08 Synopsis AMD-01 2024 02-15.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

PS0001

7PQA

1. This modification is issued to amend the 47PH0823R0005 Synopsis.

2. The purposes of this amendment is to include all questions and answers & participant list that resulted from the 47PH0823R0005 Pre-Proposal Conference held on 13-Feb 2024.

4. All other terms and conditions of the synopsis remain unchanged.

7PQA

ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION

ACQUISITION PROGRAM SUPPORT BRANCH

819 TAYLOR ST RM 12B01

FORT WORTH, TX 76102 USA

ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION

ACQUISITION PROGRAM SUPPORT BRANCH

819 TAYLOR ST RM 12B01

FORT WORTH, TX 76102 USA

47PH0823R0005

1 3

02/15/2024

01/29/2024

SYNOPSIS 47PH0823R0005, Amendment 01 page 2 of 3

PRE‐SYNOPSIS INQUIRIES:

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

1 Just to confirm, there is only 1 awardee? Yes

Do you have a list of potential projects that could come out of this IDIQ?

See: Section 2. PROJECT INFORMATION under Synopsis.

Examples of potential project may include building envelope studies, capital investment feasibility studies, MEP modernization designs, building addition designs, and historic preservation studies/designs.

What members of the team would you like to fill out SF330 resumes?

Team members recommended to be included at a minimum are Lead Architectural Designer, Lead Engineering Designer, any primary (contract) Sub‐Consultant or affiliate firm's primary Principal disciplines, and any primary personnel who will be directly responsible for work delivered under this

IDIQ.

Which subconsultants do you consider “Key Personnel,” and would you like to fill out the necessary SF330 forms?

See Pre‐Synopsis Question #3.

Regarding the RFP instructions for Form 330, Section H ‐ Quality in Design, can example projects representing design excellence differ from the projects included in SF330 Part 1 – Section F?

No. The projects cited in GSA Form 330 shall align with the projects submitted in portfolios for evaluation.

Regarding the RFP instructions for Form 330, Section H ‐ Quality in Design, is the term lead Architectural/Mechanical “designer” intended to refer to the lead design firms or individual employees?

The "Lead Designer" may be either an individual or a design firm. However, if a firm is proposed as a lead designer, a specific individual from the firm must be identified as a Primary Point of Contact.

Regarding the RFP instructions for Form 330, Section F, where it refers to three out of ten projects must be directly attributable to the “Lead Designer”, can we interpret this as meaning the lead design firm?

Yes

Are estimating services still being considered part of the "design" fee? Estimating is not a true a design effort.

In accordance to FAR 404‐4(i)((b), "...contract price or the estimated cost and fee for production and delivery of designs, plans, drawings, and specifications..." is considered to be design effort. Therefore, cost estimate effort is considered part of design effort.

For Section H‐ "submit a portfolio representative of the lead architectural designer's ability to provide high quality in design" Can these projects overlap with the projects listed in Section F? Or do they need to vary?

Yes, projects listed in Section F should be included in the portfolio submitted under Section H.

For Section G, are sub‐consultants also supposed to have contributed to projects that only the prime firm lists? Or is it okay for just the key personnel from the prime to have that overlap?

Key personnel as noted in Section E who were involved in the projects listed under Section F should be listed in Section G.

SYNOPSIS 47PH0823R0005, Amendment 01 page 3 of 3

ATTENDEE LIST

Name Firm / Company

William Vidaud de la Vega HED

Audrey Aria‐Bima HED

Russell Himes HED

Kenneth Golovko HED

Steven Jackson HED

Sean Smith Terracon

Stephanie Cardoza Terracon

Melissa Cooksey Perkin & Will

Nada Sarraf‐Knowles Perkin & Will

Jenna Vardell Perkin & Will

Erin Welch Perkin & Will

Amy Blonder Perkin & Will

Cara Atchison POND

Jeanette Scarsdale DBR

David Reynolds Farnsworth Group

Denise Bates SmithGroup

Mark Adams SmithGroup

Vijay Sarma IDD Architecture

Nichole Arapis Campose Engineering

Lisa Herron Manning Architecture Int. Planning

Amy Frankowski EXP

Robert Cvroysdale GSR / ANDRADE