaluation criteria and scoring matrix. The respondent selected for award will ultimately be chosen on the basis of the best evaluated response by the City of Amarillo.

EVALUATION CRITERIA:

This proposal will be awarded to the best evaluated proposer. The following scoring will be used to evaluate each proposer’s response to the RFQ. Evaluation criteria are not necessarily listed in the order of importance. The City reserves the right to weigh its evaluation criteria in any manner it deems appropriate and to create a shortlist of candidates to be invited to interview. In addition, the City reserves the right to reject any or all RFQ responses and too waive informalities and irregularities in RFQ responses received. Final approval of contract award is subject to the action of the Amarillo City Council.

A. Response to Scope of Work: Proposal must respond to Scope of Work 35 pts

B. Relevant Experience: Proposal should include previous experience and qualifications of your business. You may provide additional pertinent information relevant to the project for which you are submitting this proposal in an appendix

35 pts

C. References: Your proposal should list 2 references that may be contacted during the evaluation phase of this RFQ. If your references do not respond to our request for information, you may receive a score of 1

10 pts

D. Project Timeline: Number of days to evaluate and assess market demand for aquatic services in the city and surrounding region per the objectives outlined in the Scope of Work.

20 pts

E. Maximum Possible Score 100 pts

PRESENTATIONS & NEGOTIATIONS:

Contract negotiations may be conducted with responsible respondents who submit Qualifications that are reasonably susceptible of being selected. Respondents reasonably susceptible of being selected based on criteria set forth in this RFQ may be given an opportunity to make a presentation and/or interview with the Evaluation Committee. Following any presentation and/or interviews, firms will be ranked in order of preference and contract negotiations will begin with the top ranked respondent.

Should negotiations with the highest ranked respondent fail to yield a contract, or if the respondent is unable to execute said contract, negotiations will be formally ended and then commence with the second highest ranked respondent, etc. However, the City of Amarillo reserves the right, within its sole discretion, to award a contract without presentations or interviews, based solely on information supplied in the RFQ responses.

AWARD OF CONTRACT

CONTRACT FORM:

Please submit a sample contract that your company uses for this service. We will work with the selected respondent to negotiate a contract that is acceptable to both parties. If there is a conflict with the contract and the proposal, the proposal will prevail. All other documents including the original Request for Qualifications package together with all addendums and clarifications and the successful respondents bid documents will be included by reference.

NOTE: the form of contract and business points will be negotiated with the successful proposer.

ASSIGNMENT OF PROPOSAL / CONTRACT:

Once the Contract is awarded to the successful Respondent, the Respondent cannot assign or subcontract the work or any part thereof, without the previous written consent of the City of Amarillo, which shall not be unreasonably withheld.

CONTRACT DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS:

After the proposal has been awarded by the City of Amarillo, the Purchasing Department will send the awarded respondent a Notice of Award which will include a contract and a listing of other documentation required prior to fully executing the contract. Upon receipt of this notice, the vendor will have ten (10) calendar days to provide the Purchasing Department with all of the insurance, signed contracts and any other documentation that is required by the terms and conditions of the proposal. The Contracts must be signed by the City of Amarillo, insurance, and all other conditions required by the terms and conditions of the proposal must also be met before any work may begin. If there is failure to demonstrate good faith effort in providing the necessary documentation, then the respondent will be considered to have abandoned his proposal. The proposal will then be considered as non-responsive and may be promptly re-awarded to the next best evaluated proposal.

DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION:

Respondent will be required to certify that neither it nor its principals are currently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in the Contract resulting from these specifications by any federal department or agency. This will be included as part of the City of Amarillo Vendor Acknowledgement Form.

INDEBTEDNESS TO THE CITY OF AMARILLO:

Per City Ordinance No. 6706, the City of Amarillo will not award a proposal to vendors who are delinquent in any indebtedness to this City.

CITY EXCLUDED PARTIES LIST:

Please note the City’s Excluded Parties List attached and submit your bid accordingly. It will apply to this City of Amarillo RFQ.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

Per the terms of Chapter 176 of the Local Government Code, should any vendor be awarded all or any part of the goods or services on which this Proposal solicits a return, then it is the vendor’s sole responsibility to provide the City of Amarillo, with an updated Conflict of Interest Questionnaire, Form CIQ. The vendor must file the updated form within 7 days after learning that a prior filing (if any) is no longer accurate. This form and the names of the City Council Members, Mayor, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, and Assistant City Managers is available on the City’s website located at www.amarillo.gov

FORM 1295

Effective January 1, 2016, The Texas Legislature adopted House Bill 1295, which added Section

2252.908 of the Government Code. The law states that a governmental entity or state agency may not enter into certain contracts with a business entity unless the business entity submits a disclosure of interested parties (Form 1295) to the governmental entity or state agency at the time the business entity submits the signed contract to the governmental entity or state agency. The Texas Ethics Commission has adopted rules requiring the business entity to file form 1295 electronically with the Commission. Before the City of Amarillo will enter into a binding agreement with a business, that said business must submit form 1295. The said business must go to www.ethics.state.tx.us to file the reports electronically. Once the said business has filed the report electronically the said business will print a copy of the form and submit back to the City with the signed copy of the contracts. Once the City has received the copy of the submitted form 1295 and acknowledged the form on the Texas Ethics Commission website the City will execute the Contract.

ETHICS-ENERGY BOYCOTT

Texas Government Code, Chapter 809, prohibits a governmental entity from entering into a contract for goods and services with a company that has 10 or more employees, and the contract is of $100,000 value or greater. Vendor certifies that it (1) does not boycott energy companies; and (2) will not boycott energy companies during the term of the contract.

ETHICS- FIREARMS DISCRIMINATION

Texas Government Code, Chapter 2274, prohibits a governmental entity from entering into a contract http://www.amarillo.gov/ https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/ for goods and services with a company that has 10 or more employees, and the contract is of $100,00 value or greater. Vendor certifies that it: (1) does not have a practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association; and (2) will not discriminate during the term of the contract against a firearm entity or firearm trade association

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment “A” Respondent Signature page

Attachment “B” References

Attachment “C” City of Amarillo Vendor Acknowledgement Form

Attachment “D” City Excluded Parties List

PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS
Bid No.

PROHIBITION:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .