Technical Question Tracking Sheet - 1.11.21.docx
DOCX document 125 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C77621R0004
About this file
This document contains a technical questions and response tracking sheet for a solicitation to replace a seismically deficient resident building at the Southern Oregon Rehabilitation Center and Clinic. The solicitation number is 36C77621R0004 and questions will be accepted through January 11, 2021. The contractor will be required to provide all labor, project management, materials, tools, and equipment to complete the scope of work. The project is set aside as a competitive Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business opportunity. Four technical questions were received from offerors and answered by the Department of Veterans Affairs related to past performance criteria and submission requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| S05 -Technical Question Tracking Sheet - 1.29.21.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C77621R0004 0006.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C77621R0004 0005.docx | DOCX document | |
| 692-349 B208 replacement - Construction fencing and laydown area plan.pdf | ||
| Technical Question Tracking Sheet - 1.25.21.docx | DOCX document | |
| B208 Landscape plans.pdf | ||
| Technical Question Tracking Sheet - 1.21.21.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C77621R0004 0004.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C77621R0004 0003.pdf | ||
| Site Visit Sign-in Sheet - White City.pdf | ||
| Technical Question Tracking Sheet - 1.15.21.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C77621R0004 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 7 - Drawing Part 6.pdf | ||
| 36C77621R0004 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 8 - Drawing Part 7.pdf | ||
| Attachment 9 - Drawing Part 8.pdf | ||
| White City Solicitation and Attachments.zip | ZIP file |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TECHNICAL QUESTIONS
AND RESPONSE TRACKING SHEET
Replace Seismic Deficiency Resident Building 208 36C77621R0004
PROJECT TITLE
SOLICITATION #
| QUESTION # |
| QUESTION RECEIVE |
DATE
QUESTION ANSWERED
DATE
| CONTRACTOR QUESTIONS |
| VA RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS |
| 1 |
| 1.4.21 |
| 1.5.21 |
| Proposal Volume I, Factor 3, Past Performance: Will the Government please consider allowing projects completed within the last seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP? |
| We want offerors with more recent experience. Projects “completed within the past five years” essentially captures experience that is older than 5 years. |
| 2 |
| 1.4.21 |
| 1.5.21 |
| Proposal Volume I, Factor 3, Past Performance: Relevancy is defined as “New construction in an active campus or related environment involving all the work and progression of a multi-story building…”. Are projects submitted under this factor required to be multi-story |
| Single story buildings of $5M minimum might not have the same challenges that a multistory does unless the offeror could describe the complexity of their completed single story structure as being equally complex as the subject multi-story building B208. |
| 3 |
| 1.5.21 |
| 1.11.21 |
| Would the government amend the requirement for “new Construction” in the past performance to include “renovations”? Many VA projects include both renovation and addition (new construction) especially when discussing Seismic upgrades? |
| At this time we will not be amending past performance to reflect renovations. |
| 4 |
| 1.5.21 |
| 1.11.21 |
| In the solicitation, on page 10, the offeror is restricted to 3 emails, each of 5MB or less. This is restrictive to content including the schedule. Would the government allow for more than 3 emails with clear labeling if some of the volumes are more than 5MB? |
| The solicitation requirements will remain the same. 3 emails of 5 mb or less. |
image1.jpeg image2.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .