Market Survey 697DCK-26-X-XXXXX EFS II Matrix v4.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 697DCK-26-X-XXXXX
About this file
This is a Market Survey Matrix spreadsheet supporting a Request for Information (RFI) for Enterprise Financial Services (EFS) II issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The matrix appears to be designed to track and organize vendor responses and capability assessments across the EFS II marketplace survey initiative. The survey aims to inform industry of the FAA's intent to conduct a competitive source selection for enterprise financial services, assess interest and capabilities among qualified providers, determine whether adequate competition exists to support a small business set-aside, request comments on the draft Statement of Work, and gather industry input to finalize the FAA's EFS II acquisition strategy and documentation. The anticipated NAICS code is 541219 (Other Accounting Services).
Responses to the RFI are limited to 30 pages in PDF format using Times New Roman 12-point font and must be submitted at the respondent's sole expense, as the FAA will not reimburse preparation costs. The FAA emphasizes that responses are for informational purposes only and do not constitute a commitment to contract. This is a pre-solicitation market survey under FAA Acquisition Management System Section 3.2.1.2.1, and no vendor evaluation will occur during this phase. The FAA retains sole discretion to contact respondents for additional information and to determine the competitive approach for the subsequent formal solicitation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Market Survey 697DCK-26-X-XXXXX - EFS II Matrix 20260630 v3.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Enterprise Financial Services II Statement of Work (SOW).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Comment ID | Date Received | SOW Section Reference | Page Number | Comment Type | Vendor Comment / Question | Internal Owner | Discipline / Function | AFM/ACQ Response Required By | Final Response (AFM/ACQ) | Resolution Status | Response Issued Date | SOW Revision Required? | Document Updated | Addendum Number | Priority / Risk Level | Notes / Action Items |
| 1 | 6/9/25 | Would the FAA consider adding NAICS code 541611 Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services to the solicitation? This NAICS code is from the first EFS FAA CO Announcement. This NAICS code has a broader scope than 541219 Other Accounting Services and covers all of the current and prospective taskings on EFS II. | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | For the time being the FAA is only consider using 541219. | |||||||||||
| 2 | 6/9/25 | When does the FAA plan to release the EFS II SIR and award the EFS II contracts? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | The FAA does not have a definite date. However, please continue to monitor SAM.gov. | |||||||||||
| 3 | 6/9/25 | Does the FAA intend to maintain two (2) separate contract awards—one for small business and one for large business—under EFS II? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 4 | 6/9/25 | Does the FAA intend to make a single award or multiple awards for the small business and large business contract pools under EFS II? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 5 | 6/9/25 | If multiple awards are made, will task orders be competed among all awardees or will the FAA use another process to select task order awardees? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 6 | 6/9/25 | Will the FAA permit cross-teaming between small business and large business offerors? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 7 | 6/9/25 | Does the FAA anticipate any organizational conflict of interest (OCI) restrictions? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 8 | 6/9/25 | The draft SOW includes DOT-wide ordering authority under the Economy Act. Does the FAA anticipate DOT operating administrations utilizing the EFS II contract? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 9 | 6/9/25 | Will the task order types available under EFS II include labor hour, T&M, and fixed price, or will they all be fixed price? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 10 | 6/11/25 | The predecessor EFS contract used NAICS 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services). EFS II uses NAICS 541219 (Other Accounting Services). Given that the nine work areas span budget operations, financial operations, program and project management, training, strategic planning and investment analysis, risk management, and administrative services, would FAA clarify why there is a NAICS change? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 11 | 6/11/25 | The Market Survey notes that one purpose is to assess whether adequate competition exists to set the procurement aside among small businesses. What factors will the Government weigh in deciding between a full set-aside, partial set-aside, or full and open competition? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | This is determined by who repsonds to the market survey whether it be large or small businesses who are capable of doing the work. | |||||||||||
| 12 | 6/11/25 | Section C.3.7 of the RFI lists activities including developing risk taxonomies and lexicons, recommending governance structures, and monitoring risk indicators. Would FAA clarify whether Work Area 7 is intended as enterprise risk management (agency-level ERM framework development and monitoring) or program-level risk management embedded in project management support? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 13 | 6/9/25 | Does the government intend to award a single-award or multiple-award? We understand the current EFS is a multi-award, but did not want to assume this new procurement would be the same. | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 14 | 6/1/25 | Can you please share incumbent? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | Large: Ernst & Young, Small Business: Cexec | |||||||||||
| 15 | 6/11/25 | Will the government consider providing an extension to the RFI submission date, allowing vendors to fully consider and incorporate the government’s responses to questions once released. | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | Yes | |||||||||||
| 16 | 6/11/25 | Question #2 includes the sentence "If applicable, describe how the approaches outlined in your response to the first question proved successful in performing these services." Is the government's intent for vendors to describe the specific performance and customer satisfaction measures/indicators that their federal clients used to monitor the quality of services provided under the contracts cited as past performance examples in the response to Question #2? If not, would the government clarify the intent for Question #2? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | Please describe your past performance. | |||||||||||
| 17 | 6/11/26 | For planning purposes, can the FAA confirm the primary financial system(s) of record and the main budget/financial tools in scope for EFS II (e.g., Delphi or other DOT/FAA systems), so that respondents can accurately describe their capabilities and avoid assumptions in their responses? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | This has not been determined at this time; two systems that are currently used are PRISM & Delphi. | |||||||||||
| 18 | 6/11/26 | Section C.1.4 notes that DOT components beyond FAA may place orders under EFS II. Does FAA anticipate significant use by other DOT organizations, and if so, are there particular types of services (e.g., internal controls, budget operations, strategic analysis) they are most likely to request? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 19 | 6/11/26 | Can FAA confirm whether contractors under EFS II will be expected to develop training that is delivered through one or more existing LMS platforms, and whether there are any preferred formats or standards for training content that respondents should assume? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 20 | 6/10/26 | Will EFS II be structured as a single IDIQ contract or a suite of separate contracts? If a single vehicle, will task orders be competed among all awardees or directed to specific contractors? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 21 | 6/10/26 | Does the FAA anticipate setting aside EFS II exclusively for small businesses, or will large businesses be permitted to compete as primes or in joint ventures/teaming agreements with small businesses? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 22 | 6/10/26 | What is the anticipated total ceiling value and estimated ordering period (base years plus options) for EFS II? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 23 | 6/10/26 | Will all nine work areas described in the SOW be available under every task order, or will task orders be issued against specific work areas only? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 24 | 6/10/26 | Will the FAA require offerors to demonstrate capability in all nine work areas to be eligible for award, or may offerors compete for a subset of work areas? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 25 | 6/10/26 | Will EFS II be competed through the existing eFAST vehicle or through a new procurement vehicle? If a new vehicle, what is the anticipated SIR/RFP release timeline? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | It is not anticipated that EFS will be competed through eFAST but this has not been determined at this time. | |||||||||||
| 26 | 6/10/26 | Will the FAA create a small business award for EFS II? If so, will it be a set aside or open competition? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 27 | 6/10/26 | If the FAA creates a small business (SB) award under EFS II, will a large Prime pursuing EFS II as a large be allowed to team with a SB to compete for the SB award? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 28 | 6/10/26 | The SOW states this is an agency-wide contract and any FAA office may order. Will there be a designated ordering approval process, or may any FAA program office place task orders directly against the contract without further authorization? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 29 | 6/10/26 | Section C.1.4 excludes software development and custom configuration of COTS products. Does this exclusion apply to Tableau or Power BI dashboard development, or are data visualization and financial analytics tools within scope? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | Data visualization and financial analytics tools are within scope | |||||||||||
| 30 | 6/10/26 | Will individual task orders be issued as firm fixed price, time-and-materials, or labor hour contracts, or will the ordering contracting officer determine contract type at the task order level? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 31 | 6/10/26 | Does the Section 508 compliance requirement apply to all contractor deliverables—including internal reports, briefings, dashboards, and training materials—or only to products that will be publicly distributed or posted on FAA-accessible websites? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 32 | 6/10/26 | Will the FAA provide a Section 508 test environment or accessibility testing tools for contractor use, or is the contractor expected to procure and operate its own testing infrastructure? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 33 | 6/10/26 | Will the contractor perform OMB Circular A-123 internal control testing independently, or will it support FAA personnel who lead the testing? Please clarify the expected contractor-versus-Government role split for testing and analysis activities described in C.3.2.1.1 and C.3.2.1.2. | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 34 | 6/10/26 | How many open internal control findings or corrective action plans are currently active across the FAA offices expected to use EFS II? This information will help offerors estimate level of effort for deficiency remediation work under C.3.2.2 | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 35 | 6/10/26 | Will the contractor have access to FAA's internal audit management system (e.g., TeamMate or equivalent) to track corrective action plans, or is the contractor expected to maintain tracking in its own tools with periodic reporting to the COR? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 36 | 6/10/26 | Does the FAA require project managers assigned to EFS II task orders to hold a PMP or FAC-P/PM certification? If so, at what certification level—Entry, Mid, or Senior—and must certification be in place at assignment or within a defined period thereafter? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 37 | 6/10/26 | Will program governance activities under C.3.3.1.1 involve oversight of recipients of FAA program funds (e.g., grant recipients, interagency partners)? If so, how many recipient entities are anticipated, and what audit or compliance review activities will the contractor be expected to support? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 38 | 6/10/26 | How many FAA offices or program organizations are expected to receive budget formulation and execution support under EFS II? Is the scope limited to ABA and AFN, or does it extend to all FAA Lines of Business and regional offices? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 39 | 6/10/26 | Does contractor support for reimbursable agreements include formation activities—drafting MOUs, preparing Economy Act determinations, coordinating interagency agreement documentation—or only execution and administration monitoring after agreements are in place? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 40 | 6/10/26 | Approximately how many active reimbursable agreements does the FAA anticipate requiring contractor support to administer at any given time under EFS II? This information will help offerors develop accurate staffing estimates. | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 41 | 6/10/26 | Will workforce analysis and PC&B support be limited to the ABA/AFN workforce, or is it intended to extend to other FAA Lines of Business and program offices that order under EFS II? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 42 | 6/10/26 | Will the contractor be responsible for coordinating posting of online training content to FAA's Learning Management System (LMS), or will FAA staff handle LMS administration while the contractor develops and hands off the content? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 43 | 6/10/26 | Approximately how many training events (courses, workshops, briefings) per year does the FAA anticipate requiring under EFS II, and what is the expected range of audience size per event? This will help offerors estimate staffing and level of effort for Work Area 5. | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 44 | 6/10/26 | Will the FAA provide existing training content as Government-furnished information (GFI), or will the contractor be expected to develop all training materials from the ground up? Will GFI include prior course materials, subject matter expert access, and learning objectives? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | This has not been determined at this time - it is anticipated that the FAA will want to leverage exisiting training. | |||||||||||
| 45 | 6/10/26 | Will contractor staff be required to work on-site at FAA facilities, or will remote and hybrid telework arrangements be permitted? If on-site work is required, at which FAA locations (e.g., FAA Headquarters, 800 Independence Ave. SW; Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center; regional offices)? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | Hybrid | |||||||||||
| 46 | 6/10/26 | Will staff assigned to budget execution tasks be required to hold active Federal Appropriations Law certification at the time of assignment, or may they obtain certification within a specified grace period after assignment begins? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 47 | 6/10/26 | Where a contractor incorporates pre-existing proprietary tools, templates, or methodologies into Government work products, will the contractor retain limited rights in that pre-existing intellectual property, or does incorporation into a deliverable result in unlimited Government rights over all embedded content? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 48 | 6/9/26 | Is the FAA considering a single-award or multiple-award contract structure for EFS II? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 49 | 6/9/26 | Can FAA provide estimated staffing levels, labor category mix, and anticipated annual funding levels associated with EFS II? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | The FAA labor category staffing levels will be introduced during the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 50 | 6/9/26 | Can the FAA provide information regarding the current contract(s), including contractor name(s), approximate contract value, and staffing levels supporting these services today? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | 693KA9-19-D-00004 (ERNST & YOUNG LLP) / 693KA9-19-D-00005 (CEXEC Inc): Total award value: $483,661,447.00 | |||||||||||
| 51 | 6/9/26 | Approximately what percentage of anticipated effort is expected across each of the nine work areas? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | This has yet to be determined. | |||||||||||
| 52 | 6/9/26 | Does FAA anticipate primarily on-site, hybrid, or remote support for EFS II? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | Hybrid. | |||||||||||
| 53 | 6/9/26 | Will support be centralized within FAA Headquarters organizations or distributed across multiple FAA facilities nationwide? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | Distributed across multiple FAA Facilities. | |||||||||||
| 54 | 6/9/26 | Will the final solicitation include a transition-in period, and if so, what duration is anticipated? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 55 | 6/9/26 | How does FAA envision knowledge transfer and continuity requirements between incumbent and successor contractors? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | The FAA envisions a fluid transfer of knowledge between vendors. | |||||||||||
| 56 | 6/9/26 | How does FAA anticipate weighting direct FAA financial management experience versus broader federal financial management experience? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | The FAA will value both alike. | |||||||||||
| 57 | 6/9/26 | The RFI references innovation and measurable cost savings. Are there specific modernization initiatives, automation efforts, or financial transformation objectives FAA seeks to emphasize under EFS II? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | The FAA is seeking overall general cost savings. | |||||||||||
| 58 | 6/9/26 | What are the FAA's primary objectives for EFS II that differ from the current approach or existing contracts supporting financial management services? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 59 | 6/9/26 | Given the highly specialized nature of FAA financial and budget operations, how does FAA intend to evaluate and ensure continuity of institutional knowledge during contract transition? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | The FAA will determine the continuity of knowledge during the 90 day transition period. | |||||||||||
| 60 | 6/9/26 | Can FAA identify the primary financial, budget, reporting, and business intelligence systems anticipated to be used under EFS II? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | PRISM & Delphi. | |||||||||||
| 61 | 6/10/26 | Does FAA anticipate EFS II will be awarded as a multiple-award vehicle? If so, are there current projections for the number of awardees? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 62 | 6/10/26 | Does FAA anticipate separate award pools or tracks, such as Full and Open and Small Business? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 63 | 6/10/26 | If separate tracks are established, may a large business prime the Full and Open track and also subcontract to a Small Business prime on the Small Business track? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 64 | 6/10/26 | Is FAA seeking to expand the number of vendors available under EFS II compared to the current EFS vehicle? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 65 | 6/10/26 | Will FAA evaluate proposed team capabilities using both prime contractor and subcontractor experience? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 66 | 6/10/26 | May offerors demonstrate coverage of EFS II work areas through a combination of prime and subcontractor experience? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 67 | 6/10/26 | Will FAA consider federal internal controls, audit readiness, A-123, and remediation experience from non-FAA agencies as relevant? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 68 | 6/10/26 | Will FAA consider financial systems support, reporting, data analysis, and process automation experience relevant to financial and accounting operations? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 69 | 6/10/26 | Does FAA expect EFS II contractors to support financial reporting automation, dashboards, and data-quality improvement? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 70 | 6/10/26 | Does FAA want offerors to describe how they would bring new ideas for future task orders, including automation, analytics, and process improvement opportunities? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 71 | 6/10/26 | The RFQ appears to contemplate a single award for this OCDIO Digital Factory Capacity Task Order. Please confirm whether the Government intends to make one task order award under this RFQ, or whether the Government reserves the right to make multiple awards, partial awards, or separate capacity task order awards by work area, team size, OM&E scope, Operating Administration, or other grouping | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 72 | 6/10/26 | Please confirm whether the Government imposes any teaming exclusivity restrictions for this RFQ. Specifically, may the same subcontractor, consultant, or teaming partner participate on more than one offeror’s quotation, provided all actual or potential Organizational Conflicts of Interest are disclosed and mitigated as required? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 73 | 6/10/26 | Because the PWS describes a scalable Digital Factory / Capacity-as-a-Service model supporting DOT Operating Administrations, please clarify whether the Government anticipates issuing future OCDIO Digital Factory capacity task orders under SWES using the same or similar structure, and whether future task orders may be segmented by Operating Administration, platform, work area, team size, or other capacity grouping | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | |||||||||||
| 74 | 6/10/26 | Does the FAA anticipate that responses to this Draft will be used as a 'down select' for identifying potential contractors for a targeted release? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | To Be Determined (TBD) at the solicitation phase. | |||||||||||
| 75 | Would the Government provide preferred labor categories, minimum qualifications, or key personnel requirements for each work area? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | ||||||||||||
| 76 | Would the Government confirm the final solicitation will identify key personnel requirements? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | ||||||||||||
| 77 | Would the Government confirm that the contractor’s internal corporate information systems, if required to be used to perform this work and handle controlled unclassified information (CUI), are only required to comply with National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-171 and Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.204-21, and that the strict adherence to NIST SP 800-53, Revision (Rev.) 5 controls is solely applicable to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) application being assessed? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | ||||||||||||
| 78 | Would the Government confirm the final SOW will include a deliverables list, frequency, acceptance criteria, and expected review timelines? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | ||||||||||||
| 79 | Would the Government provide examples of the types of “Other financial, budget, and management-related activities” anticipated under Work Area 9? Should this area be viewed primarily as surge support, special projects, emerging requirements, studies and analyses, or all of the above? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | ||||||||||||
| 80 | Would the Government provide the anticipated volume for administrative services, including meeting support, correspondence, action tracking, and document management?SOW C.3.8 | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | ||||||||||||
| 81 | Will the incumbent be required to support structured transition activities, including document transfer, process walkthroughs, current-state briefings, and status of open actions? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | The FAA will determine the continuity of knowledge during the 90 day transition period. | ||||||||||||
| 82 | Does the Government anticipate a single award or multiple award structure, and will tasking be managed through task orders, work authorizations, or a consolidated performance model? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | ||||||||||||
| 83 | Would the Government provide historical workload volumes for recurring reports, task requests, meetings, corrective actions, or administrative support activities? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | TBD | ||||||||||||
| 84 | Could you also please confirm that we’re permitted to use a smaller, legible font size for headers, footers, footnotes, tables, and any graphics, provided that all substantive narrative text is in 12-point Times New Roman? | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | Yes, you're permitted to use a smaller font size for headers, footnotes, tables, and graphics. | ||||||||||||
| 85 | Please confirm that the title page, cover letter, and table of contents of the RFI response would be excluded from the 30 page response limit. | Stephen Young/Karina Espinosa/Sharief Williams | 6/26/26 | The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) confirms that the title page, cover letter, and table of contents are excluded from the 30 page limit. |
Sheet2
| Comment ID | Unique identifier for each comment/question (e.g., Q001, C001). |
| Company Name | Name of the respondent/vendor submitting the comment. |
| Contact Name | Individual who submitted the comment. |
| Contact Email | For follow-up if clarification is needed. |
| Date Received | Date the comment was submitted. |
| SOW Section Reference | Section, paragraph, table, or attachment being referenced. |
| Page Number | Page number in the SOW package. |
| Comment Type | Question, Clarification, Exception, Recommendation, Commercial, Technical, Legal, etc. |
| Vendor Comment / Question | Full text of the comment or question. |
| Internal Owner | Team member responsible for preparing the response. |
| Discipline / Function | Engineering, Contracts, Procurement, Legal, Operations, Finance, etc. |
| Response Required By | Internal due date for drafting a response. |
| Proposed Response | Draft answer under review. |
| Final Response | Approved response to be issued to all vendors. |
| Resolution Status | Open, In Review, Pending Clarification, Approved, Closed. |
| Response Issued Date | Date the final response was communicated. |
| SOW Revision Required? | Yes/No. |
| Document Updated | Reference to revised section, addendum, or amendment. |
| Addendum Number | If the response resulted in an official addendum. |
| Priority / Risk Level | High, Medium, Low. |
| Notes / Action Items | Additional tracking information. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .