36C25619R0152-055.docx
DOCX document Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25619R0152
About this file
This document contains a past performance survey for a federal construction contract opportunity with the Department of Veterans Affairs. The contractor is seeking feedback on previous projects performed for the respondent's organization. The survey requests details on the identified projects, location, award amount, and responses using a rating scale for questions regarding resource commitment, responsiveness, management, reporting, safety compliance, and overall satisfaction. Additional questions ask about cure notices, cost-saving recommendations, willingness to recommend the contractor, and any labor, safety, or security investigations. The respondent is asked to provide comments and signature with date.
A related federal contract opportunity is also provided. The solicitation is for corrective actions to mechanical systems at the John L. McClellan Memorial Veterans Hospital in Little Rock, Arkansas. The performance period is 180 days with a dollar value between $250,000 and $500,000. The NAICS code is 236220 for commercial and institutional building construction with a size standard of $36.5 million. This is a 100% set-aside for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses. Firms must be registered and verified in SAM, ORCA, VetBiz, and have a CVE seal. The point of contact is provided and amendments will be posted on FedBizOpps. The solicitation issue date is October 24, 2019 and award date is November 26, 2019.
36C25619R0152 Past Performance Survey.docx
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25619R0152-0004000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619R0152-0004001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619R0152-0003000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619R0152-0003004.jpg | JPG image | |
| 36C25619R0152-0003005.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619R0152-0003003.jpg | JPG image | |
| 36C25619R0152-0003002.jpg | JPG image | |
| 36C25619R0152-0003001.pdf | ||
| 36C25619R0152-0002015.pdf | ||
| 36C25619R0152-0002014.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619R0152-0001001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619R0152-0001000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619R0152-053.pdf | ||
| 36C25619R0152-051.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619R0152-054.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619R0152-052.mht | MHT file | |
| 36C25619R0152-050.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
VA256-14-R-0731
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
EXPANDING NLR PATIENT CARE BUILDING
To: ____________________ (Point of Contact)** ____________________ (Company)** ____________________ (Phone) ____________________ (Fax) ____________________ (E-Mail)** _____________________ (Name of Company requesting survey)**
The company from which you received this survey is competing for award of a contract with the Department of Veterans Affairs, Central Arkansas Healthcare System (CAVHS), North Little Rock Arkansas. As part of the CAVHS process for screening potential Offerors, this company is soliciting your input and assessment of its past performance for one or more projects they performed for your firm. Please respond to each of the questions below and forward the completed survey directly to the CAVHS Contract Specialist.
To consider your responses, the CAVHS Contract Specialist must receive your responses, either by fax or e-mail, not later than: 2:00PM CDT on September 15, 2014.
If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me. Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Jack S. Caperton Contract Specialist Phone: 501-257-1067 Fax: 501-228-8651 Email: Jack.Caperton@va.gov
Please identify the project(s) that this company has performed for your organization, description, city, state, and award amount and final dollar value at completion of contract:
Respond to the question using the following scale: O- Outstanding, A- Acceptable, S-Satisfactory, M- Marginal, U-Unacceptable.
1. Did the contractor commit adequate resources in timely fashion to the contract to meet the requirements and to successfully solve problems? O A S M U
2. To what extent did the contractor respond positively and promptly to technical direction, contract change orders, etc.?
O A S M U
3. How reliably did the contractor follow through on commitments?
| O A S M U | ||
| 4. | To what extent did the contractor’s management system provide visibility into problems and risks? |
O A S M U
5. How responsive do you think the contractor was to information requests, issues, or problems during the course of the contract? O A S M U
6. How effective has the contractor been in identifying requirements?
O A S M U
| 7. | To what extent did the contractor have the ability to administer and manage the contract? |
| O A S M U |
8. To what extent did the contractor issue professional correspondence?
O A S M U
9. How well did the contractor adhere to the Statement of Work? O A S M U
| 10. | What was your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s management and support staff? |
| O A S M U |
| 11. | What was your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s Supervisor(s)? |
| O A S M U |
12. To what extent did the contractor submit required reports and documentation in a timely manner? O A S M U
| 13. | To what extent were the contractor’s reports and documentation accurate and complete? |
| O A S M U |
| 14. | To what extent was the contractor’s maintenance and problem tracking/reporting documentation timely, accurate and of appropriate content? |
| O A S M U |
| 15. | To what extent did the contractor comply with safety requirements? |
| O A S M U |
| 16. | What was your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s overall quality of service? |
| O A S M U |
17. To what extent was the contractor effective in interfacing with the Government staff? O A S M U
18. What was your level of overall customer satisfaction? O A S M U
| 19. | To what extent were the contractor’s employees experienced and qualified? | |
| O A S M U |
Respond: Yes or No.
20. Were there any cure notices issued? Yes: ____ No: ____
21. Was contractor pro-active? Yes: ____ No: ____
22. Did contractor suggest cost-saving changes? Yes: ____ No: ____
23. Would you recommend this contractor? Yes: ____ No: ____
For Federal contracts:
24. Were there any Labor Department Investigations? Yes: ____ No: ____
24a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
25. Were there any safety investigations? Yes: ____ No: ____
25a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
26. Were there any security investigations? Yes: ____ No: ____
26a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
27. Was there a partial or complete termination for default or convenience?
Yes: ____ No: ____
27a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
28. Are there any pending terminations? Yes: ____ No: ____
29. What is/was the duration of the contract? _____________________
30. Were there any performance issues regarding the contractor’s work? If yes, please describe (use a separate sheet of paper if necessary).
Please provide other comments (Use a separate sheet of paper if necessary):
Signature: ____________________________
Date: ____________________________
**Required
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .