S02 ATTACHMENT 3 PAST PERFORMACE QUESTIONAIRE.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25625Q0597
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for a federal contract opportunity related to court reporting services. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate a contractor's performance across multiple dimensions, including quality of service, timeliness of performance, business relations, and management of key personnel. Respondents are asked to rate the contractor on a scale from Outstanding (O) to Unsatisfactory (U) across 25 specific evaluation criteria.
The document is associated with Solicitation Number 36C25625Q0597 for the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 16. The completed questionnaire is requested to be submitted by 12 PM CST on March 19, 2025, via email to justintaylor5@va.gov. The purpose of the questionnaire is to assess the contractor's past performance and potential capability to successfully execute future contract requirements, with ratings reflecting confidence levels in the contractor's ability to perform the specified services.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25625Q0597 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT 3 PAST PERFORMACE QUESTIONAIRE.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25625Q0597.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT 2 LIST OF PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCES.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT 1 Harrison County MS WD 2015-5147 R24 dtd 07-22-2024.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION (Information on the Company that you are evaluating)
A. Contractor Name:
B. Contractor's Address:
C. Point of Contact:
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
IN ORDER TO DETERMINE RELEVANCY AND RECENCY, THE FOLLOWING DATA IS REQUIRED. FAILURE TO PROVIDE THIS INFORMANTION MAY RENDER THE PROPOSAL UNRESPONSIVE.
A. CONTRACT NUMBER:
B. CONTRACT TYPE:
C. AWARD DATE:
D. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
E. TOTAL CONTRACT DOLLAR AMOUNT INCLUDING
OPTIONS, IF APPLICABLE: $________________
F. SCOPE: PLEASE INCLUDE A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES PERFORMED TO DETERMINE SIMILARITY OF SCOPE.
1. Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:
a. For each question please circle one rating as defined below. Please circle "N" if you are unable to provide a rating for an area. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the scoring levels:
Rating
Definition
| Outstanding (O) |
| High Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Excellent (E) |
| Significant Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Neutral (N) |
| Unknown Confidence |
| No performance record identifiable (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iii) and (iv)). |
| Marginal (M) |
| Little Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Changes to the offeror’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| No Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
b. Handwritten remarks are encouraged. Space is provided at the end of the survey. If more space is needed, please provide information of a separate sheet of paper.
c. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor's performance with the judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, we solicit your comments on other contracts/programs that your activity has with this offeror.
2. Please return completed questionnaire by 12PM CST on March 19, 2025 by e-mail to:
EMAIL (PREFERRED): justintaylor5@va.gov
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Contractor's compliance with contractual terms and conditions. O E S N M U
2. Quality of contractor furnished reports/deliverables. O E S N M U
3. Overall rating of contractor's commitment to providing quality service. O E S N M U
4. Contractors ability to meet standards specified for performance. O E S N M U
5. Overall rating of contractor's quality of service. O E S N M U
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
1. Contractor's ability to meet specific response times and scheduled O E S N M U time frames for completion of specific tasks.
2. Contractor's responsiveness/timeliness for providing administrative O E S N M U reports/documents required by the contract.
3. Contractor's timeliness in responding to emergency service requirements. O E S N M U
4. Overall rating of contractor's responsiveness/timeliness. O E S N M U
BUSINESS RELATIONS
1. Contractor's ability to identify problems and potential problems and O E S N M U promptly notify the Contracting Officer.
2. Contractor's ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential O E S N M U problems in a timely manner.
3. Contractor's willingness to improve and correct noncompliance issues O E S N M U or concerns.
4. Extent to which the contractor has demonstrated reasonable and cooperative O E S N M U behavior.
5. Contractor's ability to use effective approaches and provide technical O E S N M U expertise and resources to solve contract problems.
6. Contractor's working relationship with the Contracting Officer, O E S N M U quality assurance personnel, and customers.
7. Contractor's flexibility in satisfying the requirements of its customers. O E S N M U
8. Extent to which the contractor provided prompt and courteous O E S N M U service when responding to customer complaint.
9. Overall rating of customer satisfaction. O E S N M U
10. Overall rating of business relations. O E S N M U
MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
1. Contractor's ability to select and retain cooperative and effective O E S N M U key personnel, such as the contract manager and quality control personnel.
2. Extent key personnel were knowledgeable about contractual O E S N M U requirements.
3. Contractor's ability to meet appropriate staffing levels with qualified O E S N M U personnel in order to provide required services.
4. Contractor's ability to effectively manage subcontracts. O E S N M U
5. Overall rating of contractor's management of key personnel. O E S N M U
REMARKS CONCERNING CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
RESPONDENT’S PRINTED NAME: ____________________________________________
RESPONDENT’S TITLE: _____________________________________________________
RESPONDENT’S SIGNATURE: ________________________________________________
RESPONDENT’S PHONE NUMBER: ___________________________________________
THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE!
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .