552-22-203 Dayton - Evaluation Criteria Grotto.pdf

Evaluation Criteria for the

REPAIR HILL AND PONDS GROTTO

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The existing sea wall around the East side of the West Pond is seriously deteriorated. The wall will need rebuilt at the same dimensions and elevations that are existing while utilizing the existing limestone wall and cap for the State Historic Preservation Office. Existing spillway will remain in the same place with repairs on it.

EVALUATION FACTORS

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

a) Technical Capability

b) Past Performance

b) Location

Award shall be made to the offeror whose quote offers the best value to the government, considering technical capability, past performance, and location. The government will evaluate information based on the comparative evaluation procedures authorized in FAR Part 13.106-2 – Evaluation of Quotations of Offers using the following evaluation criteria:

Factor 1 - Technical Capability: The evaluation process will consider whether the proposal demonstrates a clear understanding of the technical features involved in meeting the requirements of the solicitation.

Professional Qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required services. Provide resumes for all key personnel required to complete the services indicated in this solicitation. Professional disciplines are required to be licensed, registered, or certified by a US state, the District of Columbia, or a US territory.

Specialized experience of personnel proposed for assignment to the contract and their record of working together as a team. Provide specialized experience and technical competence with healthcare related designs in inpatient, ambulatory care settings, in the type of work indicated in this solicitation.

Factor 2 - Past Performance: The offeror quote must include a summary description of at least three but no more than five prior contracts/orders per team member/sub-contractor for projects completed within the last five years with organizations with similar mission and functional domains, and of comparable size, complexity, and scope. These references must also include:

Contract/Order Number, brief description of the project, type of contract, amount of the contract

Contracting Officer’s Name and Phone Number, Government agency Contracting Officer’s Representative Name and Phone Number

The Offeror must indicate whether they were the prime contractor, sub-contractor, or other teaming arrangement. Prime shall indicate which aspect they are directly responsible for of this requirement.

The Offeror is required to provide references for the above projects. In the event the company itself does not have relevant past performance; references may be submitted on contracts performed by the Key Personnel of the company. The VA reserves the right to contact all the references that the Offeror lists.

Factor 3 - Location: The Offeror must indicate how far their company is located from the Dayton VA Medical Center by stating the timeframe to be onsite for this project in response to an emergent need.

FACTOR DEFINITIONS:

Consensus Evaluation: State the reasons why the best rated proposal was found to be superior to the others. What major evaluation factors were significant in your decision? What limitations of non-selected firms were significant? This paragraph should be two or three sentences, using information provided above, and should clearly explain your selection. This is a consensus report, and I should only receive one of these from the team. Your raw worksheets should be provided as well, but the Chair has the responsibility for combining all the comments into a coherent explanation of the TEB’s selection.