Questions and Answers for SPCC Plan Update.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25926Q0424
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document for Amendment 0001 to Solicitation 36C25926Q0424, which addresses inquiries regarding the Spill Prevention, Countermeasures and Control (SPCC) Plan Update for Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center. The document clarifies that no formal training course development or delivery is required as part of this contract, and that any existing site diagrams are already included in the current SPCC documentation. Contractors must update CAD drawings using proper CAD software rather than PDF-based edits to ensure adequate clarity and compliance with State of Colorado and EPA requirements.
The document establishes a critical geographic requirement: the contractor must be a registered professional engineering firm physically located within the State of Colorado with an actual office address in the state. This requirement stems from previous issues with out-of-state firms holding Colorado PE stamps that could not adequately verify technical updates based on Colorado's unique requirements specific to the Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center's systems, which were developed following lessons learned from a significant 2017 fuel spill. The contractor must use the existing SPCC plan template and format rather than developing a new plan from scratch, with the plan last updated in 2023. The solicitation is a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) set-aside with a response deadline of May 1, 2026, at 12:00 MT, administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 19.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers update.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25926Q0424 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 52.222-90 Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors Deviation APR 2026 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25926Q0424 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| VAAR 852 219 75 as of 26 Mar 2024 Services.docx | DOCX document | |
| Service Contract Act WD 2015 5419 Revision 31 December 03 2025.pdf | ||
| Combine Synopsis SPCC Plan Update.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25926Q0424.docx | DOCX document | |
| PWS Spill Prevention Plan Update.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
36C25926Q0424 0001| Spill Prevention, Countermeasures and Control (SPCC) Plan Update for Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center
QUESTIONS (Q) AND ANSWERS (A):
Q1: Is the VA requesting that a formal training course be developed?
A1: “With this update, training is not needed.”
Q2: Will this training be provided in person or virtually?
A2: “Training will not be required”
Q3: Will this training be provided in person or virtually?
A3: “No students will be participating since there’s no longer a training need.”
Q4: Will PDF copies of existing site diagrams be provided to the contractor?
A4: “Please note these are already in the SPCC.”
Q5: Is the contractor required to updating existing CAD Drawings using CAD or can updates be made on pdf versions of the diagrams?
A5: “Yes. CAD drawings must be updated. No. CAD updates on PDF do not provide the clarity required.”
Q6: Regarding the following line in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) – FY26 Spill Prevention, Background section, "Mandatory technical updates are needed from a third-party registered professional engineering firm located within the State of Colorado..., " does this mean the firm needs to be located in the State of Colorado, such as having an address in Colorado?
A6: “Yes. Mandatory technical updates are needed from a third-party registered professional engineering firm located within the State of Colorado to ensure timely in-person reporting to the State of Colorado’s Department of Oil and Public Safety if required.”
Q7: Does the VA expect the plan to be updated using the existing plan version/template, or is this considered a full plan update and redevelopment?
A7: “Updated using previous/current template as that’s compliant format derived from the State of Colorado and EPA requirements.”
Q8: When was the plan last updated?
A8: “2023:
Q9: Can you provide context on the number of oil storage containers, approximate total oil capacity, or can you provide the existing SPCCP?
A9: “This was already provided as part of the solicitation. Would prefer we stay with RMRVAMC’s already existing SPCC to assure consistency in format and content.”
Q10: Does this mean an out of state entity cannot be awarded this contract, even if we have a Colorado PE Stamp? We would be on site for the inspection and available for any comments/reporting if needed.
A10: “Yes. Problem with previous plan updates from out-of-state firms with Colorado PE stamps was that firms couldn’t be present to verify what needed to be updated based on highly technical State of Colorado requirements unique to RMRVAMC’s systems that were, in turn, based on lessons learned from the large fuel spill in 2017. The VA was then left with the unenviable task of finding ALL of the errors which occurred due to the VERY large size of the fuel systems that must be investigated and updated.”
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .