Offeror_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
GSA Region 8 Small Projects Delivery State of Colorado
Solicitation number
47PJ0019N0001
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Request_for_Information_Q.docx DOCX document
RFI_Responses.docx DOCX document
Denver.pdf PDF
Boulder.pdf PDF
Brand_Name_Justification__JOCC.pdf PDF
47PJ0019N0001_Generated_PDF_with_TOC.pdf PDF
R8_IDIQ_JOCC_CSC-_Solicitation_-_.pdf PDF
R8_IDIQ_JOCC_CSC-_Reps_&_Certs_.pdf PDF
ATTACH_1.docx DOCX document
R8_IDIQ_JOCC_CO_-_Agreement_(Autosaved).pdf PDF
Supplement_to_SF1442_Region_8_IDIQ_JOCC.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SOW_BMK37_JOCC_Office_Renovation_v2.0_-_RK_Edit.docx DOCX document
Attachment_3_Past_Experience_Form.docx DOCX document
Larimer.pdf PDF
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Job Order Construction Contract Colorado

Attachment 4 to GSA Solicitation No. 47PJ0019N0001 Offeror Past Performance Questionnaire

References should complete survey and review Offeror Experience Attachment (to ensure contractor completed information is correct) and submitted directly to Monique Brumley (Monique.brumley@gsa.gov) and David Berry (david.berry@gsa.gov)

Contractor’s Name: _____________________________________________________________________ Reference Name and Title: _______________________________________________________________ Reference Phone Number: _______________________________________________________________ Reference Email Address: _______________________________________________________________ Do you concur with the information provided by the offeror on the Offeror’s Experience Attachment, in regards to this reference? YES______ NO______ If no, please explain the discrepancy:

Rating
Description
Excellent
Significantly exceeds the standard.
Very Good
Exceeds the standard.
Satisfactory
Meets the standard.
Marginal
Fails to fully meet the standard.
Poor
Completely fails to meet the standard.

1. Quality

How well did the contractor implement effective quality control and safety control procedures to meet the contract/scope requirements?
Poor
Marginal
Satisfactory
Very Good
Excellent

Please explain your answer:

2. Problem Solving

How well was the contractor able to resolve problems effectively?
Poor
Marginal
Satisfactory
Very Good
Excellent

Please explain your answer:

3. Timeliness

How well did the contractor perform timely contract/task order services?
Poor
Marginal
Satisfactory
Very Good
Excellent

Please explain your answer:

4. Overall Customer Satisfaction

How would you rate overall satisfaction with the contractor and the project?
Poor
Marginal
Satisfactory
Very Good
Excellent

Please explain your answer:

File details come from the government source that posted it.