4.02 N00244-26-Q-0060 Combined Synopsis.docx

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with FAR Part 12.201-1 Simplified procedures.

This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; a Request for Quotation (RFQ) is being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. The Solicitation number is N00244-26-Q-0060. The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through latest Federal Acquisition Circular and DFARS change notices. This solicitation is issued as 100% small business set aside. NAICS Code 541410 Interior Design Services is applicable and business size is $9 (millions of dollars). The solicitation will start on the date this solicitation is posted and will end on 15 July 2026 12:00 PM Pacific Standard Time.

Contractor must complete all Representations and Certifications found in the provisions listed below within their profile in the System for Award Management (SAM) at http://www.sam.gov to be considered for this solicitation.

Requirements This requirement is for the fabrication, delivery, and installation of custom mixed media art displays and murals at the HSA CZ Hall Galley located in Point Loma, CA. The work includes the creation of mixed media art with integrated photography, artist relief elements, and proper mounting/application to designated glass and drywall surfaces.

Refer to Performance Work Statement for full detail.

Period of Performance: 01 September 2026- 31 August 2027 Delivery: FOB Destination.

Inspection and acceptance: At Destination by the Government.

Contract Type: Purchase Order/ Contract resulting from this solicitation will be Firm Fixed Price (FFP).

Attachment -01 Performance Work Statement (PWS) This solicitation documents and incorporates provisions and clauses in effect through the latest FAC and DFARS change notices. It is the responsibility of the contractor to be familiar with the applicable clauses and provisions. The clauses may be accessed in full text at these addresses: https://www.acquisition.gov/far-overhaul

Post Award Contract Administration will be performed by NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center San Diego, Code 250. Payment: The US Navy anticipates using Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) to pay invoices IAW DFAR 252.232-7003.

Requests for technical and or contractual clarification are to be submitted in writing. TECHNICAL QUESTIONS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL to amber.m.haverstick.civ@us.navy.mil and received no later than 3 days from solicitation close. Answers to questions will be provided in the form of an amendment to this solicitation.

THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS AND CLAUSES ARE APPLICABLE AND ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO THE SOLICITATION BY REFERENCE AND BY FULL TEXT.

It is the responsibility of the interested contractors to obtain copies of the necessary provisions and or clauses that are required as a part of this solicitation. Required clauses/provisions that are not submitted may render a quote not to be accepted by the Government.

THE FOLLOWING NAVSUP LOCAL TEXT IS HEREBY MADE PART OF THE STATEMENT OF WORK/PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT.

NAVSUP FLC San Diego may utilize contractor support through the AbilityOne Program, as needed, to perform contract closeout functions for this acquisition. Information, including business sensitive/confidential or proprietary data, that the offeror provides to the Government or information already in the possession of the Government may be viewed and utilized by the AbilityOne Program support contractor personnel during the course of its contract performance. The information that may be made available to the support contractor may include, for example, pricing and technical proposals, historical contract, pricing and performance information, Commercial Asset Visibility (CAV) reporting information and similar data/information.

By submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation, the offeror and its subcontractors consent to a release of their business sensitive/confidential or proprietary data to the Government's AbilityOne Program support contractor personnel in order to perform close out services. Prior to the release of any such information to the support contractor, the support contractor will have in place with the Government a Non-Disclosure/Non-Use Agreement in accordance with the terms of the AbilityOne Program support contract.

Offerors may execute their own Non-Disclosure Agreement with the AbilityOne Program (AbilityOne contact information available from the contracting point of contact). The support contractor must provide copies of the executed agreements to the Contracting Officer and the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) for the support contract; and the offeror/contractor for this acquisition must provide copies of the executed Agreement to the Contracting Officer for this acquisition. If the offeror/contractor seeks such a Non-Disclosure Agreement with the AbilityOne Program support contractor, the Agreement must be executed no later than the date of final delivery under the resulting NAVSUP FLC San Diego contract.

REVIEW OF AGENCY PROTESTS

The contracting activity, Fleet Logistics Center San Diego (FLCSD) will process agency protests in accordance with the requirements set forth in FAR 33.103(d).

Pursuant to FAR 33.103(d)(4), agency protests may be filed directly with the appropriate reviewing authority; or, a protester may appeal a decision rendered by a contracting officer to the reviewing authority.

The reviewing authority for FLCSD is the Director, Regional Contracts Department, Fleet Logistics Center San Diego at 3985 Cummings Road, San Diego, CA 92136-4200. Agency procurement protests should clearly identify the initial adjudicating official, i.e., the "contracting officer" or "reviewing official".

Offerors should note this review of the Contracting Officer's decision will not extend GAO's timeliness requirements. Therefore, any subsequent protest to GAO must be filed within 10 days of knowledge of initial adverse agency action.

UNIT PRICES

Contractor unit prices, when incorporated into a Government contract, may be releasable under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in the event NAVSUP FLCSD receives a FOIA request.

For supplies: New Equipment ONLY; NO remanufactured or "gray market" items. All items must be covered by the manufacturer's warranty.

No partial shipments are permitted unless specifically authorized at the time of award.

WAGE DETERMINATION

If applicable, WD 2015-5635 (Rev.30) and posted on https://sam.gov/is hereby incorporated by reference. To view the San Diego, CA Wage Determination-please visit https://sam.gov/

It is the responsibility of the interested contractors to obtain copies of the necessary provisions and or clauses that are required as a part of this solicitation. Required clauses/provisions that are not submitted may render a quote not to be accepted by the Government.

PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Suspended, Proposed for Debarment, or Voluntarily Excluded. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 SECTION L

1.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1.1 This section provides general instructions for preparing offers as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the offer. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements in addition to those identified as evaluation factors and subfactors. Taking exception to any provision in the solicitation without addressing the exception with the contracting office before the offer due date specified within the solicitation will render the offer ineligible for award.

1.2 The anticipated Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract award under this solicitation will be a total small business set-aside made in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services, and FAR 13 Simplified Acquisition Procedures following the policies and procedures for solicitation, evaluation, and award.

1.3 Only offers received from eligible small businesses under NAICS code 541410 will be considered for award.

1.4 The evaluation of offers will be best on a best value basis in accordance with FAR 12.203 Evaluation using a comparative evaluation of offers in accordance with FAR 12.203(a).

1.5 Vendors are hereby instructed that, regardless of any language that may be used in this solicitation, this procurement is being conducted under FAR 12.201 Simplified Procedures. Offerors are advised that in accordance with FAR 13.106-2, the Goverment, at its discretion, may avail itself to one or more of tuations procedures in FAR Part 14 or 15.

1.6 An Offeror’s offer is presumed to represent the Offeror’s best efforts to comply with the solicitation requirements. Clarity and completeness of the offer are of the utmost importance. The offer must be written in a practical, clear, and concise manner. It must use quantitative terms whenever possible and must avoid qualitative adjectives to the maximum extent possible. Offerors are cautioned against restating PWS requirements in their offer, particularly with regard to technical requirements and must state how all RFQ and PWS requirements will be met. Statements such as "the Offeror understands" and "the Offeror shall/can comply", along with responses that paraphrase the RFQ, are inadequate. The use of phrases such as "standard practices" (with a specific government reference or industry reference) does not indicate that an Offeror understands the requirements and will likely result in a diminished evaluation rating.

1.7 The offer should be complete as submitted and not include references to data or information previously submitted. Data previously submitted to the Navy, if any, will not be incorporated “by reference” into the offer and will not be considered in the evaluation of the offer.

1.8 At the Government’s discretion, the Contractor’s offer may be incorporated into the final contract, either in whole or in part.

1.9 The Government intends to award this contract without further exchanges with offerors. Notwithstanding this intent, the Government reserves the right, at the Governments discretion, to conduct exchanges with any or all Offerors and request revised offers.

1.10 The Offeror’s offer shall remain valid for at least 60 calendar days after the offer due date.

1.11 Questions regarding any aspect of this procurement must be submitted in writing via email only and addressed to amber.m.haverstick.civ@us.navy.mil. The subject line of all email correspondence should state: RFQ N00244-26-Q-0060 QUESTIONS in the subject line.

1.12 Other methods of submitting questions are not authorized and may not be acknowledged or addressed. Both questions and answers will be posted to the Government Point of Entry for all parties to view. The Government will make every attempt to answer all questions in a timely manner. However, questions submitted within three (3) days of the posted closing date may not allow for ample time to respond, and Offerors cannot be guaranteed a response will be issued. All questions must be submitted by date referenced on solicitation.

PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT

2.1 The Offerors proposal shall be submitted in severable volumes based on the Factors as set forth below and all information specific to each Factor shall be confined to that volume. Failure to provide any volume may result in the proposal being given an Unacceptable rating. Information provided shall be specific to each Factor.

2.2 The offeror's proposal shall consist of three (3) separate volumes:

Volume I - Technical Volume II - Past Performance Volume III – Price

Note: All information pertaining to price data shall be included exclusively in Volume III. Under no circumstances shall any pricing data be included elsewhere in the proposal.

2.3 Each volume must include the Cover Sheet. The cover sheet shall include:

- Title

- Volume Name (Technical and Price)

- Volume Number

- Name and address of the offeror, point-of-contact (POC), title, telephone number, fax number, email address, Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN), and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code.

- Table of Contents - The table of contents shall provide enough detail to easily locate all important elements of the proposal.

Data submitted directly to the Government by subcontractors in support of the prime offeror's price proposal shall follow the above format. In addition, the prime offeror shall be prominently identified. All submissions are subject to the posted submission requirements including the posted closing date and time.

2.4 All text shall be single spaced and on white background with black color font (Black and white requirement does not apply to graphics or photos. Company stationary and logos are acceptable). Cross-references should be utilized to preclude unnecessary duplication of data between sections. Digital copies shall be provided in Microsoft Word, PDF, PowerPoint, and/or Excel.

2.5 Electronic copies of all offers are to be submitted via email. All copies must be able to be printed out single-sided, on either an 8.5" by 11" paper or 11' by 17' paper for diagrams, charts, or graphic materials. Minimum font type size 10, Times New Roman font or similar common desktop environment font is to be used. Pages of each volume must be numbered consecutively. All offers must be received by date posted through NECO. The posted closing date and time applies to all electronic copy submissions.

3. SPECIFIC VOLUME INSTRUCTIONS

3.1 VOLUME I: TECHNICAL

NOTE: Data previously submitted, if any, will not be used in the evaluation of this Request for Proposal. Therefore, previously submitted data should not be included in proposals "by reference".

3.1.1 The technical proposal should be written so that the government can make a thorough evaluation and arrive at a sound determination as to whether the proposal meets the requirements of this solicitation. To this end, the technical proposal shall be so specific, detailed and complete as to clearly and fully demonstrate that the prospective contractor has a thorough understanding of and ability to perform the technical requirements contained in the PWS.

3.1.2 The technical proposal shall be page numbered, contain a table of contents, be organized in the order specified for technical sub-factors below:

Sub-factor (I): Technical Approach Offerors must demonstrate a sufficient understanding of and approach to the various requirements identified in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Offerors shall provide a narrative explanation of the general understanding of the methodology and ability to perform all the PWS tasks. Emphasis should be placed on proven ability to provide like or similar work, corporate experience/team experience or other like information demonstrating understanding and capability to work the various tasks set forth in the PWS.

The technical approach shall demonstrate that the Offeror can accomplish the specific tasks in a technically competent, timely, cost effective manner with minimum risk to the Government. The narrative shall provide a complete analysis of the performance requirements and explain the processes, best practices and other methods the Offeror will use to meet each requirement stated in the PWS. The technical approach is not to be a restatement of the information contained in the PWS.

3.1.3 The proposal shall not exceed the limits stated below. The maximum page requirement excludes cover sheets, tables of content, or separation/index pages. Page limitations are as follows:

Note: To ensure fairness to all offerors, the above page limitations must be strictly enforced by the Government's evaluation process. Material over and above the page limitation established for any one plan will not be reviewed and / or evaluated by the Government.

3.2 VOLUME II - PAST PERFORMANCE

3.2.1 Offeror should include a list of 3-4 references using an Offeror Past Performance Data (OPPD) from previous contacts and narrative pertaining to the work provided. An OPPD will be included as an attachment in the solicitation announcement.

3.2.2 The past performance evaluation factor assesses the degree of confidence the Government has in an Offeror's ability to supply products and services that meet users' needs, based on a demonstrated record of performance.

3.2.3 Offerors should provide relevant past performance information for similar or related work under contracts completed during the last three years. Offerors may submit performance data regarding current contract performance as long as a minimum of one year of performance has been completed as of the closing date of this solicitation. Each Offeror has the opportunity to provide in its proposal any information regarding its past performance of contracts similar to the Government's requirement that it would like the Government to consider. The Offeror may include Federal, State and Local Government and private sector contracts.

3.2.4 Offerors should provide the following information below. There is a limit of three past performance entries.

a. Contract Number and, in the case of Indefinite Delivery type contracts, GSA contracts, and Blanket Purchase Agreements, also include Delivery Order Numbers

b. Customer/Agency (name, e-mail address, and telephone number)

c. Contracting Officer and Technical Point of Contact (name, e-mail address, and telephone number)

d. Brief description of the scope of work: Offerors shall provide a specific narrative explanation of each contract describing the objectives achieved and detailing how the effort is relevant to the requirements of this solicitation.

e. Contract type (specific type such as Fixed Price (FP), Cost Reimbursement (CR), Time & Materials (T&M), etc.)

f. Award Price

g. Total Labor-Hours of Effort

h. Period of Performance

i. Contract Deliverables

3.2.5 For any contracts that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence.

3.2.6 Offerors may submit past performance information regarding the following: predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience and subcontractors that will perform major aspects of the requirement.

3.2.7 To obtain information, the Government may contact the points of contact listed by Offerors, however, the Government is not required to contact the points of contact provided by Offerors and may limit the number of references it decides to contact. The Government is also free to contact references other than those provided by the Offeror to evaluate past performance of Offerors.

3.3 VOLUME III – PRICE

3.3.1 The price proposal shall cover all aspects of the proposed effort. Data contained in the price proposal shall be consistent with data contained in Volume I. Since adequate price competition is anticipated in response to this announcement, certified cost and pricing data is not required.

3.3.2 The Offeror is required to submit a price proposal breakdown for each CLIN included in the Schedule of Supplies/Services of the Solicitation. For an offer to be considered reasonable, applicable base rates must at a minimum meet the applicable wage determination or collective bargaining agreement. The proposal shall include employees' vacation, sick pay, and other fringe benefits.

Service Contract Act WD #2015-5635 (Rev.30)

The offeror must state explicitly whether any exceptions are taken to the terms and conditions of the solicitation. If so, the offeror shall list, and provide its rationale for any such exception. Any comments or exceptions must be addressed in this section and may form the basis for an offeror to be considered ineligible for award. Alternate proposals are not authorized and will be rejected.

Addendum to 52.212-2:

1.1 This procurement will be conducted in accordance with FAR 12. The award resulting from this solicitation will be a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) purchase order. Award will be set-aside 100% for small businesses.

1.2 Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation requirements and is determined to be the Best Value Offeror after performing a Best Value Tradeoff analysis, where price is more important than non-price factors.

1.3 The Government intends to award this contract without discussions. Therefore, the Offeror's initial proposal should contain the Offeror's best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. Notwithstanding this intent, the Contracting Officer reserves the right to conduct discussions, a matter within his/her discretion. In the event discussions are held, a competitive range determination will be made. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

1.4 To be eligible for inclusion in the competitive range and subsequent award, the Offeror must fully comply with the instructions included in 52.212-1 (Instructions, Conditions, and Notices for Submission of Offers), and sufficiently address all solicitation requirements. Taking exception to any requirement in the solicitation without addressing the exception with the contracting office before the proposal due date specified within the solicitation will render the proposal ineligible for award.

· EVALUATION FACTORS

· The Government will evaluate proposals based on the following factors and sub-factor:

Factor I – Technical Factor II – Past Performance Factor III – Price

· Factor I (Technical) and Factor II (Past Performance Confidence) are listed in descending order of importance. Where Factor III (Price), is more important than non-cost factors [Factor I (Technical), Factor II (Past Performance Confidence).

FACTOR I – TECHNICAL

.1 The Government will assess the Offeror’s Technical proposal with respect to its compliance with the solicitation requirements and the risk associated with the Offeror's approach through the assessment of the strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies.

Each sub-factor will be evaluated using the ratings below.

TABLE M-1 COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATING

FACTOR II – PAST PERFORMANCE

· The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used by the Government as a means to evaluate the relative capability of the Offeror and other competitors to successfully meet the requirements of the PWS and as a measure of performance risk for contract award. The government’s assessment of performance risk is not intended to be the product of a mechanical or mathematical analysis of an offeror’s performance on list of contracts, but rather the product of subjective judgment of the government after it considers all available relevant and recent information.

· Each past performance data sheet will be evaluated to determine whether the work performed by the Offeror is recent and relevant to the instant requirement. Relevant past performance is performance under contracts accomplished within the past three (3) years that is of the same or similar scope, complexity, and magnitude to that which is described in the solicitation. Common aspects of relevancy include, but are not limited to, the following: similarity of product/service/ support, complexity, dollar value, contract type, use of key personnel (for services), and extent of subcontracting.

· The Government will assign one relevancy rating for each past performance effort submitted using the four levels of relevancy as shown in “Past Performance Relevancy Rating” Table below. Past performance of greater relevancy will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance. Past performance reference that that has no relevance to the instant requirement will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably and will not be considered in the overall assessment of Past Performance Confidence.

“Past Performance Relevancy Rating” Table

Each past performance reference under each offeror’s Past Performance submission that is found to have at least some relevance to the instant requirement will be evaluated to determine the quality of the offeror’s performance under that reference. The Government will focus its inquiry of the Offerors record of performance as it relates to timeliness, quality, cost control, and customer satisfaction.

Quality of the relevant past performance will form the basis for the Offeror’s overall rating for Past Performance.

Past performance will be rated using the ratings defined below:

TABLE M-2 PAST PERFORMANCE

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

· FACTOR III – PRICE

Price will not be scored or rated. Evaluation of price will be performed using one or more of the proposal analysis techniques in FAR 15.404-1(b). Through these techniques, the Government will determine whether prices are reasonable and complete (to include all prices contained in the Schedule of Supplies/Services of the Solicitation).

(End of provision)