52.212-1 Addendum Instructions to Offeror - Tiger Tug Model 8.0.pdf
PDF 71 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Tiger Tug Model 8. 0
- Solicitation number
- W912L624R0865
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army National Guard
About this file
This document is an addendum to the instructions to offerors for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the Oklahoma Army National Guard for a Tiger Tug Model 8.0. The RFP will be awarded on a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable basis. Key details include:
The proposal must include an acknowledgement of all RFP amendments, a technical proposal response per the evaluation criteria, a separate price proposal, and proof of an active SAM.gov registration with no exclusions and a favorable responsibility determination. Technical acceptability will be based on the salient features in the Statement of Work. Questions are due by September 17, 2024 and proposals are due by September 23, 2024, both to be submitted via email to the specified points of contact. The RFP is a small business set-aside under NAICS code 333924 or PSC 1730, with a firm-fixed-price contract for one Tiger Tug 8.0 to be delivered to Tulsa, OK.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Statement of Work - Tiger Tug Model 8.0.pdf | ||
| JA Other Than Full and Open Competition - Brand Name TIGER TUG (rev 1 09092024)1_Redacted.pdf | ||
| Provisions and Clauses.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS FOR PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL, ADDENDUM
1. Criteria for Award
Will be based on the “Lowest Price Technically Acceptable”. Request For Proposals (RFP) will be rated either
“Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” in accordance with (IAW) the Technical Evaluation Criteria.
2. Proposal Documentation
The following must be included in the Offeror’s proposal when submitted by the close date and time:
a) Acknowledgement of ALL Amendments to the RFP, if applicable.
b) Technical Proposal response IAW the Technical Evaluation Criteria (see paragraph 5).
c) Price Proposal IAW the Statement of Work (SOW) and salient features of the brand named equipment.
d) PRICE PROPOSAL SHALL BE SEPARATE FROM THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.
3. Received Proposal Review
a) If the Offeror’s proposal is received by or before the due date and time, the proposal will be considered
“Responsive”.
b) If the Offeror’s proposal is received late, past the due date and time, the proposal will be considered “Non-
Responsive”.
4. Responsive Proposals
The Offerors’ company will be checked in the SAM.gov database.
a) Offeror’s SAM registration with an “Active” status, no “Exclusion”, and has a favorable “Determination of
Responsibility” will be considered for a “Technical Evaluation”.
b) If the Offeror’s registration shows “Inactive” or “Pending”, has “Exclusions”, or has an unfavorable
“Determination of Responsibility” the proposal will not be considered for a technical evaluation nor award.
5. TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY REQUIREMENTS
Technical acceptability will be based on all of the salient features in paragraph 4 of the Statement of Work, as follows:
6. Questions and Proposals Due
a) Questions are due by September 17, 2024 at 1p.m. CST; shall be sent to both Candace OBrian candace.i.obrian.civ@army.mil and Harvetta Taylor harvetta.r.taylor.civ@army.mil.
b) Proposals are due by September 23, 2024 at 1p.m. CST; shall be sent to both Candace OBrian candace.i.obrian.civ@army.mil and Harvetta Taylor harvetta.r.taylor.civ@army.mil.
mailto:candace.i.obrian.civ@army.mil mailto:harvetta.r.taylor.civ@army.mil mailto:candace.i.obrian.civ@army.mil mailto:harvetta.r.taylor.civ@army.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .