5-Exhibit B - Environmental Site Assessment-Long Key.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Long Key Living Shoreline Restoration Project
- Solicitation number
- RFP-608
- Issued by
- Monroe County, Florida
About this file
This document is an Environmental Site Assessment prepared by WSP USA for Monroe County, Florida, focusing on the Long Key Transfer Station located approximately 16 miles north of Marathon. The project involves fortifying the transfer station within two specific parcels to protect critical infrastructure from storm damage by strengthening assets vulnerable to storm surge. The proposed work includes repairing the existing riprap shoreline, restoring storm-damaged areas of the wetland fringe through native wetland plantings, and installing wave attenuation devices. The survey encompassed approximately 0.39 acres of wetlands, with the survey area extending from the service road adjacent to the shoreline to the mean high-water line.
The site consists of established solid waste facilities where waste is prepared for transportation and disposal outside Monroe County. The property, owned by Monroe County, has an existing riprap-fortified shoreline and wetland fringe. The ecological survey identified several significant environmental features, including mangrove fringe, saltmarsh, and various native and invasive plant species. Of particular note, the survey documented the potential presence of an American Crocodile in the vicinity and noted several species classified as Category I invasive by the Florida Invasive Species Council, such as Seaside Mahoe and Brazilian Pepper. The assessment was conducted using a Trimble Geo 7X with Centimeter Accuracy Edition software, and the data was post-processed using GPS Pathfinder Office to enhance location accuracy.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
LONG KEY TRANSFER STATION
Prepared for
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
WSP USA PROJECT NO.: 600408.16
MAY 2025
Prepared by
WSP USA
16250 NW 59TH AVENUE
MIAMI LAKES, FLORIDA 33014
WSP.COM
MAY 2025
Table of Contents
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Scope & Purpose
1.2 Site History
1.2.1 Overview
1.2.2 Project Site - Parcels 00098460-000000 and 00098710-000000 2
2 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Ecological Survey
2.1.1 Data Collection & Analysis
3 SITE CONDITIONS
3.1 Ecological Survey
3.1.1 Site Assessment of Parcels 00098710-000000 and 00098460-
000000
4 ADDITONAL FIGURES
5 TABLES
6 REFERENCES
Table of Contents
FIGURES
FIGURE 1 Location Map FIGURE 2 Site Survey Area FIGURE 3 Mangrove Fringe FIGURE 4 Wetland Delineation FIGURE 5 Identified Gaps in Mangrove Fringe
TABLES
TABLE 1 Vegetation Survey Species List
ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT 1 IPaC Species List ATTACHMENT 2 FNAI Biodiversity Matrix ATTACHMENT 3 Photo Log
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 SCOPE & PURPOSE
Monroe County (County) is proposing to fortify the Long Key Transfer Station within and adjacent to parcels 00098460-000000 and 00098710-000000. The project is part of the County’s effort to protect critical infrastructure from storm damage by strengthening assets vulnerable to storm surge.
Current conditions include a riprap fortified shoreline and wetland fringe. The proposed work consists of repairing the existing riprap shoreline, restoring storm damaged areas of the wetland fringe through native wetland plantings, and installing wave attenuation devices.
WSP USA, Inc. (WSP) has been contracted by Monroe County to provide permitting and ecological assessment services for the duration of this project. This report intends to define the existing on-site environmental conditions including sensitive regulated benthic resources, wetland extent, and vegetation as defined in 62-312 F.A.C., 62-340 F.A.C., and the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Resource Assessment Survey Protocols for Nearshore Construction Projects Version November 30, 2022 (FKNMS Survey Protocols-November 30, 2022).
A wetland delineation was performed to identify the landward extent of wetlands and locate the federal jurisdictional line using the methods and requirements defined in 62-340 F.A.C. Mangrove fringe and saltmarsh were detected and have been summarised in Section 3.2.
All location data was collected using a Trimble Geo 7X equipped with the Centimeter Accuracy Edition software package. Data collected in the field was then post-processed using GPS Pathfinder Office to further increase location accuracy. Project maps contained within this report were created using Esri ArcGIS Pro.
1.2 SITE HISTORY
1.2.1 OVERVIEW
The proposed project area consists of 2 parcels (00098460-000000 and 00098710-000000) located approximately 16 miles north of Marathon, Florida. The parcels are bounded to the east and west by US-1 and Florida Bay respectively and experiences moderate to high boat and vehicle traffic of vacationers and fisherman traveling to and from the Florida Keys. The transfer station allows visitors to enter the property and dispose of residential solid waste on site.
The survey encompassed approximately 0.39 acres of wetlands. The survey area begins along the service road adjacent to the shoreline and extends to the mean high-water line. The proposed project scope is limited to the survey area.
Figure 1: Location Map
1.2.2 PROJECT SITE - PARCELS 00098460-000000 AND 00098710-000000
The site consists of established solid waste facilities. On site, waste is prepared for transportation and disposal at facilities outside Monroe County. The facility has existing landfills surrounded by service roads. The property is owned by Monroe County and has an existing riprap fortified shoreline and wetland fringe spanning most of the survey area.
Figure 2: Site Survey Area
2 METHODOLOGY
2.1 ECOLIGICAL SURVEY
On March 26, 2025, WSP scientists conducted a survey of the proposed project area to document the terrestrial vegetation community (landward of the apparent mean-high water line) using the methods defined within Chapter 62-340 of the Florida Administrative Code Data Form Guide to be included within the permitting package. The survey area consisted of approximately 0.4 acres of mangrove fringe, saltwater marsh wetlands, and mixed species uplands. The survey was conducted by a two-person team to ensure safety and accuracy of data. Location data was collected using a Trimble Geo 7X equipped with the Centimeter Accuracy Edition software package. Data collected in the field was then post-processed using GPS Pathfinder Office and Esri ArcGIS Pro to further increase spatial accuracy. Survey design and methodology included:
• Complete a desktop review of the proposed survey area using aerial imagery.
• Conduct a comprehensive on-site survey to describe the vegetation community within the proposed project area.
• Post process data collected using Pathfinder Office and Esri ArcGIS Pro.
• Summarize the findings within a biological report.
2.1.1 DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS
On March 26, 2025 WSP staff surveyed the portion of the proposed project area waterward of the mean-high water line to the edge of Card Sound Road to document the vegetation community for use during project design and submitted as part of the permitting package. Location data was collected using a Trimble Geo 7X equipped with the Centimeter Accuracy Edition software package.
Data collected in the field was then post-processed using GPS Pathfinder Office and Esri ArcGIS Pro to further increase spatial accuracy. The results of the vegetation survey have been depicted in Figures 3 & 4.
3 SITE CONDITIONS
3.1 ECOLOGICAL SURVEY
The assessment areas consisted of approximately 0.4 acres of saltwater marsh. Riprap had been previously installed along the waterward edge of the road running parallel to the shore with staff noting areas with a slope greater than the 2:1 recommended. WSP scientists delineated the extent of wetlands while noting areas suitable for native plantings.
The wetland line follows the toe of the existing riprap (Figure 4) and consisted primarily of herbaceous obligate wetland flora interspersed with mature black and white mangrove (Avicennia germinans, Laguncularia racemosa) fringe (Figure 3). Gaps within the mangrove fringe where delineated as suitable for mangrove restoration plantings for erosion prevention as well as storm mitigation.
WSP staff also documented several species classified as Category I invasive by the Florida Invasive Species Council (FISC) most notable among them Seaside Mahoe (Thespesia populnea) and Brazilian Pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia). Category I invasives are especially problematic as they have been documented to quickly spread, establish dense monocultures, and displace native plant communities.
WSP staff were notified of the presence of a resident American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) by Monroe County staff. Monroe County staff described the crocodile as having lived within on of the saltwater marsh ponds south of the proposed construction site. Although the individual wasn’t observed by WSP staff, it’s important to note the presence of the federally and state listed species and ensure necessary steps are taken to ensure minimal impact during the construction phase of the project.
4 ADDITONAL FIGURES
Figure 3: Mangrove Fringe
Figure 4: Wetland Delineation
Figure 5: Identified Gaps in Mangrove Fringe
5 TABLES
Common Name Scientific Name Endemic
Shrubby Indian Mallow Abutilon incanum YES
Black Mangrove Avicennia germinans YES
Spanish Needle Bidens alba YES
Sea Ox-Eye Borrichia frutescens YES
Seagrape Coccoloba uvifera YES
Green Buttonwood Conocarpus erectus YES
Pinebarren Flatsedge Cyperus ovatus NO
Strangler Fig Ficus aurea YES
White Mangrove Laguncularia racemosa YES
Poisonwood Metopium toxiferum YES
Frogfruit Phyla nodiflora YES
Keys Blackbead Pithecellobium keyense YES
Beach Naupaka Scaevola taccada NO
Brazilian Pepper Schinus terebinthifolia NO
Sea Purslane Sesuvium portulacastrum YES
Shrubby False Buttonweed Spermacoce verticillata YES
Blue Porterweed Stachytarpheta jamaicensis YES
Bay Cedar Suriana maritima YES
Seaside Mahoe Thespesia populnea NO
White Indigoberry Randia aculeata YES
Red Mangrove Rhizophora mangle YES
Table 1: Vegetation Survey Species List
6 REFERENCES
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2021. Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters (FDEP, Chapter 62.340, F.A.C)
National Oceanic Atmospheric Association. 2022. Resource Assessment Survey Protocols for Nearshore Construction Projects November 30, 2022.
Paul Humann. 2003. Reef Coral Identification (Florida, Caribbean, Bahamas) Enlarged 2nd Edition
IPaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location Monroe County, Florida
Local office Florida Ecological Services Field Office
(352) 448-9151
(772) 562-4288 fw4flesregs@fws.gov
U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceIPaC 10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 1/25 mailto:fw4flesregs@fws.gov https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/
777 37th St Suite D-101 Vero Beach, FL 32960-3559 https://www.fws.gov/office/florida-ecological-services
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 2/25 https://www.fws.gov/office/florida-ecological-services
Endangered species This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project-specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 3/25 https://www.fws.gov/ecological-services/ https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/topic/consultations/endangered-species-act-consultations https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species-directory/threatened-endangered https://www.fws.gov/law/endangered-species-act https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/status/list https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
Birds
NAME STATUS
Florida Panther Puma (=Felis) concolor coryi Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1763
Endangered
Key Deer Odocoileus virginianus clavium Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6326
Endangered
Lower Keys Marsh Rabbit Sylvilagus palustris hefneri Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2658
Endangered
Puma (=mountain Lion) Puma (=Felis) concolor (all subsp.
except coryi)
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6049
SAT
Silver Rice Rat Oryzomys palustris natator There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6988
Endangered
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Proposed Endangered
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
Threatened Marine mammal
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 4/25 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1763 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6326 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2658 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6049 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6988 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
Reptiles
NAME STATUS
Eastern Black Rail Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. jamaicensis Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10477
Threatened
Roseate Tern Sterna dougallii dougallii No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2083
Threatened
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
SAT
American Crocodile Crocodylus acutus There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6604
Threatened
Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon couperi Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/646
Threatened
Florida Keys Mole Skink Plestiodon egregius egregius Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4480
Proposed Threatened
Hawksbill Sea Turtle Eretmochelys imbricata Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3656
Endangered
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 5/25 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10477 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2083 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6604 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/646 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4480 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3656
Fishes
Insects
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Endangered
Key Ring-necked Snake Diadophis punctatus acricus Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6768
Proposed Endangered
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
Endangered
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110
Threatened
Rim Rock Crowned Snake Tantilla oolitica Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1497
Proposed Endangered
NAME STATUS
Gulf Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus (=oxyrhynchus) desotoi Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/651
Threatened
NAME STATUS
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 6/25 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6768 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1497 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/651
Flowering Plants
Miami Blue Butterfly Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3797
Endangered
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Proposed Threatened
NAME STATUS
Big Pine Partridge Pea Chamaecrista lineata keyensis There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8416
Endangered
Blodgett's Silverbush Argythamnia blodgettii There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6823
Threatened
Cape Sable Thoroughwort Chromolaena frustrata There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4733
Endangered
Everglades Bully Sideroxylon reclinatum ssp.
austrofloridense
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4735
Threatened
Florida Pineland Crabgrass Digitaria pauciflora There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3728
Threatened
Florida Prairie-clover Dalea carthagenensis floridana There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2300
Endangered
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 7/25 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3797 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8416 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6823 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4733 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4735 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3728 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2300
Critical habitats Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
You are still required to determine if your project(s) may have effects on all above listed species.
Bald & Golden Eagles
Florida Semaphore Cactus Consolea corallicola There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4356
Endangered
Garber's Spurge Chamaesyce garberi No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8229
Threatened
Key Tree Cactus Pilosocereus robinii No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2520
Endangered
Sand Flax Linum arenicola There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4313
Endangered
Wedge Spurge Chamaesyce deltoidea serpyllum There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/949
Endangered
Bald and Golden Eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) . Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to Bald or Golden Eagles, or their habitats, should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate avoidance and minimization measures, as described in the various links on this page.
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 8/25 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4356 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8229 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2520 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4313 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/949
There are Bald Eagles and/or Golden Eagles in your project area.
Measures for Proactively Minimizing Eagle Impacts For information on how to best avoid and minimize disturbance to nesting bald eagles, please review the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. You may employ the timing and activity-specific distance recommendations in this document when designing your project/activity to avoid and minimize eagle impacts. For bald eagle information specific to Alaska, please refer to Bald Eagle Nesting and Sensitivity to Human Activity.
The FWS does not currently have guidelines for avoiding and minimizing disturbance to nesting Golden Eagles. For site-specific recommendations regarding nesting Golden Eagles, please consult with the appropriate Regional Migratory Bird Office or Ecological Services Field Office.
If disturbance or take of eagles cannot be avoided, an incidental take permit may be available to authorize any take that results from, but is not the purpose of, an otherwise lawful activity. For assistance making this determination for Bald Eagles, visit the Do I Need A Permit Tool. For assistance making this determination for golden eagles, please consult with the appropriate Regional Migratory Bird Office or Ecological Services Field Office.
Ensure Your Eagle List is Accurate and Complete If your project area is in a poorly surveyed area in IPaC, your list may not be complete and you may need to rely on other resources to determine what species may be present (e.g. your local FWS field office, state surveys, your own surveys). Please review the Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles, to help you properly interpret the report for your specified location, including determining if there is sufficient data to ensure your list is accurate.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to bald or golden eagles on your list, see the "Probability of Presence Summary" below to see when these bald or golden eagles are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.
Review the FAQs The FAQs below provide important additional information and resources.
BREEDING SEASON
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds Nationwide avoidance and minimization measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action
NAME
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 9/25 https://www.fws.gov/media/national-bald-eagle-management-guidelines https://www.fws.gov/Alaska-eagle-nesting https://www.fws.gov/Alaska-eagle-nesting https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/contact-us https://www.fws.gov/program/ecological-services/contact-us https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management/eagle-incidental-disturbance-and-nest-take-permits https://www.fws.gov/story/do-i-need-eagle-take-permit https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/contact-us https://www.fws.gov/program/ecological-services/contact-us https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds https://www.fws.gov/media/nationwide-avoidance-minimization-measures-birds https://www.fws.gov/media/nationwide-avoidance-minimization-measures-birds https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( ) Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 10/25 https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( ) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable
Bald & Golden Eagles FAQs
What does IPaC use to generate the potential presence of bald and golden eagles in my specified location?
The potential for eagle presence is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are an eagle (Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requirements may apply).
Proper interpretation and use of your eagle report On the graphs provided, please look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical line) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal line). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort line or no data line (red horizontal) means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list and associated information help you know what to look for to confirm presence and helps guide you in knowing when to implement avoidance and minimization measures to eliminate or reduce potential impacts from your project activities or get the appropriate permits should presence be confirmed.
How do I know if eagles are breeding, wintering, or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating, or resident), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and view the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If an eagle on your IPaC migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it (indicated by yellow vertical bars on the phenology graph in
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 11/25 http://www.avianknowledge.net/ https://data.pointblue.org/api/v3/annual-summaries-about-data-types.html https://www.fws.gov/law/bald-and-golden-eagle-protection-act https://www.fws.gov/law/bald-and-golden-eagle-protection-act https://data.pointblue.org/apps/rail your “IPaC PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY” at the top of your results list), there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
Interpreting the Probability of Presence Graphs
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated.
This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
Breeding Season () Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range.
If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort () Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps.
No Data () A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
Migratory birds The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits the take (including killing, capturing, selling, trading, and transport) of protected migratory bird species without prior authorization by the Department of Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service).
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 12/25 https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/laws-legislations/migratory-bird-treaty-act.php https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/laws-legislations/bald-and-golden-eagle-protection-act.php
Measures for Proactively Minimizing Migratory Bird Impacts
Your IPaC Migratory Bird list showcases birds of concern, including Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), in your project location. This is not a comprehensive list of all birds found in your project area. However, you can help proactively minimize significant impacts to all birds at your project location by implementing the measures in the Nationwide avoidance and minimization measures for birds document, and any other project-specific avoidance and minimization measures suggested at the link Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds for the birds of concern on your list below.
Ensure Your Migratory Bird List is Accurate and Complete
If your project area is in a poorly surveyed area, your list may not be complete and you may need to rely on other resources to determine what species may be present (e.g. your local FWS field office, state surveys, your own surveys). Please review the Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles document, to help you properly interpret the report for your specified location, including determining if there is sufficient data to ensure your list is accurate.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the "Probability of Presence Summary" below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area.
Review the FAQs The FAQs below provide important additional information and resources.
BREEDING SEASON
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds Nationwide avoidance and minimization measures for birds Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action
NAME
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 13/25 javascript:void(0);
https://www.fws.gov/media/birds-conservation-concern-2021 https://www.fws.gov/media/birds-conservation-concern-2021 https://www.fws.gov/media/nationwide-avoidance-minimization-measures-birds https://www.fws.gov/media/nationwide-avoidance-minimization-measures-birds https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Black Skimmer Rynchops niger This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5234
Breeds May 20 to Sep 15
Brown Pelican Pelecanus occidentalis This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6034
Breeds Jan 15 to Sep 30
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
Double-crested Cormorant phalacrocorax auritus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3478
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 31
Florida Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia floridana This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 31
Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias occidentalis This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds Jan 1 to Dec 31
Least Tern Sternula antillarum antillarum This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 25 to Sep 5
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679
Breeds elsewhere
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 14/25 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5234 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6034 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3478 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679
Magnificent Frigatebird Fregata magnificens This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds Oct 1 to Apr 30
Mangrove Cuckoo Coccyzus minor This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
Painted Bunting Passerina ciris This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds Apr 25 to Aug 15
Pectoral Sandpiper Calidris melanotos This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds elsewhere
Prairie Warbler Setophaga discolor This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.
Breeds elsewhere
Reddish Egret Egretta rufescens This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7617
Breeds Mar 1 to Sep 15
Ring-billed Gull Larus delawarensis This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.
Breeds elsewhere
Royal Tern Thalasseus maximus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities.
Breeds Apr 15 to Aug 31
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 15/25 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7617
Probability of Presence Summary The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria interpres morinella This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds elsewhere
Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris pusilla This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds elsewhere
Short-billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9480
Breeds elsewhere
Swallow-tailed Kite Elanoides forficatus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8938
Breeds Mar 10 to Jun 30
White-crowned Pigeon Patagioenas leucocephala This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4047
Breeds May 1 to Sep 30
Willet Tringa semipalmata This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 5
Wilson's Plover Charadrius wilsonia This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 20
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 16/25 https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9480 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8938 https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4047 no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( ) Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort ( ) Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( ) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
10/20/25, 10:37 AM IPaC: Explore Location resources https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 17/25
American Kestrel
BCC - BCR
Bald Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable
Black Skimmer BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Brown Pelican Non-BCC Vulnerable
Chimney Swift BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Double-crested Cormorant Non-BCC Vulnerable
Florida Burrowing Owl
BCC - BCR
Great Blue Heron
BCC - BCR
Least Tern BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Lesser Yellowlegs BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Magnificent Frigatebird
BCC - BCR
Mangrove Cuckoo
BCC - BCR
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Painted Bunting
BCC - BCR
Pectoral Sandpiper BCC Rangewide
(CON)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/IYLJSCRT5FEKDCEDAWBZ7JEE3A/resources 18/25
Prairie Warbler BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-breasted Merganser Non-BCC Vulnerable
Reddish Egret BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Ring-billed Gull Non-BCC Vulnerable
Royal Tern Non-BCC Vulnerable
Ruddy Turnstone
BCC - BCR
Semipalmated Sandpiper
BCC - BCR
Short-billed Dowitcher BCC Rangewide
(…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .