Attachment 4.doc

42-08-064

ATTACHMENT 4

SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1Performance Evaluation Plan

JCN:

Task Order #:

Rating Period: MM/DD/YYYY to MM/DD/YYYY

TM:

(Contractor) PM:

Assessment of Task Order Performance

Appropriate Standard Review Plan (SRP)/Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) Sections Reviewed

Incorporation of Comments

Timeliness (Schedule)

Budget Compliance

Note: A written justification is required, and must be attached, for any rating of Unsatisfactory;

however, comments may still be provided with a Satisfactory rating if there are issues of concern.

TM

PO

I certify that the above evaluation is accurate. I concur in the rating provided by the TO TM.

Comments:

Comments:

Signature

Date

Signature

Date

Note:

PO signature only required when rating of unsatisfactory is given

Rating Scale and Subcategory Definitions

Rating Scale

Appropriate SRP Sections Reviewed

· Excellent – Reviewed all appropriate SRP sections and subsections as specified in the Task Order. Interfaced with NRC staff at least weekly to collect their inputs, and made recommendations in a clear and concise manner.

· Satisfactory – Addressed all appropriate SRP sections and subsections as specified in the Task Order. Communication with the NRC staff was infrequent (less than weekly) but adequate.

· Unsatisfactory – Did not address 2 or more appropriate SRP sections and subsections as specified in the Task Order. Communications with NRC staff was infrequent and inadequate.

Budget

· Excellent – Performed all work specified in the Task Order at or within the initial budget.

· Satisfactory – Performed all identified tasks within the NRC adjusted budget that was adjusted for issues outside the Contractor’s control. Contractor identified budget and schedule issues promptly to NRC to allow adequate time to evaluate the situation and revise the budget as needed.

· Unsatisfactory – Failed to complete work specified in the Task Order within budget. Did not adequately keep NRC advised of issues that could affect the task budget or schedule.

Incorporation of Comments

· Excellent – Communicated effectively and in a timely manner with NRC to incorporate NRC comments promptly and correctly. Resolved or incorporated major comments in one iteration. General and editorial comments were resolved quickly and ahead of schedule. Questions and potential issues were resolved in a highly professional manner.

· Satisfactory – Communicated adequately with the NRC staff to collect and incorporate comments. One or more rounds of comment resolution was required to resolve major issues. General and editorial comments were resolved within the established scheduled time period.

· Unsatisfactory – Communication between the contractor and NRC was inadequate to identify and incorporate comments in a timely manner. Several iterations of comment resolution were insufficient to incorporate the NRC comments. Major issue resolution was not pursued appropriately, and general and editorial comments were not adequately addressed, which caused a schedule delay.

Timeliness

· Excellent – Completed all tasks on or ahead of schedule

· Satisfactory – Completed all tasks at or ahead of the schedule revised due to circumstances beyond the contractor’s control.

· Unsatisfactory – Exceeded the agreed upon (or revised) schedule by greater than 2 business days.

PAGE