36C78619Q0196-003.pdf
PDF 35 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C78619Q0196
About this file
36C78619Q0196 Attachment D - Past Performance Questionaire 022119.pdf
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C78619C0059-000.pdf | ||
| 36C78619Q0196-004.pdf | ||
| 36C78619Q0196-002.pdf | ||
| 36C78619Q0196-005.pdf | ||
| 36C78619Q0196-001.pdf | ||
| 36C78619Q0196-000.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT D: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICIATION NO.: 36C78619Q0196- Unarmed and Uniformed Security Guard Services for the Willamette National Cemetery
NOTE TO EVALUATORS: Upon completion, please email this confidential Questionnaire directly to Ms. Tené Becknell, Contracting Officer, National Cemetery Administration at tene.becknell@va.gov.
ALL FIELDS MUST BE COMPLETED:
DATE OF EVALUATION: _____________
NAME OF EVALUATOR: ______________________________________
COMPANY OR AGENCY NAME: __________________________________
EVALUATOR EMAIL ADDRESS: ______________________________________
WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE COMPANY FOR WHOM YOU ARE PROVIDING A
REFERENCE FOR:
TYPE OF WORK PERFORMED: ___________________________________________
CONTRACT PERIOD: __________________________________________________
CONTRACT NUMBER: (if applicable):
CONTRACT AWARD AMOUNT: _________________________________________
For the following questions, please choose the number on the scale from 1 to 5, which most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance on the contract referenced above.
1 - unacceptable performance
2 - marginally acceptable
3 - fully acceptable or Good
4 - Very Good, with very few incidents
5 - Superior performance.
mailto:tene.becknell@va.gov
1). Evaluate the company’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions and the technical requirements of the contract.
1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Comments:
2). Has the company demonstrated reasonable and cooperative behavior in resolving customer requests and or complaints?
3). Is the Offeror competent in the performance of the contract and in satisfying the requirements of the customer?
4). Did the Offeror meet minimum deadline and response timelines as outlined in the contract?
5). Were invoices submitted in a timely manner, easily understood and accurately reflected charges?
6). Rate this company’s overall performance:
7) . Would you award to this company again? If not, please explain below:
File details come from the government source that posted it.