CABR_C6_RipReport.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 69056718R000008
About this file
CABR_C6_RipReport
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CABR
Cycle 6
Federal Highway Administration Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division Road Inventory Program (RIP)
Prepared By:
Road Inventory and Condition Assessment of Paved Routes Cabrillo National Monument
Report Date: November 2015
Final Report in California
_̂ Sacramento
Carson City
Ely
Reno
Yuma
Fresno
Kingman
Medford
Oakland
Redding
San Jose
Las Vegas
San Diego
St. George
Twin Falls
Bakersfield
Los Angeles
San Francisco
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Esri, DeLorme, GEBCO, NOAA NGDC, and other contributors ±
Cabrillo National Monument
Table of Contents
4 - 1 4 - 2 4 - 3 4 - 4
SECTION PAGE NO.
1. INTRODUCTION 1 - 1
2. PARK ROUTE INVENTORY
2 - 1
3.
3 - 1
4.
APPENDIX
8 - 1
Route ID Report, Subcomponent Report, and Changes Report (As Applicable)
PAVED PARKING AREA CONDITION RATING SHEETS
Paved Parking Area Pages
PARK SUMMARY INFORMATION
Parkwide Paved Route Condition Summary
PARK ROUTE LOCATION MAPS
Route Location Key Map Route Location Area Map(s) Route Condition Key Map – PCR Mile by Mile Route Condition Area Map(s) – PCR Mile by Mile
PAVED ROAD CONDITION RATING SHEETS
Paved Road Pages 5 - 1
6 - 1
5.
6.
7. ROAD MILEPOST INFORMATION
Road Milepost Information and Logs 7 - 1
8.
Appendix A: Methodology for Determining Condition Ratings with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV)
8 - 5
Appendix B: Methodology for Determining Condition Ratings Using Manual Rating Procedures Appendix C: Description of Cycle 6 Deliverables 8 - 29
8 - 20
Appendix D: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations 8 - 33
Improvements to the RIP Index Equations and Determination of PCR 8 - 1 Description of the Rating System 8 - 2 Explanation of the Condition Descriptions 8 - 3 Description of Pavement Treatment Types 8 - 4
Explanation of Condition Descriptions Route-Level Condition Summary Reports for Data Collection Vehicle, Manually Rated, and Parking Area Routes (As Applicable)
3 - 2 3 - 3
Section 1 Introduction
1-1
Introduction
The Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA), Road Inventory Program (RIP) inventories all roads and parking areas in the National Park System, and performs condition inspections on all paved roads and parking areas for the National Park Service (NPS). This report contains the results of the Cycle 6 condition assessment of paved roads and parking lots for this park unit. This assessment was done using an automated, state-of-the-art pavement inspection vehicle as well as manual ratings. This information represents the condition of the paved assets at the time of the inspection. The pavement management system utilized by FHWA and the NPS uses these assessments to estimate future conditions and help prioritize pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects. Further information about RIP data and its role in managing paved roads and bridges can be obtained by contacting the NPS Regional Transportation Program Manager.
A History of the Road Inventory Program:
The FHWA, in the mid-1970s, was charged with the task of identifying surface condition deficiencies and corrective priorities on NPS roads and parkways. Additionally, FHWA was tasked with establishing an integrated maintenance features inventory, locating features such as culverts, guardrails, and signs, among others, along NPS roads and parkways. As a result, in 1976 the NPS and FHWA entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) which established the RIP. This MOA was revised in 1980 to update RIP data collection standards and develop a long-range program to improve and maintain NPS roads to designated condition standards and establish a pavement management program.
The FHWA completed the initial phase of inventory in the early 1980s. As a result of this effort, each NPS unit included in the collection received a RIP Report known as the “Brown Book” which contained information that was inventoried during this first RIP phase. In the 1990s, a cyclical program was developed, and since then five cycles of collection have been completed. Cycle 6 is currently in progress.
A summary of the RIP collection cycles is shown in the table below.
Cycle Years Parks Collected
Cycle 1 1994 - 1997 44 Large Parks
Cycle 2 1997 - 2001 79 Large Parks 5 Small Parks
Cycle 3 2001 - 2004 All Large Parks All Small Parks
Cycle 4 2006 - 2010 86 Large Parks Several Small Parks
Cycle 5 2010 - 2014 All Large Parks (Only functional class 1, 2, 7, and new/modified routes collected) All Small Parks (all roads and parking areas collected)
Cycle 6 2014 – 2020 (±) All roads and parking areas collected at all Parks Additional partial collections of functional class 1, 2, and 7 roads at Large Parks Cycle 6 is expected to last 6 years
Note: Large Parks have ≥ 10 Paved Miles; Small Parks have < 10 Paved Miles
1-2
Since 1984, the Road Inventory Program has been funded through the Federal Lands Highway Park Roads and Parkways (PRP) Program. Currently, coordination of the RIP with Federal Lands Highway (FLH) is under the NPS Washington Headquarters Park Facility Management Division. The FLH Washington office coordinates policy and prepares national reports and needs assessment studies for Congress.
In 1998, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) amended Title 23 U.S.C., and inserted Section 204(a)(6) requiring the FHWA and NPS, to develop by rule, a Pavement Management System (PMS) applied to park roads and parkways serving the National Park System.
In 2012, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) amended Title 23 U.S.C., and under Section 203(c)(1-2) stated that the National Park Service in cooperation with the DOT/FHWA, shall maintain a comprehensive national inventory of their transportation facilities, with the goal of quantifying transportation infrastructure needs within the National Park System.
A History of the Pavement Management System:
In 2005, the FHWA began implementing the use of a pavement management system to assist the NPS in prioritizing Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation activities. The system used by FHWA is the Highway Pavement Management Application (HPMA), which has the ability to store inventory and condition data from RIP and forecast future performance using prediction models. Outputs include performance and condition reports at the National, Regional, Park, or Route level. Regional prioritized lists and optimizations have been produced for most regions, and the Service’s overall roadway Deferred Maintenance is calculated via the HPMA.
Overview of Cycle 6:
Cycle 6 launched in the spring of 2014 and will again comprise all NPS park units that are served by paved roads and/or parking areas. For Cycle 6, all paved roads (approximately 5,700 miles) and parking areas will be collected in all parks at least once, while the primary routes (functional class 1, 2, and 7 roads) at Large Parks will have additional collections. These multiple collections will provide updated condition data on a majority of the NPS’s primary road network and help build a better pavement management system, allowing for more accurate pavement performance prediction models.
FLH is responsible for the accuracy of all data presented in this report. Any questions or comments concerning the contents of this report should be directed to the national RIP Coordinator located in Sterling, Virginia.
Respectfully, FHWA RIP Team
FHWA/Eastern Federal Lands FHWA/Central Federal Lands 21400 Ridgetop Circle 12300 West Dakota Ave Sterling, VA 20166 Lakewood, CO 80228
(703) 404-6371 (720) 963-3556
Section 2 Park Route Inventory
Cycle 6 NPS / RIP Route ID Report Report Date: 11/02/2015
(Numerical By Summary Route and Subcomponent #)
= Concession Route
DCV = Data Collection Vehicle MRL = Manually Rated Line MRP = Manually Rated Polygon PKG = Parking Areas NC = Not Collected
Green = Unpaved Parking Areas
Black = Non-NPS RoutesGrey = Paved Routes, DCV not Driven
Blue = Paved Parking Areas
Red text denotes:
*Unpaved route data was obtained from the NPS and was not collected by the Road Inventory Program (RIP).
Yellow = Unpaved Routes, DCV not Driven
White = Paved Routes, DCV DrivenShading Color Key
CABR Cabrillo National Monument
Fu nc tio na l C la ss
Ite ra tio n
C ol le ct ed
C yc le le ct ed
Maintenance DistrictC on ce ss io n
Area Map
FMSS
Number
Total MileageToFrom
Unpaved Miles
Surf.
Type
Paved MilesRoute Name
Route No.
Route Description
ROAD INVENTORY (1100 SERIES FMSS LOCATIONS)
Area
(SQ FT)
0.31 1102701 TO ROUTE 0900 (VISITOR
CENTER PARKING)
AS0.000.31CABRILLO MEMORIAL DRIVE0010 1FROM INTERSECTION OF
CABRILLO MEMORIAL DRIVE
(NON NPS SECTION) AND
ASHBURN ROAD
6 1
0.69 1109730 TO BEGINNING OF ROUTE
0012 (GATCHELL ROAD) AT
COAST GUARD ENTRANCE
ON LEFT
AS0.000.69CABRILLO ROAD0011 1FROM ROUTE 0010 (CABRILLO
MEMORIAL DRIVE)
6 1
0.67 1109731 TO SAN DIEGO SEWAGE
TREATMENT PLANT
ENTRANCE
AS0.000.67GATCHELL ROAD0012 1FROM END OF ROUTE 0011
(CABRILLO ROAD) AT COAST
GUARD ENTRANCE ON LEFT
6 1
0.00 1102702 TO ROUTE 0402 (BATTERY
HUMPHREYS ROAD) AND
END AT RADIO TOWER
AS0.000.00LIGHTHOUSE SERVICE ROAD0400 5FROM ROUTE 0900 (VISITOR
CENTER PARKING)
6 1 24,026
0.30 1102703 TO BATTERY HUMPHREYS
ROAD (NON NPS SECTION )
AT PARK BOUNDARY
AS0.000.30BATTERY HUMPHREYS ROAD0402 6FROM ROUTE 0400 (LIGHTHOUSE
SERVICE ROAD)
6 1
Area Map
Surf.
Type
Area
(SQ FT)
Access Level
Maintenance DistrictTo
Route Description
FromRoute NameC on ce ss io n
FMSS
NumberC le ct ed
Route No. Ite ra tio n C ol le ct ed
PARKING AREA INVENTORY (1300 SERIES FMSS LOCATIONS)
10900 6 VISITOR CENTER PARKING FROM END OF ROUTE 0010 (CABRILLO
MEMORIAL DRIVE)
TO PARKING PUBLIC AS 1201,740102682
10901 6 TIDEPOOL PARKING FROM ROUTE 0012 (GATCHELL ROAD) TO PARKING PUBLIC AS 122,546102698
10902 6 COAST VIEW PARKING ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0012 (GATCHELL
ROAD)
PUBLIC AS 15,023102699
10903 6 SEA COVE PARKING ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0012 (GATCHELL
ROAD)
PUBLIC AS 113,820102700
(Numerical By Summary Route and Subcomponent #)
= Concession Route
DCV = Data Collection Vehicle MRL = Manually Rated Line MRP = Manually Rated Polygon PKG = Parking Areas NC = Not Collected
Green = Unpaved Parking Areas
Black = Non-NPS RoutesGrey = Paved Routes, DCV not Driven
Blue = Paved Parking Areas
Red text denotes:
*Unpaved route data was obtained from the NPS and was not collected by the Road Inventory Program (RIP).
Yellow = Unpaved Routes, DCV not Driven
White = Paved Routes, DCV DrivenShading Color Key
CABR Cabrillo National Monument
Area Map
Surf.
Type
Area
(SQ FT)
Access Level
Maintenance DistrictTo
Route Description
FromRoute NameC on ce ss io n
FMSS
NumberC le ct ed
Route No. Ite ra tio n C ol le ct ed
PARKING AREA INVENTORY (1300 SERIES FMSS LOCATIONS)
10904 6 OCEAN VIEW PARKING FROM ROUTE 0900 (VISITOR CENTER
PARKING)
TO ROUTE 0900 (VISITOR CENTER
PARKING)
PUBLIC AS 18,923102686
10905 6 LOWER MAINTENANCE
AREA
FROM ROUTE 0010 (CABRILLO MEMORIAL
DRIVE)
TO MAINTENANCE AREA NONPUBLIC AS 121,590102694
10906 6 LIGHTHOUSE PARKING
AREA
ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0400 (LIGHTHOUSE
SERVICE ROAD)
PUBLIC AS 1508234528
(Numerical By Summary Route and Subcomponent #)
= Concession Route
DCV = Data Collection Vehicle MRL = Manually Rated Line MRP = Manually Rated Polygon PKG = Parking Areas NC = Not Collected
Green = Unpaved Parking Areas
Black = Non-NPS RoutesGrey = Paved Routes, DCV not Driven
Blue = Paved Parking Areas
Red text denotes:
*Unpaved route data was obtained from the NPS and was not collected by the Road Inventory Program (RIP).
Yellow = Unpaved Routes, DCV not Driven
White = Paved Routes, DCV DrivenShading Color Key
Cycle 6 Summary Totals for Cabrillo National Monument
Paved Roads, Manually Rated Length (Miles)
Paved Roads, Data Collection Vehicle Rated (Miles)
Cycle 6 Route Totals
Paved Roads, Manually Rated Area (Sq. Ft.)
Unpaved Roads (Miles)
NPS
Maintained
Paved Parking (Sq. Ft.)
Unpaved Parking (Sq. Ft.)
Concessionaire Maintained
Park Totals
Cycle 6 Lane Miles and Overall Pavement Condition
Lanes Miles*
Pavement Condition Rating**
Parking Areas
Manually Rated Roads
Data Collection Vehicle Routes
* Equivalent Lane Miles are calculated by route using the following equations:
- DCV and MRLs = (PAVE_WIDTH x PAVED_MI) / 11 foot lane
- MRPs and PKGs = SQ_FEET / 5280 / 11 foot lane
**Parking and Manually Rated Routes are assigned the following PCR values based on the type of observed distresses:
-Excellent = 97 -Good = 90 -Fair = 73 -Poor = 53, 30, or 0 -Construction / Not Rated = -1
1.97
4.50
24,026
274,150
0.41
4.72
0.61 1.36
0 0
24,026 0
274,150 0
0 0
(Numerical By Summary Route and Subcomponent #)
= Concession Route
DCV = Data Collection Vehicle MRL = Manually Rated Line MRP = Manually Rated Polygon PKG = Parking Areas NC = Not Collected
Green = Unpaved Parking Areas
Black = Non-NPS RoutesGrey = Paved Routes, DCV not Driven
Blue = Paved Parking Areas
Red text denotes:
*Unpaved route data was obtained from the NPS and was not collected by the Road Inventory Program (RIP).
Yellow = Unpaved Routes, DCV not Driven
White = Paved Routes, DCV DrivenShading Color Key
General Park Road Functional Classification (FC) Table
0400 - 0499All public roads intended for access to administrative developments or structures such as park offices, employee quarters, or utility areas.
PublicAdministrative Park Road
0600 - 0699 City streets are usually extensions of the adjoining street system that are owned and maintained by the National Park Service. The construction and/or reconstruction should conform with accepted local engineering practice and local conditions.
City Street
0001 - 0009These facilities serve high volumes of park and non-park related traffic and are restricted, limited-access facilities in an urban area. This category of roads primarily encompasses the major parkways which serve as gateways to our nation's capital. Other major park roads or portions thereof, however, may be included in this category.
PublicUrban Parkway
0400 - 0499 All roads normally closed to the public, including patrol roads, truck trails, and other similar roads. Note: Functional Classes 5 and 6 have the same route numbers because historically they were numbered similarly and often there is little distinction between these routes. For example, because utility areas and employee housing are often closed to the public, this restriction would result in classification of FC 6 rather than FC 5.
NonpublicAdministrative Park Road
(Restricted Access)
0200 - 02994 Primitive Park Road
Public Roads which provide circulation through remote areas and/or access to primitive campgrounds and undeveloped areas.
These roads frequently have no minimum design standards and their use may be limited to specially equipped vehicles.
Note: Functional Classes 3 and 4 have the same route numbers because, historically, they were numbered similarly.
0200 - 0299Roads which provide circulation within public areas, such as campgrounds, picnic areas, visitor center complexes, concessionaire facilities, etc. These roads generally serve low-speed traffic and are often designed for one-way circulation.
Public
0100 - 0199Roads which provide access within a park to areas of scenic, scientific, recreational or cultural interest, such as overlooks, campgrounds, etc.
PublicConnector Park Road
0001 - 0009 0010 - 0099
Roads which constitute the main access route, circulatory tour, or thoroughfare for park visitors. Rural Parkways (e.g. Natchez Trace) are numbered 0001 - 0009.
PublicPrincipal Park Road Rural Parkway
FC
Special Purpose Park Road
Surface Types
AS - Asphaltic Concrete Pavement
BR - Brick or Pavers Road Bed
CB - Cobble Stone Road Bed
CO - Portland Cement Concrete Pavement
GR - Gravel Road Bed
NV - Native or Dirt Material Road Bed
OT - Other Materials Road Bed
N/A Non-NPS Roads
Public
State, County, or City owned roads which border, traverse, or provide access to Park Facilities or Locations. Non-NPS roads are not assigned functional classes and are driven for GPS and Video Log only.
Type User Access
Description Route Numbers
Public 5000 - 5999
A park road system contains those roads within or giving access to a park or other unit of the NPS which are administered by the NPS , or by the Service in cooperation with other agencies.
The assignment of a functional classification (FC) to a park road is not based on traffic volumes or design speed, but on the intended use or function of that road or route.
The historic route numbering system also included a 300 series for interpretive roads, and a 500 series for one-way roads. There are approximately 250 roads nationwide which are designated by the 300 and 500 series. The numbers for these roads will be maintained for reporting consistency. However, since these interpretive and one-way routes are not as clearly tied to a specific functional class, the 300 and 500 series will be discontinued for future use.
Route Identification Changes to Paved Routes from Previous Cycle
ROUTES MODIFIED FROM PREVIOUS INVENTORY:
CommentsType of ChangeRoute NameRoute No.
0011 CABRILLO ROAD OTHER ROUTE CHANGED TO CONCESSIONAIRE BECAUSE
ROUTE IS OPERATED AND MAINTAINED BY SAN
DIEGO WATER AND SEWAGE.
0012 GATCHELL ROAD OTHER ROUTE CHANGED TO CONCESSIONAIRE BECAUSE
ROUTE IS OPERATED AND MAINTAINED BY SAN
DIEGO WATER AND SEWAGE.
Section 3 Park Summary Information
Parkwide Paved Route Condition Summary
Breakdown of Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Based on Access Level
Table 1: Paved Route Miles and Parking Area Square Footages by Access Level and PCR
EXCELLENT
(PCR of 95 -100)
GOOD
(PCR of 85 - 94)
POOR
(PCR of 0 - 60)
FAIR
(PCR of 61 - 84)
Functional Class Total Mileage by FC
PAVED ROADS
Length (miles) Length (miles) Length (miles)Length (miles) 1 1.671.560.11 5 0.210.21 6 0.300.08 0.020.20
Total Mileage by PCR 0.08 0.34 1.56 2.170.20
PAVED PARKING
Area (sq. ft.) Area (sq. ft.) Area (sq. ft.) Total AreaAccess Level Area (sq. ft.)
PUBLIC 252,560252,560
NONPUBLIC 21,59021,590
Total Area by PCR 274,1500 274,150 00
3.73% Poor
9.20% Fair
15.45% Good
71.62% Excellent
100.00% Good
Parkwide Condition Percentages
Figure 1: Pavement Condition Rating Breakdown for Paved Roads and Parking Areas
Parking Area Condition Percentages Road Condition Percentages
NOTES:
1. Data are reported in the table only for paved roads and parking lots that received a condition rating.
2. Non-linear roads (MRP collected routes) are measured by area and converted to equivalent route miles based on a 22-ft pavement width in order to be included in the mileage totals for paved roads shown above.
3. Quantities in the table above are derived from the route condition data within the PMS_20, PMS_MRL, PMS_MRP, and PMS_PKG tables in the Park geodatabase.
3-1
3-2
Cycle 6 - Road Inventory Program Road Condition Summary Report for
Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) Rated Roads
Cabrillo National Monument
Notes:
• This condition summary report contains only the roads rated with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV).
• Condition on roads that were manually rated and parking areas are shown in separate reports.
• Additional details on individual road ratings can be found in Section 5 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.
• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.
POOR (0 - 60)
FAIR (61 - 84)
GOOD (85 - 94)
Condition (Rating / Index) Legend
EXCELLENT (95 - 100)
NR = NOT RATED
Route No. FMSS No.
Functional
Class Surf.
Type
Paved Length (Miles)Route Name R ut tin g In de x
Pa tc h
Po th ol e
In de x
Lo ng itu di na l C ra ck in g
In de x
St ru ct ur al C ra ck
In de x
Su rf ac e
C on di tio n R at in g (S
C R
R ou gh ne ss C on di tio n
In de x (R
C I)
Pa ve m en t C on di tio n R at in g (P
C R
A lli ga to r C ra ck
In de x
Tr an sv er se C ra ck in g
In de x
Route-Level Condition for Roads Rated with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV)
CABR-0010 102701 CABRILLO MEMORIAL DRIVE 1 AS 0.31 NR 96 99 100 99 100 100 9696
CABR-0011 109730 CABRILLO ROAD 1 AS 0.69 NR 100 100 100 100 100 100 100100
CABR-0012 109731 GATCHELL ROAD 1 AS 0.67 NR 100 100 100 100 100 100 100100
CABR-0402 102703 BATTERY HUMPHREYS ROAD 6 AS 0.30 NR 68 68 100 68 97 100 9168
Data Collection Date: 05/2015 3-3
Road Condition Summary Report for
Manually Rated Roads
Cabrillo National Monument Notes:
• This condition summary report contains only the roads that were manually rated.
o MRL = Manually Rated Line (a linear road) o MRP = Manually Rated Polygon (a non-linear road)
• Condition on roads that were rated with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) are shown in a separate report.
• A road is manually rated when it is determined to be unsuitable for the DCV to drive.
• Additional details on individual road ratings can be found in Section 5 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.
• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.
POOR (0 - 60)
FAIR (61 - 84)
GOOD (85 - 94)
Condition (Rating / Index) Legend
EXCELLENT (95 - 100)
NR = NOT RATED
Asphalt Surface Distresses
FMSS No. Route Name Area
(Sq. Ft.)
Surf.
Type
Concrete Surface Distresses
Pa ve m en t C on di tio n R at in g (P
C R
A lli ga to r C ra ck in g
Lo ng itu di na l /
Tr an ve rs e
C ra ck in g
R ut tin g
D is to rti on s
Po th ol es
P at ch in g
H M
A P at ch in g
Su rf ac e
R av el in g
Bl ee di ng
Jo in t F au lti ng
Sl ab
C ra ck in g
Jo in t D is tre ss es
D el am in at io n
Po p-
O ut s
Po th ol es
P at ch in g
Route No.
Route-Level Condition for Manually Rated Polygon (MRP) Roads
Functional Class
LIGHTHOUSE SERVICE ROAD102702CABR-0400 AS 24,026 97 90 97 97 97 97905
Data Collection Date: 02/2015 3-4
Parking Area Condition Summary Report
Cabrillo National Monument Notes:
• A PCR of 0 indicates a paved parking area in very poor condition. Individual distresses could not be identified.
• Additional details on individual parking areas can be found in Section 6 of the Cycle 6 RIP Report.
• Refer to the RIP Report Appendix for an explanation of the rating system and rating methods.
POOR* (0, 30, 53)
FAIR (73)
GOOD (90)
Condition (Rating / Index) Legend
EXCELLENT (97)
NR = NOT RATED
Asphalt Surface Distresses
FMSS No. Route Name Area
(Sq. Ft.)Route No.
Surf.
Type
User Access
Concrete Surface Distresses
Pa ve m en t C on di tio n R at in g (P
C R
A lli ga to r C ra ck in g
Lo ng itu di na l /
Tr an ve rs e
C ra ck in g
R ut tin g
D is to rti on s
Po th ol es
P at ch in g
H M
A P at ch in g
Su rf ac e
R av el in g
Bl ee di ng
Jo in t F au lti ng
Sl ab
C ra ck in g
Jo in t D is tre ss es
D el am in at io n
Po p-
O ut s
Po th ol es
P at ch in gCondition Rating Details for Parking Areas
VISITOR CENTER PARKINGCABR-0900 102682 201,740AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 97
TIDEPOOL PARKINGCABR-0901 102698 22,546AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 90
COAST VIEW PARKINGCABR-0902 102699 5,023AS 97PUBLIC 9790 97 97 97 90
SEA COVE PARKINGCABR-0903 102700 13,820AS 97PUBLIC 9790 97 97 97 90
OCEAN VIEW PARKINGCABR-0904 102686 8,923AS 97PUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 97
LOWER MAINTENANCE AREACABR-0905 102694 21,590AS 97NONPUBLIC 9090 97 97 97 97
LIGHTHOUSE PARKING AREACABR-0906 234528 508AS 97PUBLIC 9790 97 97 97 90
Data Collection Date: 02/2015 3-5
Section 4 Park Route Location Maps
ROUTE LOCATION MAP
Key Map
Cabrillo National Monument
±0 1.5 3
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Non-NPS Collected RoutesNPS Collected Routes
4-1
ROUTE LOCATION MAP
Area Map 1
Cabrillo National Monument
±0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Non-NPS Collected RoutesNote: Unique colors used to differentiate roads
Rte. 0905
Rte. 0900
Rte. 0400Rte. 0903
Rte. 0902
Rte. 0901
Rte. 0904
Rte. 0012
R
te. 0011
Rte. 0402
R
te. 0010
Rte. 0906
4-2
ROUTE CONDITION MAP
PCR - MILE BY MILE
Key Map
Cabrillo National Monument
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 1.5 3
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
4-3
ROUTE CONDITION MAP
PCR - MILE BY MILE
Map 1
Cabrillo National Monument
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
±0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Only Data Collection Vehicle and Manually Rated Roads are displayed
Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0012 Rte. 0011
R
te. 0010
Rte. 0402
4-4
Section 5 Paved Road Condition Rating Sheets
Surface Type:
Inspection Date:
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Cabrillo National Monument
ROUTE 0010: CABRILLO MEMORIAL DRIVE
2 2
0.31
5/19/2015 0.31
ASPHALT
10.9
10.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100100
Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) Rating
R
te. 0010
5-1
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
R
te. 0011
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Cabrillo National Monument
ROUTE 0011: CABRILLO ROAD
2 2
0.69
5/19/2015 0.69
ASPHALT
25.5 12.2
25.5 12.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100100 100100
Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) Rating
5-2
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
R
te. 0012
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Cabrillo National Monument
ROUTE 0012: GATCHELL ROAD
2 2
0.67
5/19/2015 0.67
ASPHALT
23.7 10.9
23.7 10.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100100 100100
5-3
User AccessInspection Date FMSS Number Surface Type
Pavement RecommendationArea (Sq. Ft.) Lane Miles (11' Widths)
Condition Rating / PCR
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
Rte. 0400
FROM ROUTE 0900 (VISITOR CENTER PARKING)
TO ROUTE 0402 (BATTERY HUMPHREYS ROAD) AND END AT RADIO TOWER
ROUTE 0400: LIGHTHOUSE SERVICE ROAD
Manual Rating
Cabrillo National Monument
2/27/2015
0.414
102702 PUBLIC ASPHALT
GOOD / 90
24026
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
0 490 980
Feet±
Rte. 0900
Rte. 0402
Rte. 0904
R
te. 0011
R
te. 0012
5-4
Paved Length (Miles):
Number of Lanes Lane & Width Information
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Roadway Condition Information
Longitudinal Crack Index
Distress Index Values
Route Summary Section Length (MI) Beginning Section MP
Surface Condition Rating (SCR)
Transverse Cracking Index Patching Index Rutting Index International Roughness Index (IRI)
Paved Width (ft) Lane Width (ft)
Roughness Condition Index (RCI)
Alligator Crack Index Structural Crack Index
Rte. 0402
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Cabrillo National Monument
ROUTE 0402: BATTERY HUMPHREYS ROAD
2 2
0.3
5/19/2015 0.3
ASPHALT
20.5 13.9
20.5 13.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100100
5-5
Section 6 Paved Parking Area Condition Rating Sheets
Curb Reveal (Inches)Area (Sq. Ft.) Lane Miles (11' Widths) Curb Recommendation
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM END OF ROUTE 0010 (CABRILLO MEMORIAL DRIVE)
TO PARKING
2/27/2015
201,740
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
CONCRETE
3.473
102682 PUBLIC ASPHALT
DO NOTHING
6-1
ROUTE 0900: VISITOR CENTER PARKING
Manual Rating
Cabrillo National Monument
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
R
te. 0010
Rte. 0011
Rte. 0400
Rte. 0900
Rte. 0904
± 0 450 900
Feet
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
FROM ROUTE 0012 (GATCHELL ROAD)
TO PARKING
2/27/2015
22,546
ASPHALT
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.388
102698 PUBLIC ASPHALT
DO NOTHING
6-2
ROUTE 0901: TIDEPOOL PARKING
Manual Rating
Cabrillo National Monument
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rt e.
Rte. 0901
± 0 150 300
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0012 (GATCHELL ROAD)
2/27/2015
5,023
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
CONCRETE
0.086
102699 PUBLIC ASPHALT
DO NOTHING
6-3
ROUTE 0902: COAST VIEW PARKING
Manual Rating
Cabrillo National Monument
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0012
Rte. 0902
± 0 75 150
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0012 (GATCHELL ROAD)
2/27/2015
13,820
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
CONCRETE
0.238
102700 PUBLIC ASPHALT
DO NOTHING
6-4
ROUTE 0903: SEA COVE PARKING
Manual Rating
Cabrillo National Monument
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0012
Rte. 0903
± 0 100 200
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
NOT APPLICABLE
FROM ROUTE 0900 (VISITOR CENTER PARKING)
TO ROUTE 0900 (VISITOR CENTER PARKING)
2/27/2015
8,923
NO CURB
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
CONCRETE
0.154
102686 PUBLIC ASPHALT
DO NOTHING
6-5
ROUTE 0904: OCEAN VIEW PARKING
Manual Rating
Cabrillo National Monument
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0904
Rte. 0900
± 0 70 140
Rte. 0900
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
FROM ROUTE 0010 (CABRILLO MEMORIAL DRIVE)
TO MAINTENANCE AREA
2/27/2015
21,590
ASPHALT
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.372
102694 NONPUBLIC ASPHALT
DO NOTHING
6-6
ROUTE 0905: LOWER MAINTENANCE AREA
Manual Rating
Cabrillo National Monument
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
R te.0010
Rte. 0905
± 0 160 320
Curb & Gutter TypeCurb Type
Condition Rating / PCRPavement Recommendation
ADJACENT TO ROUTE 0400 (LIGHTHOUSE SERVICE ROAD)
2/27/2015
CONCRETE
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE GOOD / 90
NO CURB AND GUTTER
0.009
234528 PUBLIC ASPHALT
DO NOTHING
6-7
ROUTE 0906: LIGHTHOUSE PARKING AREA
Manual Rating
Cabrillo National Monument
Route Condition Legend – Pavement Condition Rating (PCR)
See Appendix for definitions and formulas Fair (61- 84) Good (85 - 94)Poor (0 - 60) Excellent (95 - 100) Not Rated
Rte. 0400 Rte. 0906
± 0 10 20
Section 7 Road Milepost Information
Road Milepost Information
This report section contains road milepost information for all paved roads in the park that were collected with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV).
The milepost data is obtained from the DCV by using a distance measuring instrument (DMI) that is calibrated to record mileage to the nearest thousandth of a mile. Park roads that were manually rated did not have milepost data collected, and thus are not included in this report section. For routes that have mileposts signs along them, the milepost reported by RIP will most likely not line up exactly with the sign located in the field. This could be happening for many reasons, most likely due to either the error falling within the acceptable calibration range of the vehicle, or the level of accuracy that the milepost signs were placed in the field.
For Cycle 6, the information presented in this section differs from previous RIP cycles in that it does not contain the roadside features inventories for the paved park roads. Some examples of the features previously collected are signs, culverts/drop inlets, guardrails, curbing, pullouts, etc. If the park was collected in a previous RIP cycle, then the latest features data can be obtained by referencing the following:
Where to find the latest Features Inventories for NPS Parks:
For Small Parks (parks with less than 10 miles of paved roads):
o Refer to Cycle 5 data (collected 2010 - 2014) Features were reported in Section 9 of the Cycle 5 RIP report Video of features can be viewed using the PathViewVO program and Cycle 5 data
For Large Parks (parks with more than 10 miles of paved roads):
o Refer to Cycle 4 data (collected 2006 - 2009)
Features were reported in Section 9 of the Cycle 4 RIP report Video of features can be viewed using the VisiData program and Cycle 4 data o Note: Features inventories were updated in Large Parks in Cycle 5 only on a route by route basis if the route was new or modified in Cycle 5. If this is the case for a particular route, then features for the route can be obtained using the PathViewVO program and Cycle 5 data (same as above for Small parks).
Milepost Events Collected in Cycle 6 In Cycle 6, the following events were collected and reported in Section 7 of this report:
Intersections with roads and parking areas One-Way travel directions All bridges and culverts with BIP Numbers (bridge inspection program numbers) Overpasses Tunnels Low Water Crossings (LWCR) Surface type changes Construction areas where no pavement condition data was obtained
7-1
CABR: Route Milepost Log
ROUTE 0010: CABRILLO MEMORIAL DRIVE
COMMENT
FROM
MILEPOST
TO
MILEPOST SIDEFEATURE
0.00 N/A PAVED ROUTE (CABRILLO MEMORIAL DRIVE / NON NPS)INTERSECTION0.00
0.00 L PAVED ROUTE (ASHBURN ROAD / NON NPS)INTERSECTION0.00
0.20 R PAVED ROUTE (560 BATTERY PARKING / NON NPS)INTERSECTION0.20
0.24 L ROUTE 0010 (CABRILLO MEMORIAL DRIVE) CUT-THRUINTERSECTION0.24
0.24 L ROUTE 0905 (LOWER MAINTENANCE AREA)INTERSECTION0.24
0.25 R PAVED ROUTE (RCL ROAD / NON NPS)INTERSECTION0.25
0.27 R ROUTE 0011 (CABRILLO ROAD)INTERSECTION0.27
0.31 N/A ROUTE 0900 (VISITOR CENTER PARKING)INTERSECTION0.31
Data Collected on 5/2015 7-2
ROUTE 0011: CABRILLO ROAD
COMMENT
FROM
MILEPOST
TO
MILEPOST SIDEFEATURE
0.00 R ROUTE 0010 (CABRILLO MEMORIAL DRIVE)INTERSECTION0.00
0.00 L ROUTE 0010 (CABRILLO MEMORIAL DRIVE)INTERSECTION0.00
0.69 L PAVED ROUTE (COAST GUARD STATION ENTRANCE / NON
NPS)
INTERSECTION0.69
0.69 N/A ROUTE 0012 (GATCHELL ROAD)INTERSECTION0.69
Data Collected on 5/2015 7-3
ROUTE 0012: GATCHELL ROAD
COMMENT
FROM
MILEPOST
TO
MILEPOST SIDEFEATURE
0.00 L PAVED ROUTE (COAST GUARD STATION ENTRANCE / NON
NPS)
INTERSECTION0.00
0.00 N/A ROUTE 0011 (CABRILLO ROAD)INTERSECTION0.00
0.03 L PAVED ROUTE (NON NPS)INTERSECTION0.03
0.10 L ROUTE 0901 (TIDEPOOL PARKING)INTERSECTION0.10
0.55 L ROUTE 0902 (COAST VIEW PARKING)INTERSECTION0.55
0.65 L ROUTE 0903 (SEA COVE PARKING)INTERSECTION0.65
0.67 N/A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT ENTRANCEINTERSECTION0.67
Data Collected on 5/2015 7-4
ROUTE 0402: BATTERY HUMPHREYS ROAD
COMMENT
FROM
MILEPOST
TO
MILEPOST SIDEFEATURE
0.00 N/A ROUTE 0400 (LIGHTHOUSE SERVICE ROAD)INTERSECTION0.00
0.30 N/A N/APARK BOUNDARY0.30
0.30 N/A PAVED ROUTE (BATTERY HUMPHREYS ROAD / NON NPS)INTERSECTION0.30
Data Collected on 8/2012 7-5
Section 8 Appendix
Improvements to the RIP Index Equations and Determination of PCR
In 2005, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) began implementing the use of a Pavement Management System (PMS) to assist the National Park Service (NPS) in prioritizing Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation activities. The PMS used by FHWA is the Highway Pavement Management Application (HPMA) which has the ability to store inventory and condition data from the Road Inventory Program (RIP) and forecast future performance using prediction models. Outputs include performance and condition reports at the National, Region, Park, or Route level. A regional prioritized list and optimization have been produced for most regions and the Federal Highway Deferred Maintenance is calculated via the HPMA as well.
In an effort to improve the accuracy of treatment recommendations and pavement condition descriptions the distresses and indexes that comprise the Pavement Condition Rating (PCR), an extensive study was completed throughout 2010 that has resulted in changes to the RIP condition reporting method and specifically, the calculation of PCR. It was determined that a better representation of PCR could be achieved by modifying the relative impact certain distresses would have on the overall rating.
Through the use of HPMA data, it was noted that false failure indicators existed with the existing PCR model, and that it would be necessary to reduce their impact. The distresses affected in this way were Rutting and Roughness. Conversely, experience showed that roadways with extensive cracking present were often shown to have a high PCR. Therefore, the crack index models were adjusted to be more sensitive to changes in crack severity or quantity. It was also determined that these issues were not due to a problem with data acquisition (i.e. the RIP “van”), but with the way the collected data was processed.
The final change was to provide guidance on when to use the Roughness Condition Index (RCI) in the PCR calculation. Roughness data is of little value to determining overall condition on routes that, due to their length or geometrics, have lower vehicle operating speeds. Therefore, in Cycle 5, only routes that have lengths of one half mile or greater and posted speed limits of 25 mph or greater will have RCI reported and included in the PCR calculations.
Additionally, methodologies were updated in 2013 for Manually Rated Routes (paved routes that the collection vehicle is unable to drive) as well as Parking Areas to provide more accurate condition data to the HPMA. These updated methodologies allow for the efficient assessment of pavement conditions using a visual inspection method to denote specific distresses. These distresses are indicative of current conditions, the causes for current and future deterioration, and identify the level of targeted repair and rehabilitation practices required.
The changes that were implemented were endorsed by management at both the FHWA and NPS. In order to show the effectiveness of these changes, several sites were ground truth tested in early 2014 to ensure that an improvement was achieved between the relationship of PCR and the actual Maintenance and Rehabilitation needs that were represented. The changes will allow greater use of RIP and HPMA data for not simply condition data reporting, but also as a reliable tool for project identification and selection.
8-1
Description of the Rating System
The Federal Highway Administration, National Park Service Road Inventory Program (NPS-RIP), collects roadway condition data on paved surfaces (asphalt, concrete, brick, and cobblestone) on roads, parkways, and parking areas in national parks nationwide. The road surface condition data is collected using an automated Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) and manually using Manually Rated Route (MRR) procedures. Roads having brick or cobblestone surfacing are not normally surveyed with the DCV, but are manually rated for condition rating.
The FHWA RIP is implemented based on the premise that an accurate pavement surface condition assessment can be accomplished using automated crack detection technology as applied to digital images.
Various methods of pavement condition assessment have been developed over the years with varying degrees of accuracy and acceptance. The use of digital photography to record pavement images and subsequent crack detection and classification has undergone continuous improvements over the past decade. Digital cameras with increasingly superior resolution and high definition have become more affordable, and the proprietary programming code and algorithms have been improved in crack detection software.
With the use of quality digital photography and automated crack detection software, FHWA RIP is tasked with executing a pavement condition assessment on a network of roughly 5,700 miles of National Park Service roads and parkways. Because a subset of roads will be collected multiple times this cycle, the total collection length will be around 13,000 miles. Foremost in setting up the basis of pavement distress identification is employing the distress identification protocols used by FHWA. There is no single distress identification system that is universal among entities conducting a program of distress identification. For the purpose of the NPS RIP, FHWA employs distress identification protocols that are specific to this program.
FHWA has referenced the “Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program”, Publication No. FHWA-RD 03-031, June 2003, as the point-of- reference for distress types on NPS pavement. In truth, the FHWA RIP distress types are similar to those described in the LTPP manual with some modifications. This document, “Distress Identification Manual for the NPS Road Inventory Program, Cycle 6, 2014-2020” was developed using the “Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program” as a guideline. Definitions of severity levels based on crack width contained in this document adhere to the LTPP Distress ID Manual. Modifications have been made to the definition of Alligator and Longitudinal Cracking and determination of Alligator Cracking severity. This manual also addresses Rutting and Roughness and its application to RIP.
Cycle 6 has launched in the spring of 2014 and will again comprise all parks, large and small, that are served by paved roads and/or parking areas. For Cycle 6, roughly 333 large and small parks will have all paved routes and parking areas collected at least once in the cycle, some will have multiple collections depending on the size of the park and the functional class of the route.
This “Distress Identification Manual for the NPS Road Inventory Program, Cycle 6, 2014- 2020” will be used as a reference resource in crack detection and classification, determination of distress severity and extent, and in the calculation of distress index values for the FHWA RIP Cycle 6.
8-2
Explanation of the Condition Descriptions
In addition to the RIP Index changes that were implemented in Cycle 5, we will also aim to provide greater assistance in translating good/fair/poor categories into pavement needs categories. The PCR can be used to indicate the place in the Pavement Life Cycle and the types of treatments that should be considered now and into the future.
Excellent/New: PCR of 95-100. Pavements in this range will require only spot repairs Good: PCR of 85-94. Pavements in this range will likely be candidates for preventive maintenance. Examples include Chip and Slurry Seals, Micro Surfacing and Thin Overlays.
Fair: PCR of 61-84. Pavements in this range will likely be candidates of Light Rehabilitation (L3R). Examples include single-lift overlays up to 2.5 inches in total thickness, milling and overlays.
Poor: PCR of 60 or below. Pavements in this range will likely be candidates of Heavy Rehabilitation or Reconstruction (H3R or 4R). Examples include Pulverization, Multiple Lift Overlays, and Reconstruction.
At this time, specific maintenance and rehabilitation activities should be evaluated and recommended at the project level. Site-specific conditions that influence treatment type should be determined based on performing a subsurface investigation and/or pavement condition survey, and not be based solely on RIP data. Additionally, RIP produces a snapshot of conditions the year in which the data was collected. For further information or to obtain additional PMS data from our (HPMA) please contact the Eastern Federal Lands pavement team.
Pa ve m en t C on di tio n R at in g
Pavement Age
Condition Categories and Treatments
Reconstruction
POOR/Heavy Rehabilitation
GOOD/Preventive Maintenance GOOD/PreventiveGOOD/P i MMMaintMainiMaiM i tenatena EXCELLENT/Localized Repairs Only
FAIR/Light Rehabilitation
8-3
Description of Pavement Treatment Types
1. Preventive Maintenance is a planned strategy of cost-effective treatments to an existing roadway system and its appurtenances that preserves the system, retards future deterioration, and maintains or improves the functional condition of the system (without significantly increasing the structural capacity). Preventive maintenance is typically applied to pavements in good condition having significant remaining service life. As a major component of pavement preservation, preventive maintenance is a strategy of extending the service life by applying cost-effective treatments to the surface or near-surface of structurally sound pavements. Examples of preventive treatments include asphalt crack sealing, chip sealing, slurry or micro-surfacing, thin and ultra-thin hot-mix asphalt overlay, concrete joint sealing, diamond grinding, dowel-bar retrofit, and isolated, partial and/or full-depth concrete repairs to restore functionality of individual slabs.
2. Pavement Rehabilitation consists of structural enhancements that extend the service life of an existing pavement and/or improve its load carrying capacity. Rehabilitation techniques include restoration treatments and structural overlays. Rehabilitation projects extend the life of existing pavement structures either by restoring existing structural capacity through the elimination of age-related, environmental cracking of embrittled pavement surface or by increasing pavement thickness to strengthen existing pavement sections to accommodate existing or projected traffic loading conditions. Two sub-categories result from these distinctions, which are directly related to the restoration or increase of structural capacity.
Light Rehabilitation (L3R) - Examples include single-lift overlays up to 2.5 inches in total thickness and milling and overlays for flexible pavements
Heavy Rehabilitation (H3R) – Requires rehabilitation with grade improvement. H3R stands for resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation projects. H3R projects typically involve multi-depth (overlays greater than 2.5 inches) pavement improvement work (short of full-depth replacement) and targeted safety improvements. H3R projects generally involve retention of the existing three-dimensional alignment.
3. Reconstruction (4R) is defined as the replacement of the entire existing pavement structure by the placement of the equivalent or increased pavement structure. Reconstruction usually requires the complete removal and replacement of the existing pavement structure. Reconstruction may utilize either new or recycled materials incorporated into the materials used for the reconstruction of the complete pavement section. Reconstruction is required when a pavement has either failed or has become functionally obsolete.
8-4
Appendix A
Methodology for Determining Condition Ratings with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV)
8-5
Surface Distresses Identified by the Data Collection Vehicle
Surface Condition Rating – SCR
Surface distresses are measured in the primary lane only. In the classification and measurement of all paved surface condition data, results will be reported in the database in record intervals of 0.02 miles (105.6 feet) (smallest granularity) along the route.
Surface distresses and rutting are determined from digital images that provide both the longitudinal and transverse profile. The images also provide an elevation profile of the road, creating a 3-dimensional image of the paved surface.
Transverse Cracks Longitudinal Cracks Alligator Cracks Patching/Potholes Rutting
Each of the…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.