S02 - RFQ Attachment C QASP Sendout Lab Semen Analysis.doc
DOC document 98 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Q301--VISN 22 Semen & Vasectomy Test Kits
- Solicitation number
- 36C26227Q0056
About this file
This is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) template for laboratory services provided to the Department of Veterans Affairs, VISN 1 (Veterans Integrated Service Network 1). The QASP outlines the systematic methodology for evaluating contractor performance on a Reference Laboratory Services contract, specifically for semen analysis and related laboratory testing services. The document establishes the framework for monitoring, documentation, and rating of contractor performance but does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work itself.
The QASP defines five primary performance standards with specific acceptable quality levels (AQL): Clinical Information Return requiring 100% compliance for written consultative reports; Clinical Information Return documentation requiring 95% compliance for complete specimen identification information; Quality Care/Licensing and Accreditation requiring 100% maintenance of required certifications; Quality Care/Safety and Specimen Integrity requiring 95% compliance with no loss or destruction of specimens and timely delivery; and Turnaround Time requiring 90% compliance with established test schedules. Surveillance methods include periodic inspections, random sampling, and contractor reporting. Performance is rated using a three-tier system (Green/Yellow/Red) based on whether standards and acceptable quality levels are met. The Contracting Officer's Representative maintains Quality Assurance Worksheets documenting performance ratings, causative factors, mission effects, and required actions, with final submission to the Contracting Officer within 30 days of contract expiration. The incentive for meeting performance standards is the potential exercise of contract option periods. Key government personnel include the NCL Program Director, Quality Manager, and Program Support Medical Technologists from the New England Network Consolidated Laboratory.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| S02 - RFQ Attachment B Past Perf Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| S02 - RFQ Attachment A Pricing.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| S02 - RFQ 36C26227Q0056.pdf | ||
| 36C26227Q0056_1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan
For: Laboratory Services Contract Number: [Enter Contract#] Contract Description: Check One:
[ ] VISN1 Primary Reference Laboratory Services, intraVISN transportation and specimen collection and processing at Patient Service Centers for CBOC’s.
[ X ] VISN1 Reference Laboratory Services Only Contractor’s name: [Enter Vendor’s Name]
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
· What will be monitored.
· How monitoring will take place.
· Who will conduct the monitoring.
· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
2. Government Roles and Responsibilities
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
a. Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.
Assigned CO: [Enter Name of Assigned CO] Organization or Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs, VISN1 Consolidated Contracting
b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.
Assigned COR’s: [Enter name(s) of CORs]
c. Key Government Personnel -
· Wendy Strollo, NCL Program Director, New England Network Consolidated Laboratory
· Jacqueline Dang, NCL Quality Manager, New England Network Consolidated Laboratory
· Holly Charpentier, Program Support Medical Technologist, New England Network Consolidated Laboratory
· Jacqueline Hite, Program Support Medical Technologist, New England Network Consolidated Laboratory
3. Contractor Representatives The following employee(s) of the contractor shall serve as the contractor’s program manager for this contract.
a. Program Manager – [Enter name(s) of Contractor personnel]
4. Performance Standards Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor meets, exceeds or does not meet these standards.
The Performance Requirements Summary Matrix table as provided below includes performance standards. The Government shall use these standards to determine contractor performance and shall compare contractor performance to the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL).
| Task |
| ID |
| Indicator |
| Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level |
| Method of Surveillance |
| Incentive |
| Clinical Information Return |
| 1 |
| Written consultative reports provided to the authorizing VA Medical Center |
| Report received for each consultative case. |
| 100% |
| Periodic inspection and random sampling |
| Potential Exercise of Option Period |
| Clinical Information Return |
| 2 |
| Written Consultative Reports include laboratory’s name & address that performed the consultation, laboratory-specific accession number, date and time specimen was collected, date received by the laboratory and completed by the laboratory; and the pathologist’s and/or signature where appropriate |
| Reports include appropriate specimen identification information |
| 95% |
| Periodic inspection and random sampling |
| Potential Exercise of Option Period |
Quality Care
| 3 |
| Licensing and Accreditation |
| Maintains accreditation, certifications, etc. as outlined in the PWS |
| 100% |
| Periodic inspection |
| Potential Exercise of Option Period |
| Quality Care |
| 4 |
| Ensure Safety, Security, timely delivery/pickup and Integrity of Specimens |
| No loss or destruction of specimens; delivery times are met |
| 95% |
| Contractor reporting/VA reporting |
| Potential Exercise of Option Period |
| Turnaround Time |
| 5 |
| Actual turnaround time per test |
| Maintains the time schedule for tests as outlined in the contractor electronic reference guide |
| 90% |
| Periodic Inspections and random sampling |
| Potential Exercise of Option Period |
5. Incentives The Government shall use “Potential Exercise of Option Period” as an incentive. Incentives shall be based on meeting, exceeding or not meeting performance standards.
6. Methods of QA Surveillance Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.
a. PERIODIC INSPECTION. (Evaluates outcomes on a periodic basis. Inspections may be scheduled [Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, or Annually] or unscheduled, as required.)
Performance standard(s) IDs 1, 2, 3 and 5.
b. RANDOM SAMPLING. (Designed to evaluate performance by randomly selecting and inspecting a sample of cases.
Performance standard(s) IDs 1,2 and 5.
c. CONTRACTING REPORTING. (Self-reported by the contractor or VA) Performance standard(s) ID 4 and 6
7. Ratings Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance meets, exceeds or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used:
| Rating |
| Has Performance Met Standards? |
| Green |
| Yes. Performance and technical specifications are being met at an Acceptable |
Quality Level (AQL).
| Yellow |
| Yes. Performance and technical specifications are currently being met at the minimum AQL, but the following service/deliverable needs immediate contractor attention: |
(The Customer must identify what component of the deliverable and/or service requires attention.)
| Red |
| No. Performance and technical specifications are not being met at AQL and the following service/deliverable needs immediate contractor resolution: |
(The Customer must identify what component of the deliverable and/or service requires attention.)
QUALITY ASSURANCE WORKSHEET
Performance Rating
| Deliverable/Service |
| ( |
| Quality Rating |
| Causative Factors |
| Effect on Mission |
| Action Required/Date |
Clinical Information Return (Task #1)
| Green |
| Comments Unnecessary for “Green” QA Rating. |
Yellow
Red
Clinical Information Return (Task #2)
| Green |
| Comments Unnecessary for “Green” QA Rating. |
Yellow
Red
Quality Care (Task #3)
| Green |
| Comments Unnecessary for “Green” QA Rating. |
Yellow
Red
Quality Care
(Task #4)
| Green |
| Comments Unnecessary for “Green” QA Rating. |
Yellow
Red
Turnaround Time
(Task #5)
| Green |
| Comments Unnecessary for “Green” QA Rating. |
Yellow
Red
Quality Care
(Task #6)
| Green |
| Comments Unnecessary for “Green” QA Rating. |
Yellow
Red
8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE
The COR shall maintain the Quality Assurance Worksheets in a contract file and submit this at end of the contract period to the Contracting Officer. These worksheets shall be submitted no later than 30 days after contract expiration.
9. Frequency of Measurement
The COR shall assess contract performance on a periodic basis using the Quality Assurance Worksheet.
Signature/Date – Contractor Program Manager
Signature/Date – Contracting Officer’s Representative
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .