Contract_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Conference Meeting Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693JF717R00029
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q_&_R_v.4.pdf | ||
| Q_&_R_v.3.pdf | ||
| MTSNAC_Draft_Q__R_v2.pdf | ||
| MEGA_TECH,_Inc._PO_&_Clauses.pdf | ||
| 693JF717R00029-0002_.pdf | ||
| Revised_SOW.pdf | ||
| MTSNAC_Line_Item_Estimates.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| MTSNAC_Q_&_R.pdf | ||
| Sol___693JF717R00029-0001_.pdf | ||
| Sol___693JF717R00029.pdf | ||
| Source_Selection.pdf | ||
| SOW.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire Page | 2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONTRACT/PROJECT INFORMATION (Contractor/Vendor only completes section 1-4)
1. Contract/Project Name:
Contract/Project Number (If Applicable):
Location:
Period of Performance:
Amount:
2. General Work Information
Work Performed as: (Check all that apply) - [ ] Prime Contractor [ ] Sub Contractor [ ] Joint Venture [ ]Other (Explain)
If a subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract/Project Description:
Contract or Delivery/Task Order #:
Contract Type: [ ] Firm Fixed Price [ ] Cost Reimbursement [ ] Other Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date:
Actual Completion Date:
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description
Complexity of Work: [ ] High [ ] Med [ ]Routine
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CLIENTS COMPLETING THIS QUESTIONNAIRE: MARAD requests that the client completes this questionnaire and submits it directly back to the offeror. The offeror will submit the completed questionnaire to MARAD with their proposal. The government reserves the right to verify all information on this form.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
| ASSESSMENT RATINGS |
| DEFINITION |
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
| (VG) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory |
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginal effective or were not fully implemented. |
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or ineffective. |
| (N) Not Applicable |
| No Information or did not apply to your contract. Rating will be neither positive nor negative. |
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
Client Information:
Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Contact Phone Number
Client’s Signature:
Date Questionnaire was completed:
A. QUALITY
| · Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance |
| E V N M U N |
| · Quality of Work |
| E V N M U N |
| · Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolutions without extensive customer guidance |
| E V N M U N |
| · Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance |
| E V N M U N |
B. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
| · Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below |
| E V N M U N |
| · Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract |
| E V N M U N |
C. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
| · To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? |
| E V N M U N |
| · Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication). |
| E V N M U N |
| · To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike and concerned with the interests of the customer |
| E V N M U N |
| · Overall customer satisfaction |
| E V N M U N |
D. MANAGEMENT/PERSONNEL/LABOR
| · Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? |
| E V N M U N |
| · Ability to Hire, apply and retain a qualified workforce to this effort |
| E V N M U N |
| · Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel |
| E V N M U N |
| · Utilization of Small Business concerns |
| E V N M U N |
| · Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines |
| E V N M U N |
| · Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes |
| E V N M U N |
| · Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program). |
| E V N M U N |
E. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
| · Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s) |
| E V N M U N |
| · Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client |
| E V N M U N |
| · If this is/was a Government cost type contract, or a CMc/CMc at Risk contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns). |
| E V N M U N |
| · Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? (If no, please explain in comment section below.) |
| Yes No |
| · If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? (Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.) |
| Yes No |
| · Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? (If yes, please explain in the comment section below.) |
| Yes No |
F. SAFETY/SECURITY
| To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the user’s rules, regulations and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.) |
| E V N M U N |
| Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements |
| E V N M U N |
G. GENERAL
| Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues.) |
| E V N M U N |
| Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (If there were specific issues, please explain in the comments section below) |
| E V N M U N |
| In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor |
| E V N M U N |
H. SUSTAINABILITY
| Did this project include sustainable methods, materials, processes or certifications? (See Whole Building Design Guide for acceptable requirements. Link to guide WBDG Green Building Standards and Certification Systems (If yes, please explain in the comments section below.) |
| Yes No |
I. SUMMARY
| Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain in the comments section below.) |
| Yes No |
COMMENTS SECTION
Release of Information: This Contractor Performance Report may be used to support future award decisions, and will be treated as source selection information in accordance with FAR 3.104-4(k)(1)(x) and 42.1503(b). The completed report shall not be released to other than Government personnel and the contractor whose performance is being evaluated during the period the information is being used to provide source selection information.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .