4.01 Combined SS_final.pdf

N0024423Q0002

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with FAR Part 13 Simplified Acquisition Procedures and 12.6 Streamlined Procedures for Evaluation and Solicitation for Commercial Items.

This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; a Request for Quotation (RFQ) is being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. The Solicitation number is N00244-23-Q-0002. The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through latest Federal Acquisition Circular and DFARS change notices. This solicitation is issued as full and open competition.

NAICS Code 811310 Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance is applicable and business size is $7.5 Million Dollars. The solicitation will start on the date this solicitation is posted and will end on 24 October 2022 12:00 PM Pacific Standard Time.

Contractor must complete all Representations and Certifications found in the provisions listed below within their profile in the System for Award Management (SAM) at http://www.sam.gov to be considered for this solicitation.

Requirements

Naval Construction Group ONE (NCG1), Site Ventura County is located on Naval Base Ventura County (NBVC) in Port Hueneme, California. NCG1 leads and manages the overall capability and readiness of six NMCBs located in Port Hueneme, CA. NMCBs engage in peacetime and wartime contributory construction in support of U.S. and Allied Forces worldwide.

The purpose of this effort is to provide yearly preventive maintenance and repair of Material Handling Equipment (MHE) used to sustain movement and storage of material and equipment for NCG1 and subordinate units. The majority of the work will be completed at NVBC Port Hueneme; however, occasional major repairs at may be performed at a facility equipped to accomplish required repairs. A government Point Of Contact (POC) will be assigned and utilized by the contractor to coordinate and initiate all work performed on government equipment aboard NBVC.

In addition, to a base year, there will be four options years for above services.

Refer to statement of work for full detail.

Qty. 12 Months

Period of Performance:

FY23 Base Year: 01 Nov 2022 – 30 SEP 2022 FY24 Option Year 1: 01 Oct 2023 – 30 SEP 2024 FY25 Option Year 2: 01 Oct 2024 – 30 SEP 2025 FY26 Option Year 3: 01 Oct 2025 – 30 SEP 2026

Delivery: FOB Destination.

Inspection and acceptance: At Destination by the Government.

Contract Type: Contract resulting from this solicitation will be Firm Fixed Price (FFP).

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

Naval Construction Group ONE

Material Handling Equipment (MHE) Port Hueneme, CA

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Naval Construction Group ONE (NCG1), Site Ventura County is located on Naval Base Ventura County (NBVC) in Port Hueneme, California. NCG1 leads and manages the overall capability and readiness of six NMCBs located in Port Hueneme, CA. NMCBs engage in peacetime and wartime contributory construction in support of U.S. and Allied Forces worldwide.

2.0 SCOPE

The purpose of this effort is to provide yearly preventive maintenance and repair of Material Handling Equipment (MHE) used to sustain movement and storage of material and equipment for NCG1 and subordinate units. The majority of the work will be completed at NVBC Port Hueneme; however, occasional major repairs at may be performed at a facility equipped to accomplish required repairs. A government Point Of Contact (POC) will be assigned and utilized by the contractor to coordinate and initiate all work performed on government equipment aboard NBVC.

3.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS/DIRECTIVES

All work performed by the contractor shall be accomplished in accordance with applicable publications, technical directives, instructions, standards, and procedures contained in pertinent manuals utilizing blueprints, drawings or schematics as provided by the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM).

4.0 TECHNICAL/PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

4.1 Equipment Maintenance Plan: The contractor shall perform tasks which include developing and executing a comprehensive quarterly Equipment Maintenance / Inspection Plan (EMP) based on the number of MHE assets and the number of estimated operational hours placed on each piece of equipment at OEM recommended intervals. The contractor shall also perform troubleshooting, removal, repair, installation, and testing of electrical and mechanical systems and sub-systems after repair and overhaul of equipment to OEM specifications. The EMP shall run from September 30th to September 29th of the next year and be submitted to the government for approval prior to any work commencing.

4.2 Work Orders: The contractor shall develop and submit work proposal forms to the government for any maintenance check or repairs that are identified during any routine maintenance check for approval prior to the execution of any work that supports the maintenance mission.

4.2.1 Types of Work Orders: Work order information entries, such as USN, time for performing maintenance, identification of deficiencies, required parts, record of repairs, etc., shall be recorded in accordance with applicable manuals, regulations or NCG1 standing operating procedures or directives. The work order shall also specify if it is for a routine maintenance check or a deficiency repair that was identified during the routine maintenance check. Each work order shall have its own unique number for tracking purposes. All work order documents and supporting documentation will be reviewed by the government on a systemic basis for accuracy, completeness, compliance, and for revisions necessary to prevent recurrence of any deficiencies reported by contractor personnel.

4.2.2 Emergency Repairs: From time to time there will be a requirement for immediate repairs to MHE due to a flat tire or other malfunction that require immediate response. The contractor shall dispatch personnel to evaluate and submit an emergency repair work order to the government for review and funding as soon as possible. The POC will coordinate with the government to secure funding and the contractor to execute the emergency repair to return the MHE to operational status “As Soon As Possible” (ASAP).

4.2.3 Work Order Content: Work Orders shall include all labor, parts, fluids, transportation and any other requirements to complete the maintenance check, repair, or emergency repair. Funding shall be secured by the POC before any work order is executed.

5.0 Performance Summary (Metrics)

5.1 This section describes the metrics used to measure contractor schedule and performance.

Circumstances or external influences beyond the control of the Contractor that impact the ability of the Contractor to meet performance standards will not affect Contractor performance measurements.

The following metric applies to each of the following measuring criteria:

Criteria: A percentage will be calculated as follows:

To receive a score of +1 or exceeds standard, will be assessed if the contractor maintains a percentage greater than 95% of maintenance checks completed.

To receive a score of “0” or meets standard, the contractor must maintain a percentage of 95%-85% of maintenance checks completed.

To receive a score of “-1”, or unacceptable will be assessed if the contractor meets less than 85% of the scheduled maintenance checks completed.

5.1.1 Maintenance Schedules: The Government will track schedule impacts and work closely with Contractor to mitigate schedule risks. If the government demonstrates that the contractor has caused a schedule delay resulting in NCG1 not meeting the monthly maintenance schedule, this will be reflected in the performance score for that month. This metric applies to each month of the year and will also be measured against the maintenance schedule for entire year for an overall score.

5.1.2 Performance Report: The Performance Report will evaluate the contractor on the criteria described above and the assigned score of either positive (+1), neutral (0), or negative (-1) will be reported to the NCG1 CoC The POC shall mediate any dispute regarding the maintenance schedule scores, and their decision shall be final. Should the Contractor fail to provide the POC with written notice of dispute within 10 calendar days upon receipt of the applicable score, the Contractor will be considered to be in agreement with the score. Written notice may be in the form of an email.

Although each metric must have a whole number score (-1, 0, or 1), it is acceptable for the overall Performance or Schedule Average, as reflected on the Contractor Monthly/Yearly Performance Report to be other than a whole number once averaged (i.e. -.5 or .75)

6.0 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

6.1 Contractor is required to determine and staff adequate supervision The Contractor will define their approach in writing which explains and quantifies proposed on site supervision.

6.2 The Contractor shall notify the POC of any accomplishments or condition that may delay performance or completion of any maintenance or repairs by phone call, in person, or email as soon as possible.

6.3 The Contractor shall report promptly (within one hour) to the POC all available facts relating to each instance of damage to government property/material or injury to contractor personnel.

6.4 When the following conditions occur, the Contractor shall advise the POC of following conditions or deficiencies.

6.4.1 A condition or material fault that is a hazard to personnel, equipment and missions.

6.4.2 When a prescribed installation or maintenance action cannot be accomplished or when operational characteristics or durability cannot be obtained because of faulty design or materials.

6.4.3 Any condition which is a direct result of poor quality workmanship during manufacture modification, repair, or overhaul.

6.4.4 Deterioration of installed components or operational equipment due to effects of climatic or environmental conditions.

6.4.5 Conditions which prevent operation of the equipment by operators.

6.4.6 When equipment does not perform to published, OEM operational standards.

7.0 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS/INSTRUCTIONS

7.1 Security: Performance of work will require access to NBVC and it is the contractor’s responsibility to acquire the necessary credentials in order to obtain base access. It shall also be the responsibility of the contractor to assure that all personnel working on equipment have been screened and obtained the proper access credentials for Port Hueneme.

7.1.2 Employees operating their personal vehicle on NVBC shall have the appropriate vehicle security identification. The employee is responsible for obtaining this identification through base security.

7.2 Contractor Quality: The Contractor shall ensure quality service is maintained throughout the life of the contract, and shall prepare and implement a Quality Control Plan (QCP). The QCP shall be due not later than 15 calendar days after the start of the contract or extension. The plan shall reflect the Contractor’s overall approach, internal controls and establishment of procedures for evaluating each of the major service areas (who, method, how often), for reporting to the Government, for resolving deficiencies, for identifying potential improvements, and for maintaining and making available to the Government, documentation (as listed in Deliverables Section) reflecting quality control inspections and any corrective actions taken.

7.3 Contractor shall follow all established Government policy and procedure required to ensure accountability of all government furnished property and equipment. Repeated instances of lost, damaged or stolen Government property and or equipment will result in issuance of corrective action requests.

7.4 Technical Discrepancies: Maintenance problems resulting from technical discrepancies that cannot be resolved between the POC and the Contractor will be referred to OEM engineering authorities for resolution.

7.5 Safety: The Contractor shall comply with all safety regulatory guidance including those as detailed in appropriate OSHA and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) instructions; the contractor shall be responsible for the safety and accountability of all its employees; the contractor shall provide common Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for team members. Some examples of PPE include safety shoes, safety eye glasses, ear plugs, gloves and trade specific PPE such as welding gear for welders and arc flash gear for electricians.

7.6 Workspace:

7.6.1 Equipment on jacks shall be roped off, posted with multiple warning signs and all unauthorized personnel kept clear of the equipment in the area.

7.6.2 Work areas shall be kept neat, free of other loose equipment as they may present a hazard to personnel and equipment.

7.7 Equipment Movement:

7.7.1 Equipment being moved shall require appropriate guides. Only qualified and licensed drivers shall be permitted to operate forklifts, and other motor vehicles.

7.7.2 If is equipment is required to be transported from NVBC to an appropriate repair facility it shall be the contractors responsibility to coordinate and execute the transport. Any cost associated with this movement shall be documented on the repair work order and approved prior to execution.

7.8 Fire: The Contractor shall adhere to general fire safety precautions:

7.8.1 Used waste, rags and other combustible material shall be the responsibility of the contractor and disposed of properly. Oily rags shall not be left on equipment.

7.8.2 Oil, grease, and fuel spills shall be immediately cleaned or covered with absorbent material and it shall be the responsibility of the contractor for cleanup and disposal.

7.9 Hazardous Materials:

7.9.1 The Contractor shall perform duties as are necessary for proper control, issue and disposal of Hazardous and non-hazardous chemicals used in the course of maintenance and repair in accordance with all local, state, and federal laws.

7.9.2 The contractor shall be responsible for the disposal of all HAZMAT generated by any maintenance or repair.

7.10 Equipment & Tool Care:

7.10.1 The contractor shall clean all equipment of residue resulting from their work.

7.10.2 Rescheduling: Any requirements for rescheduling work will be communicated through the POC to the Contractor Site Manager via telephone, email or in person.

7.10.3 Surge/Emergency Operations: None anticipated

7.10.4 Weekends/Holidays: None anticipated

8.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED MATERIALS:

8.1 Equipment and Facilities: The contractor will coordinate with the government POC for the approval and use of any government facilities prior to the execution of any work.

9.0 DELIVERABLES:

9.1 Yearly Maintenance Schedule as per section 4.

9.2 Sample Work Order form

9.3 Quality Control Plan

10.0 ATTACHMENTS:

10.1 Equipment Inventory List

10.2 Current Hours on the Equipment

ATTACHMENT 10.1

Equipment Inventory List:

SERIAL NUMBER SER REG MFR YR MAKE MODEL

L177G08419J 13-03036 2011 HYSTER H60FTM

11075 13-07051 2018 TOYOTA TRK FORKLIFT 6,000 LBS

11156 13-07069 2018 TOYOTA 8FGC7O0U

11157 13-07070 2018 TOYOTA 8FGC7O0U

A380V07106T 13-07082 2018 HYSTER 6K FORK LPG W/48" FORKS

A380V07132T 13-07083 2018 HYSTER 6K FORK LPG W/48" FORKS

A380V07227T 13-07084 2018 HYSTER 6K FORK LPG W/48" FORKS

13-07090 2018 HYSTER 6K FORK LPG W/48" FORKS

A380V07276T 13-07091 2018 HYSTER 6K FORK LPG W/48" FORKS

A380V07277T 13-07092 2018 HYSTER H60XT

HHKHHN13EK0002986 13-07099 2019 HYUNDAI 30D-9

HHKHHN13CK0002987 13-07100 2019 HYUNDAI 30D-9

HHKHHN13TK0002988 13-07101 2019 HYUNDAI 30D-9

HHKHHN13PK0002989 13-07102 2019 HYUNDAI 30D-9

J004V02055N 13-11024 2015 HYSTER S100FT

H187V03584N 13-11025 2015 HYSTER S60FT

U005V02577N 13-15299 2015 HYSTER H80FT

U005V02579N 13-33150 2015 HYSTER H80FT

U005V02593N 13-33151 2015 HYSTER H80FT

U005V02594N 13-33152 2015 HYSTER H80FT

73728 13-33155 2015 TOYOTA 8FGCU20

13-78141 2020 DOOSAN G35NC-7LP

13-78142 2020 DOOSAN G35NC-7LP

F187V08065D # 1 2008 HYSTER 60 S60FT

F187V11171E # 2 2008 HYSTER 60 S60FT

E010V02698E # 3 2008 HYSTER 40 S40FTS

L177G08418J 13-03035 2011 HYSTER M60FTM

D177635667U 13-48774 1997 HYSTER H60XM

F019E02552E F019E02552E 2007 HYSTER H330HD

F019E02553E F019E02553E 2007 HYSTER H330HD

L177G08419J HYSTER H60FTM

ATTACHMENT 10.2

Current Hours on Equipment (For HISTORICAL purposes only)

SERIAL NUMBER SER REG MFR

YR MAKE MODEL HOURS

F019E02553E F019E02553E 2007 HYSTER H330HD 133

F019E02552E F019E02552E 2007 HYSTER H330HD 268

L177G08418J 13-03035 2011 HYSTER M60FTM

E010V02698E # 3 2008

HYSTER

40 S40FTS 2745

F187V11171E # 2 2008

HYSTER

60 S60FT 3885

F187V08065D # 1 2008

HYSTER

60 S60FT 4370

13-78142 2020 DOOSAN G35NC-7LP 46

13-78141 2020 DOOSAN G35NC-7LP 47

73728 13-33155 2015 TOYOTA 8FGCU20

U005V02594N 13-33152 2015 HYSTER H80FT 547

U005V02593N 13-33151 2015 HYSTER H80FT 454

U005V02579N 13-33150 2015 HYSTER H80FT 583

U005V02577N 13-15299 2015 HYSTER H80FT

H187V03584N 13-11025 2015 HYSTER S60FT 296

J004V02055N 13-11024 2015 HYSTER S100FT 202

HHKHHN13PK0002989 13-07102 2019 HYUNDAI 30D-9 84

HHKHHN13TK0002988 13-07101 2019 HYUNDAI 30D-9 63

HHKHHN13CK0002987 13-07100 2019 HYUNDAI 30D-9 402

HHKHHN13EK0002986 13-07099 2019 HYUNDAI 30D-9 428

A380V07277T 13-07092 2018 HYSTER H60XT 230

A380V07276T 13-07091 2018 HYSTER 6K FORK LPG W/48" 433

13-07090 2018 HYSTER 6K FORK LPG W/48" 171

A380V07227T 13-07084 2018 HYSTER 6K FORK LPG W/48" 152

A380V07132T 13-07083 2018 HYSTER 6K FORK LPG W/48" 681

A380V07106T 13-07082 2018 HYSTER 6K FORK LPG W/48" 513

11157 13-07070 2018 TOYOTA 8FGC7O0U 437

11156 13-07069 2018 TOYOTA 8FGC7O0U 497

11075 13-07051 2018 TOYOTA TRK 6,000 LBS

L177G08419J 13-03036 2011 HYSTER H60FTM 430

L177G08419J HYSTER H60FTM

End

This solicitation documents and incorporates provisions and clauses in effect through the latest FAC and DFARS change notices. It is the responsibility of the contractor to be familiar with the applicable clauses and provisions. The clauses may be accessed in full text at these addresses: https://www.acquisition.gov

Post Award Contract Administration will be performed by NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center San Diego, Code 250.

Payment: The US Navy anticipates using Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) to pay invoices IAW DFAR 252.232-7003 and DFARS 252.232-7006.

Requests for technical and or contractual clarification are to be submitted in writing. TECHNICAL QUESTIONS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL to Jheanna.u.poblete@navy.mil and nelson.arias@navy.mil received no later than 20 October 2022 9:00:00 AM Pacific Standard Time.

Answers to questions will be provided in the form of an amendment to this solicitation.

THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS AND CLAUSES ARE APPLICABLE AND ARE HEREBY

INCORPORATED INTO THE SOLICITATION BY REFERENCE AND BY FULL TEXT.

It is the responsibility of the interested contractors to obtain copies of the necessary provisions and or clauses that are required as a part of this solicitation. Required clauses/provisions that are not submitted may render a quote not to be accepted by the Government.

REVIEW OF AGENCY PROTESTS

The contracting activity, Fleet Logistics Center San Diego (FLCSD) will process agency protests in accordance with the requirements set forth in FAR 33.103(d).

Pursuant to FAR 33.103(d)(4), agency protests may be filed directly with the appropriate reviewing authority; or, a protester may appeal a decision rendered by a contracting officer to the reviewing authority.

The reviewing authority for FLCSD is the Director, Regional Contracts Department, Fleet Logistics Center San Diego at 3985 Cummings Road, San Diego, CA 92136-4200. Agency procurement protests should clearly identify the initial adjudicating official, i.e., the "contracting officer" or "reviewing official".

Offerors should note this review of the Contracting Officer's decision will not extend GAO's timeliness requirements. Therefore, any subsequent protest to GAO must be filed within 10 days of knowledge of initial adverse agency action.

WAGE DETERMINATION

Reference WD 2015-5625 (Rev.17) dated July 25, 2022. To view the Ventura County, CA Wage Determination-please visit https://sam.gov/ https://www.acquisition.gov/ mailto:nelson.arias@navy.mil

PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting AUG 2020 52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and

Video Surveillance Services or Equipment

NOV 2021

52.209-11 Representation by Corporations Regarding Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law

FEB 2016

52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Items (CD 2018-O0018) NOV 2021 52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Items NOV 2021 52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications—Commercial

Products and Commercial Services--Alternate I

NOV 2021

52.217-3 Evaluation Exclusive of Options APR 1984 52.217-4 Evaluation of Options Exercised at Time of Contract Award JUN 1988 52.217-5 Evaluation of Options JUL 1990 52.252-5 Authorized Deviations in Provisions APR 1984 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

NOV 2011

252.204-7008 Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls

OCT 2016

252.204-7016 Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services-- Representation

DEC 2019

252.204-7017 Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services--Representation

DEC 2019

252.225-7973 Prohibition on the Procurement of Foreign-Made Unmanned Aircraft Systems—Representation. (DEVIATION 2020-O0015)

MAY 2020

252.225-7974 Representation Regarding Persons that have Business Operations with the Maduro Regime (DEVIATION 2020-O0005)

FEB 2020

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.203-19* Prohibition on Requiring Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements

JAN 2017

52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-10* Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier

Subcontract Awards

JUN 2020

52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2018 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance AUG 2020 52.204‐19 Incorporation By Reference Of Representations And

Certifications

DEC 2014

52.204-23* Prohibition on Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Services Developed or Provided by Kaspersky Lab and Other Covered Entities

NOV 2021

52.204-25* Prohibition of Contracting for Certain Telecomunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment

NOV 2021

52.209-6* Protecting the Government’s Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment

NOV 2021

52.209-10* Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations

NOV 2015

52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions—Commercial Items OCT 2018 52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement

Statutes or Executive Orders—Commercial Items (CD 2018-O0021)

52.217-8 Option to Extend Services NOV 1999 52.217-9 Option to Extend the Term of the Contract MAR 2000 52.219-4 Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small

Business Concerns (CD 2020-O0008)

NOV 2020

52.219-28* Post-Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation SEP 2021 52.222-3* Convict Labor JUNE 2003 52.222-21* Prohibition of Segregated Facilities APR 2015 52.222-26* Equal Opportunity SEP 2016 52.222-36* Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities JUN 2020 52.222-41* Service Contract Labor Standards AUG 2018 52.222-42* Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires MAY 2014 52.222-43* Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Labor

Standards—Price Adjustment (Multiple Year and Option Contracts)

AUG 2018

52.222-44* Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Labor Standards—Price Adjustment

MAY 2014

52.222-50* Combating Trafficking in Persons NOV 2021 52.222-55* Minimum Wages Under Executive Order 13658 JAN 2022 52.222-62* Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706 JAN 2017 52.223-18* Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging

While Driving

JUN 2020

52.232-33* Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer—System for Award Management

OCT 2018

52.232-18 Availability of Funds APR 1984 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

DEC 2013

52.233-3* Protest after Award AUG 1996 52.233-4* Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004 52.245-1 Government Property SEP 2021 52.245-9 Use and Charges APR 2012 52.246-4 Inspection of Services-Fixed-Price AUG 1996 52.247-34 F.o.b. Destination NOV 1991 52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated By Reference FEB 1998 52.252-6 Authorized Deviations in Clauses NOV 2020 252.201-7000 Contracting Officer’s Representative DEC 1991 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203‐7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights

SEP 2013

252.204-7004 DoD Antiterrorism Awareness Training for Contractors FEB 2019 252.204-7015 Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for

Litigation Support

MAY 2016

252.204-7018 Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services

JAN 2021

252.211-7007 Reporting of Government-Furnished Property AUG 2012 252.223-7008 Prohibition of Hexavalent Chromium JUN 2013 252.225-7001 Buy American And Balance of Payments Program—Basic JUN 2022

252.225-7002 Qualifying Country Sources As Subcontractors MAR 2022 252.225-7012 Preference For Certain Domestic Commodities APR 2022 252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUN 2013 252.225-7049 Prohibition on Acquisition of Certain Foreign Commercial

Satellite Services- Representations

DEC 2018

252.225-7050 Disclosure of Ownership or Control by the Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism

SEP 2021

252.225-7051 Prohibition on Acquisition of Certain Foreign Commercial Satellite Services

SEP 2021

252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports

DEC 2018

252.232-7006 Wide Area Workflow Payment Instructions DEC 2018 252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.232-7017 Accelerating Payments to Small Business Subcontractors--

Prohibition on Fees and Consideration

APR 2020

252.237-7010 Prohibition on Interrogation of Detainees by Contractor Personnel

JUN 2013

252.243-7001 Pricing of Contract Modifications DEC 1991 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012 252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items JAN 2021 252.246-7003 Notification of Potential Safety Issues JUN 2013 252.246-7004 Safety of Facilities, Infrastructure, and Equipment for

Military Operations

OCT 2010

252.246-7008 Sources of Electronic Parts MAY 2018 252.247-7023 Transportation of Supplies by Sea--Basic FEB 2019

*Included in 52.212-5

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND

COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV 2021)

I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. This solicitation is Full and Open Competition. The award resulting from this solicitation will be a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract following FAR 13.5 procedures based on a Best Value Trade-off Approach. The Government will award a contract to the responsible offeror whose quote is responsive to the request for Quotation (RFQ).

Offers submitted for other than FFP will not be considered and will be rejected outright.

2. Questions regarding this procurement must be submitted through email to the contract specialists at Jheanna.u.poblete@navy.mil and nelson.arias@navy.mil. All questions submitted shall include the solicitation number in the subject line. Other methods of question submittal will not be acknowledged. The Government will make every attempt to answer all questions in a timely manner; however, questions submitted within 3 days of the posted closing date may not allow ample time to respond and offerors cannot be guaranteed a response. All questions and answers will be posted for viewing by all other potential offerors.

3. All offers must be received no later than the date posted on the official soliciation.

This posted closing date and time applies to all submissions, as well as to all parts of the submission which are to be considered for award. No offers or modifications will be accepted after the deadline.

mailto:Jheanna.u.poblete@navy.mil mailto:nelson.arias@navy.mil.

4. Offerors must provide information in sufficient detail to clearly and fully demonstrate that the prospective contractor has a thorough understanding of and ability to perform all requirements of this solicitation. The Government will not assume the Offeror possesses any capability, understanding, or commitment not specified in the offer. Offerors are cautioned against restating the SOW requirements in their offers, particularly with regard to technical requirements. Statements such as "the offeror understands", and "the offeror shall/can comply", along with responses that paraphrase the RFQ, are inadequate. The use of phrases such as "standard practices" (with a specific government reference or industry reference) does not reflect the offeror understands the requirements and will likely result in a diminished evaluation rating.

II. FORMAT OF THE QUOTES

1. Offers must be submitted in severable volumes as set forth below and all information specific to each Volume shall be confined to that volume:

1) Volume I - Cover Letter and Technical Factor

2) Volume II - Past Performance Factor

3) Volume III – Price Factor

Volumes I * and Volume II * shall not contain any price or cost information

III. CONTENT OF THE QUOTES

A. VOLUME I: Cover Letter and Technical Factor.

a. Cover Letter Offerors shall include the name of the company, the cage code, the physical address, the point of contact information (name, email and phone number), and the titles or names of all of the documents submitted in response to this solicitation. If applicable, the cover letter can be used for any assumptions forming the basis of the RFQ submission.

b. Factor I --Technical Approach Technical Factor section of Volume I shall provide information in sufficient detail to allow the Government make a thorough evaluation and arrive at a sound determination as to whether the offer meets the requirements of this solicitation. To this end, the proposed technical approach shall be as specific, detailed and complete as to clearly and fully demonstrate that the prospective contractor has a thorough understanding of and ability to perform the technical requirements contained in the PWS.

Technical Factor shall be divided in three clearly labeled sections, correlating to the subfactors identified below:

a. Sub-Factor 1 – Technical Requirements Offerors shall provide, in detail, an approach that will demonstrate the Offerors’ understanding and ability to perform the requirements listed in Section 4.0 of the SOW, including the Offeror’s ability to meet all the technical requirements in accordance with the attached Equipment Inventory List (Attachment 10.1). The

Volume Name Page Limit Volume I – Cover Letter and Technical Factor* No more than (50) pages exclusive of cover letter table of contents, table of figures.

Volume II - Past Performance Factor* 2 Pages exclusive of Offerors Past Performance

Data Volume III- Price Factor Unlimited offer must not merely repeat the solicitation requirements, but rather must provide convincing documentary evidence in support of conclusive statements of how contract requirements will be met. Acceptable documentary evidence can be in the form of servicing guides, product literature, and specifications. The quote shall address requirements including an evaluation of the suitability for meeting the technical specifications;

the quote must include the following:

• Supporting technical documentation, e.g., servicing guides, product literature, and specifications to help the Government determine if the quoted service meets or exceed all of the essential characteristics specified in the RFQ.

B. VOLUME II: Past Performance Factor

1. Offeror’s may include in Volume II, a one to two page document listing all potential references. Information to be provided is reference name, address, phone number, email address, and any other identifying information such as Contract Number or type of work provided.

2. Offerors shall provide all relevant past performance information for similar or related work under contracts completed during the last three years. Offerors may submit performance data regarding current contract performance as long as a minimum of one year of performance has been completed as of the closing date of this solicitation

3. Past Performance references may include federal, state, or local

Government and private contracts performed by the Offeror that were similar in nature for this effort being evaluated.

4. To obtain information, the Government may contact the points of contact listed by

Offerors, however, the Government is not required to contact the points of contact provided by Offerors and may limit the number of references it decides to contact.

The Government is also free to contact references other than those provided by the Offeror to evaluate past performance of Offerors

C. VOLUME III: Price

Pricing shall be firm-fixed price and include all labor, equipment, materials required to perform the work listed in the statement of work. Offerors shall return fully executed CLINs to include a unit price and total extended prices for all Contract Line Items listed in the solicitation and a Total Amount showing the cumulative sum of all line items. The proposed total price should be inclusive of maintenance, repair and labor. The Offerors shall provide a breakdown of pricing for each CLIN.

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Addendum to 52.212-2 Evaluation

1. BASIS FOR AWARD

1.1 The award resulting from this solicitation will be a single firm fixed price contract.

This is a full and open solicitation, using a best value trade-off methodology for source selection in accordance with FAR13.5 and FAR 12.6. The basis for award of a contract will be an integrated assessment by the Contracting Officer of the results of the evaluation based on the evaluation factors and their importance as indicated below. The integrated assessment will include consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of the offers. The Government reserves such right of flexibility in conducting the evaluation as is necessary to assure placement of a contract is in the Government's best interest. Accordingly, the Government may award to other than the lowest price offeror, or other than the offeror with the highest technical rating.

1.2 To be eligible for award, the offeror must fully comply with the statement of work, and address all solicitation requirements. As such, offers that take exception to any term or condition of this solicitation, propose any additional term or condition, or omit any required information, may not be considered for award. Alternate proposals are NOT authorized and will be rejected. An offeror must propose in accordance with the directions set forth in the “Instruction to Offerors” to be considered for award. Additionally, prior to award, a responsibility determination will be made in accordance with FAR 9.104-1 and will take into consideration the information submitted by the offeror and information obtained from other resources.

The Government intends to award based on initial submissions. Therefore, the Offeror's initial offer should contain the Offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

However, the Government reserves the right to enter into discussions with Offerors if it is determined by the Contracting Officer to be in the Government’s best interest.

1.4 Relative Weights

1.4.1 Factor I (Technical Approach) and Factor II (Past Performance Confidence) are listed in descending order of importance. When combined, the non-priced factors [Factor I (Technical Approach) and Factor II (Past Performance Confidence), are significantly more important than Factor III (Cost). A rating of “Unacceptable” in any factor will render the entire proposal ineligible for award. There is one sub-factor under Factor I (Technical). The one sub-factor shall be used to establish an overall rating for Factor I. An unacceptable in any sub-factor will result in an overall Factor I rating of Unacceptable, rendering the entire proposal ineligible for award. The sub-factors is listed below:

a. Sub-factor (1) Technical Requirements;

1.4.2 Award will be made to that offeror whose proposal contains the combination of those criteria offering the best overall value to the government. In making this comparison, the government is more concerned with obtaining superior Technical Approach (Factor I), Past Performance Confidence (Factor II), than making the award to the lowest cost (Factor III) to the Government. However, the Government may not make an award at a significantly higher cost to the Government to achieve slightly superior technical approach or past performance.

2. EVALUATION OF OFFERS

A. Factor i -- Technical APPROACH

The Government will assess the Offeror’s Technical Approach with respect to its compliance with the solicitation requirements and the risk associated with the Offeror's approach through the assessment of the strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies.

a. Sub-Factor (1) Technical Requirements:

1 The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s submission to determine the Offeror’s understanding of, approach to, and ability to meet the solicitation requirements based on the information provided as required by INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS. The contractor’s technical information will be used to determine whether the items or services proposed meet or exceed the requirements included in the SOW.

2.2 Technical Approach Grading Criterion:

The Government shall evaluate Technical Approach using the following adjectival ratings:

Color Rating Table 1 Combined Technical/Risk Rating Rating Description Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

N0024422R0003

2.3 Unacceptable Rating. Any offeror receiving a score of “unacceptable” in a factor or any sub-factor will render the entire proposal ineligible for award.

B. Factor II – Past Performance Grading Criteria There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate each contractor’s past performance for relevancy to the proposed effort. The second is to determine the Government’s confidence level regarding future performance, based on each contractor’s past performance.

1. Relevance. Past performance on current and recent contracts (within the last 3 years) that are more technically relevant to the customer’s mission and program performance requirements, and similar in size, scope and complexity will receive greater consideration than performance on contracts that are less relevant.

1.1 Grading Criteria for “Past Performance Relevancy.” To determine how relevant each recent effort accomplished by the contractor is, the government will evaluate each past performance action, and rate each action using the following table below:

Table 2 Past Performance Relevancy Rating Rating Definition Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

2. Performance Confidence Assessment The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts in the past (including at a minimum customer service, quality of work, schedule, delivery of services) and what level of confidence the government can place in the contractor’s future performance under the proposed effort.

The government will evaluate vendors’ past performance for the following:

• Extent of client satisfaction with previous performance

• Reasonable and cooperative behavior in dealing with clients

• Quality of previously performed services

• Effectiveness in meeting schedules and providing services or products

2.1 Grading Criteria for “Performance Confidence Assessment:” To determine the confidence level, each past performance action will be evaluated and rated using the following ratings:

Table 3 Performance Confidence Assessment Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

N0024422R0003

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

In the case of a vendor for whom information on past performance is not available, the government will not evaluate the vendor favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Such vendor will receive a Neutral rating for past performance. The government intends to verify past performance information on contracts listed by the Offerors.

The Government may contact some or all of the references. The Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government.

The Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) will be accessed to locate recent and relevant information.

C. Factor IV – Price:

The Government will evaluate technically acceptable quotations for price completeness, and price reasonableness. A price reasonableness determination will be made using the price analysis techniques identified in FAR 15.404-1 as deemed appropriate.

(End of Provision)

End of Clauses/Provisions.

Contractor must complete all Representations and Certifications found in the provisions listed below within their profile in the System for Award Management (SAM) at http://www.sam.gov to be considered for this solicitation.

Quotation information may be submitted via email. Submit responses to: Jheanna.u.poblete@navy.mil Reference solicitation number:

N00244-23-Q-0002 on all documents and requests for information. Quotes must be received no later than 24 October 2022 12:00 PM Pacific Standard Time http://www.sam.gov/