4-Attachment C - Scoresheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 75 KB Posted
- Attached to
- APEX Accelerator Procurement Support Services
- Solicitation number
- GN26-20
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for the APEX Accelerator Procurement Support Services solicitation (GN26-20) issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing in conjunction with the Governor's Office of Economic Development. The solicitation seeks a vendor to provide support services to the APEX Accelerator program for federal procurement services on an as-requested, authorized basis. The contract term is five years, and the evaluation will be conducted using a technical scoring methodology with a maximum of 550 points. Vendors are evaluated across four technical criteria: level of expertise in resolving the stated purpose, objectives, and scope of work (40% weight, 200 points); ongoing support to the APEX Accelerator program throughout the contract term (20% weight, 100 points); experience servicing similar government clients (20% weight, 100 points); and experience working with other businesses in pursuing government contracts (30% weight, 150 points). A minimum threshold of 75% of total technical points (412.5 points) must be achieved for a proposal to be considered acceptable.
The vendor receiving the highest ranking will be selected to negotiate a contract with compensation to be determined as fair and reasonable through negotiation. If fair and reasonable compensation cannot be agreed upon with the highest-ranked vendor, the state may proceed with negotiations with the next highest-ranked vendor. Vendors are instructed not to include pricing information in their submissions, as this is a statement of qualifications procurement conducted under Utah Procurement Code 63G-6a Part 15 for Design Professional Service Providers and Consultants. No specific response dates, bid due dates, or award dates are indicated on this scoresheet document.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3-Attachment B - Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Part 15.pdf | ||
| 5-Attachment A - Agency-Terms-and-Conditions-GS.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| APEX Accelerator Procurement Support Services |
| SOLICITATION #GN26-20 |
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET |
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | |
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP |
Scoreable Technical Criteria Evaluator Score (0-5) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned
| 1 | Level of Expertise: | ||||||||
| Vendor must demonstrate, with supporting metrics, how it is the industry expert on resolving the Purpose, Objectives, and Scope of Work outlined within this solicitation. | 40 | 36.4% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 2 | Support: | ||||||||
| Vendor must describe the level of ongoing support they will provide to the APEX Accelerator program throughout the contract term | 20 | 18.2% | 100.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 3 | Experience: | ||||||||
| Vendor must demonstrate its experience in servicing similar government clients such as APEX Accelerator. | 20 | 18.2% | 100.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 3 | Supporting Businesses: | ||||||||
| Vendor must demonstrate their experience in working with other businesses in successfully pursuing government contracts. | 30 | 27.3% | 150.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 100.0% | 550.00 | 0.00 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| 75% | 412.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| Total Evaluation Points | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 550.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Evaluation Points | 550.0 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .