4-26139 Score Sheet.xls

XLS spreadsheet 60 KB Posted

Attached to
USDC Physical Therapy Services
Solicitation number
DHHS26139
Issued by
Utah

About this file

This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for USDC Physical Therapy Services (Solicitation #DHHS26139) issued by the Utah Department of Health and Human Services for physical therapy services at the Utah State Developmental Center. The scoresheet is designed to evaluate proposals from up to seven offerors and includes both mandatory requirements and technical scoring criteria. Vendors must demonstrate current physical therapy or physical therapy assistant licensure from the Utah Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing, at least three years of professional experience working with individuals who have developmental and cognitive disabilities with possible behavioral and physical issues, and current registration with the Utah Department of Commerce. The evaluation utilizes a 0-5 scoring scale across six technical criteria worth a combined 1,100 points, with individual criteria focusing on years of experience with intellectual disabilities, general physical therapy experience, experience in non-traditional settings (such as hippotherapy and aquatic therapy), caregiver training capabilities, mobility assistive equipment expertise, and experience with assistive mechanical devices.

The total evaluation is weighted at 90 percent technical merit and 10 percent cost, with a required minimum technical threshold of 60 percent (660 points) to be deemed responsive. Cost points are allocated from a pool of 110 points based on a comparative formula where the lowest-priced proposal receives 100 percent of available cost points, with all other proposals receiving proportional points based on their price variance relative to the lowest bid; proposals exceeding double the lowest price receive no cost points. The scoresheet accommodates evaluation by up to four evaluators whose scores are averaged for each criterion, and the final award determination is based on the combined technical and cost scores, with a total possible score of 1,210 points across all offerors.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
9-26139 Form 5 Technical Proposal.docx DOCX document
10-26139 Form 6 Cost Proposal.docx DOCX document
1-26139 RFP.docx DOCX document
6-26139 Form 2 W-9.pdf PDF
12-DHHS26139 Award Recommendation and Justification Statement.docx DOCX document
7-26139 Form 3 Conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement.pdf PDF
8-26139 Form 4 Business Associate Agreement.pdf PDF
5-26139 Form 1 Data Sheet.pdf PDF
3-26139 DHHS Client Service Terms.docx DOCX document
11-26139 Document Submission Checklist.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
2-26139 Scope of Work.docx DOCX document
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Score Sheet

USDC Physical Therapy Services
SOLICITATION #DHHS26139
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Vendor:
Evaluator:Date:
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsEvaluation (Pass/Fail)
1Current Physical Therapy license, or a Physical Therapy Assistant license (if a Physical Therapy Assistant will also be providing services) from the Utah Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing.
2At least three years of professional experience working with individuals who have developmental and cognitive disabilities and possible behavioral and physical issues.
3Current registration with the Utah Department of Commerce, Division of Corporations and Commercial Code.
0
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = The proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information.
1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and, in some respects, exceeds them.
5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.
Scoreable Technical CriteriaEvaluator Score (0-5)Criteria Weight% of Tech CriteriaPoints PossiblePoints
EarnedMinimum Required
1Years of experience in providing physical therapy to individuals with intellectual disabilities - 3 points for 3 years - 4 points for 4-6 years - 5 points for 6 + years5022.7%250.00.0150.0
2Describe your experience in providing physical therapy services.5022.7%250.00.0150.0
3Describe your experience in providing services outside of a traditional clinic setting (i.e., hippotherapy (horse riding), aquatic pool therapy, adaptive mobility therapy, etc.).3013.6%150.00.090.0
4Describe your experience in providing comprehensive training to caregivers (not patients) as it relates to physical therapy.3013.6%150.00.090.0
5Describe your experience with mobility assistive equipment (wheelchairs), as it relates to fit, safety positioning and adjustments for long term users.3013.6%150.00.090.0
6Describe your use of assistive mechanical devices in a clinical PT setting, such as walkers, tilt tables and others; and describe outcomes in gross motor skills, gait training, range of motion and positioning.3013.6%150.00.090.0
Totals:100.0%1100.00.0660.0
Required Technical Point ThresholdMin PercentMin Points RequiredPoints EarnedPercent EarnedStatus
60%660.00.00.0%0
CostLow Cost OptionOffered CostPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
10%110.00.0
* The following cost formula will be used: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. An offeror whose Proposed Price is more than double (200%) the Lowest Proposed Price will receive no points. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (2- Proposed Price/Lowest Proposed Price).
Total Evaluation PointsPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
Total Technical Evaluation Points90%1,100.00.0
Total Cost Evaluation Points10%110.00.0
Total Evaluation Points100%1,210.00.0

Scoresheet Summary

DHHS26139 Scoresheet Summary
Signatures:Date:
Evaluator 1__________________
Evaluator 2__________________
Evaluator 3__________________
Evaluator 4__________________
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor G
1
2
3
WeightTechnical ScoresOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor G
Criteria #1
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #2
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #3
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #4
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #5
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #5 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #6
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #6 - Total Points (Total Possible XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Technical Points (Total Possible Points = XX) Minimum Threshold = XX0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Cost PointsCost ScoresOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor G
Cost
Cost Points0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Score SummaryOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor G
Total Technical Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Cost Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Grand Total Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .