4-Attachment D Evaluation Criteria Proposal Requirements.docx

DOCX document 16 KB Posted

Attached to
JH27-127 Sample Analysis for Environmental Investigations and General Water Quality Monitoring
Solicitation number
JH27-127
Issued by
Utah

About this file

This document is an evaluation criteria and proposal requirements attachment for a contract opportunity issued by the State of Utah Division of Water Quality through the Division of Purchasing. The RFP seeks a NELAP/ELAP/NELAC certified environmental laboratory to process and analyze soil and water samples using EPA, SM, ASTM, USP, USGS, and AOAC analytical methods to support the Division's environmental investigation and water quality monitoring objectives. The contract term is five years, with vendors required to guarantee pricing for a minimum of 12 months from the contract effective date. A single contract award will be made to the responsive and responsible vendor achieving the highest score based on technical and cost evaluation criteria.

Proposal responses are limited to 10 pages and must include certifications and accreditations, descriptions of relevant completed projects, a table of proposed team members with qualifications and experience, project role descriptions, a description of work methodology, and emergency contact information. Evaluation will be based on 800 technical points divided between key personnel qualifications and vendor capability to perform reliable analysis with rapid turnaround times for emergency situations (350 points) and experience with timely analysis and meeting deadlines (450 points), plus 200 cost points, totaling 1,000 points. Vendors must achieve a minimum technical score of 560 points (75 percent of technical points) to advance to cost evaluation.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment D Evaluation Criteria & Proposal Requirements Proposal Requirements Responses are limited to 10 pages and must include the following elements:

· Certifications/Accreditations

· A description of successfully completed projects relevant to this scope of work.

· A table of proposed team members that summarizes title/position with the company, qualifications and experience

· A description of project roles for the proposed team members including project management, analytical tasks, technical editing, etc.

· A description of how the work will be performed to achieve the scope of work.

· A list of contact information, including telephone number, and email address for emergency situations.

Evaluation Criteria Responses will be evaluated based on the following criteria.

Criteria
Points
Key Personnel proposed for project work (experience, expertise, and reliability). Vendor’s ability to perform the requirements of the contract.
350
Experience: Vendor’s ability to perform reliable analysis and meet timelines, including rapid analytical turnaround times for emergency situations
450
Cost
200
Total
1000

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .