6-Attachment E ScoreSheet VictimInformationSystem.xls
XLS spreadsheet 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Statewide Victim-Centered Information System
- Solicitation number
- TR27-3
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is a scoring sheet attachment related to a Statewide Victim-Centered Information System procurement by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing, conducted by the Department of Criminal Justice. The procurement seeks design professional service providers and consultants to develop and implement a statewide victim-centered information system under a 10-year contract term. The request for statements of qualifications (RFSQ) is issued under Utah Procurement Code 63G-6a Part 15, focusing on professional services rather than products. Vendors are evaluated based on qualifications and ranked accordingly, with the highest-ranked vendor selected to proceed to contract negotiations for compensation terms determined to be fair and reasonable. If negotiations cannot be concluded with the top-ranked vendor regarding pricing, contract requirements, or contract documents, the state may advance negotiations with the next highest-ranked vendor in succession.
The scoring sheet serves as the evaluation instrument for assessing and comparing vendor qualifications. As this is an RFSQ procurement, vendors are explicitly instructed not to include pricing in their submission of qualifications, as compensation will be negotiated following vendor selection. The procurement does not specify particular set-asides, incumbent information, or explicit funding amounts and sources in the available documentation. The ten-year contract term represents a significant commitment for the implementation and management of a victim-centered information system designed to serve statewide criminal justice operations.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3-Attachment B IT TC VictimeInformationSystem.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Part 15.pdf | ||
| 5-Attachment A TC VictimeInformationSystem.docx | DOCX document | |
| 7-Attachment C SOW VictimInformationSystem.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-Attachment D TechnicalCriteria VictimInformationSystem.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Statewide Victim-Centered Information System | ||||||||
| EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | ||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | |||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | |||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |||||||
| Offeror must certify: | ||||||||
| 1. | System Continuity, Victim Verification, and Program Growth: The offeror must meet all requirements for victim notification system and have capacity for expansion of services to potentially include two or more of: (1) end-to-end case management capabilities that carry through the entire system(including access to case management notes, case information, contact information, and a complete history of the case's progression), (2) Victim/Offender Dialog management, (3) Grant Reports, and (4) Publications/Training Library. | |||||||
| 2. | Data Protection & No Commodification: The offeror must certify they will never mine, share, transfer, or use the data for any private or commercial purpose without explicit written authorization from the State of Utah. | |||||||
| 3. | Mitigation of Vulnerable Information Release: The offeror must certify they have programming safeguards to mitigate any release of vulnerable information and provide notification of data leakage or breaches and remediation protocols. | |||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points |
Earned
| 1 | Trauma-Informed and Victim-Centered Communication | 50 | 23.8% | 250.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | System Continuity, Victim Verification, and Program Growth | 40 | 19.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | Seamless Integration and Accessibility (Compliance) | 40 | 19.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | Strict Data Ownership, Privacy, and Security | 40 | 19.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |
| 5 | Timeline & Logistics | 40 | 19.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 100.0% | 1050.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| Cost will be negotiated with the highest ranking vendor |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .