632-26-102 - AE SP-13 Submission Schedule.pdf

PDF 189 KB Posted

Attached to
C1DZ--NRM-AE 632-26-102 Repair Facade Building 13
Solicitation number
36C24226R0028
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Design Review and Completion Schedule for a federal contract to repair the façade of Building 13, with a project number of 632-25-102 dated 11/18/2025. The schedule outlines a detailed timeline for design deliverables and reviews, starting from the Notice to Proceed (NTP) and progressing through multiple design package stages: 100% Schematic Design, 100% Design Development, and 50% and 100% Construction Documents. Key milestones include delivering design packages at specific intervals (ranging from 30 to 156 calendar days after NTP), with corresponding review meetings. The estimated project timeline indicates a bid opening 211 calendar days after NTP, construction contract award 241 calendar days after NTP, and estimated construction completion 511 calendar days after NTP. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to schedule additional design reviews if deemed necessary for satisfactory completion of contract drawings and specifications.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

632-25-102 Repair Façade Building 13 11/18/2025

SP-13 DESIGN REVIEW AND COMPLETION SCHEDULE

(a) The A/E shall perform the work required by this contract in compliance with the following schedule. He/she shall provide professional architects and engineers as directed by the Contracting Officer who are familiar with the work to attend the Design Review Meetings in accordance with the following schedule:

Deliver First Design Package (100% Schematic Design) to the Contracting Officer’s

Representative not later than .......................................................... 30 calendar days after the NTP

Review First Design Package (100% Schematic Design) with the Contracting Officer’s Representative not later than .......................................................... 51 calendar days after the NTP

Deliver Third Design Package (100% Design Development) to the Contracting Officer’s Representative not later than .......................................................... 72 calendar days after the NTP

Review Third Design Package (100% Design Development) with the Contracting Officer’s

Representative not later than ......................................................... 93 calendar days after the NTP

Deliver Fourth Design Package (50% Construction Documents) to the Contracting Officer’s Representative not later than ....................... 114 calendar days after the NTP

Review Fourth Design Package (50% Construction Documents) with Contracting

Officer’s Representative not later than ......................................... 135 calendar days after the NTP

Deliver Fifth Design Package (100% Construction Documents) to the Contracting Officer’s Representative not later than ....................... 156 calendar days after the NTP

Review Fifth Design Package (100% Construction Documents) with Contracting

Officer’s Representative not later than .......................................... 177 calendar days after the NTP

Deliver Signed and Sealed Final Bid Documents to Contracting Officer’s Representative not later than ....................... 191 calendar days after the NTP

Bid Opening Date (Estimated) ................................................ 211 calendar days after the NTP

Construction Contract Award (Estimated) .……………… ....... 241 calendar days after the NTP

Construction Completion (Estimated) ..................................... 511 calendar days after the NTP

(b) The Contracting Officer may schedule an additional Design Review(s) should he/she determine that such review(s) is(are) required for satisfactory completion of the Contract Drawings and Specifications. The A/E will be reimbursed for the additional trip(s) in accordance with Clause SP-9 unless the additional Design review(s) was requested by him or caused by actions for which he/she is responsible.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .