36E77618R0034-008.docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for Proposal (RFP) for VHA Marketing and Advertising Project (VA-18-938141) CO/CS: Jimmison/Morgan
Solicitation number
36E77618R0034
Issued by

About this file

36E77618R0034 S02 - Attachment - 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36E77618R0034-A00002000.docx DOCX document
36E77618R0034-014.docx DOCX document
36E77618R0034-A00001000.docx DOCX document
36E77618R0034-006.docx DOCX document
36E77618R0034-010.pdf PDF
36E77618R0034-003.pdf PDF
36E77618R0034-011.docx DOCX document
36E77618R0034-002.pdf PDF
36E77618R0034-001.docx DOCX document
36E77618R0034-007.docx DOCX document
36E77618R0034-013.pdf PDF
36E77618R0034-012.docx DOCX document
36E77618R0034-004.docx DOCX document
36E77618R0034-009.pdf PDF
36E77618R0034-005.docx DOCX document
36E77618R0034-000.docx DOCX document
Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration - Program Contracting Activity – Central (PCAC) is considering the Offeror listed below for award of a contract to provide High Level Strategic Facilitation Services for Veterans Health Administration, Office of Policy and Services.

Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance. The intent of this form is to evaluate the company’s ability to perform the work as described in the solicitation. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. Space is provided for comments. In addition to submitting this questionnaire, the PCAC may contact you in order to obtain any additional information regarding a contract award.

Please email your completed questionnaire to Adeitra.Jimmison@va.gov and Kymberly.Morgan@va.gov no later than 03/27/2018 1:00pm EST.

**All Email Correspondence for this project must reference the RFQ Number, Project Identifier and Project Title in the subject line of the email:36E77618R0034 – HRMO M&A IDIQ

If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please email Adeitra Jimmison and Kymberly Morgan at Adeitra.Jimmison@va.gov and Kymberly.Morgan@va.gov

Past Performance Information:

Name and Address of Company (Offeror) being evaluated:

Contract Number/Delivery or Task Order Number, Title, & Location of project the Offeror performed:

Evaluator: (The following information will assist in the analysis of the data. Information will be kept confidential)

Name of Evaluator:

Address:

Phone Number:

Position held or function in relation to project:

Rating: Please evaluate the past performance using only the following ratings without variation. DO NOT RATE ON A “+” OR “-“ SCALE. If a “+” or “-“ is used, the rating without the "+" or "-" will be applied. In addition to the ratings, please provide a short narrative in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.

“O”
Outstanding
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were highly effective.
“A”
Above Average
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were effective.
“S”
Satisfactory
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were satisfactory.
“U”
Unacceptable
Performance did not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflected a serious problem for which the offeror has yet to identify corrective actions or the offeror’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Please rate and provide any supporting information/comments for the following:

1. The quality of the working relationship with the client (the tenant and/ or owner).

O A S U

2. The professionalism and integrity with which offeror conducted business.

O A S U

3. The responsiveness to the client’s needs and expectations.

O A S U

4. The Offeror’s ability to manage and perform the project successfully.

O A S U

5. The offeror’s level of communication.

O A S U

6. The quality control of the project.

O A S U

7. Would you award another contact to the party being evaluated? If no, please explain.

Yes No

8. The delivery of the project was on schedule.

O A S U

9. Overall rating for this firm:

O A S U

Signature of Evaluator

Date

File details come from the government source that posted it.