2024.02.07 SIR Q&As 447-449.pdf

PDF 126 KB Posted

Attached to
Air Traffic Engineering and Program Support (ATEPS) II Screening Information Request Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
693KA9-24-R-00005
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Headquarters

About this file

This document contains a screening information request (SIR) for the Air Traffic Engineering and Program Support (ATEPS) II contract along with related questions and answers. The Federal Aviation Administration is seeking support for program management, system engineering, development, and implementation efforts for its NextGen programs and systems. Interested vendors must respond to the ATEPS II SIR by the specified deadline solely through the dedicated FAA email address provided, with no phone inquiries accepted. The SIR includes draft sections A through M and attachments in a zip folder, as well as previously issued questions and answers linked in a related notice. The incumbent contractor is ATEPS I. No pricing or award date details are provided in this SIR document.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SIR 693KA9-24-R-00005 ATEPSII SIR Questions and Answers Matrix

# Question SIR Section Section Name Section Number Page Number FAA Response

447 Can the government please clarify the role of Key Personnel “Financial Analyst IV or Higher”? Is this position supporting the oversight of the ATEPS II contract or providing support directly to ATEPS II Program Offices? The absence of Financial Analyst IV from Attachment L-2c_SDB#1 – Bus. Mgmt.

suggests that the respective Key Personnel will not be directly supporting FAA POs.

The role of the Financial Analyst as a Key Personnel will be supporting ATEPS II at the contract level. It is the Offeror’s discretion how it intends to use that individual at a Task Order level, as appropriate.

448 Attachment L-2c_SDB#1 – Bus. Mgmt. includes significant hours for Quality Assurance Specialist II on the Contractor Site Rates tab (locked tab). This appears to be an error and the summation of the bid hours. Will the government correct it and provide a new attachment?

Attachment L-2c has been corrected as issued with Amendment 0004.

449 Amendment 2 of the ATEPS II RFP changed one of the key personnel from "Business or Financial Manager" to "Financial Analyst IV or higher" (AMS 3.8.2-17, page 76). Q&A #269 states: "The Offeror must determine the appropriate LCAT for the Business or Financial Manager and Task Lead based on their proposed staffing solution." Q&A #390 states: “The key personnel requirement for a Business Manager/Finance Manager has been updated to reflect the position is a Financial Analyst Level IV or higher." Attachment L-2c_SDB#1 - Bus. Mgmt. - Proposal Bid Model (0129) does not include any LCATS for Financial Analysts. Only Attachment L-2a_Unrestricted - Proposal Bid Model (0129) includes an LCAT for Financial Analysts. Does the Q&A #390 negate Q&A #269? If yes, can the government please advise what offerors should do to include the Financial Analysts LCAT in Attachment L-2c_SDB#1

– Bus. Mgmt. Proposal Bid Models? Capabilities.

The Financial/Business Manager was changed to Financial Analyst IV or higher as indicated in Q #390. Key Personnel need to be identified for all roles; however, it is at the Offeror's discretion as to how it proposes to meet FAA requirements in relation to the bid models.

Subject: SIR No. 693KA9-24-R-00005

Final_V3

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .