Questions and Answers.pdf

PDF 107 KB Posted

Attached to
Reasonable Accommodation Program | Nov 1, 2026 - Oct 31, 2027
Solicitation number
36C26127Q0037
Issued by

About this file

This is a Questions and Answers document for Solicitation 36C26127Q0037, a firm-fixed-price contract for a Reasonable Accommodation Program supporting the San Francisco VA Health Care System.

The contractor will provide ergonomic and reasonable-accommodation evaluation services across three categories: proactive injury prevention, active workers' compensation claims, and ADA reasonable accommodations. The estimated workload is approximately 10 evaluations per month (120 annually), though the exact distribution among the three categories fluctuates based on employee requests. Evaluation reports must be completed no later than 10 business days after each evaluation is conducted. The SOW does not mandate a specific response time for performing evaluations after requests are received; contractors should propose their standard response times in their offers. Contractors may group multiple evaluations on designated on-site service days if coordinated with SFVAHCS Employee Occupational Health. The pricing structure is a monthly firm-fixed-price rate covering all required services regardless of caseload, with no minimum guaranteed level of effort. For Service Contract Labor Standards compliance, contractors must independently select the most appropriate labor category from the four attached wage determinations (Sonoma, Shasta, Humboldt, and San Francisco counties) based on their proposed staffing model and tasks performed; the VA does not pre-assign or certify a specific classification. Contractors must not access, collect, store, or transmit personally identifiable information (PII) or protected health information (PHI); the VA will provide guidance on compliant procedures. Reporting templates and access instructions for the November 2025 VHA Ergonomics Guidebook should be requested from the VA. Subcontractor qualifications and experience may be evaluated as part of the technical approach, even if the prime lacks directly comparable ergonomics past performance.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Questions and Answers 2.pdf PDF
36C26127Q0037_3 Amend 0002 to RFQ.docx DOCX document
36C26127Q0037 0002.pdf PDF
36C26127Q0037_2.docx DOCX document
36C26127Q0037 0001 (1).pdf PDF
WD 2015-5651 Sonoma.pdf PDF
36C26127Q0037_1.docx DOCX document
WD 2015-5673 Humboldt.pdf PDF
WD 2015-5637 San Fran.pdf PDF
36C26127Q0037.pdf PDF
WD 2015-5627 Shasta.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Questions and Answers Solicitation 36C26127Q0037

Reasonable Accommodation Program for San Francisco VA Health Care System

1. Question: The Price/Cost Schedule (Section B.2) prices each period as 12.00 MO with no unit quantities. Can the Government provide historical data on the number of ergonomic and reasonable-accommodation evaluations performed per year over the last one to three years?

Answer: Historical data for prior years is not formally tracked. The best available indicator of expected annual volume is expected to be approximately 10 ergonomic evaluations per month, which equates to approximately 120 ergonomic evaluations per year.

2. Question: What is the estimated monthly and annual caseload, and how is it distributed across the three categories named in SOW Section 1 (Scope):

proactive injury prevention, active workers' compensation claims, and ADA reasonable accommodations?

Answer: The exact distribution across categories fluctuates based on employee requests and cannot be predicted with precision; however, the overall combined workload is reliably estimated at 10 evaluations per month.

3. Can multiple evaluations be scheduled together on designated on-site service days, or is the contractor expected to travel to a VA location whenever an individual request is received?

Answer: The contractor is expected to respond to evaluation requests based on their timing and urgency. The SOW does not mandate a specific scheduling method, so grouping evaluations on designated service days is permissible if it meets VA needs and is coordinated with SFVAHCS Employee Occupational Health. Contractors should propose their scheduling approach in their offer.

4. Question: Is there a required response time between the VA submitting an ergonomic evaluation request and the contractor performing the evaluation? The SOW gives us a clear deadline for the report (no later than 10 business days after the evaluation) but I don't see a similarly clear deadline for getting onsite to perform the evaluation.

Answer: The SOW does not specify a required response time for performing the evaluation after a request is received. Contractors should propose their standard response times in their offers, and the VA may clarify expectations during contract negotiations or after award.

9. Question: Four wage determinations are attached in Section D (Sonoma 2015- 5651, Shasta 2015-5627, Humboldt 2015-5673, San Francisco 2015-5637).

Which SCA labor category or categories does the Government consider applicable to ergonomic evaluators, considering potential professional/exempt status?

Answer: The VA does not identify a mandatory SCLS labor category for “ergonomic evaluators.” Contractors must consult the attached wage determinations and select the most appropriate classification based on their proposed staffing model, the tasks performed, and DOL guidance.

The Government does not certify or endorse a particular category; compliance is evaluated at the time of proposal review and again after award.

10. Which Service Contract Labor Standards classification does the VA anticipate applying to the individual performing these ergonomic evaluations, or does the VA anticipate the position qualifying as an exempt professional employee?

Answer: Because SCLS coverage is determined by the nature of the work actually performed, offerors are responsible for reviewing the duties described in the Statement of Work and selecting the labor category—or exempt professional classification—they believe most accurately reflects their proposed labor. The Government does not direct or pre‑assign the classification.

11. Question: Given the monthly firm-fixed-price structure in Section B.2 and Section E.3 (Type of Contract), does the Government expect a single fixed monthly rate regardless of caseload, or a minimum guaranteed level of effort?

Answer: The solicitation establishes a firm-fixed-price monthly rate for services.

This rate covers all required services regardless of caseload, with no minimum guaranteed level of effort. If the Government anticipates a maximum workload or intends to authorize additional services beyond the base scope, this would be stated in the solicitation or clarified during negotiations.

12. Will the proposed subcontractor’s personnel qualifications, company experience, and references be considered under the Technical Capability and Experience factors? How should a prime without directly comparable ergonomics past performance address the reference requirement?

Answer: Yes, subcontractor qualifications and experience may be considered as part of the offeror’s technical approach. If the prime does not have directly comparable ergonomics past performance, they may submit relevant past performance from related fields and demonstrate how the subcontractor’s expertise will be leveraged and managed. The Government evaluates the overall capability and management approach of the offeror.

13. The SOW requires employee interviews and individualized reports, while the “No Access to Sensitive Information” provision prohibits handling PII and PHI. Please clarify the authorized information-access, reporting, transmission, and storage procedures for prime and subcontractor personnel.

Answer: Contractors and subcontractors must not access, collect, store, or transmit PII or PHI. All reporting and data transmission must comply with this restriction. The VA will provide guidance on how evaluation requests and reports are to be handled to ensure compliance with privacy requirements.

14. Please provide the required evaluation-report template, monthly/annual reporting requirements, and access instructions for the November 2025 VHA Ergonomics Guidebook. How should the 30-day advance availability schedule be handled if award occurs fewer than 30 days before November 1?

Answer: The SOW requires reports in a recommended format and monthly/annual data submissions, but does not provide a template or access instructions for the Guidebook. Contractors should request the Guidebook and reporting templates from the VA. If award occurs fewer than 30 days before November 1, the contractor should provide their availability schedule as soon as possible after award.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .