60RRBH26R0002 AAS PPQ ATTACHMENT 1.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RRB-OIG Actuarial Audit Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 60RRBH26R0002
- Issued by
- Railroad Retirement Board
About this file
This is a Performance Evaluation Form and Past Performance Questionnaire for the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) Office of Inspector General's Actuarial Audit Services solicitation (60RRBH26R0002). The form is designed to be completed by government evaluators or references who have contracted with vendors for actuarial audit services, capturing detailed feedback on contractor performance across multiple dimensions. Evaluators must rate contractor performance on eleven criteria using a five-point scale: Overall contract implementation, proactive performance and service quality, key personnel effectiveness and reliability, timeliness and deadline compliance, customer satisfaction and staff responsiveness, agency interface effectiveness, business relations and inquiry response capability, billing procedures and accuracy, security requirement compliance, overall technical competence, and likelihood of awarding a similar contract. Each rating is accompanied by space for evaluator comments, with options to mark items as not applicable where relevant.
The form requests standard contractor information including evaluator name and position, company details, contractor name, period of performance, contract number, contract type, and contract value. Respondents must also provide a thorough description of the most recent services contracted from the vendor. The rating scale defines performance levels clearly: 5 indicates excellent performance with no problems or delays; 4 indicates good performance that does not impact requirements; 3 indicates satisfactory performance requiring minor agency resources; 2 indicates marginal performance requiring major agency resources; and 1 indicates unsatisfactory performance that compromises contract requirements. Yes/No questions use the same five-point scale with 5 representing affirmative responses.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 60RRBH26R0002 Actuarial Audit Services - Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| 60RRBH26R0002 Actuarial Audit Services - Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| RFP 60RRBH26R0002 Actuarial Audit Services OIG.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation No. 60RRBH26R0002 Page 1 of 2 Attachment 1
Actuarial Audit Services
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM & PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Name of Evaluator: ________________________________
Official Position: ________________________________
Name of Company: ________________________________
Company Address: ________________________________
Phone/Fax/Email: ________________________________
Name of Contractor ________________________________
Period of Performance: ________________________________
| Contract No. or | |
| Reference’s Name | ________________________________ |
Contract Type: ________________________________
Contract Value: ________________________________
Please provide a thorough and complete description of the most recent services you have contracted for from the vendor.
INSTRUCTIONS – For each item, circle the rating that best describes the contractor’s work on this project and provide any additional comments. For items not applicable to your project, please indicate N/A.
| 5= Excellent | No problems, issues, or delays in achieving contract requirements | ||
| 4= Good | Does not impact achievement of contract requirements | ||
| 3=Satisfactory | Requires minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements | ||
| 2=Marginal | Requires major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements | ||
| 1= Unsatisfactory | Achievement of contract requirement is compromised | ||
| For Yes or No Questions: | 5=Yes & 1=No | ||
| N/A= Not applicable | Does not apply |
(1) Overall implementation of the contract? 5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Comments:
(2) Ability to pro-actively and aggressively perform 5 4 3 2 1 N/A contract requirements and quality of service?
(3) Effectiveness and reliability of contractor's key personnel? 5 4 3 2 1 N/A
| (4) Timeliness of performance, reliability, and ability to meet | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | N/A |
| contractually established deadlines. |
| (5) | Customer satisfaction; was the contractor’s staff responsive, | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | N/A |
| cooperative, and effective in working with your staff, and | |||||||
| were there an adequate number of staff resources? |
| (6) | Effectiveness in interfacing with agency or organization | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | N/A |
| personnel. |
| (7) | Overall business relations with your agency or organization, | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | N/A |
| and the contractors ability to effectively respond to inquiries. |
| (8) | Quality of the contractor’s billing procedures, | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | N/A |
| billing accuracy and resolution of billing discrepancies. |
| (9) | Ability to meet agency’s or organization’s security | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | N/A | |
| requirements. |
(10) Rate the contractor’s overall technical competence. 5 4 3 2 1 N/A
| (11) | Based on this contractor’s overall performance, | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | N/A |
| would you award this contractor a similar contract? |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .