6-255X901084 Addendum 1.pdf

Office of Procurement

ADDENDUM

Two Centennial Plaza

805 Central Avenue, Suite 234

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202-1947

DATE 10/7/2025 BUYER Margaret Allen-Elkanick

ADDENDUM NUMBER #1 ORIGINAL SOLICITATION DATE 09/15/2025

Your attention is called on a "Request for Qualifications" mailed from this office under the below referenced number and on which it is found necessary to make the following revision.

This addendum should be considered in submitting your proposal and should be attached to the original "Request for Qualifications" and made a part there of.

ITEM DESCRIPTION

REFERENCE NUMBER

SUBMISSIONS DUE

03:00 PM ET

Design and Engineering Services for the Renovation of Dunham Recreation Center

255X901084 October 21, 2025

PRE-SUBMISSION MEETING

An additional pre-submission meeting will be held Friday October 10, 2025, at 12:00PM, Noon via Teams at the link below. This meeting will have information relating to the mandatory inclusion goals of 3% MBE and 3% WBE associated with this RFQ.

Microsoft Teams Need help?

Join the meeting now

Meeting ID: 251 946 686 997 9 Passcode: W98sF6z6

Dial in by phone

+1 513-666-2177,,468062559# United States, Cincinnati Find a local number Phone conference ID: 468 062 559#

For organizers: Meeting options | Reset dial-in PIN

DUE DATE

The due date for this solicitation has been extended to Tuesday, October 21, 2025, at 3:00 PM ET.

https://aka.ms/JoinTeamsMeeting?omkt=en-US https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_N2Y5MDZmNTUtNDdlZS00ZGIyLWIxN2ItZTM2MThjM2VhOWMw%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%226f55bfd1-3669-41fd-a0e3-c98d56adb39f%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22cefdf8b6-9ebc-4d24-a91e-77989d2c8b5f%22%7d tel:+15136662177,,468062559 https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/9d03d963-8094-4dfc-ae86-c676fa6cddab?id=468062559 https://teams.microsoft.com/meetingOptions/?organizerId=cefdf8b6-9ebc-4d24-a91e-77989d2c8b5f&tenantId=6f55bfd1-3669-41fd-a0e3-c98d56adb39f&threadId=19_meeting_N2Y5MDZmNTUtNDdlZS00ZGIyLWIxN2ItZTM2MThjM2VhOWMw@thread.v2&messageId=0&language=en-US https://dialin.teams.microsoft.com/usp/pstnconferencing

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

Q1. What are the main priorities of this renovation?

A1. Correcting water damage, consolidation of spaces, and updates to modernize the building.

Q2. What programs are most relevant to the Dunham Recreation Center?

A2. Senior Citizen programming, Summer Camps, After School, Individual Classes (ceramics, etc), small Fitness Classes.

Sports Leagues are not, primarily because of a lack of gym space.

Q3. Is there a desire to expand or add onto the gym?

A3. There is desire to expand if the budget allows for it.

Q4. Are we to assume that we will need an environmental/hazardous materials consultant on the team to do abatement investigation and design?

A4. An investigation has been completed, and the Asbestos Inspection Report is attached. We will need to include material abatement in project.

Q5. Has an Asbestos Abatement been done? If so, can this be provided?

A5. No, abatement would need to be completed as part of the project.

Q6. Has an environmental study been done and, if not, is that a part of the scope?

A6. Yes. See attached Hazardous Materials Report.

Q7. Has an Arc Flash assessment been done? If so, can this be provided?

A7. Yes, See attached.

Q8. Has an ADA assessment been done?

A8. Yes, an ADA assessment was done about ten (10) years ago.

Q9. Has a needs assessment been done and, if not, is that a part of the scope?

A9. A Coordinated Site Review is in process and will be provided when available to the awarded vendor.

Q10. Is any storage included?

A10. If understanding the question: 3rd floor of building is used for CRC storage, the consolidation of rooms in the design should include some storage space but reduced from existing. CRC will not provide storage of materials during renovation.

Q11. Does CRC want to maintain character of the building?

A11. Yes, but modernized.

Q12. Will a roof replacement be necessary?

A12. The upper section in the center of the building will likely need replacement. The east and west wings will need renovations, not replacement. Some of the Spanish tile roofs will need work also.

Q13. Is anything outside of the building part of the scope?

A13. Only the front parking; the schoolhouse and theater are outside the scope.

Q14. Is there a plan to do a Phased Construction?

A14. No.

Q15. Is there any specific information regarding water damage?

A15. No.

Q16. Does CRC want or need a commercial level kitchen?

A16. No.

Q17. We see on page 5 of the RFQ that the site plan will be developed in conjunction with CRC's civil engineer. Does that mean we should assume that the civil engineer for this project will be contracted directly with CRC and should not be included on the A/E team submitting?

A17. Please include a civil engineer. Design will be developed in conjunction with CRC planning department for input.

Q18. Is there anything in the funding that will affect the timeline? (Grants, etc)

A18. Funding for the construction portion of the project is still undetermined.

Q19. Is there a sign in sheet from the pre-proposal that can be shared?

A19. Yes, the sign-in sheet is attached.

Q20. If we were to utilize a construction firm as a consultant for this project on our team, would they be disqualified from bidding for the final construction of the project?

A20. Yes, they would be disqualified from bidding for the final construction of the project. See page 7:

PREVENTING UNFAIR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES in the RFQ document.

Q21. Since this is an RFQ and not a fee proposal how does the City want Form MWP-20 (page 5 of the packet) and DEI Form 2003 (page 6 of the packet) filled out? Should we leave the dollar amounts blank?

A21. See above for a Teams link to an additional pre-submission meeting that will be held Friday October

10, 2025, at 12:00PM, Noon via Teams. This meeting will have information relating to the mandatory inclusion goals of 3% MBE and 3% WBE associated with this RFQ.

ATTACHMENTS

• Hazardous Materials Report

• Asbestos Inspection Report

• Arc Flash

• Pre-Submission Meeting Sign-In Sheet_09.22.2025

All other terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged.

ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT

DUNHAM ALLE HOUSE

4356 DUNHAM WAY

CINCINNATI, OHIO

PN: HULL.028

Prepared by:

Sierra Environmental Group, Inc.

1041 Straight Street

Cincinnati, Ohio 45214

(513) 542-5323 and Hull & Associates, Inc.

4770 Duke Drive, Suite 300 Mason, Ohio

Prepared for:

The City of Cincinnati Office of Environmental Quality 805 Central Avenue, Suite 320

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

March 2011

Prepared by: Chuck Callahan Reviewed by: Todd Taylor cYc4{~ SignatureSignature

1041 STRAIGHT STREET • CiNCINNATI. OHIO 45214 • OFFICE 513.542.5323 • FAX 513.542.6653

Figures

Tables

Section I

Section 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary I-I

Introduction 2-1

BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT

3-[Section 3

Section 4

Section 5

Section 6

Appendix A

Appendix B

Appendix C

Inspection Procedures

3.1 Method of Sampling and Analysis 3-1

3.1.1 Bulk Sample Collection Method

3.1.2 Analysis of Bulk Samples

3-1 3-2

3.2 Results of Bulk Sample Analyses 3-2

Physical Assessment and Hazard Assessment 4-1

4.1 Theory of Physical Assessment 4-1

4.2 Theory of Hazard Assessment 4-4

4.3 Hazard Assessment 4-4

Material Quantities of ACBM 5-1

Response Recommendations 6-1

Inspector's Certificates and Accreditations A-I

Glossary B-1

Floor Plans C-I umber

3-1

4-1

4-2

4-3

4-4

Number

3-1

6-1

T ABLE OF CONTENTS (CON'T)

FIGURES

Bulk Sample Laboratory Report

Flow Chart for AHERA Inspection and Assessment

Classification of the Potential for Disturbance

Classification for Hazard Potential (Decision Tree Display)

Conversion to Response Actions

3-3

4-2

4-3

4-5

4-6

TABLES

Bulk Sample Data Summary

Inspection and Assessment Summary

Page

3-4

6-3

III

SECTION 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A total of fifty-four bulk samples were collected from the Dunham Allen House located at 4356 Dunham Way in Cincinnati, Ohio and analyzed for asbestos fiber content by Polarized Light Microscopy. One of the samples was found to contain> I% asbestos.

The fifty-four bulk samples were collected from thirty-two homogeneous areas (a Homogeneous Area is defined as "an area of surfacing material, thermal system insulation, or miscellaneous material that is uniform in color and texture"). There was one identified homogeneous area in the Dunham Allen House located at 4356 Dunham Way in Cincinnati, Ohio that were sampled and determined to be asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM). There are two homogeneous areas in Dunham Allen House that are assumed to be asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM). These materials are as follows:

Preformed-block pipe insulation (10 If) Exterior stucco (16,000 sf) Roofing materials, assumed (9,390 sf)

Firedoors, gaskets, electrical wire sheathing, firebrick, roofing, boiler muds, etc., which were not sampled, should be assumed to contain asbestos. All activities involving these materials should be in strict accordance to requirements stipulated by the EPA, unless further testing proves these materials to be asbestos free. Asbestos-containing materials, which may be located behind walls, above hard plaster ceilings, under carpeting, etc., were not assessed or quantified. If, through demolition or renovation, these materials are discovered, they should be documented and handled accordingly.

I-I

SECTION 2

INTRODUCTION

In September 20 I0, Hull & Associates contracted Sierra Environmental Group, Inc. (Sierra) to conduct a comprehensive building inspection of the Dunham Allen House located at 4356 Dunham Way in Cincinnati, Ohio for asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM).

The purpose of the inspection program was I) to identify those accessible building materials that may contain asbestos, 2) to collect and analyze bulk samples in accordance with EPA-recommended guidelines, 3) to physically assess the condition of all accessible asbestos-containing material (ACM) and its potential for disturbance, and 4) to provide estimated 20 II asbestos unit removal costs. Utilizing the assessment of ACBM, Sierra will recommend appropriate strategies to control or eliminate potential hazards.

Mr. Todd Taylor and Mr. Chuck Callahan, (Ohio-Certified Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialist # ES32139 and # ES31960) with Sierra, conducted a detailed walk-through inspection of the Dunham Allen House located at 4356 Dunham Way in Cincinnati, Ohio from March 16-17,2011. Representative bulk samples of suspect materials were collected and condition of the materials were assessed.

Section I of this report is the Executive Summary that briefly discusses the ACBM that was identified from the laboratory analysis of suspect materials, and the material that was assumed to be ACBM.

Sections 3 through 6 consist of the Building Inspection Report, which describes the building inspection procedures, bulk sample collection and analytical techniques, and the material evaluation and physical assessment methods used.

It also explains how estimates were made of the footages of areas treated or covered with ACBM, as well as a listing of types of material tested, their location, and their asbestos content.

In order to obtain specific knowledge of the ACBM in the building, utilization of Tables 3-1 and 6-1 is essential.

Table 3-1 lists all of the materials which were sampled, sample locations, sample numbers (field and laboratory), asbestos content, and homogeneous area numbers. A description of all homogeneous area numbers can be found at the end of Table 3-1. Table 6-1 lists all of the areas in the building where ACBM was identified. By using Table 6- I and the homogeneous area numbers found at the end of it, one can determine how much of each variety of ACBM exists in a particular area. Type ACM, condition, potential for disturbance, response action cost estimates and 20 I I unit removal cost estimates are also summarized on this Table.

Cost estimates for asbestos-containing materials are calculated based on 20 II unit rates. A cost estimate has been provided for each independent line item, with a minimum estimate of $250.00. Because costs were estimated for individual items, the actual cost to remove several line items would be significantly lower than the aggregate of their individual cost estimates.

Proof of the Sierra inspector's training and Ohio Department of Health Certifications are presented in Appendix A.

Appendix B is a Glossary of terms that are commonly used throughout the Inspection Report and the asbestos industry in general.

2-1

BUILDING INSPECTION REPORT

SECTION 3

INSPECTION PROCEDURES

The asbestos inspection of the Dunham Allen House located at 4356 Dunham Way in Cincinnati, Ohio was scheduled through Mr. Matt Mullin, City of Cincinnati. The building inspection was conducted from March 16-17, 20 II by Mr. Todd Taylor and Mr. Chuck Callahan, (Ohio-Certified Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialists # ES32139 and # ES31960).

Upon arrival at the building the inspectors conducted a cursory review of available floor plans to identify those building components that could potentially contain asbestos. This information helped to familiarize Sierra with the building itself and with the locations of suspect building components. Regardless of the information gathered before the inspection, the renovation areas were given a thorough inspection. This inspection included a room-by-room walk-through investigation of the Dunham Allen House located at 4356 Dunham Way in Cincinnati, Ohio, during which the accessible areas were visually checked for the suspected presence of any asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM).

During the building inspection, the inspectors looked for suspect materials on building components such as pipes, tanks, walls, ceilings, etc. that could contain asbestos. Suspect materials were touched to determine their degree of friability, and sampling areas containing homogeneous materials were identified.

3.1 METHOD OF SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

3.1.1 Bulk Sample Collection Method

During the building inspection, the asbestos evaluation specialist looked for suspect materials on building components such as pipes, tanks, wall, ceilings, etc. that could contain asbestos and pose potential exposure hazards.

Samples of suspect materials were collected in accordance with protocol outlined in the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA - Section 763.86). Although the AHERA regulation currently applies only to schools, it is considered state of the art in terms of protocol for building inspections for ACBM.

For friable Surfacing Materials, three (3) bulk samples were collected for each homogeneous area less than or equal to 1,000 square feet. If the homogeneous area was greater than 1,000 square feet but less than 5,000 square feet, five

(5) bulk samples were collected. For homogeneous areas that were greater than 5,000 square feet, seven (7) bulk samples were collected. The inspectors determined random sample locations in each homogeneous area of suspect surfacing materials during the initial inspection.

Three (3) samples were randomly collected from homogeneous areas of Thermal System Insulation such as piping.

Miscellaneous Material and non friable suspected ACBM were typically sampled "in a manner sufficient to determine" whether the material in question contained asbestos.

To avoid disturbing the material more than necessary and potentially cause the release of asbestos fibers, the inspectors performed bulk sampling of suspect materials in accordance with generally accepted procedures outlined in the current EPA Guidance Document and in accordance with AHERA (Section 763.86) protocol. Each sample was collected and placed in a clean, sealable vial and labeled with a unique sample identification number. This sample number was recorded on a Bulk Sample Log Sheet, the sample vial, and at the sample location to permit easy identification of the sampled materials in the future. Supplemental information was also recorded on the Bulk Sample Log Sheet, including date of inspection, name of the inspectors, the building name (or number), a brief description and location of the sample, and type of material sampled (e.g. thermal insulation, fireproofing, acoustical plaster). BuLk samples were submitted to IATL Laboratory or Environmental Hazards Services (EHS) analytical laboratory upon completion of the inspection.

3-1

3.1.2 Analysis of Bulk Samples

Bulk samples were analyzed for asbestos content by polarized-light microscopy (PLM) and dispersion staining (Method Reference: 40 CFR Part 763, Volume 47, No. 103, May 27, 1982, pg. 23376). This analytical method, which the EPA currently recommends for the determination of asbestos in bulk samples of friable insulation materials, can be used for qualitative identification of six morphologically different types of asbestos fibers:

chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, tremolite, and actinolite asbestos.

The method specifies that the asbestos content in a bulk sample shall be estimated and reported as a finite percentage (rounded to the nearest percent) within the range of 0 to 100. Minute quantities of asbestos in bulk samples may be reported as "trace" or less than I percent «1%). The analytical method determined the "area percent" asbestos or the percentage of the area ofa microscopic field of view that is occupied by asbestos fibers.

The results of all bulk sample analyses are reported in a standard written laboratory report. This written report includes the client name, the laboratory identification numbers assigned to each bulk sample upon receipt by the laboratory sample custodian, and the field number assigned to each bulk sample during the building inspection. The composition of the bulk sample is reported in percentages of asbestos (i.e., chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, or other) and non-asbestos (i.e., cellulose, fiberglass, synthetic, or other) components. The original laboratory reports are presented in Figure 3-1 in Section 3.2.

There is another factor that relates to sample analysis. Assume that seven bulk samples were taken from a large homogeneous area. If the first sample analyzed by the laboratory is positive for asbestos fibers, there is no need to analyze the other six samples; per AHERA protocol, one positive sample is enough to determine that the entire area contains ACBM. If the first sample is negative, then further analysis is required until either a positive sample is found or until all seven samples are tested as negative.

3.2 RESULTS OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSES

The results of the analyses of all samples that were suspected to contain asbestos are summarized in Table 3-1. This table lists:

The location from where the sample was collected.

A description of the material sampled.

The identification number assigned to the sample by the evaluation specialist in the field.

The identification number assigned to the sample by the analytical laboratory.

If asbestos was found in the sample, the percentage of asbestos present and the type of asbestos.

The homogeneous area from which the sample was collected.

Indication as to whether or not the sample was friable at the time of collection (as required by the EPA's National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants ).

The actual laboratory reports are presented in Figure 3-1. These reports also list the nature of the non-asbestos material that was identified in each sample.

3-2

TABLE 3-1

BULK SAMPLE DATA SUMMARY

3-3

TABLE 3·1 . BULK SAMPLE OATA SUMMARY

SAMPLE SAMPLE HOMO AREA SAMPLE ASBESTOS FRIABLE/

DESCRIPTION LOCATION # I.D. NO. CONTENT NO 'FRIABLE

(Material Type)

The followlng samples were collected from the unham A en ouse ocate at un am ay m mcmna I, 10.

Spray applied fire proofing Area #1 I I-I None Detected Friable (Thermal System Insulation)

Spray applied fire proofing Area #4 I 1-2 None Detected Friable (Thermal System Insulation)

Spray applied fire proofing Area #6 I 1-3 None Detected Friable (Thermal System Insulation)

Spray applied fire proofing Area #35 I 1-4 None Detected Friable (Thermal System Insulation)

Spray applied fire proofing Area #1 I 1-5 None Detected Friable (Thermal System Insulation)

Skim coat of hard wall plaster Area #2 2 2-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Skim coat of hard ceiling plaster Area #2 2 2-2 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Skim coat of hard wall plaster Area #5 2 2-3 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Skim coat of hard wall plaster Area #22 2 2-4 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Skim coat of hard ceiling plaster Area #43 2 2-5 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Skim coat of hard wall plaster Area #68 2 2-6 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Skim coat of hard wall plaster Area #74 2 2-7 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Skim coat of hard ceiling plaster Area #19 2 2-8 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Brown coat of hard wall plaster Area #2 3 3-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Brown coat of hard wall plaster Area #2 3 3-2 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Brown coat of hard wall plaster Area #5 3 3-3 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Brown coat of hard wall plaster Area #22 3 3-4 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Brown coat of hard wall plaster Area #43 3 3-5 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Brown coat of hard wall plaster Area #68 3 3-6 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

D II H d 4356 D h w C t Oh

Table 3-1-1

TABLE 3·1· BULK SAMPLE DATA SUMMARY

SAMPLE SAMPLE HOMO AREA SAMPLE ASBESTOS FRIABLE/

DESCRIPTION LOCATIO # 1.0. NO. CO TENT NONFRIABLE

(Material Type)

Brown coat of hard wall plaster Area #74 3 3-7 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Brown coat of hard wall plaster Area #19 3 3-8 None Detected Nonfriable (Surfacing)

Joint compound ceiling patch Area #1 4 4-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

12" Ceiling tile with holes Area #3 5 5-1 None Detected Friable (Miscellaneous)

2'x2' Suspended ceiling tile Area #4 6 6-1 None Detected Friable with holes and fissures

(Miscellaneous)

2'x2' Suspended ceiling tile Area #4 7 7-1 None Detected Friable with holes and tracks

(Miscellaneous)

Large gray baseboard Area #4 8 8-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Mastic associated with large gray baseboard Area #4 9 9-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Gray and white linoleum Area #4 10 10-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Preformed-block pipe insulation Area #6 II 11-1 20% Chrysotile Friable (Thermal System Insulation)

Gray duct sealant Area #5 12 12-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Black baseboard Area #19 13 13-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Mastic associated with black baseboard Area #19 14 14-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Drywall behind hard plaster Area #20 15 15-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Layered-paper pipe insulation Area #21 16 16-1 None Detected Friable (Thermal System Insulation)

2'x2' Suspended ceiling tile. rough Area #22 17 17-1 None Detected Friable (Miscellaneous)

Gray sink under coating Area #25 18 18-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

12"x12" Gray and white floor tile Area #42 19 19-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Table 3-1-2

TABLE 3-1 - BULK SAMPLE OATA SUMMARY

SAMPLE SAMPLE HOMO AREA SAMPLE ASBESTOS FRIABLE!

DESCRIPTIO 1 LOCATION # J.D. NO. CO TENT NONFRIABLE

(Material Type)

Yellow mastic associated with 12" Area #42 20 20-1 None Detected Nonfriable gray and white floor tile

(Miscellaneous)

Brown floor tile Area #68 21 21-1 None Detected Nonfriable (M iscellaneous)

Yellow mastic associated with Area #68 22 22-1 None Detected Non friable brown floor tile (M iscellaneous)

Yellow carpet mastic Area #67 23 23-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Brown floor tile Area #71 24 24-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Yellow mastic associated with Area #71 25 25-1 None Detected Nonfriable brown floor tile (Miscellaneous)

Drywall Area #74 26 26-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Joint compound Area #74 27 27-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Joint compound Area #77 27 27-2 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Joint compound Area #80 27 27-3 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Small gray baseboard Area #95 28 28-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Mastic associated with Area #95 29 29-1 None Detected Nonfriable small gray baseboard

(Miscellaneous)

Blue linoleum Area #101 30 30-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Drywall Area #101 31 31-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Joint compound Area #101 32 32-1 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Joint compound Area #102 32 32-2 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Joint compound Area #104 32 32-3 None Detected Nonfriable (Miscellaneous)

Table 3-1-3

FIGURE 3-1

BULK SAMPLE LABORATORY REPORT

3-4

IATL International Asbestos Testing Laboratories

9000 Commerce Par~y Suite B Mt LaUrel, NJ 08054 Telephone; 856·231·944~ Fax; 856·231-9818

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Sierra Environmental Group Inc

1041 Straight Street

Cincinnati OH 45214

Report Date: 3/22/2011

Project! Allen House

Project No.: Hnll.028

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249074 I-I

Description / Location: Lt Grey Insulation

% Asl!estos % Nap-Asbestos Fibrous Mntsrja! % Non:FjbrQUSMaterial

None Detec(cd None: Detected 90 Mlneral Wool 10

Lab No.:

ClicntNo.:

4249075 1·2

Description I Location: Lt Grey Insulation

% Asbestos % Non·Asbesto.~ Fihrous Material % Nqn-Fjbrous Mnrerial

None Derected None Detected 90 Mineral Wool 10

Lab No.:

Client No.;

4249076 1-3

Description I Location: Lt Grey Insulation

% A.•beslQJ % Nnn-Asbestos Fibrou~ M!Uctial

None Detected Norte Detected 90

1m Mineral Wool

% Non-PibrO\J1! Materia!

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249077 1-4

Description I Lecatlon: Lt Grey Insulation

% Non-AsbesIO$ Fibrous Marerial % Non.Fibtous Material

None Detected None Detected 90 Mineral Wool 10

NIST-l\rvLA.:P No. 10116>0 NY-DOH No. 11021 AlBA Lab No. 100188 Thll oonjldcorw/ report Nlatos DIlly co rJoOJ~itun(s) tSMsd aNi d«s not rlpNJMtlm Norsemen' by NIST·NT4JP. AlIU or any agUlC)/o/rJoc u.s. goy",11IWI1

Thlr report shall net b! 78JJroduc~"uJH infilll. wUh= "'ritlen approya/ ofrJo~/4li()raf()'Y.

A1lalysis Method: EPA 600JR.-93/116 COllUDtrltlI: (PC) Indic'Iles Slnlificd Point CoWl[ MelhoQ performed. Mefu(ld lIot paformcd unless Nled. Qambficaticll at <0.25% by volume is possible widllbiB medlo(\. (pc-tra;c) rcptcstllt$

1his Iimic at quamitation. (PC.Ttaee) meaDS tbat asbUlOS was detected but is lIot 'l\>llllifiablc \DIcier the Poinl ConntiDg rcgimm. ~ incllldu all disWlot scplInble Iayus ill aoc:ordaDcewidl EP.\ 600 Method. rr_ f~ or odlcrwiJe notecl, I~ is .ilha Dot prestll1 ot the climt haJ speeifioaUr ~~ tbat it JlOt be maJyzcd. slIIIInasbcitos fibers =y be missed by PlM due III mJolution Ilmitations of1h& opl:i¢:llmicroscope. Th8f8fo.-e. lIegative Pl.M rCsWl$ =01 be ~ EI~ Microscopy can be •••cd OJ •• c:olIfi~ technique. ~8IlIatol)' Limit is basc4 \/POrt the ssmpl. maIrix.

Analysis Performed By: __ J_. _H_areroza ~ __ Approved By:

Frank E. Ehrellfe1d, m Laboratory Directoe

Date: 3/22/201 I

9000 Commerce Parkway Suire B Mt. Laurel, NJ 080$4 Telephone: 856-231-9449 Fu: 856-231-9818

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Sierra Environmental Group Inc

1041 Straight Street

Cincinnati OH 45214

Report Date: 3/22/2011

Project. Allen House

Project No.: HuIL028

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Lab No.:

CtleotNo.:

4:249078 1-5

Description 1Loeaticn, Lt Grey Insulation

%Asbes~ % Non-AsbestOS FibrouS Material % Non-'I1'j,rous Material

None: Detected None Detected 90 Mi.o.~Wool 10

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249079 2·1

Description I Location: White Plaster

% Asbwos % Non.Asbestos Fibrous Maten.u % Non.Fibrous Materia!

None Detected None Detected None Detected None DeteCted 100

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249080 2-2

Description I Location: White Plaster

None Detected

% Non·Asbestos Fibrous Moterial

None Detected

% NOh-Fibrous Material% Asbestos

None Detected None Detected 100

Lab No.:

Client No.1

4249081 :2-3

Description I Location: White Plaster

None Detected None Detected

None Detected

% Non-Fibrous Ml\tetial% Non-Asbestos Fibrou.~Material

None Detected 100

NIST-NVLAP No. 101165-0 NY-DOli No. 11021 AlHA Lab No. 100188 '!hisconjldUlttal ,~port rel~lu only to tnos« tr~(I) IW.d and dDu nor rcprlllmt an entiO'SDlln.i by NlST-NYLAP, A.I1IA or ""Y qgmcy oflM U.S. ~v~mmtmt

This repor: sJ,qU I'HJttw roproduclll ""pt illjWl. IIltJtoutW/"iIIt:n ~pprovalojlh.ldJorlllol)l.

AIl~s Method: EPA 600IR-93/116 CommCllts: (PC) I!Idi~ StI1Ilified Poiot CoIII1I Method performed. Method not pcrfotTnOd ijlllm na1ICd. QuaDlificaliOll at <O.25'l'1 by WlIlO1C is ponible \>Iidlllli$lIItthod. (pc-Traee) represents

Ibis limit of quamilalioa. (pC-trace) m~ Ihal Mbcstoo wu detee~ but a not Q\llllltitW)l. wder !be Point Cc1lllti1l8 te,m..... AIIaI»$i$ iodudes .u diiIiDct iOpmble 1000mIin accordance wilh EP A 600 Mcdlod. ItDOtreported or od\etWi$e noted, laya- is eidler DOt prescot or the cliCIIIbilS specifically re/j\IWed Wrt it not be ~~d. 5maII ubcstos 6bers may be missed by PI.M due to resolution limitations of the optical microseope. 'Therefare, ""saDY$ PLM IUUitB cannot be 8IIl11'111tccd. E1cclfOn MiOlOSoop'f .:m be used 3S ~ coDfinninS technique. Reaut.twr Limit is b2sed upOn the aample 1IIo1ItUx.

Analysis Performed By:__ J_. _H_ar_emza _

Date: 3122/2011 Pate 2 of IS

9000 Commer~ ParkMiy Suite 13Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Telephone: 856-231-9449 Fax: 856-231-9818

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Sierra Environmental Group Inc

1041 Straight Street

Cincinnati OR 4,214

Report D:a:te: 3/2212011

Project: AllenHouse

Project No.: Hull.028

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249082 2-4

Descripti.on I Location: White Plaster

% Asbestos

None Detected

% Non-Asbestos Fihrous Material % Nnn-ribrous Material

None Detected None Detected None Detected 100

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249083 2-5

Description I Location: White Plaster

% Non-Asbestps Fibrous Material % Non-Fibrtlus Ml!tc[jaJ

None Detected None~ccted None Detected None Detected 100

Lab No.:

ClicntNo.:

4249084 2-6

Desc:ription I Location: White Texture Plaster

None Detected None Detected None Detected

None Detected

% Non-Fibrous Malerial% Asbestos % Non-Asbestos FibrollS Materia!

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249085 2-7

Description I Location: White Plaster

% Non-Asbc3tos Fibrous MnteriaJ % Non-Fihro\ls Material

None Detccu:d None Detected None Detected NoneDetec~ 100

NIST-NVLAP No.10116S-0 NY-DOH No. nen AlBA Lab No. 100188 ThiS ,onfidUlt/al NJport '~Il1/(;sOff/Yto thos« IrB1tl($)ruled cmcIdolU not I'eprU4IJt IlfIlmriomlmtml by NlST-}/YLAP. AlHA 0' any (JgCncyo/tfle u.s. 80~f11rm~t

Th/J repor: shall not b. reprotilJ"d UC.pl in full, withtM wrtath approvaltJ/ th~ /a/J(JTaif)ry.

Analysis Method: EPA 600/R.-93/116 CommOllts' (PC) Iftcli~1eJ SttaliDed Point CoutotMethod performed. MoLbod 1101perfO<lllcd 'CID!ess s~,1. QuaDlitlcaliOll at <;0.25%II)' voIumc is ponible with tIIia lIICIbod. (PC-Tr.=c) ~ts

Ibis Iimil of quantiwiol1, (Pc.Tme) means !hat albesto$ "III8S detected but is 1101ItIl~tifiabJe under th. 'oint Colllltin: regimen. Anal)'m iDcWdc& all disIin~ scpMable Jayea in ao;oordance willi EPA 600 Method. If nOl reported or otherwiJe 1I010d. lay" u ci!ber DQI P_I or the client bas specjt\cally rcque.ated tIw it l\Ot be amIyttd. Small ~beslo> fibcn may be missed by PLM due to re.sollllioD limitatiom of !be op\~a1 microscope. Thuefore, nep!M: PLM r....u\S =01 be gll&wnced. Ele<:a'onMlcrolrCOpy caI1 be USC<Ias. COIIfinDing technique. Realllaroty Limit iI based UPOn 1he .ample matriK.

Analysis Performed By:-------------------------J. Haremza

Date: 3/22/2011 Page 3 of 1S

9000 COnm'leree Parkway Suire B hilt. Laurc:l, Nl 08054 Telephone: 156-231-9449 Fax: 8S6-23 1-9818

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Sierra Environmental Group lnc

1041 Straight Street

Cincinnati OH

Report Date: 312212011

Project! Allen House

Project No.: Hull.02845214

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUl\fl\1ARY

Lab No.:

CtientNo.:

%ASbestcs

Sample Not Received

Lab No.:

Client No.:

% Asbestos

None Detected

Lab No.:

Client No.:

% AsbcstoS None Detected

Lab No.:

Client No.:

None Dc;ICCted

4249086 2-8

Sample Not ReceivedDeserlptien I Location:

% Nnr>-Asbc:rtos Fibrou~ Mntcrial % Non-fibrous Material

Sample: NOI Received

4249087 3-1

Tan PlasterDescription I Location:

None Detected

Mon-Asbestos Fibrous Material ~ Cellulose 100

% NOn-Fibroys Material

Trace

4249088 3-2

Tan PlasterDescription I Location:

% Non·ASbesln~ Pibroys Material % N01I·FihrollSMau:rial

None: Detected CelluloseTrace 100

4249089 3-3

Description I Location: Tan Plaster

% Non.Asbesroo Fibrous MaWiaJ % NOII-FibtOtlSMaterial

None: Detected CelluloseTraee 100

NIST-NVLAP No. 101165-0 AUlA Lab No. 100188NY-DOH No. 11021 Thisc01l.ftd4h~1 report relatc only r~ Iho.e ilem(z) tutu/ t»td dqr;s ~ HpNunl tDI en4orn:mQlt by NI$T.NVLAP, AIHA 01'Q1ly~ o/,hs u.s. gO\l~1'HJnetJl

ThU ':~rt shaJl "01b, rep1'(Idut;~~epl in full, withOVl wrill." ap!>'Oya/o/rhe WiomlC",.

ArtaIysisMethod: EPA 600/R-93/116

Com •••eats: (PC) Iadieart:$ Stl;iijicd Point Cotmr Method performed Method DOlpodormcd wau stoIled. Qumdficalion lie<0.:25% by whllM is p"OMiblcwith d14ll1eltlod. (PC-Tracc) represoJllS tbiJ llinil oCquantitalion. (PC-Trace) means that asbestos was detcaed boll is IIIOtqulllllifiahic under the Point CoanIiDg re~ ADaly.w iDclll(les all distm.:1Rcporalllo layen in ~ocordallcc with EPA 600 MClhod. IfnOI "POrted or otherwise nOled.layer is either 1101pte.tCQIor the cli""III1S spct:ilically requaSld lhat il DDIbe 1lIaI~ SDIIIlI UbcslOJ 1l\)eo$1IIOly be miuod by PLM due 10 re$olulion JimiblliQ/lJ of "'0 optioa! microsccp.. Therefore, DCg;aIiw PLM resulll O/IIIDotbe ~teccl ElC<lQ'OftMi~p)' oaDbe UJe4 U a oon/inaiQg lcolmiquc. R.e$ulAICI)'Limit i& ba$el! \IpOO the wup\c matrix.

J. HaremzaAnalysis Performed By!------------------- Date: 312212011

Page40t IS

IATL Intemarional Asbestos

9000 Commerce Patbiay Suite B Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Telephone: 856-231-9449 Fax: 856-231-9818

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Sierra Environmental Group Inc

1041 Straight Street

Cincinnati OH

Report Date: 3/22/2011

Project: Allen Honse

Project No.: HuIl.02845214

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Lab No.:

Client No.:

Description J Location:

% Asw.u0S None Detected

Lab No.:

Client No.:

% Asbes\OS

NOlle Detected

Lab No.:

Client No.:

None Detected

LllbNo.:

Client No.:

None Detected

4249090 3-4

Tan Plaster

None Detected

% NOll-A.~bcstoS Fibl'Qu~ Materia! % Non-Fibtou.. MmmaJ~ Cellulose 100

4249091 3-5

Tan PlasterDescription I Location:

% Nnn-Alibestos Fibrous Material ~ Cellulose

% Non-Fibrnus Materjal

None Detected 100Trace

4249092

3-6 Tan PlasterDescription J Leesnen:

% Non-Asbe.<;tos Fibrous Material % 'Non-Fibmus Materia!~ Cellulose 100None Detected Trace

4249093 3-7

Tan PlasterDescription J Location:

% 'Non-Asbef;tos FibrouS Materilll % Non-fibrous MQteri!!l~ Cellulo~None Detected Trace 100

NIST-NVLAP No. 101165-0 AlBA Lab No. 100188NY-DOB No. 11021 This cOlrjltiBJ1111Jlreport ,ua(ez only 10 ,/lose iUm($) ruwJ and does not rop,t1/W "" cncJorsntimr by N1S't·NJILAP. AIHA or (1")1 ggcncy ofrh6 US. ~eT1I1l1mr

TII~f report shall norlle ,eproduc,J txCqJl brfoll •.••.ithout '"lrtOi apf'rOlIfl/ "Ith, /abol't1toty.

Analysis Method: EPA 6oolR-93Jt 16 Comb>etIhs: O'C) Indicates Slrati6ed PoiDI: COIlIIt Method pc:rformod. Method aot performed unICSllWod.. ~c:ation 81 <0,2$% by whlmc is possiblewill! flIia method. (pc-Tracc) rcpre_lS

!his lin\il of qllllDmatioll. (PC-Tn") means tlut aslmtOll wu de~ed but is uot quautUjAblc uudcr the Point Couuting rcgim •••. Au~m iDelwk, all distinct separable layers ill aooordancc wilh EPA 600 Method. If (lot reponed or olherwise Doted, layer ;$ ellhcr IIOtPrcsellt Of th= client hti spec;i1ioallyreqeestcd lbal ilnot be analyW. SmAllubestos fibers JIJ:i.y be mis$od by PLM due to resoJ.jtionlimiratiollS otrhe optical microscope. 1hercCorc. oe,aci"" PLMresaltS eaDIlOC be guaramud. Electron Micro_py ~ be used &J a C<IIIfirmiDg Ie.:hnique. lU!gu1atoI)' Limit ub8$ed upon the samp"'lIlatrix.

J. Harenu:aAnalysis Performed By:----------------------

Page 5 ofl5

9000 Commerce Parkway S\litt: B Mt Laure), NJ oaOS4 Telephone: 856-231-9449 Fax: 856-231-9818

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Sierra Environmental Group Inc

1041 Straight Street Cincinnati OH 45214

Report Date: 312212011

Project: Allen House

Projed No.: Hull. 028

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249094 3·8

Description I Location: Sample Not Received

% Non-Asbestos Fibrou.~ Mmri!!! % Non.FibtOllS Material

Sample Not Received SlIIIIplc Not Received

Lsb No.;

CliontNo.:

4249095 4--1

Description I Lccaticn, White Joint Compound

% Asbestos % NoD.Asbe8ttI.Q Fibrous Material % Non·Fihmu., MIIt&[ia\

None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected 100

LllbNo.:

Client No.:

4249096 5·1

D~cription I Location: GreylWhite Ceiling Tile

% Asbestos % Non.Asbe!:ttl5 Fibrous Material % Non-Fi!rrous Material

None Detected None Detected 50

Mineral Woo!

Cellulose

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249097 6·1

Description I Location: Tan/White Ceiling Tile

%Asbest()~ % Non-AsbCSlosj'ibrous MlIteliAl % Non.Fibrous Material

None Detected None Detected 2S

Mineral Wool Cellulose

NIST-NVLAP No. 101165-0 NY.DOH No. 11021 AlBA Lab No. 100188 1111$C()I1/Kicnlia/ rBpon 7:1(1/1$ only 10 thas« a:III(s) lutld t11Iddoes "or ,..prlSmr IDI ."t/crsl;m.rl! by NIST·NJILAP, AJ1iA or QII)I (lfetlq <11th. CIS. goYcmmlfrll

Thls report 1hDfInoI b. 7I!p1'()drJC~ =ept injWJ, wirnOl'llllritten apJ1l'()vo/ ofrha labOl'a/ory.

Analysis Method: EPA 600/R·93/116 ComDlOllI*; (PC) Indicalcs S~ti1ied Paint Count Molhod pcrrormcd. Method not perform." IIDles. .tated. Q\w\(itication at «l.2S% b)' volnme i&possiblo with thiI mclhQd. (PC- Trace) repl'CSelllS tIIi&limit of'lcnntitation. (PC- Tq~) mOllllS thai a$bostos "' detected bill is not quantiIlablo IItIdcr !he Paint CoIlllliDJ rc;imcn. Analysi,t iDclWltJ all distinct scpalabl& layers in aocordance wid!EPA 600 Method. If not t"I)ortcd or otherwise f\O~.layer iJ eiIhat lIot present or die eJient Iw &pCcificaJlyrequcttcd 1IW it 110Ibe analyzed. Sm)U a.bcItoa fibtrs may be mined by PLM duot ro r •• olution IiJ\\il1lliom oftbt; optical mioroacopc. ~ro"" ne!;8tive PLM ~tE cannot be "' ••••• tccd EIeCItoQ Mic:roscopy ca6 be wed •• a co~ tedmi~, ltcgulatozy Limit is based upon tile s3IIlple malrix.

Analysis Performed By:__ J_._H_ar_e_UlZa _

Date: 3/2212011

9000 Commerce Patkway Suite B Ml Laurel, Nl 08054 Telephone:: 8~6-2'31.9449 Fax; 8S6·231-9818

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Cheat: Sierra Environmental Group Inc

1041 Straight Street

Cincinnati OR 45214

Report Date: 3/2212011

Project! Allen House

Project No.: HuU.028

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Lab No.:

ClieotNo.:

4249098 7-1

Description! Location: TanlWhitc Ceiling Tile

%A~bes~ % Nnn-Asbesto~ l"ibrous Matcrjai

None Detected None Detected 5

MiJ\eral. Wool

Cellulose:

%.Non-flibrpus Materilll

3S

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249099 8-1

Description! Location: Grey Rubber

% Asbestos % Non-Asbestos Fibrou.. Ma!crial % Non-Fibrous Malenaj

None Detected None Detected None: Detected None Detected 100

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249100 9·1

Description! Location: Dk Tan Mastic

None Detected

% Non-As~t.os Fibrous MateriAl

NODeDetected

% Nqn.Fibrou$ Mnrerial% Asbestol

NoneDete<:~ NOlie Detected 100

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249100 9-1

Description! Location: White Plaster uyerNo.: 2

None Detected

Nonc Deteeted

% Non-Fibrous Material%Asbesto~ % Nnn-Asbestos Fibrous Material

None Detected None Detected 100

NIST-NVLAP No. 101165-0 NY-DOH No. 11021 AlllA Lab No. 100188 '/1Ji. ccnftdmrtolr~117'lotu ""/)1 to thos« IltJltI(s)tosr,d rmd dou /1Ot''P''.I6JU an eflliornmtmt I>y NlSI'-NYLAP, AJHA or Ofl)lagmC)l ~tM a.s. grwtmm""t

This repor: JholI7If)t b.l'6p,oductd ~'pt Info/~ v..ilhout wrl«/III apprOVQ/ of tit, iDbor4tory.

AnQlysis Method: EPA 600/R·93/116 CODUIICllm: (PC) Indit.aws SlDrtified POill1 COunl Method periormed. Method not pcrforme4l111lcss stated. Q~antificaJjon at <O.2S% by .•••l\Ia1. is poJSl'b1c w.ilh dUs method. (l'C-Tmcc) rcpre.seo\lS lhi$limit of quaIltiUlioo. (PC- Tr_) JUe1llS thai a,sbes(os was detcetacl bul is net quantifiable 1Dld<%thol'<lUll Counting ftlsim=- Analysis inclndca all dislincc 'cperabJc IJytll'$ in a<:eordanco with EPA 600 )4dwd. Ifnol I'8llOrted or otherwise noled, layer is e.ilhcr nOI p~ or lIIe client has speQfically rII4\l'eSled IIW it: /lOt be IIlIIIyzed. S""U ",beilbi fibers moy be missed by PLM <I\Ie10 r..,olulion lil1Iitaliom oCthe optical microscope. nl.t,...,core, •••tam PLM (_lIS OiIDnot be SUlItaa!ecd.. EIccIroII Mil:roscapy can be used as • C()~ n:duIiqu.. AcguJatory Limit is baled "1'04 \he sample matrix.

Analysis Performed By:----------------------J. Haremza

Date: 3!2V2011

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Ml Latrrcl. Nl 08054 Telephone; 856·231·9449 Fax: 856-231.9818

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client; Sierra Environmental Group Inc

1041 Straight Street

Cincinnati OH 45214

Report Date: 312212011

Project; Allen House

Project No.: Hul1.028

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Lab No.:

Client Nc.:

4249101 )0-1

Description I Location: Tan RUbber Floor Tile

% Non·Asbestos Fibtou~ Mat&ria! % Non·Fibrous Material

None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected 100

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249101 10·)

J>esc:ription I Location; Yellow Mastic LayerNe.: 2

%Mbest~

None Detected

%Non-A.bcstos Fibrou< Material % Non·Fibrous Material

Nooe Detected None Detected None Detected 100

Lab No.;

Client No.:

4249102 11·1

Description / Location: White Insulation

None Detected

None Detected

% Nort-Fibrou! Material% Asbcstos % Non'Asbesto~ FibrousMaterial

20 Chrysotile 80

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249103 12-1

Description I Location: Grey Caulk

% Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material % Non.Fibrous Material

None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected 100

NIST~NVLAP No. 101165-0 NY-DOH No. 11011 AlBA Lab No. 100188 TIt/f cof'l/i<kntla/ reporr reJatu only en shos« it.m(r) tWfd (lna dou not ,.pt~ent QtI uuiOnf/tltJII by NlST-JlTlLAP, A/HA. or OIly agency altho US- ,,,,,,,,,men!

171" '~PCTl Jhall"or be rcproauc.d UClJH infol/, wirJlOlJt •••.ri/tQl appl'ovol ollh~ /abo7'alory.

Analysis Metbod; EPA 600lR-931l16 CODlllltlll$' (PC) lDdicates StraliJied Point Collnl Method pcrfQrllled. Method nOll*fotmcd unless ~M ~oa at <0.25% by volume is po$SI'bJc Mth Ihi$~ocf. (PC-T~) nprcseDIB lhillimit of qvantitalion. (PC.T=c) means !hat asbestoswas detectedbut is no( qumtifiableUftder tile Point Co\IlIIiDS regimen. Al!~J,ym includos all.futiDct scpacable'" in accol1laDl:cwilli EPA 600 Metbcd. IfIlOt reported or olbetwioc noted, '-)'0" is either nOl ~'Dt orw elieothu apccifl~ requested thai. il Dot be~. SIIIIIIlubcJtQ$lib.,. may

b. missed by PLM due to resolutionlimitali(lQS ofth. oplical microsc;ope. Thaleforc. negatiw PLM rcuIts C&IIDOIbe ~ced. El~ Mi£rQjeopy Gallbe llSed as a eoafiIming [.~qoc. ResWalOl)' Limit u ba$&d \/pODthe O8IIIplt matJix.

Analysis Performed By:-------------------L. Solebello

Pas\: 8 of 15

9000 Commeree ParkCYaySuite: B Mt LaorcJ, NJ 08054 Tolephon~; 856-231-9449 F\llt; 856-231-9318

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Sierra Environmental Group Ine

1041 Straight Street

Cincinnati OH

Report Date: 312212011

Project: Allen House

Project No.: Hull. 02845214

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Lab No.:

Client No.:

%.Asbestos

None Detected

Lab No.:

Client No.:

%A~hCSUl§

None Detected

Lab No.:

Client No.:

%A~b~

None Detected

Lab No.:

Client No.:

% Asbestos

NODe Detected

4249104 13-1

Black Cove BaseDescription I Lecatiea:

% Non-Asbwos Fibrou5 Material % Non-Fibrous Matcrill1

None Detected None Detected 100None Detected

4249105 14-1

Lt Yellow MasticDescription I Location:

% Non-Asb~tos Fibrous Matcrilll % NOll-Fibrous Mllterial

None Detected 100None Detected

4249106 15-1

Whiterran SheetrockDescription I Location:

None Detected

% Non-Asbesto~ Fibrous Material %tHon-Fihrous Material

10 Cellulose 90

4249107 16-1

Green/Tan FibrousDescription I Location:

% Nop-Asbestn. Pibrolls Material % NOJl:Fibrou., Material~ Cellulose

Hair None De\(:Cted 80

NIST-NVLAP No.10U6S-0 NY-DOH No. 11021 AIIlA Lab No. 100188 Tltu crJtrjirkntlQ/repan Y:/(ltu tmIy .0 those U~",(s) rutBd aIld d04 "or "PIS"'" a>I ondors.",mt by NlS1WIILAP. A/HA. 0' i1II)I <>:mCJI oflJl. u.s. goVll7lhllllt

This "'PoK sh~/1no<b.l'6p~«I ~.pt i1Ifoll. wflitlllJiM7r1.n opp1'OWllofth. taborato",.

Artalysis Mc:thod: EPA 6001R-93/116

Commmq: (PC) Indic:ate8 Stratilied Point Count Me!b.odper{ormcd. Method DOt performed UI\Iw stDtcd. QuantiHcatiOn at <0.25% by volwn; is poaJIDIewith this rmthod. (l'C--Trxc) tq>l'CIeIllS Ihio limit ot qvantitation. (pc-Tncc) means that ••.•beslOS....u detected bill is lIot quamiliablo udder the Point CoUOl.i4&regimen. Analysis .iDclwlcaall clistinet S;perable ~ in accordiIDCC with BFA 6()0 Method. If 1101 reported or oth..,.,i~ IIOkd. layer iJ eiiMt Dotpresent or 1110 dient Iw specifically requested thaI it nOl be ilIIa1y7Jld. SII'4ll asbcl;too fibers may be miJsed by PLM due to resolution IimitatiOll!l of d\o optioal mieroscoll". Tberc{orc, neGative PLM -WI! caDDOt be .'IIllIDlc:cd. ElecItoo MiorcllCOPY C8I\ be used iii a contltlllinf technique. RegWatOl)' Umit ill bued upon the sample rnaltix.

Analysis Performed By:__ L_._S_o_le_be_l_lo _

9000 Commerce Parkway SUite B Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Telephone: 856-231-9449 Fax: 856-231-9818

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Siena Environmental Group Inc

1041 Straight Street

Cincinnati OH

Report Date; 3/2212011

Project: Allen House

Project No.: Hull.02845214

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Lab No.:

Client No.:

% AsbeslM

None Detected

Lab No.:

ClicJltNo.:

% A3bestos

None Detected

Lab No.:

Client No.:

% AsbestM

None Detected

Lab No.:

Client No.:

% Asbestos

None Detected

4249108 17-1

Off-White Ceiling TileDescription I Location:

"It Non-Albestos Flbrou~ Maicwl % Nqn-Fibrous MateriaJ

NOlie Detected Fibrous Glass80 20

4249109 18-1

Grey Sink MasticDescription I Location:

% Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material % Non-Fibrous Material

None Detected Cellulose 973

4249110 19-1

Tan Floor rileDescription I Location:

% Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material % Non-Fibrous Material

None Detected None Detected 100None Detected

4249111 20-1

Yellow MasticDescription I Location:

None Detected

% Non-AshestoS Fibrous Marerial % Non-Fihrous Material

None; Detected None Derected 100

NIST-NVLAP No. 101165-0 NY-DOH No. 11021 AlHA Lab No. 100188 ThiJ apnf<dehlialreport rBlares only (0 thos« j'6"'(~) teJled tine!does not repMwlt (In endorsemen: by NlST·NVLAP, AIHA or Q1Iy ~n'y IJ/'lhe U.S. govemmCIIl

This report shall no: be reproduced BJ(Cepl ltlfu/l, without wrltlBII OPl'f()-ll1/ 0/111. laboratory.

Analysis Method: EPA 600/R-93/116

COWWCDIll: (PC) ll>.d.ioill~.Strs.rified PoW Count Method pcrfonned. Method not performed unless stated. Q\lbI1tiJioalionat <Xl.25% by IIoiwnc is possible with this memod. (pC-TQOe) represents Ihio limit of quantilalion. (pc-Trace) means tho.1•••besrce was del~«ed but ill DotquAnliJiableunder tho Point Co\mting regimen. AnlllYsisinoJud~. all di.tine, separable layer. in aceordaace with EPA 600 Method. If not reported Ot otherwise noted, layer is either not present Ot lhe olient bas speCifiC3\lyrequested tllOI it nol be analyzed. Sman ~ fibcn may be oUs.cd by PLM due to resolution limitatioJlSofth. optical miclOs(opc. Therefo re, n.s~tive PLM result! e3l\1IOtbe guaranteed. Electi'()nMioroscopy can be used as a continning Icclmique. RC$Ulatory Limit is bMW upon the sample mmrix.

Analysis Performed By:__ L_._S_o_le_be_ll_o _

Date; 3/22/2011

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Telephone: 856-231-9449 Fax: 856"231-9818

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Sierra Environmental Group Inc

1041 Straight Street

Cincinnati OR 45214

Report Date: 3/22/2011

Project: Allen House

Project No.: Hull. 028

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249112 21-1

Description I Location: Brown Floor Tile

% Asbestos ~ Non-A.bems Fjbrou~ Material % Non-Fibrous Material

None Detected None Detected 2 Other 9&

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249113 22-1

Description I Location: Yellow Mastic

%,AsbestO!; % Non-MbeS[Qs Fihrous Material % Nnn-ribrous Material

None Detected None Detected None Detected NoneDetected 100

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249114 :l3-1

Description I Location: Yellow Mastic

%A~bestos % Non-Asbestos Fibrous M8~ % Non-Fibrou~ Maleriill

None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected 100

Lab No.:

Client No.:

4249114 23-1

Description / Location: Grey Leveling Compound Layer No.: 2

% Asbestos % Non-Asbestos FihrQUSMaterial % Non-Fibrous Material

None Detected None Detected None Detected NOne Detected 100

NIST-NVLAP No. 101165-0 NY-DOH No. 11021 AlBA Lab No. 100188 This conjld.tllJ(Jl l"Cfl'Jrt rekues only to t"~$~ ilml(s) tested and fklf!! /lOt represent an ""fkl,semem by NIST-NTILAP, AlHA or any agency Djrlte U.S. gov~mm"nr

'I1tLf re~rt ~h,,/Jnot be rep,O<iJJ.ced excep: injiJlt. W/tJIOUIWritl"" (Jpproval ojtltelaQo/'(Jlo'ry.

Analysis Method: EPA 6001R-93/116

Comments: (PC) Indi"'lIllS SlroItificdPoint Count Method perfumed. Melh.od not perfonned unless SI~t~. QUBIltificarionat <0.25% by yolome is J?O$SI'ble wilh thi3 me(ho<i, (pC-Trllee) repre~u thi$ limit at quantiralion. (PC-Triloe) means thar asbestos was detected but is not quantifiable under the Point Counting "'Bi'Mn. Annlyms includes an ~i&tinotseparable layerS in accordance witb EPA 600 Method. If tlot reported or otherwise noted. laY"" is either no( p.escnt or the client has specifically requested d!~t it not be aDaly.tAOd. SmaU asbeseoa fib.r$ "'~y be missed by PLM due tD l'l!.$OlllliOnlimitalioll!l ofth. opti~ microscope. Therefcre. negative PLM te$1Ila. Ollllllotbe SJl8l'8IIleed. Electron Micro~ can be used as a eMlinning technique. Regulatory Limit is based upon the sample matrix.

Analysis Performed By!__ L_._S_o_le_be_ll_o _

Date: 31'221'2011 Page 11ofl5

9000 Commetce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Telephont: 856·231-9449 FI\X; &sG·231-9818

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Sierra Environmental Group Inc

1041 Straight Street

Report Date; 312212011

Project: Allen House

Project No.: Hull.028Cincinnati OH 45214

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Lab No.:

ClieotNo.:

Description I Location:

0/0 Asbestos

None Detected

4249115 24·1

Brown Floor Tile

% NQn·ASbestn< Fibrous MIllt:ri~1 % Non·Fihrous Material

None Detected 2 Other 98

Lab No.;

Client No.r

•..• - -- - - --- - - •.•.•.•. - - - - -- - - - .••.•.••. - - - - --- - - •.•.•.•••.•• - -_ •.- - - - •.•.•.•. - - - - - - - - - - - •.•.•.•. - - - - - - - - - - •.•.•.•.•. - - - - - - -_ •.- ••.•.•• - - - - - - - •.•.••.•. - --.- - -- .••.•. "".o _ •. - - - _ •.•.•.•..• - - - - - - - - - - _ ••.•.•• - - - - __ - - - - •.•.•.•.•. - _ •. - - _ •.- - - - _ .••••. - - - __

Description I Location:

% AsbestQll

None Detected

Lab No.:

Client No.:

% ASQ§stos

None Detected

Lab No.:

CJlentNo.:

% Mbesms

None Detected

4249116 25-1

Yellow Mastic

None Detected

% 'Non'Nbe$s Fibrous Material

None Detected…