Amendment_03.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE

PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

3. EFFECTIVE DATE 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

7PQB

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of this amendment is to:

Incorporate revised technical evaluation criteria and Bid Sheet; Change the proposal due date from July 31, 2019 to August 30, 2019; Provide additional site visit information

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

PUBLIC BUILDING SERVICES

1919 SMITH ST. STE 1600

HOUSTON, TX 77044

SEE BLOCK 7

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

8/02/2019

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

06/24/2019

9A. AMENDMENT OF

SOLICITATION NO.

47PH0519R0014

X

1 6

(SF 30 - Continued) Solicitation Amendment Info – 47PH0519R0014 Russell B Long Federal Bldg, Baton Rouge, LA - Exterior Building Joint, Cleaning, Window Glazing, and Ledge Cleaning

1. The following changes are hereby implemented by this amendment:

Site visit to be held on Monday August 12, 2019 at 10:00 am CDT.

Please meet in lobby of 777 Florida St.

Baton Rouge, LA 70801

Provide names of personnel attending site visit to Albert.thibodeaux@gsa.gov NLT noon CDT August 9, 2019.

Request for Information (RFI’s) are due NLT noon CDT Wednesday August 14, 2019. Submit to albert.thibodeaux@gsa.gov

Revised version of the following sections of solicitation:

Section II.A Price Proposal Paragraph (1)

Section II.B Proposal Format Paragraphs (1), (2), and (3)

Section VI.B Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) mailto:Albert.thibodeaux@gsa.gov

GSA Solicitation No 47PH0519R0014

II.A. Price Proposal

(1) Contents

The Price Proposal shall consist of the SF 1442, bid schedule, and the Agreement, with prices and/or rates indicated for each price element shown on the pricing form included in Section II of the Agreement. Indicate the Base Contract Price, or if no such distinction is made, the Contract Price, in Block 17 of the SF 1442, which must be fully executed by the Offeror. A separate summary page with detail pages is required for the base scope of work and Option 1.

(2) Qualifications, Exclusions and Conditions

If the Offeror communicates in its proposal any qualifications, exclusions, or conditions to the proposed prices not provided for in the Contract Documents, the Contracting Officer may reject the proposal and exclude the Offeror from further discussions.

(3) Additional Proposal Requirements

II.B. Technical Proposal

The Technical Proposal shall include the information requested below for the non-price factors further described in Section VI.

(1) Experience on Similar Projects This factor evaluates the extent of the Offeror’s past experience as a firm in providing similar construction services to determine the firm’s experience in completing the tasks detailed in the performance work statement.

The Offeror must demonstrate successful experience as a General Construction (GC) Contractor responsible for the construction of at least two (2) similar projects substantially completed within the last five (5) years. Additionally, all subcontractor relevant experience for work activities not being performed by the prime contractor must be submitted using the same criteria of construction of at least two (2) similar projects or activities substantially completed within the last five (5) years. A “similar project” is defined as a project that is comparable in nature, type, and complexity as defined by all of the following characteristics:

● Project involved the exterior renovation of a comparably sized structure;

● Project was performed in an occupied and functioning office building;

● Project involved removal and replacement of window glazing

● Project included historic restoration and repair of a building listed or eligible to be listed on the National Register of Historic Place

● The total project construction cost at award of the construction contract(s) was not less than $750,000.00

(2) Technical Approach This factor evaluates the Offerors’ understanding of work to be accomplished. The Offeror must provide a narrative:

● Narrative format and shall provide a detailed plan for how the Contractor plans to execute the work specified in the Contract Documents

● Discuss the sequencing of work and how the Offeror intends to manage their subcontractors in order to ensure a smooth working relationship with the occupants of the building

● Discuss the Offeror’s procedures to ensure strict quality control relative to both workmanship and materials

● Management methods that the Offeror will use to monitor cost, schedule, environmental, and safety

(3) Schedule This factor evaluates the schedule of the Offeror to determine understanding of the project. The Offeror must provide a schedule:

● Submitted for the proposed total contract duration in calendar days from the notice to proceed to final cleanup of premises.

● Provide a Critical Path Method Schedule indicating durations of all major activities showing predecessors and critical path including all subcontractor work activities and a schedule that shows the major activities, durations, and critical path for all work associated with the Base scope of work and Option 1. Assume Option 1 is awarded at the same time as the Base scope of work.

VI.B. Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Evaluation Process

(1) The Government will evaluate all technical proposals on a pass/fail basis to determine all offers that meet the minimum technically acceptable requirements.

Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable. An unacceptable rating for any one factor makes the entire proposal unacceptable.

Any costs incurred by offerors in preparing or submitting offers are the offerors' sole responsibility; the United States will not reimburse any offeror for any proposal preparation costs.

(2) Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors.

(3) The following non-price factors will be evaluated for acceptability:

(a) Factor 1 - Experience on Similar Projects

Evaluation Criteria: This factor evaluates the extent of the Offeror’s past experience as a firm in providing similar construction services to determine the firm’s experience in completing the tasks detailed in the performance work statement.

Acceptability Standard (Pass): The Offeror must demonstrate successful experience as a General Construction (GC) Contractor responsible for the construction of at least two (2) similar projects substantially completed within the last five (5) years. Additionally, all subcontractor relevant experience for work activities not being performed by the prime contractor must be submitted using the same criteria of construction of at least two (2) similar projects or relevant activities substantially completed within the last five (5) years.

A “similar project” is defined as a project that is comparable in nature, type, and complexity as defined by all of the following characteristics:

● Project involved the exterior renovation of a comparably sized structure;

● Project was performed in an occupied and functioning office building;

● Project involved removal and replacement of window glazing

● Project included historic restoration and repair of a building listed or eligible to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places;

● The total project construction cost at award of the construction contract(s) was not less than $750,000.00

(b) Factor 2 – Technical Approach

Evaluation Criteria: This factor evaluates the Offerors’ demonstrated qualifications of the contractor’s understanding and proposed approach to accomplishing work

Acceptability Standard (Pass): The Offeror must provide a technical approach narrative and must meet the minimum requirements stated here.

● Narrative format and shall provide a detailed plan for how the Contractor plans to execute the work specified in the Contract Documents

● Discuss the sequencing of work and on how the Offeror intends to manage their subcontractors in order to insure a smooth working relationship with the occupants of the building

● Discuss the Offeror’s procedures to ensure strict quality control relative to both workmanship and materials

● Management methods that the Offeror will use to monitor cost, schedule, environmental, and safety

(c) Factor 3 - Schedule

Evaluation Criteria: This factor evaluates the schedule of the Offeror to determine understanding of the project.

Acceptability Standard: The Offeror’s schedule shall include work completed within Period of Performance, applicable schedule milestones and phasing.

● Submit for the proposed total contract duration in calendar days from the notice to proceed to final cleanup of premises.

● Provide a Critical Path Method Schedule indicating durations of all major activities showing predecessors and critical path including all subcontractor work activities and a schedule that shows the major activities, durations, and critical path for all work associated with the Base scope of work and Option 1. Assume Option 1 is awarded at the same time as the Base scope of work.