36C77621R0086_2.docx
DOCX document 88 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C77621R0086
About this file
This document provides details for a federal contract opportunity to design infrastructure upgrades at a Veterans Affairs medical center. The Department of Veterans Affairs seeks an architect-engineering firm to complete design work for an electrical and IT infrastructure upgrade project at the St. Louis VA Medical Center to enable a new Electronic Health Record system. Key requirements include site visits, studies, and drawings to upgrade facilities' electric, IT, HVAC, and physical security systems. The 100% set-aside contract award is reserved for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. A two-phase selection process will shortlist firms to provide responses for evaluation. The projected award date is 30 June 2021 and design completion is expected within 184 days of notice to proceed.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
VA PROGRAM CONTRACTING ACTIVITY CENTRAL ● 6150 OAK TREE BLVD SUITE 300 ● INDEPENDENCE, OH 44131
Contract Opportunity Modification to a Previous Notice
PRODUCT SERVICE CODE
SUBJECT
CONTRACTING OFFICE'S
ZIP-CODE
SOLICITATION NUMBER
BASE NOTICE TYPE
RESPONSE DATE/TIME/ZONE
ARCHIVE
DAYS AFTER THE RESPONSE DATE
RECOVERY ACT FUNDS
SET-ASIDE
NAICS CODE
CONTRACTING OFFICE
ADDRESS
POINT OF CONTACT
(POC Information Automatically Filled from User Profile Unless Entered)
DESCRIPTION
See Attachment
AGENCY'S URL
URL DESCRIPTION
AGENCY CONTACT'S EMAIL
ADDRESS
EMAIL DESCRIPTION
ADDRESS
POSTAL CODE
COUNTRY
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
* = Required Field Contract Opportunity Modification to a Previous Notice
C1DA
657-21-700JC EHRM Infrastructure Upgrades Design John Cochran - (St. Louis) 44131 36C77621R0086 P 05-03-2021 14:00
EASTERN TIME, NEW YORK, USA
N
SDVOSBC
541330 Department of Veterans Affairs Program Contracting Activity Central 6150 Oak Tree Blvd, Suite 300 Independence OH 44131 Zachary E. Penhollow zachary.penhollow@va.gov Zachary.Penhollow@va.gov 216-447-8300 St. Louis VAMC - John Cochran 915 N. Grand Blvd St. Louis
MO
63106
USA
zachary.penhollow@va.gov zachary.penhollow@va.gov
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
*PPQs should be provided back to the requestor to incorporate into their SF330, all PPQs should be included in the SF330 submission by the A-E and it will count towards the page limitation listed in the Request for SF 330s.
SECTION 1
CONTRACT INFORMATION – Contractor to complete #1-3
1. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
NAME OF OFFEROR BEING EVALUATED: Click or tap here to enter text.
ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
POINT OF CONTACT: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTACT PHONE NUMBER: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
WORK PERFOMED AS: Click or tap here to enter text.
PERCENT OF PROJECT WORK PERFORMED: Click or tap here to enter text.
IF SUBCONTRACTOR, WHO WAS THE PRIME? Click or tap here to enter text.
2. CONTRACT INFORMATION
CONTRACT TITLE: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTRACT NUMBER AND DO/TO NUMBER: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTRACT TYPE: Choose an item.
if other:
CONTRACT LOCATION: Click or tap here to enter text.
AWARD DATE: Click or tap to enter a date.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT ACCCEPTANCE (construction accepted) Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
ACTUAL CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE: Click or tap to enter a date.
EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES: Click or tap here to enter text.
ORIGINAL IMPLEMENTATION PRICE: Click or tap here to enter text.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE (all costs - design/installation/financing): Click or tap here to enter text.
FINAL CONTRACT PRICE (including modifications, if applicable): Click or tap here to enter text.
EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES: Click or tap here to enter text.
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SCOPE INCLUDED IN PROJECT: Click or tap here to enter text.
HOW IS THIS PROJECT RELEVANT TO PROJECT OF SUBMISSION? Click or tap here to enter text.
SECTION 2
EVALUATOR INFORMATION – Client to complete
Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Program Contracting Activity Central (PCAC) is considering the Offeror identified above for award of the subject project.
Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance. The intent of this form is to evaluate the company’s ability to perform the work as described in the solicitation.
Please verify the information in Section 1 is accurate and complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. In addition to submitting this questionnaire, VHA-PCAC may contact you in order to obtain any additional information regarding a contract award.
Please email your completed questionnaire back to the firm requesting prior to the date listed in the SF330 Request as they will need these completed documents to incorporate into their SF330 for submission.
*Submissions made after this date and time will not be accepted or evaluated.
EVALUATOR INFORMATION
NAME OF EVALUATOR: Click or tap here to enter text.
POSITION: Click or tap here to enter text.
ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
PHONE: Click or tap here to enter text.
EMAIL: Click or tap here to enter text.
DESCRIBE YOUR ROLE IN THE PROJECT: Click or tap here to enter text.
*Please see Page 4 for Adjectival Ratings for the following:
1. QUALITY
| Ability to meet quality design and/or construction standards specified for technical performance |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
2. SCHEDULE/ TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
| Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including timely submission of data deliverables (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below.) |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
3. COMMUNICATION
| Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with client staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/ disputes; and responsiveness to client requests) |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/ LABOR
| Effectiveness of management, including suppliers, materials, and/or labor force (including the ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the project) |
| Choose an item. |
| Continuity in the contractor’s personnel during execution of the contract (e.g., one person or team that stayed with the project throughout the contract) |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
5. COST/ FINANCIAL MANGEMENT
| Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price? |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
6. SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT
Ability to manage subcontracting effort including any subcontracting issues, and the contractor’s ability to resolve the problems without extensive customer guidance.
Choose an item.
Comments:
7. SUMMARY
| Would you hire or work with this firm again? If no, please explain below. |
| Choose an item. |
| Provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
| Choose an item. |
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
| EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: |
| DATE: |
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
*THIS PAGE WILL BE REMOVED FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES AND NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE SF 330 PAGE COUNT – IT IS FOR PPQ COMPLETION PURPOSES ONLY*
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Outstanding |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were highly effective |
| Above Average |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were satisfactory. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance did not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflected a serious problem for which the Offeror has yet to identify corrective actions or the Offeror’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract. |
End of Document image1.tif
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .