Solstice_Canyon_Bridge__2_8540-004S_Redacted.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
CA NPS PP SOCAL 2018(2), Pavement Preservation Southern California
Solicitation number
69056718R000008
Issued by

About this file

Solstice Canyon Bridge #2 8540-004S_Redacted

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
10-26-18Q&A.pdf PDF
A001_SoCal.pdf PDF
Solstice_Canyon_Bridge__1_8540-003P_Redacted.pdf PDF
RFP_SoCal.pdf PDF
CABR_C6_RipReport.pdf PDF
Plan_Request_From_SoCal.pdf PDF
CHIS_8120_C6_RIP_Report.pdf PDF
SAMO_Bridge_Location_Map.pdf PDF
ca-p-socal201802plan-fp14_07-11-18_signed.pdf PDF
SAMO_C6_RipReport.pdf PDF
PROJECT_DESCRIPTION_SOCal.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

SOLSTICE CANYON BRIDGE #2

SOLSTICE CANYON ROAD OVER SOLSTICE CREEK

SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA

LE

STRUCTURE NO. 8540-004S

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 6/11/13

Report prepared by: SD

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 8540-004S

SOLSTICE CANYON BRIDGE #2 INSPECTION DATE: 6/11/13

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... OTHER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 5 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 55.1 FT (16.8 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 41.6 FT (12.7 M) STEEL PLATE (includes orthotropic)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... OTHER DECK WIDTH: ...................... 15.2 FT (4.6 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ UNKNOWN CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 15.2 FT (4.6 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT: ........................ 2004 (EST.)

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. 2006

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 6 - RESTRICTED FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2006-DECK REPLACED, RAILING REPLACED, STRUCTURAL STEEL REPAINTED

LOCATION

SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA MILE POINT: ..................... 0.00 (KM PT 0.00)

STATE: ................................. CALIFORNIA LOCATION: CA Route 1 (Pacific Coast Highway) to Solstice Canyon Road, 3/4 mile to Solstice parking lot. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ SOLSTICE CANYON ROAD

Bridge is 0.2 miles behind locked gate at end of parking

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. SOLSTICE CREEK lot.

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

The superstructure of this bridge consists of a salvaged rail car, with two steel box beams added on the upstream side. In 2006 the deck was replaced and the structural steel was repainted. In addition, the previous timber bridge railing was replaced with a steel bridge rail system, and temporary shoring under the structure was removed.

This bridge remains in good condition following rehabilitation. The only problems currently requiring attention are a large overhanging tree that could at some point fall and strike the structure, additional branches from other trees encroaching on the structure, and a small erosion hole under the asphalt approach pavement at the southwest corner of the bridge.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: G. GOODLIN, Z. BAILEY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

GARY J. GOODLIN, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6253

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/17/13

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 8540-004S

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL:

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

$0

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 8540-004S

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N G N G N G G N G

F G

(TREES)

G G N G F G

N

N

G

G

58.1,3 ASPHALT CHIP SEAL WEARING SURFACE OVER STEEL PLATE

DECK.

58.7 MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS WITH MINOR VEGETATION

GROWTH ALONG BOTH CURBLINES.

58.8 UTILITY LINE BETWEEN BOX BEAMS #1 AND #2 ON UPSTREAM SIDE.

59 DOWNSTREAM PORTION OF SUPERSTRUCTURE CONSISTS OF

SALVAGED RAIL CAR SECTION; UPSTREAM PORTION CONSISTS OF

2 STEEL BOX BEAMS.

59.7 ALL STEEL WAS REPAINTED IN 2006; SEVERAL SMALL AREAS OF

THIN PAINT POSSIBLY DUE TO INSUFFICIENT CLEANING OF STEEL.

59.11 LARGE TREE LEANS OVER STRUCTURE ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE.

ADDITIONAL TREE GROWING AGAINST SUPERSTRUCTURE ON

DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF BRIDGE NEAR WEST ABUTMENT, AND

LIMBS FROM OTHER TRESS GROW OVER STRUCTURE.

60.3 9"W X 14"H X 5" DEEP CRACKED AND DELAMINATED AREA OF

CONCRETE AT WEST ABUTMENT SOUTH END. CRACK INITIATED AT

CORNER OF OLD TIMBER POST LEFT IN PLACE.

60.6 MODERATE SPALL IN NORTHEAST WINGWALL AT BEARING SEAT

AREA, LIKELY DUE TO THERMAL MOVEMENT OF

SUPERSTRUCTURE; MINOR SPALL AT SOUTHEAST WINGWALL.

LARGE CRACK WITH DELAMINATION AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL AT

BEARING SEAT AREA.

60.9 MODERATE (2' DEEP) EROSION AT EAST ABUTMENT; FOOTING NOT

EXPOSED.

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. G

PILE BENTS2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. G

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. G

FOUNDATIONS5. N

WINGWALLS6. F

WEEP HOLES7. N

EXPANSION JOINTS8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. F

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION11. N

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

N13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

G14. PILE BENTS

G15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

G16. FOUNDATIONS

G17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

G18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

N19. OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 8540-004S

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G G N G N

LOW

SUFF

5 FT.

STONES, GRAVEL, GLACIAL TILL

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. N

N N G G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

61.4 TREE DOWN ACROSS CHANNEL APPROXIMATELY 30' UPSTREAM

FROM STRUCTURE. HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ON CHANNEL

BANKS.

222.4 GRAVEL APPROACHES.

222.5 SMALL EROSION HOLE UNDER ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT AT

SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BRIDGE, UP TO 3' DEEP.

222.6 MINOR ELEVATION DIFFERENCE AT EAST APPROACH.

36.B,C,D NO APPROACH GUARDRAILS PRESENT.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 8540-004S

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 10 9 17 15

HS 14 12 23 21

TYPE 3 12 11 20 18

TYPE 3S2 19 17 32 29

TYPE 3-3 24 21 39 36

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: STRUCTURE IS ADEQUATE FOR TYPICAL SERVICE LOADS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 8540-004S

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA(1) STATE: ....................................... 069 - CALIFORNIA (CA)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... SOLSTICE CANYON BRIDGE #2 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 069 - SAN BENITO

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 8540-004S (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 6 - PACIFIC WEST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... SOLSTICE CREEK

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 004S (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. SOLSTICE CANYON ROAD

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 6 - RESTRICTED (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... NO (9) LOCATION: ................................ CA Route 1 (Pacific Coast

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 0.00 (KM PT 0.00)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

3 - STEEL

00 - OTHER

41.6 FT (12.7 M)

55.1 FT (16.8 M)

0 - UNKNOWN

0 - UNKNOWN

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

5 - STEEL PLATE (includes orthotropic)

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 9 - OTHER

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 13.6 TONS (12.3 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 22.7 TONS (20.6 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/13 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: Y - 3 - LOAD RATING CALCULATION (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

f

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 8540-004S

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 34°02'18.10" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 15.2 FT (4.6 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 118°45'07.30" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 15.2 FT (4.6 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 15.0 FT (4.6 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 01 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 15.0 FT (4.6 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2007 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 15.2 FT (4.6 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2027 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 41.7 FT (12.7 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... 1 - NAV PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED MATERIAL: .............................. 7 - TIMBER

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 3.42 FT (1.04 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

5 - Stable; scour within limits of

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

$3,000

$0

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2006-DECK REPLACED, RAILING REPLACED, STRUCTURAL STEEL REPAINTED

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 8540-004S

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 8540-004S

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST AWAY FROM PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW OF STRUCTURE

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG

CURBLINES, NORTH CURB SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - TREE ON WEST BANK, DOWNSTREAM SIDE, LEANING

OVER BRIDGE

PHOTO #6 - EROSION HOLE UNDER ASPHALT APPROACH PAVEMENT

AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BRIDGE

PHOTO #7 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF STRUCTURE LOOKING

EAST

PHOTO #8 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #9 - EROSION AT EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF PAINT

ON STRUCTURAL STEEL

PHOTO #12 - SPALL AT BEARING AREA

ADJACENT TO BEAM AT NORTHEAST CORNER

PHOTO #13 - SPALLING DUE TO THERMAL

MOVEMENT AT SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO #14 - CRACK WITH DELAMINATION OF

CONCRETE AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #15 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTO #16 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM

File details come from the government source that posted it.