Attachment 1-Past Performance Survey.docx

DOCX document 13 KB Posted

Attached to
M1LZ--593-23-4-528-0120 Valet Service Contract STA 593 (VA-23-00079983)
Solicitation number
36C26124Q0044
Issued by

About this file

This document contains an attachment for a past performance survey related to the federal contract opportunity solicitation number 36C26124Q0044. The solicitation is for valet service contract STA 593 to be awarded by the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 21. Offerors must include a completed past performance survey from each reference as an attachment to their quote. The survey collects information on previous contracts held by the company being evaluated, including total contract value, dates of performance, and contract numbers. Respondents are asked to rate the overall quality of work on a scale and provide any comments to support the rating, as well as detail any performance issues and how they were addressed.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment #1

Past Performance Survey

OFFEROR INSTRUCTIONS: A separate survey must be completed for each reference. The completed surveys must be included with the quote.

EVALUATOR INSTRUCTIONS: The Department of Veterans Affairs is considering the company listed below for award of a VA contract. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this company’s past performance. The name of the individuals providing reference information is confidential and will not be released or made publicly available.

Name of Company being evaluated:

Evaluator’s Name:

Evaluator’s Company Name, Address and Phone number:

Indicate what contracts did this company provided for you? Provide the total contract amount, dates of performance, and contract number.

Evaluation Questions

Please rate the overall quality of work using a scale of (Excellent, Good, Fair, Marginal, Unacceptable). Comments in support of the rating are welcome.

Were there any performance issues/concerns? If so, how were they handled?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .