31. c Customer Satisfaction Survey.pdf
PDF 87 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Elevator Maintenance Miami FAA Locations Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 697DCK-18-R-00088
About this file
31. c Customer Satisfaction Survey (pdf)
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3.f Elevator SOW ZMA and MIA ATCT 2 locations.pdf | ||
| 9. Wage Determination SCA.pdf | ||
| 16. 697DCK-18-R-00088 posted on 19 DEC 17.pdf | ||
| 16. 697DCK-18-R-00088 posted on 19 DEC 17.pdf | ||
| 31. c Customer Satisfaction Survey.pdf | ||
| 9. Wage Determination SCA.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION I ‐‐TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR AND PROVIDED TO THE CUSTOMER REFERENCE
Name of Firm Being Evaluated: ___________________________________________________________________
Project Title & Location: ______________________________________________________
Project Dollar Value: _______________________________
Year Completed: _____________ Project Manager: _______________________________________________
SECTION 2 ‐‐TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CUSTOMER REFERENCE AND MAILED, HAND‐DELIVERED OR FAXED
DIRECTLY TO: Forms submitted by other than the customer (i.e., by the offeror), will not be considered.
DOT/FAA or bill.lockard@faa.gov
Bill Lockard AAQ51 0
170 I Columbia Ave.
College Park, GA 30337
OVERVIEW: The firm shown above has submitted a proposal on a Federal Aviation Administration solicitation and provided your name as a customer reference. Part of our evaluation process requires information on the firm's past performance. Your input is important to us and responses are required by (date & time) for inclusion in this evaluation. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
In blocks below, please indicate your overall level of satisfaction with work performed by the firm shown in Section I. Mark Not
Applicable (N/A) for any areas that do not apply. Provide any additional comments on page 2.
1= Poor, 5 = Outstanding
1. Kept You Informed & Treated You as Important Member of the Team
2. Displayed Flexibility in Responding to Your Needs
3. Displayed Initiative in Problem Solving
4. Resolved Your Concerns
5. Completed Your Project Milestones on Time
6. Managed the Project Effectively (including adequate Cost Controls)
7. Managed their Work Force Effectively (including Subcontractors)
8. Maintained an Effective Quality Control Program
9. Provided Warranty Support
10. Maintained Operational Continuity at Existing Facility During Project
11. Minimized Adverse Construction Impacts on Ongoing Operations
12. Your OVERALL Level of Customer Satisfaction
13. Was payment withheld or liquidated damages assessed? (If yes, please describe below). Yes No N/A
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY (PAGE l OF 2)
697DCK‐18‐R‐00088
On this project, the firm:
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
14. REMARKS: (Please speak to the QUALITY OF PRODUCT PRODUCED / ADHERENCE TO PROJECT SCHEDULE and
PROJECT MANAGEMENT)
Your Name: _________________________________________ Phone Number: ____________________________
Firm Name: __________________________________________________________
Relationship to this Project: ______________________________________________________________
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY (PAGE 2 OF 2)
697DCK‐18‐R‐00088
File details come from the government source that posted it.