36C25619Q1210-002.docx
DOCX document 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FY20 Base +4 Medical Waste Removal Service
- Solicitation number
- 36C25619Q1210
About this file
36C25619Q1210 S02 Attachment 1 QASP Medical Waste.docx
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25620C0013-000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619Q1210-0002000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619Q1210-0001000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619Q1210-004.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619Q1210-003.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619Q1210-000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25619Q1210-001.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN
MEDICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL WASTE REMOVAL
For: Medical and Pharmaceutical Waste Removal
Contract Number: TBD
Contract Description: Network Contracting Office (NCO) 16 in support of G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center has a need for Medical and Pharmaceutical Waste Removal. The Contractor shall furnish all labor, equipment, sanitized, disinfected, and labeled containers, supplies, materials, transportation, and supervision required to provide pick up, transporting, and disposal/incineration and/or other acceptable disposal of medical, infectious, pharmaceutical (pharmaceutical waste that is also regulated hazardous waste or US DEA Controlled Substances is excluded from this solicitation/contract), veterinary, chemotherapy, biological/pathological and other contaminated wastes as defined below as well as “sharps” containers from the G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center, 1500 East Woodrow Wilson Drive, Jackson, Mississippi, 39216, in accordance with all local, state, and/or federal requirements and the terms and conditions stated herein.
Contractor’s name: TBD
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
· What will be monitored.
· How monitoring will take place.
· Who will conduct the monitoring.
· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
a. Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.
Assigned CO:
b. Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.
Assigned COR:
Alternate COR:
c. Other Key Government Personnel: None
3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager for this contract.
a. Program Manager:
b. Other Contractor Personnel:
Title:
4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.
| Performance Objectives |
| Performance Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Method of Monitoring |
| Disincentive |
| 1) Waste pick-up and container delivers are accomplished in accordance with the established schedule. See paragraph 9 |
| Contractor must be able to pick up and remove all waste covered by this Contract present in the Facility Waste Plant at the time of pick-up. |
| 100% |
| The COR or designated points of contact shall observe during actual pick-up in accordance with the pre-determined schedule. |
| Incidence of 2 skipped scheduled service days in a month shall result in a 2% deduction for the month’s facility payment for failure to meet AQL |
| Performance Objectives |
| Performance Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Method of Monitoring |
| Disincentive |
2) The Contractor shall treat and/or dispose of biomedical waste in accordance with State and Federal (U.S. EPA) guidelines. See paragraph 1.
The Contractor shall possess all necessary permits and licenses, and other permissions mandated by current US EPA and State laws and regulations, must have a current registration to transport hazardous materials with the US Department of Transportation (US DOT) along with any other special transportation approvals required by federal and/or state laws and regulations, and insurance prior to transport and/or disposal of subject waste. Vendor must provide evidence of all such required permits, licenses, registrations, and permissions for the vendor and all transfer, storage, treatment, and disposal facilities utilized (landfills, incinerators, etc.) as appropriate
| 100% |
| The COR or designated points of contact shall observe during actual pick-up in accordance with the pre-determined schedule. |
| One single incident of waste disposed of in a manner so as to violate the Statement of Work shall result in a 5% deduction for the month’s facility payment. for failure to meet AQL |
5. INCENTIVES
The Government shall use exercise of option period and past performance as incentives. Incentives shall be based on exceeding, meeting, or not meeting performance standards.
6. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE
Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.
PERIODIC INSPECTION: Inspections may be scheduled at each pickup date.
Performance Standard ID – 1 & 2
VALIDATED USER/CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS. (Relies on the Program Office to identify deficiencies. Complaints are then investigated and validated.)
Performance Standard ID – 1 & 2
7. RATINGS
Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used:
Excellent = Exceeds Standards Satisfactory = Meets Standards Unsatisfactory = Fails to Meet Standards
8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE
a. ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE
The Government shall document positive performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action.
b. UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE
When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COTR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.
When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) and present it to the contractor's program manager with a copy to the Contracting Officer.
The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COTR. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.
Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.
9. FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT
a. Frequency of Measurement.
During contract performance, the COR will periodically analyze whether the negotiated frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed.
b. Frequency of Performance Assessment Meetings.
The COR shall meet with the contractor monthly to assess performance and shall provide a written assessment.
<After award, both the contractor’s Program Manager and the COR shall sign this document.>
Signature – Contractor Program Manager
Signature – Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative
File details come from the government source that posted it.