4. Past Performance Questionnaire v2.pdf

PDF 279 KB Posted

Attached to
Chrome Plating/Coating Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911KF-22-Q-0036
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Detroit Arsenal

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire related to a solicitation for chrome plating and coating services. The solicitation is being conducted by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Detroit Arsenal for surface preparation, plating, coating, and post-treatment of components to be provided by ANAD in accordance with the specifications in the Statement of Work. Responses to the past performance questionnaire are due by the closing date of the solicitation and will be considered source selection sensitive information. The questionnaire requests ratings and narratives addressing customer satisfaction, schedule adherence, technical requirements conformance, technical responsiveness, and an overall assessment of the contractor's past performance.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Chrome Plating/Coating, newest first.
File Type Posted
W911KF-22-Q-0036 Amendment 002 MODIFICATION.pdf PDF
W911KF-22-Q-0036 Amendment 002 CONFORMED.pdf PDF
5. Chrome Material.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911KF-22-Q-0036 Amendment 001.pdf PDF
10. Carrier, 8769943.pdf PDF
12. Piston, 10895621.pdf PDF
1. Statement of Work.pdf PDF
8. Support Bearing, 8351668.pdf PDF
9. Spur Gear, 8351746.pdf PDF
11. Cannon Cradle, 9377202.pdf PDF
15. Piston, 12304670.pdf PDF
5. Chrome Material.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
6. Rod Piston Linear, 13211E7867.pdf PDF
7. Sleve Steering, 8351577.pdf PDF
13. Sleeve Sliding, 12267358.pdf PDF
14. Shaft Shoulder, 12267951.pdf PDF
16. Spur Gear, 12321718.pdf PDF
17. Spur Gear, 23017980.pdf PDF
2. Evidence of Authority To Sign Offers.pdf PDF
3. SIOAN Form 380-2 Personnel Data Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

W911KF-22-Q-0022

Past Performance Questionnaire This Questionnaire relates to solicitation requirements for

Update M1 Full Up Power Pack (FUPP) Ground Hop Stand

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE –

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection for Anniston Army Depot.

Please complete this Questionnaire and submit via e-mail.

Director of Contracting Anniston Army Depot 7 Frankford Ave.

Anniston, AL 36201-4199

ATTN: Ellen Bethea, Contract Specialist E-mail: ellen.r.bethea.civ@army.mil

Desired Response Date is the closing date of this solicitation.

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

Proposed prime contractor

1. OFFEROR NAME OFFEROR ADDRESS

Contractor Name and Address and contract/project information being addressed in this questionnaire

2. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO.:

3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:

4. COMPLETION DATE:

5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):

6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

7. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT REQUIREMENTS:

mailto:sara.b.young.civ@mail.mil

8. Point of Contact: Provide the following information for the company and individual completing this questionnaire:

Company/Agency Name and Address:

Name of person completing this questionnaire:

Title:

Role/responsibility for the effort being addressed in the survey:

Phone Number:

E-Mail:

Rating Scale:

EXCELLENT: Superior performance. Objectives/requirements essentially always achieved or exceeded, with inconsequential exceptions.

GOOD: Highly satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements achieved with only rare exceptions, and the exceptions had minor consequences.

ADEQUATE: Generally satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements generally achieved with occasional exceptions, and, in most cases, the exceptions had minor consequences.

MARGINAL: Occasionally unsatisfactory performance of significance.

Objectives/requirements were not fully achieved, with significant consequences in some cases.

POOR: Frequently unsatisfactory performance of significance. Objectives/requirements frequently not achieved, with significant consequences.

UNKNOWN: Unable to rate, not observed, or not a significant aspect of performance.

9. Questionnaire: Please indicate the rating that best reflects your experience with this contractor and provide a short narrative addressing the basis for the ratings assigned. Address compliance with requirements, actual performance, problems encountered and problem resolution. Use additional sheets if necessary. Excellent contract management, attention to Detail and Quality Assurance.

A. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s business-like concern for its customers, including such factors as dependability, flexibility, early problem identification, communication, and responsiveness.

B. Schedule – Assess the contractor’s adherence to delivery commitments; responsiveness to requests for accelerations; and early identification and mitigation of schedule slippages.

C. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s performance in conforming to contract specifications:

D. Technical Responsiveness – Assess the contractor’s ability to identify and resolve technical problems effectively and in a timely manner, including correction of faulty work and warranty claims:

Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown

Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown

Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown

E. Overall Assessment: Provide your overall assessment.

Past Performance Questionnaire

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .