Amendment 0001 - South-Atlantic IDIQ RFP 693C73-26-R-000007.pdf

(x)

693C7326R000007 x x

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR

OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

ASHBURN VA 20147

ATTN: Acquisitions

693C73

SUITE E2-3-300

QUANTUM PARK, 22001 LOUDOUN COUNTY PKWY

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

See Block 1412/04/20250001

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

11/17/2025

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

South-Atlantic Region Construction MATOC:

The purpose of this amendment is to provide a summary of responses to questions/clarifications asked by interested offerors.

The proposal due date of Wednesday, December 17, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. EST remains unchanged.

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

Amendment No. 0001

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

EASTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

South-Atlantic Region Construction MATOC

Request for Proposal No: 693C73-26-R-000007

The purpose of this amendment is to provide a summary of responses to questions/clarifications asked by interested offerors.

The proposal due date of Wednesday, December 17, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. EST remains unchanged.

Questions / Clarifications:

Interested offerors can send written questions or requests for clarification to:

eflhd.contracts@dot.gov. Questions can be submitted at any time, but questions submitted within

10 days of the proposal due date may not be answered in time for the offeror to properly incorporate the responses into their proposal.

The following questions and issues were submitted via email. The Government response or clarification is provided. Due to the repetitive nature of several questions and issues, the wording of the questions may have been revised and some questions have not been included. The

Government’s direct response to the sender may also have been updated below for better clarity.

1. Factor 1: Prime Contractor Recent and Relevant Experience – Will contractors be rated less favorably if fewer than the maximum eight (8) projects are submitted, provided all submitted projects meet as many of the elements as possible?

Response: No.

2. Factor 1: Prime Contractor Recent and Relevant Experience – Can the experience of subcontractors be used to satisfy the requirements of Factor 1?

Response: Yes, as long as the offeror was the prime contractor overseeing both the contract and the subcontractor whose work for the contract is being used to address the relevant element listed under Factor 1.

3. Factor 1: Prime Contractor Recent and Relevant Experience – Are all twelve (12) elements required to be addressed in order to achieve a rating of Some Confidence or

High Confidence?

Response: No.

4. Factor 1: Prime Contractor Recent and Relevant Experience – Must each individual project reflect as many of the twelve (12) elements as possible, or can the elements be addressed collectively across the maximum of eight (8) projects?

Response: The elements can be addresses collectively across the maximum of eight

(8) projects.

mailto:eflhd.contracts@dot.gov

5. Factor 1: Prime Contractor Recent and Relevant Experience – Does the Government consider certain elements more critical than others (e.g., vehicular bridge construction versus coordination with adjacent projects), and if so, can the Government provide a weighting or prioritization?

Response: All elements are relevant to anticipated awards under this contract and are considered equally important.

6. Factor 1: Prime Contractor Recent and Relevant Experience – Will projects that include vertical construction components be considered non-relevant, less relevant, or equally relevant under Factor 1?

Response: Example projects should be similar in scope and size to the anticipated awards under this contract. See Section C - Description/Specifications/Statement of

Work for information on scope and size of anticipated awards.