6973GH-23-R-00003 Questions and Answers_1.31.23.pdf
PDF 72 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MMAC Quesada Gate Upgrade
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-23-R-00003
About this file
This document contains questions and answers related to solicitation 6973GH-23-R-00003 for the MMAC Quesada Gate Upgrade project. The solicitation is for general construction services to upgrade security gates at the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Key project details include a 365-day period of performance, specifications in Volumes 1 and 2 applying to guard house construction, adjusted striping quantities provided, and disregard of references to Package B. Offerors must meet concrete installer qualifications and provide past performance surveys from a minimum of three projects valued over $1.5 million completed within the last five years directly to the contracting office by the amended due date of February 3, 2023. Questions are due by January 19, 2023 and must be submitted in writing to the email address provided.
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
6973GH-23-R-00003 Quesada Gate Upgrade
Date: January 31, 2023
Questions and Answers:
1. Are there specifications for the guard house?
Government Response: Yes. Specification Volumes 1 and 2 apply to the guard house.
2. Does the OKC prequal list satisfy the ACI concrete finisher requirement?
Government Response: No. The concrete installer/finisher for structural concrete at the guard house facility must meet the installer qualifications indicated in Specification Section 033000.
3. The offer guarantee is not checked.
Government Response: The offer guarantee has been checked and noted on Amendment 0002.
4. Could the proposal due date be extended to February 7, 2023?
Government Response: Due date is extended to February 3, 2023
5. On Past Performance, would CPARS be accepted?
Government Response: Follow the instructions in Section L and criteria in Section M.
6. On sheet ES1-102 General Note A: refers to sheets C5-60, 113, 114. In each volume of plans the civil sheets are “C#” example volume 4 would be C4. Sheet C5-60 is not in any of the provided plans and there is not a volume 5 that would have C5-60. Can you please provide these documents?
Government Response: Sheet ES1-102 and references to C5-## drawings are for package B only.
These sheets are not a part of the scope.
7. In multiple Volumes of the Quesada Gate drawings there are items referencing bid “package B” but on the pricing sheet provided on sam.gov the CLIN breakdown only has 1 line item. Are we supposed to price out package B included in package A
Government Response: Disregard references to Package B. It is not a part of the scope.
8. Some of the quantities associated with striping on addendum 1 are not accurate to the striping plan shown.
Government Response: Corrected quantities are as follows:
Traffic Stripe 4” Yellow – 1,445 L.F.
Traffic Stripe 4” White – 324 L.F.
Traffic Stripe 8” White – 1,462 L.F.
Traffic Stripe 12” White – 936 L.F.
Traffic Stripe 24” White – 56 L.F.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .