VMO00246 - Amendment 1 Pkg - 20211005.pdf

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION 1 | 9

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If Applicable)

1 VMO00246

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

General Services Administration, PBS Acquisition Mangagement Divison 6P1QE 2300 Main Street, Floor 7 Kansas City, MO 64108 For information contact:

Steven Steinkamp steven.steinkamp@gsa.gov

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

Whittaker Façade Prospectus Charles E. Whittaker Federal Courthouse 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

400 E. 9th Street

Kansas City, MO 64106

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, XXX is not ex-tended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(X) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CON-

TRACT ORDER NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b)

C. THIS SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCP section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible. )

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Maria R. Doedtman,Contracting Officer

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

End of Amendment #1

Amendment No. 1 is issued for the following:

1) Please see the attached Pre-Proposal Agenda with Attendees,

2) Please see the attached Form B of the Solicitation, and

3) Please see the attached Owner Evaluation.

3:00 AM

47PG0221R0026

9/24/2021

10/05/21

11/22/21

Pre-Proposal Conference Agenda

October 5, 2021 9:00 AM Bridge line: 980-292-4607

Passcode: 117560691# Charles E. Whittaker Federal Courthouse, 400 E. 9th Street Kansas City, MO 64106

Project: VMO00246 Whittaker Facade Prospectus

Project Location: 400 E. 9th Street, Kansas City, MO CO

NOTE: Disclaimer Statement: No oral statement made by a Government representative during any site visit or pre-proposal conference, nor any written record of such oral statements as may be made and subsequently furnished to the offeror, will be deemed to have the effect of adding to, modifying or otherwise varying from the written provisions of the request for proposal. In the event the discussion or questions raised during the site visit or pre-proposal conference indicate a need to modify the RFP, an amendment to solicitation will be issued in writing.

1. Introductions – Welcome CO

Sign In Sheet

2. Project Description and Scope of Work PM/COR

Project Description o Phase I o Phase II o POR

Project Scope of Work o CMc SOW o Design Assist SOW o Move Management SOW

3. Contract and Proposal Process PM/CO

Phase I Proposal – Full and Open Phase II Proposal – Limited to No More Than 5 Contractors from Phase I Bidders Award CMc During 3rd Quarter 2022 LDs = $6,000.00 Estimated Range - $30,000,000.00 - $50,000,000.00

Source Selection Evaluation Board Phase I – Please ensure that you submit your best proposal because GSA is limiting to no more than 5 Contractors to bid on Phase II, 30% Overall Score o Relevant Past Experience – 40% o Management Approach – 35% o Relevant Past Performance – 25%

Proposals shall consist of the following documents, completed, and executed in accordance with the Solicitation:

o Solicitation and Offer Form (front and back) o Technical Proposal o GSA Form 527 – Ktr’s Qualification and Financial Info

Passcode: 117560691# Charles E. Whittaker Federal Courthouse, Construction Related Issues (but not limited to):

o COVID o Parking o Waste Management - Recycling o Reduce noise related work – outside regular work hours

4. Contractor Questions CO/PM

There will be two (2) rounds of questions for the Phase I Solicitation Round 1 Questions: Contractors are to submit any questions generated during the site visit or review of the documents in writing (via email) to the PM/COR Denton Nichols (Denton.Nichols@gsa.gov) AND Contracting Officer, Maria Doedtman (Maria.Doedtman@gsa.gov) AND Contract Specialist, Steven Steinkamp (Steven.Steinkamp@gsa.gov) on or before Wednesday, October 13, 2021 3:00 PM.

Round 1 Answers: Responses to questions will be assembled, answered, and disseminated to all offerors in the form of an amendment, which will be issued via Government Point of Entry (GPE) www.SAM.gov by Close of Business (COB) Friday, October 22, 2021.

Round 2 Questions: Contractors are to submit any questions generated during the site visit or review of the documents in writing (via email) to the PM/COR Denton Nichols (Denton.Nichols@gsa.gov) AND Contracting Officer, Maria Doedtman (Maria.Doedtman@gsa.gov) AND Contract Specialist, Steven Steinkamp (Steven.Steinkamp@gsa.gov) on or before Monday, November 1, 2021 3:00 PM.

*Please note: Any questions received after Monday, November 1, 2021 at 3:00 PM may not be answered

Round 2 Answers: Responses to questions will be assembled, answered, and disseminated to all offerors in the form of an amendment, which will be issued via Government Point of Entry (GPE) www.SAM.gov by Close of Business (COB) Wednesday, November 10, 2021.

Offers, in accordance with the Solicitation, must be received by email by November 22, 2021 to Maria Doedtman, maria.doedtman@gsa.gov, no later than 3:00 PM CST.

5. Site Walk-throughs are Wednesday, October 6th at 9:00 AM or 1:00 PM and Thursday, October

7th at 9:00 AM or 1:00 PM. There is a limit to four (4) people per contractor to attend any walk-through, companies may attend more than one (1) walk-through, space permitting. Please sign up with Maria Doedtman, maria.doedtman@gsa.gov by 4:00 PM October 5th.

6. Questions or Comments?

GSA asks for all the questions to be put down in writing so that no unintentional unfair advantage is given to one contractor or another. Also, this reduces ambiguity because the questions are written down.

Passcode: 117560691# Charles E. Whittaker Federal Courthouse, NAME ORGANIZATION PHONE / E-MAIL

Maria Doedtman GSA maria.doedtman@gsa.gov

Denton Nichols GSA denton.nichols@gsa.gov

Steven Steinkamp GSA steven.steinkamp@gsa.gov

Josh Trader GSA Joshua.trader@gsa.gov

Cy Houston US Courts cy_houston@mow.uscourts.gov

Mike Meyer BKM Construction mmeyer@bkmconstructionllc.com

Donny Tennyson JE Dunn Donald.tennyson@jedunn.com

Bryan Herberg JE Dunn

David Hullinger JE Dunn

Doug Beichley JE Dunn

Margaret Bowker JE Dunn

Sydney Manning JE Dunn

Josh Christopher JE Dunn

Scott Pratt Krueck Sexton Partners spratt@ks.partners

Laura Jimenez Krueck Sexton Partners ljimenez@ks.partners

Juan Villafane Krueck Sexton Partners jvillafane@ks.partners

Stephen Shatswell Krueck Sexton Partners sshatswell@ks.partners

Chris Hof Hof Construction chris.hof@hofconstruction.com

Chris Stanton McCownGordon cstanton@mccowngordon.com

Jake Krehbiel McCownGordon jkrehbiel@mccowngordon.com

Christy Turner Turner Construction Company cnturner@tcco.com

DeJ’on Slaughter Turner Construction Company dslaughter@tcco.com

Non-Price Factors, when combined, are significantly more important than Total Evaluated Price.

Definitions:

Deficiency is a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Weakness is a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. A "significant weakness" in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Strength is any factor that will ensure successful contract performance.

The submittals will be rated on a 1-10 scale, with 10 representing the highest score of dominant performance and 1 representing the lowest score or dominantly poor performance. A “5” score is defined as meeting the standard as forth by GSA, but the selection committee member was not able to identify dominate performance information (verifiable performance measurements or best value practice with measurements) to achieve a higher score.

A. FACTOR: Relevant Past Experience

Weight: 40%

3 Projects, each one (1) page, double-sided, using Form B, Firm Relevant Past Performance or similar form.

The narrative shall also demonstrate how the projects are similar including the project description and location, square footage, project schedule, safety record, scope of design and construction phase services provided, GMP or budget at award, GMP at construction start and final contract value after adjustments, and indicating whether liquidated damages and/or claims were assessed; the projects have been completed within the past ten (10) years; the projects are within the project cost range of $20M or greater; and include the project similarity and complexity - Facility that has five (5) stories or more of curtainwall systems which may include court facilities, hospitals, health clinics, laboratories, rehabilitation clinics, corporate institutional or governmental office space where there are many organizational functions represented and are special phasing requirements to keep the facility in continuous operation..

Evaluation of past performance is not limited to the projects submitted; the Government may also consider the offeror’s performance on contracts the board is award of from past projects or from CPARS.

B. FACTOR: Management Approach

Weight: 35%

The Offeror has provided two (2) pages, double-sided narrative that illustrates the offeror’s approach to design phase and construction phase services:

Design Phase services including, but not limited to: design-assist and constructability services, schedule development, cost-estimating and cost-reconciliation services, address subcontractor participation, move coordination, building occupant communication strategy, and quality of value engineering services.

Construction Phase services including, but not limited to, scheduling, phasing and move coordination, building occupant communication strategy, cost control including contingency management, change order management, and “open book accounting”.

C. FACTOR: Relevant Past Performance

Weight: 25%

Three (3) examples of most recent completed projects with a contract price greater than $20M that demonstrate successful past performance on CMc-type contracts or on contracts that use a GMP and provide requisite information for each. An Owner Evaluation is provided for each of the three (3) projects included in RELEVANT PAST EXPERIENCE.

FORM “B” CMc FIRM PROJECT EXPERIENCE AND PAST PERFORMANCE READ CAREFULLY: The purpose of this form is to provide supporting project information for Evaluation Factor 2 CMc Firm Project Experience and Past Performance. This form is to be completed by the offeror. The offeror is to list construction projects performed from November 2011- 2021 that are similar to the work described in this solicitation. It is especially important that the offeror disclose instances in which their past performance may be considered by others to be less than fully satisfactory. The offeror should tell their side of the story and describe remedial corrective action that has been taken or will be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to do so may result in a determination that an offeror has been less than candid with the government, which could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror’s past performance record. Fill in the information by typing or printing in readable font. Form “B” consists of 2 pages per each project..

GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION

1. Offeror Name:

2. Project No. (circle one) 1 2 3

3. Project Title, Location, and facility type where work took place:

4. Project Start and completion dates:

5. Award amount:

Overall final construction costs:

6. Firms Role in Project:

7. Project Team: (Name and title and explain roles and responsibilities on this project. Team should still be employed by the company.

More detailed information for team will be required in Evaluation Factor 1: Key Personnel and Staffing):

8. Scope of Work (Specific description of the requirements of the work):

9. General Pre-construction Services provided (if applicable):

10. General Construction Services provided:

Form B (con’t) PROJECT SPECIFIC INFORMATION (Should reflect specific DETAILED project information as it relates to the offerors ability to successfully meet the standards for Evaluation Factor 1: Project Experience and Past Performance for purposes of this contract. Narratives should only be 1 page. Narratives should include but not be limited to: Experience in schedule review and management for complex multi-phase construction projects in fully occupied, multiple tenant buildings ,verbal and written communication skills.

Demonstrate knowledge in national building, structural and fire codes.

Appendix A – OWNER EVALUATION

To:

(Name of person completing survey)

Phone: Email:

Subject: Past Performance Survey of:

(Name of Contractor)

(Critical Individuals)

The GSA is implementing a process that collects past performance information on contractors and their key personnel. The firm/individual listed above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work on. The GSA appreciates your time in completing this survey. Rate each of the criteria on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisfied and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied. Please rate each of the criteria to the best of your knowledge (you may leave a question blank if you don’t have adequate knowledge).

Client Name:

Project Name:

NO CRITERIA UNIT RATING

1 Ability to manage the project cost (1-10)

2 Ability to maintain project schedule (1-10)

3 Quality of workmanship (1-10)

Ability to manage and overall professionalism (includes responses and prompt payment to suppliers and subcontractors)

(1-10)

Close out process (no punch list upon turnover, warranties, as-builts, operating manuals, etc.)

(1-10)

6 Ability to communicate and document risks on the project (1-10)

7 Ability to follow the users rules, regulations, and requirements (1-10)

8 Overall customer satisfaction (1-10)

Is the project completed (has the firm/individual completed all work required under contract)

(Y/N) Y / N

Printed Name (of Evaluator) Signature (of Evaluator)

Thank you for your time and effort in assisting the GSA and (INSERT KTR NAME) in this important endeavor.