47QMCA25R0002_PastPerfQuestionnaire.pdf

PDF 210 KB Posted

Attached to
Zone 2 Auction and Marshalling Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
47QMCA25R0002
Issued by
GSA Federal Acquisition Service

About this file

This is a Past Performance Reference Questionnaire template that must be completed by offerors and their references for solicitation 47QMCA25R0002 (Zone 2 Auction and Marshalling) issued by GSA Federal Acquisition Service. The questionnaire consists of two parts - Part I requires offerors to provide contract reference information including contract number, value, period of performance, and point of contact details. Part II must be completed by the reference/respondent and includes rating the contractor's performance across 8 categories using a 5-level scale (Exceptional to Unsatisfactory).

The evaluation categories cover quality of services, reliability/timeliness, work management, business relations, problem resolution, customer satisfaction, small business subcontracting, and overall satisfaction. The form includes detailed rating definitions and allows for additional narrative justification. This is a standard template form that does not contain any specific details about the actual products or services being procured under solicitation 47QMCA25R0002.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Zone 2 Auction and Marshalling, newest first.
File Type Posted
47QMCA25R0002_Amendment 0002_2025-01-30.pdf PDF
47QMCA25R0002_Q and A_2025-01-27.pdf PDF
47QMCA25R0002_Amendment 0001_2025-01-27.pdf PDF
47QMCA25R0002_PricingSpreadsheet_Revised_2025-01-27.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
47QMCA25R0002_RFP Detailed Description.pdf PDF
47QMCA25R0002_Estimated5YRVehicleVolumes.pdf PDF
47QMCA25R0002_FedConnectReadySetGo.pdf PDF
47QMCA25R0002_52.204 Reps.pdf PDF
47QMCA25R0002_PricingSpreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
47QMCA25R0002_ModelSubK_Commercial.docx DOCX document
47QMCA25R0002_ModelSubK_Individual.docx DOCX document
47QMCA25R0002_QuestionMatrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
47QMCA25R0002_LocationSpreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
47QMCA25R0002_52.212-3_RepsandCerts.docx DOCX document
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Form Instructions: The Offeror must complete Part I – Reference Information then provide the questionnaire to the reference Point of Contact (Respondent) who should then complete Part II

– Respondent Information.

The completed questionnaire must be submitted by the Offeror as instructed in the solicitation.

Part I – Reference Information (To be completed by Offeror)

A. Offeror Information:

Contractor’s Name:

Address:

Point of Contract (POC):

POC Phone:

POC Email:

B. Project Title and Brief Description

C. Contract Data

Contract No.: Delivery/Task Order No.:

POC Name & Title:

POC Phone No.: POC Email:

Contract Type:

Contract Dollar Value (base + option periods):

Contract Period of Performance (base + option periods):

Contractor Performed as: Prime Sub-Contractor

Part II – Respondent Information (To be completed by Reference POC)

Instructions to Reference/Respondent:

Please complete Part II – Respondent Information of this form providing past performance information as it relates to Part I – Reference information provided by the Offeror.

A. Reference/Respondent Information

Name & Title of Respondent:

Organization:

Phone No.: Email:

Respondent’s role in relation to the contract (e.g., program/project manager (PM/PjM), contracting officer (CO/KO), major end user, etc.):

Please identify any information known to be inaccurate as provided by the Offeror in Part I.

B. Rating Definitions:

Using the adjectival rating table below, choose the appropriate letter in response to performance questions on page 3 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.

Rating Definition

Exceptional Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appeared to be or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflected a serious problem for which the contractor did not identify corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions were only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery was not accomplished in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contained a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

C. Performance Questions

When responding to the questions below select the appropriate rating from the drop-down list using the definitions in the Rating Definition table above.

Contractor Performance Respondent Ratings

1. How would you rate the quality of the contractor’s services provided?

2. How would you rate the contractor’s reliability and timeliness of the services delivered?

3. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to effectively manage the work (e.g., organization, personnel, communication, quality control)?

4. How would you rate the contractor’s business relations in terms of support (e.g., cooperative and proactive behavior, flexibility)?

5. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to identify and resolve problems in a timely and effective manner?

6. How would you rate the contractor’s commitment to customer satisfaction?

7. How would you rate the contractor’s performance on small business subcontracting?

8. How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the contractor’s performance?

D. Additional Narrative Justification

If required, insert additional supporting narrative, referencing the number of the contractor performance question it applies to; additional pages may be used. If none, insert “Not applicable.”

E. Signature of Respondent

Signature:

Contractor Name:
Address:
POC:
Phone:
Email:
Project Description:
Contract #:
DO/TO#:
POC Name & Title:
Contract Type:
Contract Value:
Contract POP:
Prime: Off
Subcontractor: Off
POCPhone:
POCEmail:
Additional Narrative Justification_es_:signer:
RatingQ1_es_:signer: []
Q2Rating_es_:signer: []
Q3Rating_es_:signer: []
Q4Rating_es_:signer: []
Q5Rating_es_:signer: []
Q6Rating_es_:signer: []
Q7Rating_es_:signer: []
Q8Rating_es_:signer: []
Inaccurate Information_es_:signer:
Phone_es_:signer:
Email_es_:signer:
Organization_es_:signer:
Name & Title Respondent_es_:signer:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .