36C78618Q0148-004.pdf
PDF 52 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C78618Q0148
About this file
36C78618Q0148 ATTACHMENT C - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C78618C0156-000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C78618Q0148-00002000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C78618Q0148-00001001.pdf | ||
| 36C78618Q0148-00001000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C78618Q0148-000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C78618Q0148-002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C78618Q0148-003.pdf | ||
| 36C78618Q0148-001.pdf | ||
| 36C78618Q0148-005.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION: 36C78618Q0148
INSTRUCTIONS: -Offeror to complete boxes 1 through 7 before sending to past customer.
-Boxes 8 through 10 to be completed by past customer of Offeror and returned to: kenneth.dougherty@va.gov no later than three days after the solicitation closing date. NOTE: It is incumbent upon the offeror to have the customer send the completed questionnaire to email address above by the submission deadline.
1. Contractor Name, Address, Point of Contact: 2. Contract Number: 3. Contract Type:
1a. Name: 4. Contract Value (Current plus any unexercised
Options) : $
5. Period of Performance
1b. Address: 6. Customer Name / Evaluator’s: 5a. From:
1c. Point of Contact & Contact Information: 6a. Customer Point of Contact Information (email): 5b. To:
7. DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT:
8. RATINGS - Summarize contractor performance and check the box corresponding to the performance rating for each category. See Rating Guidelines on subsequent pages for ratings categories and evaluation definitions.
QUALITY
1 [ ] Unsatisfactory 2 [ ] Marginal 3 [ ] Satisfactory 4 [ ] Very Good 5 [ ] Exceptional
COMMENTS
SCHEDULE
1 [ ] Unsatisfactory 2 [ ] Marginal 3 [ ] Satisfactory 4 [ ] Very Good 5 [ ] Exceptional
COMMENTS
MANAGEMENT
1 [ ] Unsatisfactory 2 [ ] Marginal 3 [ ] Satisfactory 4 [ ] Very Good 5 [ ] Exceptional
COMMENTS
REGULATORY
COMPLIANCE
1 [ ] Unsatisfactory 2 [ ] Marginal 3 [ ] Satisfactory 4 [ ] Very Good 5 [ ] Exceptional
COMMENTS
9. OVERALL RATING (select one of the below):
WOULD or WOULD NOT
“Given what I know today about the Contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the above contract or order's most significant requirements, I (would or would not) recommend them for similar requirements in the future."
10. PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR: 10a. EVALUATION DATE:
File details come from the government source that posted it.